Sustainable Technology of 3020

84 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, here are some potential sustainable technologies that might exist in 3020, based on current trends and advancements:

Advanced Energy Systems:

Fusion Power: If we achieve practical fusion power, it could provide a clean, abundant, and safe energy source.
Space-Based Solar Power: Solar energy collected in space and beamed down to Earth could provide a continuous and inexhaustible source of power.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Advanced batteries or other storage technologies could allow for efficient storage and distribution of renewable energy.

Resource Management:

Circular Economy Technologies: Advanced recycling and manufacturing processes could enable a truly circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
Water Purification and Desalination: Highly efficient and low-cost water purification and desalination technologies could address water scarcity issues.
Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and lab-grown food could increase food production while reducing environmental impact.

Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies could capture and store or utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, mitigating climate change.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Technologies could be developed to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans and restore marine ecosystems.
Ecosystem Restoration: Techniques could be developed to restore damaged ecosystems, such as forests and wetlands, enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Materials Science:

Biodegradable and Sustainable Materials: New materials that are biodegradable, compostable, or made from renewable resources could replace traditional plastics and other unsustainable materials.
Smart Materials: Materials that can adapt to their environment or repair themselves could be used in construction, manufacturing, and other applications, increasing efficiency and longevity.

Information and Communication Technologies:

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI and machine learning could be used to optimize energy use, manage resources, and develop sustainable solutions.
Internet of Things (IoT): A network of interconnected devices could monitor and manage environmental conditions, resource use, and infrastructure, enabling more efficient and sustainable systems.

It’s important to note that these are just a few possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 3020 could be very different. However, by continuing to invest in research and development, we can increase the likelihood of creating a sustainable future for all.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3020 is a fun thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential breakthroughs. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy & Resources:

Fusion Power Dominance: If we crack the code to practical fusion power, it could become the primary energy source. Imagine clean, abundant energy for everyone, everywhere.
Space-Based Solar: Gigantic solar arrays orbiting Earth could collect sunlight 24/7 and beam it down, providing a constant source of renewable energy.
Advanced Resource Recovery: “Urban mining” could become the norm, with highly efficient systems to extract valuable materials from waste and recycle them endlessly.

2. Environment & Climate:

Atmospheric Regeneration: Perhaps technologies will exist to actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and even repair damage to the ozone layer.
Ocean Restoration: Advanced robotics and biotechnology could be used to clean up pollution, restore coral reefs, and revive marine ecosystems.
Hyperlocal Agriculture: Vertical farms in cities and even homes could produce food with minimal land and water use, reducing transportation needs and environmental impact.

3. Materials & Manufacturing:

Living Materials: Imagine materials that can heal themselves, adapt to their environment, or even be grown like plants. This could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and even medicine.
Nanotechnology: Tiny machines could be used to build anything from scratch, atom by atom, with incredible precision and minimal waste.
Personalized Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could allow for on-demand production of goods, tailored to individual needs and reducing the need for mass production and transportation.

4. Information & Communication:

AI-Driven Sustainability: Artificial intelligence could be used to optimize energy grids, manage resources, and even predict and prevent environmental disasters.
Global Sensor Network: A vast network of sensors could monitor the environment in real-time, providing data to help us understand and address environmental challenges.
Virtual Reality for Nature: Immersive VR experiences could allow people to connect with nature in new ways, fostering a deeper appreciation for the environment and inspiring conservation efforts.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Development: It’s crucial that these technologies are developed and used responsibly, with careful consideration of their potential impacts on society and the environment.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and a shared commitment to sustainability.
Human Factor: Technology is only part of the solution. We also need to change our behaviors and adopt more sustainable lifestyles.

While the future is uncertain, it’s exciting to imagine the possibilities. By continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can create a world where technology helps us live in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about having sustainable technology in 3020, but also about who needs it and why. Here’s a breakdown:

Humanity as a whole: This is the most obvious answer. We all need sustainable technology to ensure our long-term survival and well-being on this planet. This includes access to clean energy, clean water, healthy food, and a stable environment.
Future generations: We have a responsibility to leave a habitable planet for those who come after us. Sustainable technology is essential to ensure that future generations have the resources they need to thrive.
Developing nations: Many developing countries face significant challenges related to poverty, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation. Sustainable technology can help these nations to develop their economies and improve living standards in an environmentally responsible way.
Vulnerable populations: Those who are most vulnerable to the effects of climate change and environmental degradation, such as the poor, the elderly, and indigenous communities, are also the ones who need sustainable technology the most.
Ecosystems: It’s not just about humans. Our planet’s ecosystems also need sustainable technology to protect biodiversity, maintain ecological balance, and continue providing essential services like clean air and water.

Why is it so important?

Resource limitations: Our planet has finite resources. Sustainable technology helps us to use these resources more efficiently and find alternatives to non-renewable resources.
Climate change: The burning of fossil fuels is driving climate change, which threatens to cause widespread environmental damage and social disruption. Sustainable technology is essential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change.
Environmental pollution: Pollution from industrial activities and waste disposal is harming human health and ecosystems. Sustainable technology can help to reduce pollution and clean up existing contamination.
Social equity: Sustainable technology can help to address social inequalities by providing access to clean energy, clean water, and other essential services for all people.

In short, sustainable technology in 3020 is not just a matter of convenience or luxury. It’s a fundamental necessity for the survival and well-being of humanity and the planet.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

This is where it gets tricky! While we might envision sustainable tech flourishing in 3020, the need for it is actually now and increasingly urgent in the years leading up to it. Here’s why:

The clock is ticking on climate change: We’re already experiencing the effects of climate change, with rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems. The longer we wait to implement sustainable solutions, the more severe these impacts will become.
Resource depletion: We’re using up resources faster than the planet can replenish them. This is leading to shortages, environmental damage, and social conflict. We need sustainable technology now to help us use resources more efficiently and find alternatives to non-renewable resources.
Population growth: The world’s population is expected to continue growing, which will put even more pressure on resources and the environment. Sustainable technology is essential to ensure that everyone has access to the basic necessities of life.
Technological momentum: Developing and implementing new technologies takes time. The sustainable technologies of 3020 will likely be based on research and development that’s happening now. We need to invest in sustainable technology today to ensure that it’s available when we need it most.

So, while the full realization of some sustainable technologies might be in 3020, the need for them is immediate. We need to be working on these solutions now to avoid the worst consequences of environmental degradation and ensure a sustainable future for all.

Think of it like planting a tree: you might not see its full size and beauty for many years, but you need to plant it today to enjoy its shade and fruits in the future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” of sustainable technology in 3020! It’s not just a global issue, but one that needs to be addressed at all levels. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology will be crucial:

1. Global Scale:

International Cooperation: Sustainable technology will be needed to address global challenges like climate change, ocean pollution, and resource scarcity. This will require international collaboration on research, development, and implementation.
Space: As we venture further into space, sustainable technologies will be essential for resource utilization, waste management, and creating self-sustaining habitats.

2. National & Regional Levels:

Energy Infrastructure: Nations will need to transition to sustainable energy systems, including renewable energy generation, smart grids, and efficient energy storage.
Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and public transportation, will be needed to reduce emissions and improve air quality.
Industry & Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes, circular economy models, and resource efficiency will be crucial to minimize environmental impact and create a sustainable economy.

3. Local & Community Levels:

Urban Planning: Sustainable cities will need to be designed with walkability, public transportation, green spaces, and efficient resource management in mind.
Local Food Systems: Sustainable agriculture, urban farming, and local food networks will be needed to ensure food security and reduce the environmental impact of food production and transportation.
Waste Management: Advanced recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy technologies will be needed to minimize waste and create a circular economy at the local level.

4. Individual & Household Levels:

Sustainable Consumption: Individuals will need to adopt more sustainable lifestyles, including reducing consumption, choosing eco-friendly products, and conserving energy and water.
Smart Homes: Smart home technologies can help individuals to monitor and manage their energy and resource use, reducing their environmental footprint.
Personal Transportation: Electric vehicles, bicycles, and walking will become more common for personal transportation, reducing reliance on fossil fuel-powered cars.

Key Takeaways:

Interconnectedness: Sustainable technology is needed at all levels, from the global to the individual. These levels are interconnected, and progress in one area can support progress in others.
Equity: It’s important to ensure that sustainable technology is accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This will require addressing issues of equity and justice in the development and deployment of new technologies.
Adaptation: Sustainable technology will need to be adapted to local conditions and needs. There is no one-size-fits-all solution to sustainability.

Ultimately, the “where” of sustainable technology in 3020 is everywhere! It will be woven into the fabric of our lives, shaping the way we live, work, and interact with the planet.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

Ah, you’re asking about the methods and approaches needed to bring about sustainable technology in 3020! That’s a crucial part of the equation. Here’s how we can work towards that future:

1. Research and Development:

Fundamental Science: Investing in basic research to understand the natural world and discover new principles that can be applied to sustainable technology.
Applied Research: Focusing on developing specific technologies that can address sustainability challenges, such as new energy sources, materials, and manufacturing processes.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and social scientists to develop holistic and integrated solutions.

2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship:

Supporting Startups: Fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship to create new companies that can develop and commercialize sustainable technologies.
Incentivizing Innovation: Providing incentives for businesses to invest in sustainable technology, such as tax breaks, grants, and prizes.
Open Innovation: Encouraging collaboration between companies, research institutions, and individuals to accelerate the development of sustainable solutions.

3. Education and Awareness:

STEM Education: Investing in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education to develop a workforce that can drive innovation in sustainable technology.
Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the role of technology in achieving it.
Lifelong Learning: Providing opportunities for people to learn about sustainable technology and develop the skills they need to participate in the green economy.

4. Policy and Regulation:

Setting Standards: Establishing standards and regulations to ensure that technologies are developed and used in a sustainable way.
Incentivizing Sustainable Practices: Implementing policies that encourage businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable practices, such as carbon pricing and renewable energy mandates.
International Cooperation: Working with other countries to develop and implement global agreements on sustainability and technology.

5. Investment and Infrastructure:

Green Finance: Mobilizing financial resources to support the development and deployment of sustainable technology, such as green bonds and impact investing.
Sustainable Infrastructure: Investing in sustainable infrastructure, such as renewable energy grids, public transportation systems, and smart cities.
Technology Transfer: Facilitating the transfer of sustainable technology from developed to developing countries to promote global sustainability.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Considerations: It’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure that they are used in a responsible and equitable way.
Social Acceptance: Public acceptance is essential for the successful implementation of sustainable technology. It’s important to engage with communities and address their concerns.
Adaptability: Sustainable technology needs to be adaptable to changing conditions and new challenges. We need to be prepared to innovate and evolve our solutions over time.

By combining these approaches, we can create a future where sustainable technology is not just a dream, but a reality.Sources and related conten

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3020, as that would involve predicting the future! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements. Here’s an example:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges River Basin in 3020

Background:

By the early 21st century, the Ganges River, a vital resource for millions in India, faced severe pollution from industrial waste, agricultural runoff, and untreated sewage. Traditional cleanup efforts struggled to keep pace with the growing population and industrialization.

The 3020 Solution:

A multi-pronged approach, driven by advancements in sustainable technology, led to the river’s revitalization:

Nanotechnology-Based Water Purification: Self-assembling nanobots were deployed to break down pollutants at a molecular level, removing heavy metals, pesticides, and microplastics from the water. These nanobots were designed to be biodegradable, ensuring no further environmental impact.
AI-Powered Waste Management: A network of smart sensors monitored waste flow in real-time, directing autonomous recycling and waste-to-energy facilities to optimize resource recovery and minimize landfill waste. AI algorithms also predicted potential pollution hotspots, allowing for proactive intervention.
Sustainable Agriculture Practices: Farmers adopted precision agriculture techniques, using drones and AI to monitor crop health and optimize water and fertilizer use. This reduced agricultural runoff and improved crop yields, ensuring food security while minimizing environmental impact.
Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced biotechnology was used to restore the river’s ecosystem, including the reintroduction of native species and the creation of artificial wetlands to filter pollutants and provide habitat for wildlife.
Community Engagement: A comprehensive education and awareness program empowered local communities to participate in the river’s revitalization, promoting sustainable practices and responsible resource management.

Outcomes:

The Ganges River was restored to a healthy state, with clean water and thriving ecosystems.
Waterborne diseases were significantly reduced, improving public health.
Agricultural productivity increased, ensuring food security for the region.
Local communities benefited from a cleaner environment and improved livelihoods.

Lessons Learned:

Sustainable technology, combined with community engagement and policy support, can address complex environmental challenges.
A holistic approach, considering interconnected environmental and social factors, is essential for successful revitalization efforts.
Continuous innovation and adaptation are crucial to maintain long-term sustainability.

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a combination of advanced technologies and sustainable practices could be used to address a real-world environmental challenge. While the specific technologies may differ, the underlying principles of sustainability, innovation, and collaboration will be essential for creating a healthy and thriving planet in 3020 and beyond.Sources and related content

COURTESY : World Intellectual Property Organization – WIPO

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology of 3020: Envisioning a Harmonious Future

Executive Summary:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3020, a century removed from our current era. While predicting the future with absolute certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends, emerging technologies, and the ever-growing urgency of global sustainability challenges to paint a plausible picture. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, emphasizing the interconnectedness of technological progress with social, economic, and environmental considerations. It argues that a proactive, collaborative, and ethically-driven approach to technological development is crucial for realizing a truly sustainable future by 3020.

1. Introduction: The Imperative for Sustainability

The 21st century faces unprecedented challenges, including climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss. These interconnected crises underscore the urgent need for a global transition towards sustainable practices. By 3020, sustainable technology must be deeply integrated into every facet of human life, not just as an alternative, but as the dominant paradigm.

2. Key Areas of Technological Advancement:

2.1 Energy:

Fusion Power: Practical and economically viable fusion energy could become a reality, providing a clean, abundant, and virtually inexhaustible power source.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could capture sunlight continuously, beaming clean energy to Earth.
Advanced Energy Storage: Revolutionary battery technologies or entirely new energy storage methods could enable efficient and widespread use of renewable energy sources.

2.2 Resource Management:

Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and manufacturing processes could enable a truly circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
Resource Regeneration: Technologies may emerge to regenerate depleted resources, effectively “mining” previously unusable materials and waste.
Precision Agriculture: AI-driven precision agriculture could optimize food production while minimizing water and fertilizer use, reducing environmental impact.

2.3 Environmental Remediation:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Utilization: Large-scale carbon capture technologies, coupled with innovative methods for utilizing captured CO2, could significantly mitigate climate change.
Ocean Restoration: Autonomous robotic systems and biotechnological solutions could be deployed to clean up pollution, restore coral reefs, and revitalize marine ecosystems.
Ecosystem Regeneration: Advanced ecological engineering techniques could be used to restore damaged ecosystems, enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services.

2.4 Materials Science:

Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials that can self-heal, adapt to their environment, or even be grown like biological organisms could revolutionize construction and manufacturing.
Smart Materials: Materials with embedded sensors and actuators could respond to changing conditions, optimizing performance and extending lifespan.
Sustainable Material Synthesis: New methods for creating materials from abundant and renewable resources could replace reliance on scarce or environmentally damaging materials.

2.5 Information and Communication Technologies (ICT):

AI-Driven Optimization: AI and machine learning could be used to optimize energy grids, manage resources, and predict and prevent environmental disasters.
Global Sensor Network: A vast network of interconnected sensors could monitor environmental conditions in real-time, providing critical data for informed decision-making.
Decentralized Data Management: Blockchain and other decentralized technologies could ensure transparency and accountability in resource management and environmental monitoring.

3. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Technological advancement must be guided by ethical principles and social responsibility. Key considerations include:

Equity and Access: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technology are shared equitably across all populations.
Environmental Justice: Addressing the disproportionate impact of environmental degradation on vulnerable communities.
Data Privacy and Security: Protecting individual privacy and ensuring the responsible use of data collected by environmental monitoring systems.
Governance and Regulation: Establishing robust governance frameworks to guide the development and deployment of sustainable technology.

4. Recommendations:

Invest in Research and Development: Prioritize funding for research in sustainable technology across all disciplines.
Foster Collaboration: Encourage collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and the public.
Promote Education and Awareness: Educate the public about the importance of sustainability and the role of technology in achieving it.
Develop Ethical Guidelines: Establish clear ethical guidelines for the development and deployment of sustainable technology.
Embrace International Cooperation: Work collaboratively across nations to address global sustainability challenges.

5. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 3020 holds the potential to transform human society and create a harmonious relationship with the planet. By embracing a proactive, collaborative, and ethically-driven approach to technological development, we can pave the way for a future where both humanity and the environment thrive. The journey towards this future begins now.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

You’re asking about the practical applications of these futuristic sustainable technologies! Here are some potential industrial uses in 3020:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Living Factories: Imagine factories that grow products instead of building them. Bio-integrated materials and advanced biotechnology could allow for the production of goods using biological processes, reducing waste and energy consumption.
Nanofactories: Nanotechnology could enable the creation of tiny factories that can build products atom by atom with incredible precision and minimal waste. This could revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for on-demand production of highly customized goods.
Circular Manufacturing: Advanced recycling and resource regeneration technologies could enable closed-loop manufacturing processes, where all materials are reused or repurposed, eliminating waste and reducing the need for virgin resources.

2. Energy & Infrastructure:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries could be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy, eliminating the need for fossil fuels and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids could optimize energy distribution and consumption, ensuring efficient use of renewable energy sources.
Self-Healing Infrastructure: Bio-integrated materials and smart materials could be used to build infrastructure that can self-heal and adapt to changing conditions, reducing maintenance costs and extending lifespan.

3. Resource Extraction & Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Advanced technologies could be used to extract resources with minimal environmental impact, reducing habitat destruction and pollution.
Resource Regeneration: Technologies may emerge to regenerate depleted resources, effectively “mining” previously unusable materials and waste, reducing the need for traditional mining.
Ocean Mining: Sustainable ocean mining techniques could be used to extract valuable minerals from the seabed with minimal disruption to marine ecosystems.

4. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms: Vertical farms in urban areas could produce food with minimal land and water use, reducing transportation needs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI-driven precision agriculture could optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use, reducing agricultural runoff and environmental pollution.
Lab-Grown Food: Advanced biotechnology could be used to produce meat and other food products in laboratories, reducing the need for traditional agriculture and its associated environmental impacts.

5. Environmental Remediation:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Industries could utilize large-scale carbon capture technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, mitigating climate change.
Pollution Remediation: Advanced technologies could be used to clean up existing pollution, such as contaminated soil and water bodies.
Ecosystem Restoration: Industries could contribute to ecosystem restoration efforts by utilizing ecological engineering techniques to revitalize damaged ecosystems.

Key Benefits:

Reduced Environmental Impact: Sustainable technologies can minimize pollution, conserve resources, and protect ecosystems.
Increased Efficiency: Advanced technologies can optimize resource use and reduce waste, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
Economic Growth: Sustainable technologies can create new industries and jobs, driving economic growth and development.
Improved Quality of Life: Sustainable technologies can improve human health and well-being by providing access to clean energy, clean water, and healthy food.

By embracing these sustainable technologies, industries can not only reduce their environmental footprint but also create a more sustainable and prosperous future for all.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3020 ?

You’re thinking ahead! Research and development (R&D) is the lifeblood of future technologies, and sustainable tech in 3020 will be built on the foundations laid down today. Here’s a look at the R&D pathways that could lead to those advancements:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

Materials Science: Exploring new materials with unique properties, such as self-healing polymers, bio-integrated composites, and superconductors for energy transmission.
Energy Physics: Investigating fusion energy, advanced solar capture, and novel energy storage mechanisms beyond current battery technology.
Biotechnology: Studying biological systems to understand how to create “living materials,” optimize photosynthesis for food production, and develop bioremediation techniques for pollution cleanup.
Nanotechnology: Exploring the manipulation of matter at the atomic and molecular level to build nanobots for targeted drug delivery, self-assembling structures, and advanced manufacturing.

2. Applied Research and Engineering:

Energy Systems: Designing and prototyping fusion reactors, space-based solar arrays, and advanced energy storage solutions.
Resource Management: Developing technologies for efficient recycling, resource regeneration, and sustainable agriculture.
Environmental Remediation: Creating systems for atmospheric carbon capture, ocean cleanup, and ecosystem restoration.
Manufacturing: Inventing new manufacturing processes based on bio-integrated materials, nanotechnology, and circular economy principles.
ICT for Sustainability: Building AI systems for optimizing energy grids, managing resources, and monitoring environmental conditions.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Integrating Disciplines: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, social scientists, and ethicists to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed with consideration for their social and environmental impacts.
Knowledge Sharing: Promoting open access to research data and findings to accelerate innovation and avoid duplication of effort.
Global Partnerships: Encouraging international collaboration on research and development to address global sustainability challenges.

4. Key Focus Areas:

Scalability: Researching how to scale up sustainable technologies from the lab to industrial applications.
Cost-Effectiveness: Developing sustainable technologies that are affordable and accessible to all.
Durability and Longevity: Creating sustainable technologies that are durable and have a long lifespan to minimize resource use and waste.
Adaptability: Designing sustainable technologies that can adapt to changing conditions and new challenges.

5. Nurturing Innovation:

Funding: Increasing public and private investment in sustainable technology R&D.
Education: Training the next generation of scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs in sustainable technology.
Incentives: Providing incentives for businesses and individuals to invest in and adopt sustainable technologies.
Open Innovation: Creating platforms for collaboration and knowledge sharing between researchers, businesses, and the public.

By prioritizing these R&D pathways, we can lay the groundwork for the sustainable technologies of 3020. It’s a long-term endeavor that requires sustained effort, investment, and collaboration, but the rewards will be immense: a healthy planet and a thriving future for all.

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.