Sustainable Technology of 3030

84 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

It’s difficult to predict the exact state of technology in 2030, but here are some key trends and areas of focus in sustainable technology that are likely to be prominent:

1. Renewable Energy:

Solar Energy: Continued advancements in photovoltaic technology, energy storage, and grid integration will make solar power even more efficient and cost-effective.
Wind Energy: Larger and more efficient wind turbines, both onshore and offshore, will contribute significantly to renewable energy generation.
Other Renewables: Technologies like geothermal energy, biomass, and hydropower will also play a role in a diversified renewable energy mix.

2. Energy Efficiency:

Smart Grids: Advanced grid management systems will optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
Building Automation: Smart home and building technologies will automate energy usage based on occupancy and environmental conditions.
Industrial Efficiency: Industries will adopt more energy-efficient processes and equipment to minimize their environmental footprint.

3. Transportation:

Electric Vehicles (EVs): EVs will become increasingly mainstream, with longer ranges, faster charging times, and more affordable options.
Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles have the potential to optimize traffic flow and reduce fuel consumption.
Alternative Fuels: Research and development in biofuels, hydrogen fuel cells, and other alternative fuels will continue.

4. Resource Management:

Circular Economy: Technologies that enable recycling, reuse, and waste reduction will be crucial for minimizing resource depletion.
Water Management: Advanced water purification and conservation technologies will address water scarcity challenges.
Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and other innovative techniques will increase food production while reducing environmental impact.

5. Carbon Capture and Storage:

Carbon Capture: Technologies that capture carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources and power plants will be essential for mitigating climate change.
Carbon Storage: Safe and permanent storage of captured carbon dioxide in geological formations will prevent it from entering the atmosphere.

6. Biotechnology and Materials Science:

Bioplastics: Biodegradable plastics made from renewable resources will replace traditional plastics in various applications.
Sustainable Materials: Development of new materials with lower environmental impact and improved performance will drive innovation in various industries.

7. Digital Technologies:

Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI will play a significant role in optimizing energy consumption, managing resources, and developing sustainable solutions.
Internet of Things (IoT): Connected devices will enable real-time monitoring and control of energy usage, waste management, and other sustainability-related processes.

Challenges and Considerations:

Policy and Regulation: Supportive policies and regulations will be crucial for driving the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Infrastructure Development: Investments in renewable energy infrastructure, charging networks for EVs, and other sustainable infrastructure will be necessary.
Behavioral Changes: Individual and societal behavior changes will be essential for achieving sustainability goals.

Overall, the future of sustainable technology in 2030 and beyond looks promising. Continued innovation, coupled with supportive policies and behavioral changes, will pave the way for a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

It appears you’re asking about sustainable technology in the year 3030. While predicting that far into the future is inherently speculative, we can extrapolate current trends and make some educated guesses about what sustainable technology might look like then. Here’s a breakdown of potential developments:

1. Energy:

Fusion Power: It’s conceivable that by 3030, nuclear fusion could be a viable and widespread energy source, providing clean and abundant power.
Advanced Solar: Solar technology might reach incredible levels of efficiency, perhaps through breakthroughs in materials science like perovskites or even space-based solar farms beaming energy back to Earth.
Hyper-Efficient Storage: Energy storage solutions could be so advanced that storing and distributing renewable energy is seamless and lossless.

2. Resource Management:

Circular Economy Mastery: Technologies to recycle and reuse materials might be so advanced that waste is virtually eliminated, creating a truly circular economy.
Resource Extraction in Space: With potential resource scarcity on Earth, space mining and asteroid retrieval could become commonplace, providing access to essential materials.
Precision Agriculture: Agriculture could be highly optimized with AI and robotics, maximizing yields while minimizing water and land usage.

3. Transportation:

Personal Flight: Perhaps personal air mobility will be a reality, with electric or other clean-energy flying vehicles reducing ground traffic.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems like Hyperloop could connect cities across vast distances in a matter of hours.
Autonomous Everything: Not just cars, but ships, planes, and even personal transportation could be fully autonomous and optimized for efficiency.

4. Environment:

Geoengineering: Technologies to actively manage the Earth’s climate might be advanced enough to counteract any remaining effects of climate change.
Ecosystem Restoration: We might have the tools to restore damaged ecosystems and even bring back extinct species.
Pollution Reversal: Technologies to actively remove pollutants from the air and water could be highly effective.

5. Technology:

Quantum Computing Dominance: Quantum computers could be powerful enough to solve problems we can’t even imagine today, leading to breakthroughs in materials science, medicine, and more.
Artificial General Intelligence: If achieved, AGI could accelerate the development of sustainable technologies in ways we can’t foresee.
Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials could revolutionize manufacturing, medicine, and environmental cleanup.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: With such powerful technologies, ethical considerations will be paramount. How do we ensure these technologies are used for the benefit of all humanity and the planet?
Global Cooperation: Achieving a sustainable future will require unprecedented global cooperation and a shared vision.
Unforeseen Developments: The future is full of surprises. New discoveries and innovations could take us in directions we can’t even imagine today.

While 3030 is far off, the trends are clear. Sustainable technology will be crucial for our future, and the innovations we develop in the coming decades will shape the world of 3030 and beyond.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

It’s not a matter of who requires sustainable technology in 2030, but rather who will be relying on it and who will be responsible for its development and implementation. Here’s a breakdown:

Those who will be relying on sustainable technology:

Everyone on the planet: By 2030, the effects of climate change and resource scarcity will likely be even more pronounced. Sustainable technology will be essential for ensuring access to clean energy, safe water, and healthy food for all.
Future generations: The decisions we make today will have a lasting impact on the planet. Sustainable technology is crucial for ensuring a habitable and prosperous future for those who come after us.
Ecosystems: Sustainable technology will be needed to protect and restore the natural world, which is essential for our own well-being.

Those who will be responsible for developing and implementing sustainable technology:

Scientists and engineers: They will be at the forefront of developing new and innovative sustainable technologies.
Governments: Policymakers will need to create regulations and incentives that encourage the adoption of sustainable practices.
Businesses: Companies will need to invest in sustainable technologies and incorporate them into their operations.
Individuals: We all have a role to play in reducing our environmental impact and supporting sustainable solutions.

Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology in 2030 and beyond will depend on a collective effort from all of us.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about technological advancements. It’s also about social and economic changes that promote a more equitable and just world. This includes things like:

Education: Ensuring that everyone has access to education about sustainability and how they can contribute.
Equity: Making sure that the benefits of sustainable technology are shared by all, not just the wealthy.
Community: Building strong communities that are resilient to the challenges of climate change and resource scarcity.

By working together, we can create a future where sustainable technology is not just a necessity, but a way of life.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

You’re right to focus on the timing! It’s not just what sustainable technology will be needed by 2030, but when it needs to be in place and working effectively. Here’s a breakdown of the urgency:

Now: In many ways, the need for sustainable technology is already here. We are experiencing the effects of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Many communities around the world are already facing challenges related to access to clean water, food security, and extreme weather events. So, development and implementation of sustainable solutions need to be happening now.
By 2030: This is a critical deadline for many global sustainability goals, including those outlined in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. By 2030, we need to have made significant progress in areas like:
- Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
- Increasing the share of renewable energy
- Improving energy efficiency
- Protecting biodiversity
- Ensuring access to clean water and sanitation
Beyond 2030: Sustainable technology will continue to be essential for maintaining a healthy planet and a thriving society in the long term. We need to continue to innovate and improve our sustainable technologies to meet the challenges of the future.

Why the urgency?

Climate Change: The longer we wait to take action, the more severe the impacts of climate change will become. We need to act now to avoid the worst consequences.
Resource Depletion: Many of the Earth’s resources are finite. We need to find sustainable ways to use these resources so that they are available for future generations.
Population Growth: The world’s population is expected to continue to grow, which will put even more pressure on our resources and environment. We need sustainable technologies to meet the needs of a growing population.

What needs to happen now?

Accelerated research and development: We need to invest in research and development of new sustainable technologies.
Rapid deployment: We need to deploy existing sustainable technologies as quickly as possible.
Policy support: Governments need to create policies that encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Public awareness: We need to raise public awareness about the importance of sustainable technology.

