Sustainable Technology of 2870

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2870 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2870, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Sustainable Technologies in 2870:

  • Advanced Energy Systems:
    • Fusion Power: If humanity masters nuclear fusion, it could become a primary source of clean, abundant energy.  
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Large solar arrays in orbit could collect sunlight and beam it down to Earth, providing a continuous source of renewable energy.
    • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions would be crucial for balancing intermittent renewable sources like solar and wind.
  • Closed-Loop Resource Systems:
    • Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and resource recovery technologies would enable a truly circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
    • Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials and products could reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and create biodegradable alternatives.
    • Vertical Farming and Aquaculture: Highly efficient indoor farming and fish farming systems could provide food locally, reducing transportation needs and environmental impact.  
  • Environmental Remediation:
    • Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies could remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it safely underground.
    • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Autonomous systems could remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans and restore damaged ecosystems.
    • Geoengineering: While controversial, techniques like solar radiation management could be used to mitigate the effects of climate change.
  • Sustainable Transportation:
    • Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems could connect cities and regions with minimal environmental impact.
    • Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Widespread adoption of electric vehicles and self-driving technology could reduce traffic congestion and pollution.  
    • Personal Air Mobility: Electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft could provide a new form of urban transportation with reduced emissions and noise.  
  • Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:
    • Smart Grids: Intelligent energy networks could optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.  
    • Green Buildings: Buildings could be designed to generate their own energy, collect rainwater, and minimize their environmental footprint.  
    • Sustainable Cities: Urban planning could prioritize walkability, public transportation, and green spaces to create more livable and sustainable cities.  

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Technological Development: Many of these technologies are still in early stages of development and require significant research and investment.  
  • Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies need to be cost-competitive with traditional solutions to be widely adopted.
  • Social and Ethical Implications: The development and deployment of new technologies must consider their potential social and ethical impacts.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion requires international cooperation and collaboration.

Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 2870 will likely be a combination of advanced energy systems, closed-loop resource systems, environmental remediation techniques, sustainable transportation solutions, and smart infrastructure. While the exact nature of these technologies is uncertain, it’s clear that sustainability will be a central focus of technological development in the centuries to come.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2870 is a fascinating exercise in extrapolation. Here’s a breakdown of potential advancements, keeping in mind this is speculative but based on current trends:

Core Principles:

  • Radical Efficiency: Technologies will likely operate with near-perfect resource utilization, minimizing waste and maximizing output. Think closed-loop systems where everything is reused or repurposed.
  • Harmony with Nature: Integration with natural systems will be seamless. Technologies may mimic natural processes, enhance ecosystems, or even become part of them.
  • Localized Solutions: Globalized systems may give way to localized, self-sufficient technologies tailored to specific environments and needs.
  • Autonomous Operation: AI and robotics will likely play a huge role, allowing systems to self-regulate, adapt, and optimize for sustainability with minimal human intervention.

Possible Technologies:

  • Energy:
    • Fusion Power Mastery: If achieved, fusion could be the primary energy source, providing clean, abundant power.
    • Space-Based Solar: Massive orbital solar arrays could beam energy to Earth, ensuring a constant supply.
    • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Technologies might capture energy from the environment itself – vibrations, heat, even radio waves.
  • Resource Management:
    • Molecular Manufacturing: Nanotechnology could allow us to build anything from basic elements, on demand, with minimal waste.
    • Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to grow materials, fuels, even complex products, could be commonplace.
    • Advanced Recycling: “Waste” as we know it might cease to exist, with perfect material recovery and reuse at the molecular level.
  • Environment:
    • Geoengineering Refinement: If needed, climate intervention technologies could be highly precise and localized, minimizing side effects.
    • Ecosystem Restoration: AI-powered systems could actively monitor and repair damaged ecosystems, even reversing past environmental damage.
    • Pollution Remediation: Nanobots or other advanced technologies could actively clean up pollution in air, water, and soil.
  • Infrastructure:
    • Smart, Living Cities: Urban centers could be designed to function like ecosystems, with buildings producing resources, managing waste, and adapting to environmental changes.
    • Hyper-Efficient Transport: Maglev trains, hyperloops, or even personal aerial transport could be the norm, powered by clean energy and optimized for minimal impact.
    • Resilient Systems: Infrastructure could be built to withstand extreme weather and environmental changes, ensuring long-term sustainability.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Unforeseen Discoveries: New scientific breakthroughs could lead to technologies we can’t even imagine today.
  • Ethical Implications: Advanced technologies raise complex questions about control, access, and potential misuse.
  • Social Shifts: How would such technologies change society, economies, and even human interaction with the natural world?

In Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 2870 will likely be defined by its radical efficiency, seamless integration with nature, and ability to empower localized solutions. It’s a future where technology and environment are not in conflict, but rather work in harmony to ensure a thriving planet.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

It’s not a question of who requires sustainable technology in 2870, but rather that it will be essential for everyone and everything to thrive. Here’s why:

  • Planetary Survival: By 2870, the consequences of unsustainable practices will likely be even more pronounced. Sustainable technology will be crucial for mitigating climate change, managing resources, and preserving ecosystems for human well-being and the health of the planet itself.  
  • Human Society: Sustainable technologies will be integral to how societies function. They’ll likely underpin:
    • Food Production: Ensuring food security in a potentially changed climate and with a growing population.
    • Resource Access: Providing clean water, energy, and materials for all.
    • Economic Stability: Fostering economies that don’t deplete resources or create excessive waste.
    • Social Equity: Enabling a more just distribution of resources and opportunities.
  • Ecosystems: Sustainable technologies can help restore and protect natural environments:
    • Biodiversity: Preserving habitats and preventing species extinction.
    • Ecosystem Services: Maintaining clean air, water, and fertile soils.
    • Resilience: Helping ecosystems adapt to environmental changes.
  • Future Generations: The need for sustainable technology in 2870 is about ensuring a habitable and thriving planet for all future generations. It’s about leaving a legacy where both humanity and nature can flourish.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2870 won’t be a choice, but a necessity for life as we know it to continue. It will be deeply woven into the fabric of how we live, interact with the environment, and ensure the well-being of both present and future inhabitants of Eart

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

You’re right to think about the timing! It’s not just about having sustainable technology in 2870, but when we need it to be in place. The answer is: as soon as possible, and the process has already begun.

Here’s why:

  • Urgency of Environmental Challenges: Climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss are pressing issues that demand immediate action. We can’t wait until 2870 to address them. The longer we delay, the more severe the consequences will be.  
  • Long-Term Development: Developing and implementing sustainable technologies takes time. Research, innovation, infrastructure changes, and societal shifts all require sustained effort over decades and centuries. The groundwork for the sustainable technologies of 2870 needs to be laid now.
  • Path Dependency: The choices we make today shape the technological pathways we follow in the future. Investing in unsustainable technologies now could lock us into a high-emission, resource-depleting trajectory that’s difficult to reverse.
  • Cumulative Effects: The environmental impact of our actions accumulates over time. Every ton of carbon dioxide emitted, every hectare of forest destroyed, adds to the problem. Early action is crucial to prevent irreversible damage.  

Therefore, the need for sustainable technology is not a future concern, but a present imperative. We need to:

  • Accelerate Research and Development: Invest in clean energy, resource efficiency, and environmental remediation technologies.
  • Promote Sustainable Practices: Encourage businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable practices in all aspects of life.
  • Foster Global Cooperation: Work together to address global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.  

While the sustainable technologies of 2870 might seem distant, the decisions and actions we take today will determine whether they are even possible. It’s a long-term vision that requires immediate and continuous effort.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

Sustainable technology in 2870 (and, importantly, now) is required everywhere. It’s not confined to a specific location but is a global necessity. However, we can break down “where” into a few key areas:

  • Globally: Many environmental challenges, like climate change and ocean pollution, are inherently global. International cooperation and shared technological solutions are essential. This includes:
    • Atmosphere: Technologies for carbon capture, solar radiation management (if deemed necessary and safe), and air pollution control.
    • Oceans: Methods for cleaning up plastic waste, restoring coral reefs, and managing fisheries sustainably.
    • Global Resource Management: Systems for tracking and managing resources across borders, ensuring equitable access and preventing depletion.
  • Regionally: Different regions face unique environmental challenges and have different resource endowments. Sustainable technologies need to be adapted to local contexts. This includes:
    • Specific Ecosystems: Technologies for protecting rainforests, deserts, or other unique environments.
    • Local Resource Management: Solutions for water scarcity, soil degradation, or other regional challenges.
    • Regional Energy Grids: Developing renewable energy sources that are suitable for the specific region (solar, wind, geothermal, etc.).
  • Locally: Sustainable technology is also essential at the local level, in our cities, towns, and communities. This includes:
    • Urban Environments: Green buildings, smart grids, sustainable transportation systems, and urban farming.
    • Rural Areas: Off-grid renewable energy solutions, sustainable agriculture, and water management.
    • Homes and Businesses: Energy-efficient appliances, waste reduction strategies, and sustainable consumption patterns.  
  • Even in Space: As humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be critical for space exploration and colonization. This includes:
    • Resource Utilization: Developing technologies to extract resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies.
    • Closed-Loop Systems: Creating self-sustaining habitats that can recycle air, water, and waste.
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Collecting solar energy in space and beaming it back to Earth.  

In short, sustainable technology in 2870 (and the path leading up to it) is required everywhere from the global scale down to the individual level, and even beyond our planet. It’s a multi-faceted challenge that demands solutions tailored to specific contexts while also addressing interconnected global issues.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

That’s a crucial question! It’s not just about having sustainable technology in 2870, but how it’s developed and implemented. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects:

1. Proactive Development and Investment:

  • Continuous Research and Innovation: We need ongoing investment in research and development across a wide range of sustainable technology areas. This includes fundamental science, applied engineering, and social sciences to understand the implications of new technologies.
  • Incentivizing Sustainable Solutions: Governments, businesses, and individuals need to be incentivized to adopt sustainable practices and invest in clean technologies. This could involve carbon pricing, subsidies for renewable energy, and regulations that promote resource efficiency.
  • International Collaboration: Sharing knowledge, resources, and technology across borders is essential to accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable solutions.

2. Systems Thinking and Integration:

  • Holistic Approach: Sustainable technology needs to be developed with a holistic understanding of its impacts on the environment, society, and economy. This means considering the entire lifecycle of a technology, from resource extraction to manufacturing, use, and disposal.
  • Interconnected Systems: We need to recognize that different systems are interconnected. For example, energy systems, transportation systems, and food systems are all linked. Sustainable solutions need to be integrated across these systems to maximize their effectiveness.
  • Resilience and Adaptability: Sustainable technologies should be designed to be resilient to environmental changes and adaptable to future challenges. This means building in redundancy, flexibility, and the capacity to learn and evolve.

3. Social and Ethical Considerations:

  • Equity and Accessibility: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This means ensuring that the benefits of clean energy, clean water, and other essential resources are shared equitably.
  • Community Engagement: Local communities should be involved in the development and implementation of sustainable technologies. This ensures that solutions are tailored to local needs and that potential negative impacts are addressed.
  • Ethical Frameworks: We need to develop ethical frameworks to guide the development and use of advanced technologies, such as genetic engineering and artificial intelligence, to ensure they are used in a responsible and sustainable way.

4. Education and Awareness:

  • Building Capacity: We need to educate and train future generations of scientists, engineers, policymakers, and citizens to understand the importance of sustainability and to develop the skills needed to create and implement sustainable solutions.
  • Raising Awareness: Public awareness of environmental challenges and the need for sustainable solutions is crucial. This can be achieved through education campaigns, media outreach, and community engagement.
  • Empowering Individuals: Individuals need to be empowered to make sustainable choices in their daily lives. This means providing them with information, tools, and incentives to reduce their environmental footprint.

In essence, creating a sustainable future requires a multi-faceted approach that involves technological innovation, systems thinking, social and ethical considerations, and education and awareness. It’s a collective effort that requires the participation of governments, businesses, scientists, engineers, communities, and individuals.

You stopped this response

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology from 2870, as that future doesn’t exist yet. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future developments, which can be a useful exercise in imagining what might be possible.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Integrated Bioregenerative City of “Ecotopia” (2870)

Context: By 2870, climate change has significantly altered coastlines and weather patterns. Resource scarcity is a major global challenge. Ecotopia is a self-contained urban center designed to thrive in this environment.

Technology Focus: Integrated Bioregenerative Systems

Description:

Ecotopia is a city of approximately 10,000 inhabitants. It’s designed as a closed-loop ecosystem, mimicking natural processes to provide for its inhabitants’ needs while minimizing environmental impact.  

  • Energy: The city is powered by a combination of space-based solar power (beamed down to a local receiving station) and localized geothermal energy. Excess energy is stored in advanced, high-capacity batteries.
  • Food Production: Vertical farms and hydroponic systems within the city produce a variety of crops. These systems are integrated with aquaculture facilities, where fish and other aquatic species are raised. Waste from both the farms and aquaculture is processed to create fertilizer and biogas, further closing the loop.
  • Water Management: Rainwater is collected and filtered for drinking and other uses. Wastewater is treated and recycled through a series of bioreactors that utilize plants and microorganisms to purify the water.  
  • Material Production: Biomanufacturing facilities use engineered biological systems to grow materials for construction, clothing, and other needs. These materials are biodegradable and can be easily recycled or composted.  
  • Waste Management: “Waste” as we know it is virtually eliminated. All materials are either reused, recycled, or composted. Even carbon dioxide is captured and used in the biomanufacturing processes.
  • Transportation: The city is designed for walkability and bikeability. Electric, autonomous vehicles provide transportation within the city and to nearby settlements. High-speed maglev trains connect Ecotopia to other urban centers.  

Outcomes:

  • Environmental Sustainability: Ecotopia has a minimal carbon footprint and is virtually self-sufficient in terms of resources. It serves as a model for sustainable urban living in a resource-constrained world.  
  • Economic Resilience: The city’s closed-loop systems and reliance on renewable energy make it less vulnerable to fluctuations in global markets and resource prices.
  • Social Well-being: Ecotopia’s focus on sustainability has created a healthy and vibrant community with access to clean air, water, and nutritious food.

Challenges:

  • Initial Investment: Building Ecotopia required significant upfront investment in research, development, and infrastructure.
  • Technological Complexity: Maintaining the city’s complex integrated systems requires a highly skilled workforce.
  • Social Adaptation: Residents had to adapt to a new way of life that emphasizes sustainability and community cooperation.

Lessons Learned:

  • Systems thinking is crucial: Designing sustainable solutions requires a holistic approach that considers the interconnectedness of different systems.  
  • Technology is an enabler: Advanced technologies can play a key role in creating a sustainable future, but they must be developed and used responsibly.
  • Social and ethical considerations are essential: Sustainability is not just about technology; it’s also about how we live and interact with each other and the environment.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 2870 might involve integrated, self-sustaining systems that mimic natural processes. It also highlights the importance of social, economic, and ethical considerations in creating a truly sustainable future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2870: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2870, extrapolating from current trends and envisioning the advancements necessary to address the complex environmental and societal challenges of the future. It examines key technological domains, discusses the crucial role of systems thinking and ethical considerations, and highlights the importance of proactive development and global collaboration to achieve a truly sustainable future for humanity and the planet.

1. Introduction:

The imperative for sustainable technology has never been greater. As we move further into the 21st century, the consequences of unsustainable practices become increasingly apparent. By 2870, the cumulative effects of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation will likely be profound. This white paper posits that only through radical innovation and a fundamental shift in our relationship with the natural world can we hope to create a thriving future for generations to come.

2. Key Technological Domains:

  • 2.1 Advanced Energy Systems:
    • Fusion Power: Mastery of nuclear fusion offers the potential for clean, abundant, and safe energy production.
    • Space-Based Solar: Large-scale orbital solar arrays could provide a continuous and reliable source of renewable energy.
    • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Technologies capable of capturing energy from the environment itself (vibrations, heat, electromagnetic radiation) could supplement other energy sources.
    • Highly Efficient Energy Storage: Advanced battery technologies and other storage solutions will be crucial for balancing intermittent renewable energy sources.
  • 2.2 Closed-Loop Resource Systems:
    • Molecular Manufacturing: Nanotechnology could enable the on-demand creation of materials and products from basic elements, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
    • Biomanufacturing: Utilizing biological systems to produce materials, fuels, and even complex products offers a sustainable alternative to traditional manufacturing.
    • Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Near-perfect material recovery and reuse at the molecular level could eliminate the concept of “waste.”
  • 2.3 Environmental Remediation:
    • Precision Geoengineering: If necessary, climate intervention technologies could be deployed with high precision and minimal side effects to manage global temperatures and weather patterns.
    • Ecosystem Restoration: AI-powered systems could actively monitor and repair damaged ecosystems, reversing past environmental degradation and promoting biodiversity.
    • Pollution Remediation: Nanobots and other advanced technologies could actively clean up pollutants in air, water, and soil.
  • 2.4 Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:
    • Living Cities: Urban centers could be designed as integrated ecosystems, with buildings producing resources, managing waste, and adapting to environmental changes.
    • Hyper-Efficient Transportation: Maglev trains, hyperloops, and personal aerial transport could revolutionize transportation, powered by clean energy and optimized for minimal impact.
    • Resilient Systems: Infrastructure could be designed to withstand extreme weather and environmental changes, ensuring long-term sustainability and resilience.

3. The Importance of Systems Thinking:

Sustainable technology in 2870 will require a fundamental shift towards systems thinking. We must recognize the interconnectedness of different systems (energy, water, food, transportation) and develop integrated solutions that address multiple challenges simultaneously. A holistic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of technologies, from resource extraction to disposal, is essential.

4. Ethical Considerations:

The development and deployment of advanced technologies raise complex ethical questions. We must ensure that these technologies are used responsibly and equitably, and that their benefits are shared by all. Careful consideration must be given to potential risks and unintended consequences.

5. Proactive Development and Global Collaboration:

Achieving a sustainable future requires proactive development and investment in sustainable technologies. This includes:

  • Continuous Research and Innovation: Sustained funding for research and development across all relevant scientific and engineering disciplines.
  • Incentivizing Sustainable Solutions: Policies that encourage the adoption of sustainable practices and the development of clean technologies.
  • International Cooperation: Global collaboration on research, development, and deployment of sustainable solutions is essential.

6. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 2870 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By embracing systems thinking, prioritizing ethical considerations, and committing to proactive development and global collaboration, we can create a future where humanity and the planet thrive in harmony. The journey towards this future begins now, with the choices we make today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

While we can’t know the specifics, we can extrapolate from current trends to imagine how sustainable technologies might be applied in industries in 2870. The key is to think in terms of closed-loop systems, radical efficiency, and harmony with nature.

1. Manufacturing:

  • Molecular Manufacturing: Imagine factories where products are built atom by atom, on demand, with minimal waste. This could revolutionize everything from consumer goods to complex machinery. Materials would be sourced sustainably, perhaps even grown through biomanufacturing.
  • Biomanufacturing: Industries might use engineered biological systems to produce everything from plastics and textiles to pharmaceuticals and fuels. These processes would be designed to be carbon-neutral or even carbon-negative.
  • Closed-Loop Production: Factories would operate on closed-loop principles, where all byproducts are recycled or repurposed. Waste would become a resource.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Fusion Power Plants: Fusion reactors could provide clean and abundant energy to power entire industrial complexes.  
  • Space-Based Solar Integration: Industries could access clean energy beamed down from space-based solar arrays, ensuring a constant and reliable supply.  
  • Smart Grids and Microgrids: Intelligent energy networks would optimize energy distribution and minimize losses, ensuring that energy is used efficiently throughout the industrial sector.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: If mining is still necessary, it would likely involve highly automated and precise methods to minimize environmental impact. Robotic systems could extract resources with minimal disruption to ecosystems.  
  • In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): For industries operating in space or on other planets, ISRU would be essential. Technologies would be developed to extract and process resources from the local environment.
  • Advanced Material Recycling: Even at the industrial scale, material recycling would be highly efficient, with near-perfect recovery of valuable elements.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Indoor farming systems could be integrated with industrial facilities to provide fresh produce for workers and local communities.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI could be used to optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs like water and fertilizer.  
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Fish farms could be integrated with other industrial processes to create closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and pollution.  

5. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Hyper-Efficient Transport Networks: Industries would rely on high-speed transportation systems like maglev trains and hyperloops to move goods quickly and efficiently with minimal environmental impact.
  • Autonomous Vehicles and Drones: Self-driving vehicles and drones could be used for logistics and transportation within industrial facilities and for deliveries to customers.

6. Construction and Infrastructure:

  • Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings and infrastructure would be constructed using sustainably sourced and biodegradable materials, often grown through biomanufacturing.
  • Modular Construction: Buildings could be designed and built using modular components that can be easily assembled, disassembled, and reused.  
  • Self-Healing Materials: Advanced materials could be developed that can self-repair damage, extending the lifespan of buildings and infrastructure.  

Key Considerations:

  • Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications would rely heavily on automation and artificial intelligence, requiring a skilled workforce capable of managing these advanced systems.
  • Circular Economy Principles: The industrial sector would operate on circular economy principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.  
  • Integration with Natural Systems: Industries would strive to integrate their operations with natural ecosystems, minimizing their environmental footprint and even contributing to ecosystem health.

It’s important to remember that this is speculative. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2870 could be quite different. However, the underlying principles of sustainability, efficiency, and harmony with nature will likely be central to all industrial activities in the future.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2870 ?

You’re asking about the long game! Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 2870 is a process that’s happening now, and it will need to continue and evolve for centuries to come. Here’s a breakdown of what that R&D might look like:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • Materials Science: Discovering new materials with unique properties, like super-strength, self-healing, or biodegradability. This could involve nanotechnology, biomimicry, and exploring materials beyond Earth.
  • Energy Physics: Deepening our understanding of fusion, exploring new energy sources (like zero-point energy, if it exists), and improving energy conversion and storage.
  • Biology and Biotechnology: Engineering biological systems for biomanufacturing, developing more efficient photosynthesis, and understanding how ecosystems function at a fundamental level.
  • Earth System Science: Improving our understanding of climate dynamics, ecosystem interactions, and planetary-scale processes to better predict and manage environmental change.  

2. Applied Engineering:

  • Advanced Manufacturing: Developing new manufacturing techniques like molecular manufacturing and biomanufacturing to create products with minimal waste and maximum efficiency.
  • Energy Technologies: Designing and building fusion reactors, space-based solar arrays, and advanced energy storage systems.
  • Environmental Technologies: Creating technologies for carbon capture, ecosystem restoration, and pollution remediation.
  • Infrastructure Technologies: Developing smart grids, sustainable transportation systems, and resilient infrastructure for future cities.

3. Interdisciplinary Research:

  • Systems Thinking: Developing methodologies for analyzing and optimizing complex systems, like energy systems, food systems, and urban systems.
  • Social Sciences: Studying the social and economic implications of new technologies, understanding human behavior related to sustainability, and developing strategies for promoting sustainable practices.
  • Ethics and Governance: Establishing ethical frameworks for guiding the development and use of advanced technologies, and creating governance structures to ensure that these technologies are used responsibly.

4. Long-Term Research Initiatives:

  • Global Research Programs: Large-scale, international research programs focused on addressing global challenges like climate change, resource scarcity, and biodiversity loss.
  • Future Studies: Research that explores potential future scenarios and identifies the technologies and policies needed to create a sustainable future.
  • Citizen Science: Engaging the public in research and data collection to accelerate the pace of scientific discovery.  

5. Key Areas of Focus:

  • Radical Efficiency: Developing technologies that operate with near-perfect resource utilization and minimal waste.
  • Biomimicry: Learning from nature and mimicking natural processes in the design of new technologies.  
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Creating systems that are self-sustaining and that minimize their impact on the environment.  
  • Resilience and Adaptability: Developing technologies that can withstand environmental changes and adapt to future challenges.

Important Considerations:

  • Funding: Sustained and substantial funding for research and development is essential.
  • Collaboration: Collaboration across disciplines and across national borders is crucial.
  • Education: Educating and training future generations of scientists, engineers, and policymakers is essential.  

The research and development of sustainable technology for 2870 is an ongoing process that requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to continuous innovation. It’s a journey that begins now and will continue for centuries to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »