Sustainable Technology of 3040

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3040 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

The year 3040 is far enough in the future that it’s difficult to predict the exact state of technology. However, based on current trends and developments, we can make some educated guesses about the sustainable technologies that might be prevalent then:

1. Advanced Renewable Energy Systems:

  • Highly efficient solar: Solar technology may have advanced to the point where energy is harvested from space-based solar farms or through highly efficient perovskite cells integrated into everyday materials.
  • Fusion power: If breakthroughs occur, fusion power could become a viable and clean energy source.
  • Enhanced energy storage: Technologies like advanced batteries, pumped hydro storage, or even more exotic methods like gravitational energy storage could make renewable energy more reliable.

2. Circular Economy and Resource Management:

  • Advanced recycling technologies: We might see highly efficient systems that can break down complex materials into their basic components for reuse.
  • Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials could reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing.  
  • Waste-to-energy: Advanced systems could efficiently convert waste into usable energy, minimizing landfill use.

3. Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:

  • Smart grids: These could optimize energy distribution and usage, reducing waste.  
  • Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles, potentially with autonomous driving capabilities, could be widely adopted, along with advanced public transportation systems.
  • Green buildings: Buildings could be self-sufficient in energy and water, with integrated systems for food production and waste management.

4. Precision Agriculture and Food Systems:

  • Vertical farming: Urban farms using hydroponics and aeroponics could become widespread, reducing the need for land and water.
  • Precision agriculture: Technologies like sensors, AI, and robotics could optimize crop yields while minimizing resource use.  
  • Alternative proteins: Cultured meat and plant-based proteins could become more common, reducing the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.

5. Environmental Monitoring and Remediation:

  • Advanced sensors: These could provide real-time data on pollution levels, biodiversity, and ecosystem health.
  • Carbon capture and storage: Technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere could be more advanced and widely deployed.
  • Environmental remediation: Technologies to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems could be more effective.  

Important Considerations:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI): AI will likely play a crucial role in optimizing many sustainable technologies and systems.
  • Nanotechnology: This could lead to breakthroughs in areas like materials science, energy storage, and environmental remediation.
  • Policy and social factors: The development and adoption of sustainable technologies will depend not just on scientific advances, but also on supportive policies and societal shifts in values and behaviors.

It’s important to remember that these are just some possibilities. The actual technologies that are prevalent in 3040 could be very different. However, the general direction seems to be towards a more sustainable and resource-efficient future, driven by innovation and a growing awareness of environmental challenges.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

It’s fascinating to think about sustainable technology in 3040! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and emerging technologies. Here’s a breakdown of what sustainable tech might look like over a thousand years from now:

1. Energy:

  • Ubiquitous renewable energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable sources will likely be the dominant energy sources, possibly harvested from space-based solar farms or highly efficient systems integrated into everyday materials.  
  • Fusion power: If breakthroughs occur, fusion power could provide a clean and abundant energy source.
  • Advanced energy storage: Technologies like advanced batteries, pumped hydro storage, or even more exotic methods could make renewable energy more reliable.  

2. Resources:

  • Circular economy: Highly efficient recycling systems could break down complex materials for reuse.
  • Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials could reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing.  
  • Waste-to-energy: Advanced systems could efficiently convert waste into usable energy.

3. Infrastructure:

  • Smart grids: These could optimize energy distribution and usage, reducing waste.  
  • Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles, potentially with autonomous driving capabilities, could be widely adopted, along with advanced public transportation systems.
  • Green buildings: Buildings could be self-sufficient in energy and water, with integrated systems for food production and waste management.

4. Food:

  • Vertical farming: Urban farms using hydroponics and aeroponics could become widespread, reducing the need for land and water.
  • Precision agriculture: Technologies like sensors, AI, and robotics could optimize crop yields while minimizing resource use.  
  • Alternative proteins: Cultured meat and plant-based proteins could become more common.