The need for sustainable technology is urgent. We need to act now to ensure a healthy planet and a prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

That’s a crucial question! Sustainable technology in 2030 won’t be needed in just one place, but rather across the globe, in diverse sectors and environments. Here’s a breakdown of where it will be essential:

1. Urban Centers:

Smart Cities: Sustainable technologies will be at the core of smart cities, optimizing energy use, managing waste, and improving transportation.
Buildings: Green buildings with energy-efficient designs, renewable energy integration, and smart automation will be essential in reducing urban environmental impact.
Transportation: Electric vehicle infrastructure, public transport powered by clean energy, and urban air mobility solutions will be crucial for reducing pollution and congestion.

2. Rural Areas:

Agriculture: Sustainable agriculture technologies will be needed to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact, including precision farming, vertical farming, and efficient irrigation systems.
Energy Access: Off-grid renewable energy solutions will be vital for providing electricity to rural communities that lack access to traditional power grids.
Resource Management: Sustainable water management and waste management technologies will be essential for preserving natural resources in rural areas.

3. Industrial Sectors:

Manufacturing: Industries will need to adopt sustainable manufacturing processes, including energy-efficient equipment, circular economy principles, and carbon capture technologies.
Energy Production: Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal will need to be scaled up significantly to replace fossil fuels.
Resource Extraction: Sustainable mining and resource extraction practices will be needed to minimize environmental damage and ensure responsible resource use.

4. Developing Countries:

Basic Needs: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for addressing basic needs in developing countries, including access to clean water, sanitation, and affordable energy.
Economic Development: Sustainable technologies can drive economic development in developing countries by creating new industries and jobs.
Climate Resilience: Developing countries are often more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Sustainable technologies can help them adapt to these impacts and build resilience.

5. Global Ecosystems:

Oceans: Sustainable fishing practices and technologies will be needed to protect marine ecosystems and ensure food security.
Forests: Sustainable forestry practices and technologies will be essential for preserving forests, which play a vital role in carbon sequestration and biodiversity.
Atmosphere: Technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change will be needed globally to protect the Earth’s atmosphere.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2030 will be required everywhere, to address the interconnected challenges of climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation. It will be a global effort, requiring collaboration and innovation across all sectors and regions.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

You’re hitting on a really important point! It’s not enough to just have sustainable technology by 2030. It needs to be effectively integrated into our lives and systems. Here’s how that needs to happen:

1. Scalability:

Mass Production: Sustainable technologies need to be scaled up to mass production levels to meet global demand. This requires efficient manufacturing processes, robust supply chains, and cost-effective solutions.
Infrastructure Development: Supporting infrastructure needs to be in place for widespread adoption. This includes things like charging networks for electric vehicles, smart grids for renewable energy distribution, and recycling facilities for a circular economy.

2. Affordability:

Cost Reduction: Sustainable technologies need to be affordable for everyone, not just the wealthy. This requires innovation in manufacturing, economies of scale, and potentially government subsidies or incentives.
Equitable Access: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible to all communities, including those in developing countries, is crucial for global sustainability.

3. Integration:

Seamless Implementation: Sustainable technologies need to be seamlessly integrated into existing systems and infrastructure. This requires careful planning, collaboration between different sectors, and user-friendly designs.
Behavioral Changes: People need to adopt sustainable practices and change their behaviors to make the most of these technologies. This requires education, awareness campaigns, and potentially policy measures.

4. Resilience:

Adaptability: Sustainable technologies need to be resilient to the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise. This requires robust designs, decentralized systems, and adaptive management strategies.
Long-Term Sustainability: Technologies need to be sustainable not just in the short term, but also in the long term. This means considering the entire life cycle of products, from resource extraction to end-of-life management.

5. Collaboration:

Cross-Sector Partnerships: Achieving widespread adoption of sustainable technology requires collaboration between governments, businesses, researchers, and individuals.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international cooperation on technology development, transfer, and implementation.

In short, by 2030, sustainable technology needs to be not just available, but also accessible, affordable, integrated, resilient, and supported by a collaborative global effort.

This is a complex undertaking, but it’s essential for creating a sustainable future. By focusing on these key areas, we can ensure that sustainable technology in 2030 is not just a vision, but a reality.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2030, as that’s still in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical but plausible scenario based on current trends and expert predictions.

Scenario: The City of Eco-Haven, 2030

Eco-Haven was once a typical bustling metropolis, struggling with pollution, traffic congestion, and rising energy costs. By 2030, it has transformed into a model of urban sustainability.

Key Sustainable Technologies in Action:

Renewable Energy Integration: The city is powered by a combination of solar, wind, and geothermal energy. Solar panels cover rooftops and building facades, wind turbines dot the outskirts, and geothermal plants tap into the Earth’s heat. Smart grids manage energy distribution, ensuring a stable and reliable power supply.
Electric Mobility: Electric vehicles (EVs) dominate the roads, with a comprehensive network of charging stations powered by renewable energy. Public transportation is fully electric, and personal air mobility vehicles (PAVs) provide a clean and efficient way to travel within the city.
Circular Economy: Waste is virtually eliminated through advanced recycling and reuse technologies. Smart bins with AI-powered sorting systems optimize waste collection and processing. Businesses prioritize sustainable materials and design products for disassembly and reuse.
Urban Farming: Vertical farms and rooftop gardens provide fresh, locally grown produce for the city’s residents. These urban farms use hydroponics and other sustainable agriculture techniques to minimize water and land use.
Smart Buildings: Buildings are equipped with sensors and automation systems that optimize energy consumption based on occupancy and environmental conditions. Green roofs and walls provide insulation and improve air quality.

Impact of Sustainable Technology:

Reduced Emissions: Greenhouse gas emissions have plummeted, contributing to global efforts to combat climate change.
Improved Air Quality: Air pollution is significantly reduced, leading to improved public health and well-being.
Lower Energy Costs: Residents and businesses benefit from lower energy costs due to the widespread adoption of renewable energy and energy efficiency measures.
Enhanced Quality of Life: The city is more livable, with green spaces, clean air, and efficient transportation systems.
Economic Growth: Eco-Haven has become a hub for sustainable technology innovation, attracting investment and creating new jobs.

Challenges and Lessons Learned:

Initial Investment: The transition to sustainable technology required significant upfront investment in infrastructure and research and development.
Behavioral Change: Encouraging residents to adopt sustainable practices and change their behaviors was a challenge that required education and incentives.
Technological Advancements: Continuous innovation and improvement of sustainable technologies were essential for achieving the city’s sustainability goals.

Eco-Haven’s success demonstrates that with vision, commitment, and technological innovation, cities can transform into sustainable and thriving communities. This case study provides a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology in 2030 and beyond.

It’s important to remember that this is just one possible scenario. The actual development and implementation of sustainable technology in 2030 will depend on a variety of factors, including policy decisions, technological advancements, and societal changes. However, the case of Eco-Haven highlights the potential for sustainable technology to create a better future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology of 2030: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Executive Summary:

The year 2030 represents a critical juncture in our journey towards a sustainable future. This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in 2030, extrapolating from current trends and expert predictions. It highlights key technological advancements, their potential impact, and the crucial steps needed to ensure their effective development and deployment. The paper argues that a concerted global effort, driven by innovation, policy, and behavioral change, is essential to harness the power of sustainable technology and create a world where both humanity and the planet thrive.

1. Introduction:

The challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation demand urgent and transformative action. Sustainable technology, encompassing innovations across various sectors, offers a pathway to address these challenges and build a more resilient and equitable future. This white paper envisions the potential of sustainable technology in 2030, focusing on its key areas of development and the strategies required for its successful implementation.

2. Key Areas of Sustainable Technology in 2030:

2.1. Energy:

Advanced Renewables: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will be highly efficient and cost-competitive, forming the backbone of global energy systems. Space-based solar power and advanced energy storage solutions may become a reality.
Fusion Energy: While still uncertain, 2030 could see significant progress towards commercially viable fusion power, offering a potentially limitless source of clean energy.
Smart Grids: Intelligent grid management systems will optimize energy distribution, minimize waste, and seamlessly integrate diverse renewable energy sources.

2.2. Resource Management:

Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and resource recovery technologies will enable a truly circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. Product design will prioritize durability, repairability, and recyclability.
Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and other innovative techniques will increase food production while reducing water and land usage. Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will gain wider acceptance.
Water Management: Advanced water purification and desalination technologies will address water scarcity challenges in many regions.

2.3. Transportation:

Electric Mobility: Electric vehicles (EVs) will dominate the market, with widespread charging infrastructure and improved battery technology. Autonomous vehicles will optimize traffic flow and reduce fuel consumption.
Alternative Fuels: Biofuels, hydrogen fuel cells, and other alternative fuels will play a growing role in transportation, particularly for long-haul transport and aviation.
Sustainable Aviation: Advances in biofuels and electric propulsion could lead to more sustainable air travel.

2.4. Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Large-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies will be deployed to capture CO2 emissions from industrial sources and power plants. Direct air capture technologies may also become more viable.
Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies for restoring damaged ecosystems and even reviving extinct species could advance significantly.
Pollution Removal: Advanced materials and filtration systems will be used to remove pollutants from air and water.

3. Enabling Factors:

Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI will play a crucial role in optimizing energy consumption, managing resources, and accelerating the development of sustainable technologies.
Internet of Things (IoT): Connected devices will enable real-time monitoring and control of energy usage, waste management, and other sustainability-related processes.
Biotechnology and Materials Science: Advances in these fields will lead to new sustainable materials, bioplastics, and more efficient industrial processes.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

Policy and Regulation: Supportive policies and regulations are crucial for driving the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Infrastructure Development: Significant investments in renewable energy infrastructure, charging networks, and other sustainable infrastructure are necessary.
Behavioral Changes: Shifting consumer behavior towards sustainable practices will be essential.
Global Cooperation: International collaboration is vital for addressing global challenges like climate change.

5. Recommendations:

Invest in Research and Development: Prioritize research and development in key areas of sustainable technology.
Develop Supportive Policies: Implement policies that incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies and discourage unsustainable practices.
Promote Public Awareness: Educate the public about the importance of sustainable technology and encourage behavioral changes.
Foster International Collaboration: Strengthen international cooperation on technology development, transfer, and implementation.

6. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology landscape of 2030 holds immense promise for addressing the pressing challenges facing our planet. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and implementing supportive policies, we can unlock the full potential of sustainable technology and create a future where both humanity and the environment thrive. The journey to 2030 requires immediate and sustained action, but the rewards of a sustainable future are immeasurable.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

You’re interested in how sustainable technology will revolutionize industries by 2030! Here are some key industrial applications we might see:

1. Manufacturing:

Circular Production: Factories will operate on circular economy principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource use. AI-powered systems will optimize material flow, predict equipment needs, and manage product lifecycles for disassembly and reuse.
Green Automation: Manufacturing processes will be highly automated, powered by renewable energy, and designed for energy efficiency. Robots and AI will optimize production lines, reducing waste and improving product quality.
Sustainable Materials: Industries will utilize advanced materials with lower environmental impact, such as bioplastics, recycled materials, and high-performance composites. Nanotechnology could enable the creation of incredibly strong and lightweight materials with diverse applications.

2. Energy:

Decentralized Energy Systems: Industries will increasingly rely on on-site renewable energy generation, such as rooftop solar, wind turbines, and microgrids. Smart grids will connect these decentralized systems, optimizing energy distribution and resilience.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industrial facilities will implement carbon capture technologies to capture CO2 emissions from their processes. This CO2 can then be used to create new products, such as fuels, chemicals, and building materials.
Hydrogen Economy: Hydrogen produced from renewable energy sources will become a key fuel for industries, particularly for high-temperature processes and long-duration energy storage.

3. Agriculture:

Precision Farming: Farmers will use sensors, drones, and AI to monitor crops, soil conditions, and weather patterns. This data will be used to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, reducing resource use and environmental impact.
Vertical Farming: Urban areas will see the rise of vertical farms, using hydroponics and other sustainable techniques to grow crops in stacked layers. This reduces land and water use while increasing food production.
Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities will adopt energy-efficient technologies, minimize waste, and utilize sustainable packaging materials.

4. Construction:

Green Buildings: Buildings will be designed and constructed to minimize their environmental footprint. This includes using sustainable materials, incorporating renewable energy systems, and optimizing energy efficiency through smart building management systems.
Modular Construction: Prefabricated and modular construction methods will become more common, reducing construction waste and time.
3D Printing: Additive manufacturing (3D printing) will enable the creation of customized building components and even entire buildings using sustainable materials.

5. Transportation:

Electric Fleets: Industries will transition to electric vehicle fleets for transportation of goods and personnel. Charging infrastructure powered by renewable energy will be widely available.
Sustainable Logistics: AI and optimization algorithms will be used to improve logistics and supply chain efficiency, reducing fuel consumption and emissions.
Alternative Fuels: Industries will increasingly use alternative fuels such as biofuels and hydrogen for long-haul transportation and shipping.

General Trends Across Industries:

Digitalization: The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) will connect machines, sensors, and data, enabling real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and optimized resource management.
Artificial Intelligence: AI will be used to automate processes, optimize energy use, and improve decision-making across industries.
Collaboration: Industries will increasingly collaborate with each other and with research institutions to develop and implement sustainable technologies.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology will transform industries by 2030. The key is that these technologies will not only reduce environmental impact but also improve efficiency, reduce costs, and create new opportunities for innovation and economic growth. Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3030 ?

You’re asking about the cutting edge of sustainable technology! Here’s a look at the exciting research and development efforts that could shape our world in 2030:

1. Energy:

Next-Generation Solar:
- Perovskite Solar Cells: Researchers are working to improve the efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells, which have the potential to be cheaper and more versatile than traditional silicon-based cells.
- Space-Based Solar Power: Scientists are exploring the feasibility of capturing solar energy in space and beaming it back to Earth, providing a continuous and abundant source of clean energy.
Advanced Energy Storage:
- Solid-State Batteries: These batteries promise to be safer, more energy-dense, and have longer lifespans than current lithium-ion batteries.
- Hydrogen Storage: Researchers are developing new materials and methods for storing hydrogen efficiently and safely, enabling its use as a clean fuel.
Fusion Energy:
- ITER and Beyond: The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is a large-scale fusion experiment that aims to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power. Future reactors will build on ITER’s findings to develop commercially viable fusion energy.

2. Resource Management:

Circular Economy Technologies:
- Advanced Recycling: Researchers are developing new technologies to break down complex materials into their basic components, enabling the recycling of previously unrecyclable waste.
- Bioplastics: Scientists are exploring new types of bioplastics made from renewable resources that are biodegradable and compostable.
Sustainable Agriculture:
- Precision Agriculture: Researchers are using sensors, drones, and AI to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, reducing resource use and environmental impact.
- Vertical Farming: Scientists are developing new techniques for growing crops in stacked layers, maximizing food production while minimizing land and water use.
Water Management:
- Advanced Desalination: Researchers are working on new desalination technologies that are more energy-efficient and cost-effective than current methods.
- Water Purification: Scientists are developing new materials and methods for removing contaminants from water, ensuring access to clean and safe drinking water.

3. Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Storage:
- Direct Air Capture: Researchers are developing technologies to capture CO2 directly from the atmosphere, which could play a crucial role in mitigating climate change.
- Carbon Utilization: Scientists are exploring ways to use captured CO2 to create new products, such as fuels, chemicals, and building materials.
Ecosystem Restoration:
- Bioengineering: Researchers are using bioengineering techniques to restore damaged ecosystems and even bring back extinct species.
- Pollution Removal: Scientists are developing new materials and methods for removing pollutants from air and water, such as advanced filtration systems and bioremediation techniques.

4. Enabling Technologies:

Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI is being used to accelerate the development of sustainable technologies in various fields, from materials science to energy optimization.
Internet of Things (IoT): Connected devices are enabling real-time monitoring and control of energy usage, waste management, and other sustainability-related processes.
Biotechnology and Materials Science: Advances in these fields are leading to new sustainable materials, bioplastics, and more efficient industrial processes.

Key Research Areas:

Nanotechnology: Exploring the potential of nanomaterials for various applications, from energy storage to environmental cleanup.
Biomimicry: Studying nature’s designs and processes to develop sustainable technologies.
Systems Thinking: Taking a holistic approach to understanding the interconnectedness of environmental and social systems to develop more effective solutions.

The research and development of sustainable technology is a continuous process. By investing in these key areas, we can accelerate the transition to a more sustainable future and create a world where both humanity and the planet thrive.Sources and related content

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.