Sustainable Technology of 2940

Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

While “Sustainable Technology of 2940” might seem like a futuristic concept, it’s important to understand that sustainable technology is an ongoing and evolving field. Here’s what we can anticipate and how it connects to current trends:

Current Trends in Sustainable Technology:

• Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal energy will likely be the dominant sources, with advancements in efficiency and storage.
• Circular Economy: Technologies that enable the reuse, repurposing, and recycling of materials will be crucial to minimize waste.
• Green Chemistry: Developing chemical processes and products that are environmentally friendly and reduce hazardous waste.  
• Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize resource use in farming, reducing water waste and chemical inputs.  
• Smart Cities: Integrating technology to manage energy, water, and waste efficiently in urban environments.  

Looking Ahead to 2940:

• Advanced Materials: We might see the development of new materials that are ultra-lightweight, durable, and biodegradable, revolutionizing construction and manufacturing.
• Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions from the atmosphere could become highly advanced.
• Decentralized Energy Systems: Microgrids and community-based renewable energy generation could become more common, increasing resilience and energy access.
• Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a significant role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and developing new sustainable solutions.  
• Space-Based Solar Power: Harnessing solar energy from space and beaming it back to Earth could become a viable option for large-scale clean energy.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its development and use, ensuring it benefits all of humanity and the planet.
• Accessibility: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or economic status.
• Resilience: Sustainable systems should be designed to withstand the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.

Connecting to Current Research:

The search result you provided highlights a journal focused on “Sustainability & Circularity NOW” with the ISSN 2940-1852. This indicates that research and development in sustainable technology are ongoing and that new solutions are constantly being explored.

In Conclusion:

While we can’t predict the future with certainty, it’s clear that sustainable technology will continue to evolve and play a critical role in addressing the challenges facing our planet. By focusing on innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations, we can create a more sustainable future for generations to come.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

It’s fun to speculate about the future! While we can’t know exactly what sustainable technology will look like in 2940, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and imagine how they might evolve over centuries:

Imagine a world in 2940 where:

• Energy is abundant and clean:
  • Space-based solar power is a reality, beaming down energy from massive orbital arrays.
  • Fusion power is finally harnessed, providing a virtually limitless source of clean energy.
  • Microgrids and decentralized energy systems empower communities to generate and manage their own renewable energy.  
• Resources are managed in a closed loop:
  • Circular economy principles are deeply ingrained in every aspect of life, with materials being endlessly reused and repurposed.
  • Advanced recycling technologies can break down any material into its basic components, ready to be used again.
  • “Urban mining” of old infrastructure and waste provides a constant source of valuable resources.
• Cities are living ecosystems:
  • Buildings are self-sufficient, generating their own energy, water, and even food.
  • Vertical farms and hydroponic systems integrated into urban environments provide fresh, local produce.
  • Transportation is seamless and sustainable, with advanced electric vehicles and high-speed public transport systems.
• Agriculture is highly efficient and resilient:
  • Precision agriculture uses AI and robotics to optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.  
  • Genetic engineering and biotechnology create crops that are resistant to climate change and require minimal inputs.
  • Vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture allow food production in even the most challenging environments.  
• Technology is seamlessly integrated with nature:
  • Biomimicry inspires the design of new materials and technologies based on natural processes.  
  • Environmental sensors and AI provide real-time data on the health of ecosystems, allowing for proactive management.  
  • Humans live in harmony with nature, recognizing the importance of biodiversity and ecological balance.

Of course, this is just one possible vision of the future. The actual sustainable technologies of 2940 will depend on many factors, including:

• The choices we make today: Investing in research and development, adopting sustainable practices, and prioritizing environmental protection.
• Unexpected breakthroughs: New scientific discoveries and technological innovations that we can’t even imagine yet.
• Global events: Climate change, resource scarcity, and other challenges that may shape the direction of technological development.

It’s important to remember that the future is not predetermined. By working together and embracing innovation, we can create a world in which sustainable technology plays a key role in ensuring a healthy planet and a prosperous future for all.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

It’s fascinating to think about who would need sustainable technology in 2940! Here’s a breakdown of potential beneficiaries, keeping in mind that needs and priorities might evolve significantly over centuries:

1. Humanity as a Whole:

• Preservation of Resources: Even with advanced technology, resources are finite. Sustainable practices would be essential to ensure access to clean energy, water, and materials for everyone.
• Climate Change Mitigation: The impacts of climate change could still be felt in 2940. Sustainable technologies would be needed to adapt to changing conditions and potentially reverse some of the damage.
• Environmental Health: Maintaining healthy ecosystems and biodiversity would be crucial for human well-being. Sustainable technology would play a role in monitoring and protecting the environment.

2. Future Civilizations:

• Space Colonization: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies would be vital for establishing self-sufficient settlements on other planets or in space.  
• Off-Grid Communities: Even on Earth, some communities might choose to live in remote areas. Sustainable technology would enable them to thrive independently.

3. Industries and Organizations:

• Resource-Intensive Sectors: Industries like manufacturing, agriculture, and transportation would still need sustainable solutions to minimize their environmental impact.
• Technological Development: Even in 2940, there would likely be ongoing innovation. Sustainable technology would be needed to ensure that new advancements are environmentally responsible.

4. Individuals:

• Quality of Life: Everyone would benefit from access to clean energy, safe water, and healthy food, all of which rely on sustainable practices.
• Personal Sustainability: Individuals might have access to technologies that help them reduce their own environmental footprint, such as personal energy generation or waste recycling systems.

Important Considerations:

• Equity: It’s crucial that sustainable technology in 2940 is accessible to everyone, regardless of their location, social status, or economic means.
• Adaptability: Future societies might face unexpected challenges. Sustainable technologies should be adaptable and resilient to ensure long-term survival.
• Ethical Use: As technology advances, ethical considerations become even more important. Sustainable technology should be used responsibly and in a way that benefits all of humanity and the planet.

In Conclusion:

While the specific needs might change, the fundamental principles of sustainability – protecting the environment, conserving resources, and promoting well-being – would likely remain relevant in 2940. Sustainable technology would be essential for meeting those needs and ensuring a thriving future for generations to come.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be needed in 2940, but when it will be needed. Here’s a breakdown of the timeline:

1. The Need Starts Now:

• Addressing Current Challenges: Many of the core principles of sustainable technology are needed right now to tackle climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.  
• Laying the Foundation: Research and development in sustainable technology today will shape the solutions available in the future, including 2940.

2. Continuous Evolution:

• Ongoing Development: Sustainable technology will need to continuously evolve to adapt to new challenges, emerging needs, and changing environmental conditions.
• Long-Term Vision: The path to a sustainable future requires a long-term perspective, with ongoing investment and innovation.

3. 2940 and Beyond:

• Maintaining Sustainability: Even in a technologically advanced future, sustainable practices will be essential to maintain a healthy planet and ensure the well-being of future generations.
• Adaptability: The specific needs in 2940 might be different from today’s, but the underlying principles of sustainability will remain relevant.

Important Considerations:

• Urgency: The need for sustainable technology is urgent. The longer we wait to adopt sustainable practices, the more challenging it will be to address the environmental challenges we face.
• Proactive Approach: It’s important to be proactive in developing and implementing sustainable solutions, rather than waiting for problems to become crises.
• Global Collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international cooperation and a shared commitment to sustainability.  

In Conclusion:

The need for sustainable technology is not just a future concern; it’s a present imperative. By investing in sustainable solutions today and continuing to innovate, we can create a world where sustainable technology plays a crucial role in ensuring a healthy planet for centuries to come, including 2940 and beyond.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

This is a really interesting question! It’s not just about when sustainable technology will be needed in 2940, but where it will be needed. Here’s a breakdown of potential locations, keeping in mind that societies and their needs might evolve significantly over centuries:

1. Earth:

• Urban Centers: Cities will likely remain hubs of population and economic activity. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for managing resources, reducing pollution, and creating livable environments.
• Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and resource management will be essential for supporting rural communities and preserving natural ecosystems.
• Remote Locations: Even in 2940, there might be communities living in remote areas, such as islands or mountainous regions. Sustainable technologies will enable them to thrive independently.
• Extreme Environments: As climate change continues to reshape the planet, sustainable technologies might be needed to help communities adapt to extreme conditions, such as rising sea levels or desertification.

2. Beyond Earth:

• Space Colonies: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be vital for establishing self-sufficient settlements on other planets or in space.
• Space Stations: Long-term space missions will require sustainable systems for energy generation, resource recycling, and life support.  
• Other Planets: If we colonize other planets, sustainable technologies will be needed to terraform environments, create habitable conditions, and manage resources.

3. Virtual Worlds:

• Metaverses: As virtual reality and digital worlds become more immersive, sustainable technologies might be needed to manage the energy consumption and environmental impact of these virtual environments.

Important Considerations:

• Global Reach: The need for sustainable technology will likely be universal, spanning across different countries, cultures, and communities.
• Local Adaptation: Sustainable solutions will need to be adapted to the specific needs and conditions of different locations.
• Interconnectedness: Sustainable systems will need to be interconnected and integrated to ensure efficient resource management and environmental protection on a global scale.

In Conclusion:

The need for sustainable technology in 2940 will likely extend across a wide range of locations, from Earth’s diverse ecosystems to potential human settlements beyond our planet. By embracing innovation and collaboration, we can develop sustainable solutions that meet the needs of future generations, wherever they may be.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

Ah, that’s the core of it! How sustainable technology will be required in 2940 is a complex question. It’s not just about having the tech, but how it’s integrated into society and used. Here’s a breakdown of the “how” focusing on key aspects:

1. Systemic Integration:

• Holistic Approach: Sustainable technology in 2940 would likely be deeply integrated into all aspects of life, from energy production and resource management to transportation, agriculture, and even social systems.
• Interconnectedness: Technologies would be designed to work together seamlessly, creating a circular economy where resources are efficiently used and waste is minimized.
• Resilience: Systems would be built to withstand environmental changes, natural disasters, and other challenges, ensuring long-term sustainability.  

2. Technological Advancement:

• Advanced Materials: We might see the use of self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, and other innovations that minimize environmental impact.
• Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex sustainable systems.  
• Biotechnology: Advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology could lead to sustainable solutions in agriculture, medicine, and even manufacturing.  

3. Societal and Ethical Considerations:

• Equity and Accessibility: Sustainable technologies would need to be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
• Ethical Development: The development and use of technology would need to be guided by ethical principles, ensuring that it benefits humanity and the planet.
• Behavioral Change: Sustainable technology alone won’t be enough. It would need to be coupled with changes in human behavior and social norms to create a truly sustainable future.

4. Continuous Innovation:

• Research and Development: Ongoing investment in research and development would be crucial for creating new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
• Adaptability: Sustainable systems would need to be adaptable to changing conditions and emerging challenges.
• Collaboration: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and the public would be essential for driving innovation and ensuring that sustainable technologies are used effectively.

In Conclusion:

The “how” of sustainable technology in 2940 is not just about the technology itself, but about how it’s integrated into society, how it’s used ethically, and how it continues to evolve. It’s a complex challenge that requires a holistic approach, combining technological innovation with social responsibility and a long-term vision for a sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

It’s tough to do a traditional “case study” on sustainable technology in 2940, as that implies analyzing a real-world situation. But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and future projections. Here’s an example:

Case Study: The Integrated Sustainable City of Aurora, 2940

Background:

By 2940, climate change has significantly reshaped the planet. Coastal cities are largely submerged, and extreme weather events are common. The city of Aurora, located in a formerly arid region, has become a thriving hub thanks to its complete integration of sustainable technology.

Key Technologies and Systems:

• Atmospheric Water Generation: Aurora utilizes advanced systems that capture moisture from the air, providing a clean and abundant water supply.
• Vertical Farms: Multi-story structures integrated throughout the city house highly efficient vertical farms, producing fresh, local food with minimal land and water use.
• Renewable Energy Microgrids: Aurora is powered by a network of interconnected microgrids, each drawing on a mix of solar, wind, and geothermal energy.
• Circular Waste Management: The city operates on a closed-loop system where all waste is either recycled, composted, or used to generate energy.
• AI-Powered Resource Optimization: An advanced AI system manages all aspects of the city’s resource use, optimizing energy consumption, water distribution, and waste processing.
• Personalized Sustainable Transportation: Citizens primarily use electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, with advanced public transport systems seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric.

Results and Impacts:

• Environmental Resilience: Aurora has successfully adapted to the impacts of climate change, with its sustainable systems providing a buffer against extreme weather events and resource scarcity.
• Resource Security: The city is self-sufficient in terms of water, food, and energy, ensuring the well-being of its citizens even in times of global instability.
• High Quality of Life: Aurora’s sustainable infrastructure provides a high quality of life for its residents, with access to clean air, fresh food, and green spaces.
• Economic Prosperity: The city has become a center for sustainable technology innovation, attracting investment and creating new jobs.

Lessons Learned:

• Holistic Integration: The key to Aurora’s success is the complete integration of sustainable technologies into all aspects of urban life.
• Long-Term Vision: The city’s leaders adopted a long-term vision, investing in sustainable infrastructure and education from the outset.
• Community Engagement: Citizens played an active role in shaping Aurora’s sustainable future, participating in decision-making and adopting sustainable lifestyles.

Conclusion:

The case of Aurora demonstrates that with foresight, innovation, and a commitment to sustainability, it’s possible to create thriving urban centers that can withstand the challenges of the future. While this is a hypothetical example, it highlights the potential of sustainable technology to transform our world and create a better future for generations to come.

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2940 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2940, building upon current trends and extrapolating future advancements. It examines key areas of development, potential challenges, and the societal implications of deeply integrated sustainable systems. This vision aims to inspire innovation and guide present-day decisions toward a more sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is an ongoing journey. While we cannot predict the future with certainty, analyzing current trajectories in sustainable technology allows us to envision potential scenarios. This paper presents a plausible future where sustainable practices are not just a desirable option, but the foundation upon which civilization thrives.

2. Key Technological Domains:

• Energy:
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale orbital solar farms beam clean energy to Earth, providing a constant and abundant power source.
  • Advanced Fusion Reactors: Compact and highly efficient fusion reactors provide localized energy generation, powering cities and communities.
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Nanotechnology enables the capture of energy from the environment – vibrations, heat, light – powering small devices and infrastructure.
• Resource Management:
  • Closed-Loop Material Cycles: Advanced recycling and upcycling technologies allow for near-complete material reuse, minimizing waste and resource depletion.
  • Precision Resource Extraction: AI-powered systems optimize resource extraction from the Earth and even from space, minimizing environmental impact.
  • Synthetic Material Production: Biomanufacturing and advanced material science enable the creation of sustainable alternatives to scarce resources.
• Environment:
  • Global Ecosystem Monitoring & Restoration: A network of sensors and AI systems monitors the health of the planet’s ecosystems, enabling proactive restoration efforts.
  • Advanced Carbon Capture & Sequestration: Technologies efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it securely, mitigating climate change.
  • Geoengineering Technologies (with careful consideration): Potentially, highly controlled and localized geoengineering techniques are available to address extreme climate events, used with extreme caution and under strict international oversight.
• Agriculture & Food Production:
  • Vertical and Controlled-Environment Farming: Urban centers boast highly efficient vertical farms, providing fresh, local produce with minimal resource input.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI and robotics optimize agricultural practices in rural areas, maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact.
  • Alternative Protein Sources: Cultured meat and other alternative protein sources reduce reliance on traditional livestock farming, minimizing land use and greenhouse gas emissions.
• Infrastructure & Urban Design:
  • Self-Healing & Adaptive Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure are built with self-healing materials and adapt to changing environmental conditions.
  • Smart Cities: Urban environments are seamlessly integrated with technology, optimizing resource flow and minimizing waste.
  • Biophilic Design: Cities are designed to integrate with nature, promoting human well-being and ecological balance.

3. Societal Implications:

• Decentralized Communities: Access to abundant clean energy and advanced technologies empowers communities to become more self-sufficient.
• Global Collaboration: International cooperation is essential for addressing global challenges like climate change and resource management.
• Ethical Considerations: Robust ethical frameworks are in place to guide the development and use of sustainable technologies, ensuring equity and environmental protection.
• Human-Nature Symbiosis: Humanity recognizes its interconnectedness with nature and strives to live in harmony with the planet.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

• Technological Barriers: Continued research and development are crucial for overcoming technological limitations and realizing the full potential of sustainable technologies.
• Economic Transition: Shifting to a sustainable economy requires significant investment and policy changes.
• Social Adaptation: Changes in human behavior and social norms are essential for embracing sustainable practices.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 2940 presented in this white paper is ambitious, yet achievable. By prioritizing research, fostering collaboration, and embracing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. The journey begins now, with the choices we make today shaping the world of tomorrow.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

You’re asking about the practical applications of sustainable technology in a far-flung future! It’s a fun thought experiment. Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2940, building on current trends and imagining how they might evolve:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

• Closed-Loop Production: Factories operate on circular economy principles, with materials being endlessly recycled and repurposed within the production process.  
• Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Biological processes are integrated with manufacturing, creating new materials and products with minimal environmental impact. Imagine growing furniture or building materials!  
• Personalized Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing technologies enable on-demand production of goods, reducing waste and transportation needs.  

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

• Space-Based Solar Power Infrastructure: Massive orbital solar farms require continuous maintenance and upgrades, utilizing advanced robotics and AI.
• Fusion Reactor Maintenance: Highly specialized robots and AI systems manage the complex operations of fusion reactors, ensuring safety and efficiency.
• Smart Grid Management: AI-powered systems optimize energy distribution across vast networks, ensuring grid stability and minimizing energy loss.  

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Asteroid Mining: Sustainable technologies are used to extract resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies, reducing reliance on Earth’s finite resources.  
• Deep-Sea Mining: If necessary, careful and sustainable deep-sea mining operations are conducted with minimal impact on fragile ecosystems.
• Advanced Recycling Facilities: Highly automated facilities can break down any material into its basic components, ready to be used again in manufacturing.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farm Automation: Robots and AI systems manage all aspects of vertical farms, from planting and harvesting to environmental control and nutrient delivery.  
• Precision Agriculture Technology: Advanced sensors and AI optimize resource use in agriculture, minimizing water waste and chemical inputs.  
• Cultured Meat Production: Large-scale facilities produce cultured meat and other alternative protein sources, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

• Autonomous Vehicle Fleets: AI-powered systems manage fleets of electric vehicles, optimizing routes and minimizing traffic congestion.
• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops connect cities and regions, powered by renewable energy and minimizing travel time.
• Sustainable Aviation: Advanced biofuels and electric propulsion systems power aircraft, reducing the environmental impact of air travel.

Important Considerations:

• Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications would likely rely heavily on automation and artificial intelligence, raising questions about workforce transition and job creation.
• Environmental Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of environmental impacts would be crucial to ensure that industrial activities remain sustainable.
• Ethical Considerations: Ethical frameworks would be needed to guide the development and use of these technologies, ensuring that they benefit humanity and the planet.

In Conclusion:

The industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2940 could be transformative, enabling us to produce goods, generate energy, and manage resources in a way that minimizes environmental impact and supports a thriving future. However, it’s crucial to consider the ethical and social implications of these technologies and ensure that they are used responsibly.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2940 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the kind of research and development that might be happening centuries from now! Here’s a look at some potential areas of focus for sustainable technology R&D in 2940:

1. Fundamental Science:

• New Physics: Exploring and harnessing new fundamental forces or principles of physics to develop revolutionary energy sources, propulsion systems, or material synthesis methods.
• Consciousness and AI: Investigating the nature of consciousness and its relationship to artificial intelligence, potentially leading to more ethical and sustainable AI systems.
• Unified Theories: Developing unified theories that connect all aspects of the universe, potentially revealing new ways to manipulate energy, matter, and even time in a sustainable way.

2. Advanced Materials:

• Self-Healing Materials: Creating materials that can automatically repair themselves, extending the lifespan of infrastructure and reducing waste.
• Programmable Matter: Developing materials that can change their properties on demand, allowing for dynamic adaptation to changing needs.
• Bio-Integrated Materials: Growing materials with desired properties using biological processes, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing resource efficiency.

3. Energy and Environment:

• Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring and harnessing hypothetical energy sources like zero-point energy or vacuum energy.
• Planetary Engineering: Developing technologies to safely and sustainably manage Earth’s climate and ecosystems, potentially even reversing past environmental damage.
• Space-Based Resource Acquisition: Creating efficient and sustainable methods for extracting resources from asteroids, moons, or other celestial bodies.

4. Biotechnology and Agriculture:

• Synthetic Biology: Designing and engineering new biological systems to create sustainable fuels, materials, medicines, or even food sources. ¹   1. Synthetic Biology for Bio-Based Materials – Climafix www.climafix.in
• Genetic Engineering: Developing crops that are highly resilient to climate change, require minimal inputs, and can even enhance soil health.
• Personalized Nutrition: Creating personalized food systems that optimize individual health and minimize environmental impact.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

• Sentient AI: Developing AI systems with advanced cognitive abilities and ethical frameworks, capable of solving complex problems and making decisions that benefit humanity and the planet.
• Nanobots: Creating microscopic robots that can perform a variety of tasks, from environmental cleanup to personalized medicine.
• Self-Replicating Systems: Developing systems that can build and repair themselves, potentially revolutionizing manufacturing and infrastructure development.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Frameworks: Robust ethical guidelines and international cooperation would be essential to ensure that these technologies are developed and used responsibly.
• Long-Term Vision: R&D in 2940 would likely focus on long-term challenges and opportunities, with a focus on ensuring the well-being of future generations.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, philosophers, and other experts would be crucial for addressing the complex challenges of sustainable technology development.

In Conclusion:

The research and development of sustainable technology in 2940 could push the boundaries of human knowledge and innovation, leading to transformative solutions that address some of the most pressing challenges facing humanity and the planet. By embracing a long-term vision, prioritizing ethical considerations, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, we can pave the way for a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.