5. Environment:

  • Advanced sensors: These could provide real-time data on pollution levels, biodiversity, and ecosystem health.  
  • Carbon capture and storage: Technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere could be more advanced and widely deployed.
  • Environmental remediation: Technologies to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems could be more effective.  

Important Considerations:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI): AI will likely play a crucial role in optimizing many sustainable technologies and systems.
  • Nanotechnology: This could lead to breakthroughs in areas like materials science, energy storage, and environmental remediation.
  • Policy and social factors: The development and adoption of sustainable technologies will depend not just on scientific advances, but also on supportive policies and societal shifts in values and behaviors.

It’s important to remember that these are just some possibilities. The actual technologies that are prevalent in 3040 could be very different. However, the general direction seems to be towards a more sustainable and resource-efficient future, driven by innovation and a growing awareness of environmental challenges.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

That’s a great question! While sustainable technology in 3040 will ideally benefit everyone, some groups might have a greater need or reliance on it:

  • Future generations: This is the core of sustainability. Those living in 3040 and beyond will depend on these technologies to inherit a healthy planet with sufficient resources.  
  • Developing nations: Sustainable tech can help these regions leapfrog traditional infrastructure and build more resilient, resource-efficient economies. Imagine decentralized renewable energy systems or localized, high-tech agriculture.  
  • Vulnerable populations: Those most affected by climate change today (e.g., coastal communities, arid regions) will likely rely on advanced sustainable tech for adaptation and survival. This might include resilient infrastructure, early warning systems, or even engineered solutions to extreme weather.
  • Urban centers: Cities are hubs of consumption and waste. Sustainable technologies will be essential to make them livable and resource-efficient, with green buildings, smart grids, and advanced waste management.  
  • Industries: Companies will need sustainable tech to remain viable. This means circular economy practices, renewable energy integration, and minimizing their environmental footprint to meet regulations and consumer demands.

Essentially, everyone has a stake in sustainable technology in 3040. It’s not just about environmentalism, but about ensuring a thriving future for all of humanity.

It’s worth noting that equitable access to these technologies will be crucial. We need to avoid a future where only the privileged can benefit from sustainability, leaving others behind.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

You’re thinking long-term, and that’s exactly what sustainability is about! While the need for sustainable technology is urgent now, the full realization and reliance on the kind of advanced sustainable tech we’re envisioning for 3040 will be a gradual process. Here’s a timeline of sorts:

  • Now – 2050: This is the critical period for development and widespread adoption of foundational sustainable technologies. We need massive investment in renewable energy, circular economy models, and sustainable infrastructure. This lays the groundwork for the more advanced solutions of the future.  
  • 2050 – 2100: As climate change impacts intensify, the need for sustainable tech becomes even more pressing. We’ll likely see greater reliance on technologies like carbon capture, advanced agriculture, and more resilient infrastructure.
  • 2100 – 2200 and beyond: By this point, sustainable technology should be deeply integrated into society. We’ll likely see further innovations and refinements, with a focus on optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact.

Why this timeline matters:

  • Urgency: We can’t wait until 3040 to start working on sustainable solutions. The earlier we act, the better equipped we’ll be to face future challenges.
  • Building blocks: The technologies of 3040 will build upon the innovations and infrastructure we develop today. Investing in research and development now is crucial.
  • Adaptation: Climate change impacts are already being felt. We need sustainable technologies not just for the future, but to adapt to the changes happening now.  

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is now, and it will only become more critical as time goes on. By 3040, it will hopefully be an inseparable part of how we live and interact with the planet.Sources and related content

COURTESY: NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” of sustainable technology in 3040! It won’t be confined to just one place. Here’s a breakdown of where we might see it:

  • Everywhere! Ideally, sustainable technology will be so integrated into our lives that it’s simply part of the background. Think about how electricity is now – we don’t think about the grid every time we flip a switch.
  • Cities: As centers of population and consumption, cities will be hubs for sustainable tech. We’ll likely see:
    • Green buildings with integrated energy and water systems
    • Smart grids optimizing resource distribution
    • Vertical farms and localized food production  
    • Advanced public transportation and electric vehicle infrastructure
    • Efficient waste management and recycling systems
  • Rural areas: Sustainable tech can empower rural communities too:
    • Decentralized renewable energy systems (solar, wind, biogas)
    • Precision agriculture and sustainable farming practices  
    • Technologies for water management and conservation
    • Eco-tourism and sustainable development initiatives
  • Homes: Our houses will likely be mini-sustainability hubs:
    • Smart home systems optimizing energy use  
    • Appliances that minimize water and resource consumption  
    • Systems for composting and recycling waste
    • Potentially even small-scale food production (indoor gardens, etc.)
  • Industries: Manufacturing and resource extraction will need to embrace sustainability:
    • Circular economy models with closed-loop systems
    • Renewable energy powering factories and operations
    • Technologies to minimize pollution and waste
    • Sustainable sourcing of materials
  • Environment: Sustainable tech will be crucial for protecting and restoring ecosystems:
    • Advanced sensors for monitoring environmental health
    • Carbon capture and storage technologies
    • Environmental remediation and restoration tools
    • Technologies for biodiversity conservation

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3040 will need to be everywhere, adapting to the specific needs of different locations and sectors. It will be a key part of creating a truly sustainable future for the whole planet.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

That’s a crucial question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will exist in 3040, but how it will be implemented and integrated into society. Here are some key aspects of “how” sustainable technology will be required:

  • Holistic systems thinking: Sustainable tech won’t be isolated solutions. It will require a systems-level approach, where technologies are interconnected and optimized to work together. For example, smart grids will need to integrate with renewable energy sources, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and smart home systems.  
  • Decentralization and localization: While some large-scale infrastructure will be necessary (like space-based solar farms), we’ll likely see a trend towards decentralized and localized solutions. This means communities generating their own renewable energy, growing food locally, and managing resources at a regional level.
  • Integration with nature: Sustainable tech should work in harmony with natural ecosystems. This might involve biomimicry (designing technologies based on natural processes) or integrating technology into existing ecosystems in a way that enhances their resilience.  
  • Accessibility and equity: It’s crucial that sustainable technology is accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This requires careful planning and policy to ensure that the benefits of sustainability are shared equitably.  
  • Adaptability and resilience: The world of 3040 will likely face ongoing environmental challenges. Sustainable technologies need to be adaptable to changing conditions and resilient in the face of disruptions, whether they’re natural disasters or unforeseen events.
  • Circularity: A core principle of sustainable tech will be circularity. This means designing products and systems in a way that minimizes waste, maximizes resource reuse, and keeps materials in circulation for as long as possible.
  • Social and ethical considerations: The development and implementation of sustainable technology should be guided by ethical principles and social values. This includes considering the impact on jobs, communities, and individual rights.  

Essentially, “how” sustainable technology is required in 3040 is about more than just the technology itself. It’s about the systems in which it operates, its integration with nature, and its impact on society. It’s about creating a future where technology serves humanity and the planet in a truly sustainable way.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable tech in 3040, as that’s over a thousand years in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and what we might expect:

Case Study: The City of Aurora, 3040

Background: Aurora is a major coastal city, once heavily reliant on fossil fuels. By 3040, it has transformed into a model of urban sustainability.

Sustainable Tech in Action:

  • Energy: Aurora is powered by a combination of space-based solar farms and highly efficient wind farms offshore. Energy is transmitted wirelessly to the city and stored in advanced, gravity-based storage facilities.
  • Buildings: All buildings are “living structures,” covered in photosynthetic materials that generate energy and clean the air. They are also equipped with smart systems that optimize energy and water use.
  • Transportation: Personal vehicles are a thing of the past. Aurora has a network of autonomous electric pods that move people and goods efficiently. Public transport is seamless and powered by renewable energy.
  • Food: Vertical farms within the city produce a significant portion of Aurora’s food, using hydroponics and aeroponics to minimize water and land use. Residents also have access to personalized nutrition plans and lab-grown protein options.
  • Waste: Aurora operates on a circular economy model. Waste is collected and processed in high-tech facilities that break it down into reusable components or convert it into energy.
  • Water: The city has a closed-loop water system. Rainwater is harvested, wastewater is treated and reused, and even atmospheric water generators provide fresh water.
  • Environment: Aurora has restored its coastal ecosystems, with thriving marine life and green spaces throughout the city. Advanced sensors monitor environmental health and trigger remediation efforts when needed.

Challenges and Solutions:

  • Initial investment: The transition to this sustainable model required massive upfront investment in infrastructure and technology. This was overcome through public-private partnerships and global collaboration.
  • Social adaptation: Changing people’s habits and mindsets was a challenge. Aurora addressed this through education programs and community engagement.
  • Technological advancements: Continuous research and development were crucial. Aurora fostered a culture of innovation and attracted top talent in sustainable technology.

Outcomes:

  • Environmental: Aurora has a near-zero carbon footprint and has significantly reduced its impact on the planet.
  • Economic: The city has a thriving green economy, with jobs in sustainable

You stopped this response

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology of 3040 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3040, a millennium from now. While predicting the future with absolute certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends, emerging technologies, and societal needs to envision a world where sustainability is deeply integrated into every facet of life. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, including energy, resource management, infrastructure, food systems, and environmental remediation, highlighting the interconnectedness of these domains and the importance of a holistic approach to sustainability. It also addresses the crucial role of policy, social adaptation, and ethical considerations in shaping a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainability centers on meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. By 3040, it is anticipated that the urgency of environmental challenges and the finite nature of resources will necessitate a profound shift towards sustainable practices. This paper envisions a future where technology plays a pivotal role in enabling this transition, creating a world where human society thrives in harmony with the planet.  

2. Key Areas of Sustainable Technology in 3040:

2.1 Energy:

  • Ubiquitous Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable sources will likely be the dominant energy providers. Space-based solar farms, potentially combined with advanced energy transmission systems, could provide a significant portion of global energy needs.
  • Fusion Power: Continued research and development may lead to commercially viable fusion power, offering a clean, safe, and abundant energy source.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and scalable energy storage solutions will be essential for balancing supply and demand from intermittent renewable sources. This could involve advanced battery technologies, pumped hydro storage, or more innovative approaches like gravitational energy storage.

2.2 Resource Management:

  • Circular Economy: Closed-loop systems will minimize waste and maximize resource utilization. Advanced recycling technologies will enable the recovery of valuable materials from complex products, facilitating their reuse in manufacturing.
  • Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials and products will reduce reliance on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing methods. This could revolutionize industries from construction to textiles.
  • Resource Optimization: AI-powered systems will optimize resource use across all sectors, from agriculture to industry, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

2.3 Sustainable Infrastructure:

  • Smart Grids: Intelligent energy grids will dynamically manage energy distribution, optimizing consumption and integrating distributed renewable energy sources.
  • Green Buildings: Buildings will be self-sufficient in energy and water, incorporating features like solar panels, rainwater harvesting systems, and greywater recycling.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, potentially autonomous, will be the norm. Advanced public transportation systems will further reduce reliance on individual vehicles.

2.4 Food Systems:

  • Vertical Farming: Urban farms utilizing hydroponics and aeroponics will increase food production in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
  • Precision Agriculture: Technologies like sensors, AI, and robotics will optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs like water and fertilizers.
  • Alternative Proteins: Cultured meat and plant-based protein sources will play a larger role in diets, reducing the environmental footprint of traditional animal agriculture.

2.5 Environmental Remediation:

  • Advanced Monitoring: Real-time environmental monitoring using sophisticated sensors and AI will provide crucial data on ecosystem health and pollution levels.
  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and storing it securely will be essential for mitigating climate change.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Technological advancements will aid in restoring damaged ecosystems, from forests to oceans, enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services.

3. Enabling Factors:

  • Artificial Intelligence: AI will be a crucial enabler across all areas of sustainable technology, optimizing systems, analyzing data, and driving innovation.
  • Nanotechnology: Advances in nanotechnology could lead to breakthroughs in materials science, energy storage, and environmental remediation.
  • Policy and Regulation: Supportive policies and regulations will be essential to incentivize the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
  • Social Adaptation: Shifts in societal values and behaviors will be crucial for embracing and integrating sustainable practices into everyday life.
  • International Collaboration: Global cooperation will be essential for addressing shared environmental challenges and accelerating the transition to a sustainable future.

4. Challenges and Considerations:

  • Ethical Implications: The development and deployment of advanced technologies raise ethical questions that must be carefully considered.
  • Equity and Access: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and their benefits will be crucial to avoid exacerbating existing inequalities.
  • Resilience and Adaptability: Sustainable systems must be resilient to unforeseen challenges, including climate change impacts and other environmental disruptions.

5. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 3040 represents a vision of a future where human society has achieved a harmonious balance with the planet. While the specific technologies discussed in this paper are speculative, the underlying principles of resource efficiency, circularity, and ecological harmony are essential for creating a thriving future for generations to come. Achieving this vision will require sustained innovation, collaboration, and a fundamental shift in how we interact with the natural world. The journey towards a sustainable future begins now, and the choices we make today will shape the world of 3040 and beyond.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

You’re asking about the practical side of sustainable tech in 3040! Here are some potential industrial applications, building on the technologies we’ve discussed:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Circular Production: Factories will operate on closed-loop systems. Raw materials will be sourced sustainably, products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, and waste will be virtually eliminated.
  • Biomanufacturing: Industries will use biological processes to create materials, from bioplastics to advanced textiles, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and traditional chemical manufacturing.
  • Personalized Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques will allow for on-demand and localized production, reducing transportation costs and waste.  

2. Resource Extraction:

  • Sustainable Mining: Mining operations will use advanced technologies to minimize environmental impact, with automated systems, precise extraction techniques, and on-site remediation.  
  • Resource Recovery: Industries will be able to efficiently extract valuable materials from waste streams, turning what was once discarded into valuable resources.
  • Ocean Mining (if necessary): If deep-sea mining is still required, it will be conducted with extreme care and advanced technology to minimize harm to fragile ecosystems.

3. Agriculture:

  • Vertical Farms: Urban centers will have large-scale vertical farms producing fresh produce with minimal land and water use, supplying local populations.
  • Precision Agriculture: Farms will use sensors, AI, and robotics to optimize crop yields, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize environmental impact.  
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Fish farming will be done in a way that protects marine ecosystems, with closed-loop systems and alternative feed sources.

4. Energy:

  • Renewable Energy Integration: Industries will be powered by a mix of renewable energy sources, with smart grids optimizing energy use and storage.
  • Energy-Efficient Processes: Manufacturing processes will be redesigned to minimize energy consumption, with technologies like advanced heat recovery and more efficient machinery.
  • Hydrogen Production: Industries that require high temperatures or produce emissions (like steel or cement) might use green hydrogen (produced from renewable energy) as a clean fuel source.

5. Construction:

  • Green Building Materials: Buildings will be constructed with sustainable materials, like bioplastics, recycled materials, and even materials grown using biomanufacturing.
  • Modular and Prefabricated Construction: This will reduce waste and construction time, and enable more efficient use of resources.  
  • Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure may incorporate materials that can repair themselves, increasing durability and reducing maintenance needs.

6. Transportation:

  • Electric Fleets: Industries will rely on electric vehicles for transportation of goods and materials, with charging infrastructure powered by renewable energy.
  • Autonomous Logistics: AI-powered systems will optimize logistics and supply chains, reducing fuel consumption and increasing efficiency.  
  • Sustainable Aviation and Shipping: While these sectors are harder to decarbonize, we might see advancements in biofuels, electric propulsion, or even entirely new forms of sustainable transport.

Important Considerations:

  • Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications will rely heavily on automation and AI, which raises questions about jobs and the workforce of the future.
  • Regulation and Standards: Strong regulations and industry standards will be needed to ensure that sustainable technologies are implemented effectively and ethically.
  • Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies need to be economically viable for industries to adopt them. This will require innovation, investment, and potentially policy support.

By 3040, sustainable technology should be deeply ingrained in industrial practices, driving efficiency, minimizing environmental impact, and creating a more sustainable economy.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3040 ?

It’s exciting to think about the R&D that will shape sustainable technology in 3040! Here’s a glimpse into potential areas of focus:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

  • Self-healing materials: Imagine buildings and infrastructure that can automatically repair damage, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.  
  • Smart materials: Materials that can change their properties in response to stimuli, like temperature or light, opening up new possibilities for energy efficiency and adaptive structures.  
  • Biodegradable and compostable materials: Expanding the range of materials that can be safely returned to the earth, reducing waste and pollution.
  • Super-efficient conductors: Materials that can transmit electricity with minimal loss, revolutionizing energy transmission and storage.

2. Energy Technologies:

  • Fusion power breakthroughs: Continued research into fusion energy, aiming to achieve stable and efficient fusion reactions for a clean and abundant energy source.
  • Space-based solar power: Developing the technology to efficiently harvest solar energy from space and transmit it to Earth.  
  • Advanced energy storage: Exploring new methods for storing energy, such as gravitational energy storage or other innovative approaches.
  • Enhanced geothermal energy: Developing technologies to access and utilize geothermal energy more efficiently and in a wider range of locations.  

3. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

  • Synthetic biology: Designing and engineering new biological systems to create materials, fuels, and other products sustainably.
  • Advanced biomanufacturing: Developing scalable and efficient biomanufacturing processes to produce a wide range of goods, from pharmaceuticals to textiles.
  • Bio-integrated technologies: Integrating biological systems with technology, such as using plants as sensors or developing bio-based energy storage devices.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Computing:

  • AI for sustainability: Developing AI algorithms and models to optimize resource use, predict environmental changes, and manage complex sustainable systems.  
  • Quantum computing: Exploring the potential of quantum computing to solve complex problems related to sustainability, such as designing new materials or optimizing energy grids.  
  • Neuromorphic computing: Developing computing systems inspired by the human brain, which could lead to more energy-efficient and adaptable AI.  

5. Environmental Science and Engineering:

  • Climate change mitigation: Researching and developing technologies for carbon capture, storage, and utilization, as well as other methods to mitigate climate change.
  • Ecosystem restoration: Developing advanced techniques for restoring damaged ecosystems, including forests, oceans, and wetlands.
  • Pollution remediation: Researching and developing innovative methods for cleaning up pollution and restoring contaminated environments.

6. Social and Behavioral Sciences:

  • Sustainable behavior change: Studying how to encourage and support individuals and communities to adopt sustainable practices.
  • Policy and governance: Researching effective policies and governance structures to promote sustainability at local, national, and global levels.
  • Ethical considerations: Examining the ethical implications of sustainable technologies and developing frameworks for responsible innovation.

Important Considerations:

  • Interdisciplinary collaboration: R&D in sustainable technology will require collaboration across many disciplines, from science and engineering to social sciences and the humanities.
  • Long-term vision: Sustainable technology research requires a long-term perspective, with sustained funding and commitment to address complex challenges.
  • Global collaboration: International cooperation will be essential to share knowledge, accelerate innovation, and ensure that sustainable technologies benefit all of humanity.  

The research and development of sustainable technology in 3040 will be a continuous process, driven by curiosity, innovation, and a deep commitment to creating a thriving future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »