Sustainable Technology of 2860

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

The year 2860 is far in the future, making it difficult to predict with certainty what sustainable technologies will exist then. However, based on current trends and advancements, we can speculate on some possibilities:

Energy:

Fusion power: If nuclear fusion becomes a viable energy source, it could provide clean, abundant power with minimal waste.
Advanced solar: Solar technology may become far more efficient and integrated into various surfaces, like roads and buildings.
Space-based solar: Solar energy could be collected in space and beamed down to Earth, providing a continuous source of clean energy.
Enhanced geothermal: We may be able to tap into deeper and hotter geothermal resources, providing a stable and reliable energy source.

Transportation:

Flying cars: Personal air vehicles could become commonplace, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
Hyperloop networks: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops could connect cities and regions with minimal energy use.
Electric and autonomous vehicles: Electric vehicles may become fully autonomous and integrated into smart city systems.

Manufacturing:

3D printing: Advanced 3D printing could enable on-demand manufacturing with minimal waste and customized products.
Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials could be used to create stronger, lighter, and more sustainable products.
Biomanufacturing: We may be able to grow materials and products using biological processes, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Agriculture:

Vertical farming: Indoor vertical farms could become widespread, using less land and water to produce food.
Precision agriculture: Sensors and data analytics could optimize crop yields while minimizing resource use.
Lab-grown meat: Cultured meat could become a sustainable alternative to traditional animal agriculture.

Other areas:

Water purification: Advanced filtration and desalination technologies could provide access to clean water in even the most arid regions.
Waste management: We may develop closed-loop systems that recycle and reuse all waste materials.
Artificial intelligence: AI could play a significant role in optimizing resource use and promoting sustainability.

It is important to note that these are just a few possibilities. The actual sustainable technologies of 2860 may be very different. However, it is clear that sustainability will be a critical concern in the future, and technological innovation will play a key role in addressing this challenge.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2860 is a fascinating exercise in extrapolation. Here are some potential advancements, building upon current trends and imagining how they might evolve over centuries:

Energy:

Fusion Power Mastery: Perhaps by 2860, fusion energy is not just viable but ubiquitous. Small, efficient fusion reactors power homes, vehicles, and even individual devices. Waste is minimal, and the fuel source (deuterium) is abundant in seawater.
Space-Based Solar Revolution: Massive orbital solar arrays collect sunlight unimpeded by weather or atmosphere. Energy is beamed down to Earth as microwaves or lasers, providing a constant, clean power source.
Geothermal Unleashed: Advanced drilling and materials science allow us to tap into incredibly deep, high-temperature geothermal resources. This provides baseload power, supplementing other renewables.
Energy Networks: Smart grids manage energy flow with incredible precision. AI predicts demand, optimizes distribution, and integrates diverse energy sources seamlessly.

Materials & Manufacturing:

Nanotechnology Everywhere: Nanomaterials with incredible properties are commonplace. Buildings are constructed from self-healing, super-strong composites. Clothing adapts to temperature. Devices are incredibly small and efficient.
Biomanufacturing & Synthetic Biology: We “grow” materials and products using engineered organisms. This reduces reliance on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing, creating biodegradable and recyclable goods.
3D Printing Mastery: 3D printing has evolved into 4D printing, where objects can change shape over time in response to stimuli. This allows for dynamic infrastructure, self-assembling devices, and personalized products.

Environment & Resources:

Ocean & Atmospheric Cleanup: Advanced technologies actively remove pollutants from the oceans and atmosphere. Nanobots might break down plastics, while giant filters capture CO2.
Water Abundance: Desalination is incredibly efficient and powered by renewable energy. Atmospheric water harvesters provide clean water even in arid regions.
Closed-Loop Systems: Everything is recycled and reused. Waste is a resource. Circular economy principles are deeply embedded in society.

Agriculture & Food:

Vertical Farms & Controlled Environments: Food is grown in massive, automated vertical farms. AI optimizes growing conditions, minimizing resource use and maximizing yields.
Lab-Grown Food Perfection: Cultured meat and other lab-grown foods are indistinguishable from traditional products, but with a tiny fraction of the environmental impact.
Personalized Nutrition: Food is tailored to individual needs and preferences, with 3D printers creating customized meals on demand.

Transportation & Cities:

Flying Cars & Personal Aircraft: Airspace is managed by sophisticated AI, allowing for safe and efficient personal air travel. This reduces traffic congestion and expands urban areas.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloops connect cities and regions, powered by renewable energy. Travel is fast, affordable, and low-impact.
Smart Cities: Urban environments are highly optimized. AI manages everything from energy use to traffic flow, creating sustainable and livable cities.

Important Considerations:

Global Cooperation: These technologies would likely require unprecedented levels of international cooperation to develop and deploy effectively.
Ethical Considerations: With such powerful technologies, ethical considerations around their use and impact on society would be paramount.
Resilience: Sustainable technologies would need to be resilient to climate change and other environmental challenges.

While this is speculative, it’s grounded in current scientific trends and a vision of a future where sustainability is not just a goal but a way of life.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

It’s a great question to consider who, in the year 2860, would be driving the need for advanced sustainable technologies. Here are some key players:

Humanity as a whole: The most fundamental need for sustainable technology in 2860 would stem from humanity’s continued existence and well-being. By that point, the consequences of climate change and resource depletion might be even more pronounced, making sustainable solutions absolutely crucial for survival and a decent quality of life.
Future generations: Those living in 2860 and beyond would inherit the world shaped by the decisions of previous generations. They would rely on sustainable technologies to maintain a habitable planet and thrive.
Governments and international organizations: These entities would likely play a major role in funding, regulating, and coordinating the development and deployment of sustainable technologies on a global scale. They would need to balance economic growth with environmental protection and social equity.
Scientists and engineers: These professionals would be at the forefront of innovation, developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones. Their expertise would be essential for addressing the complex challenges of the future.
Businesses and industries: Companies would need to adopt sustainable practices and technologies to remain competitive and contribute to a healthy planet. They might even be incentivized or required to prioritize sustainability in their operations.
Individuals and communities: Every person would have a role to play in promoting sustainability, from making conscious consumption choices to participating in local initiatives. Education and awareness would be key to fostering a culture of sustainability.

It’s important to remember that the need for sustainable technology in 2860 wouldn’t be limited to any one group or sector. It would be a shared responsibility, requiring collaboration and commitment from all of humanity to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

This is a very interesting question that delves into the timeline of technological development and societal needs. While we can’t pinpoint an exact date when sustainable technology will be required in 2860, we can explore the factors that will make it increasingly necessary:

Resource Depletion: By 2860, centuries of resource consumption may have significantly depleted Earth’s reserves of fossil fuels, minerals, and other vital resources. This scarcity would necessitate the adoption of sustainable technologies that rely on renewable resources and circular economy principles.
Climate Change Impacts: Even if drastic measures are taken to mitigate climate change in the coming centuries, the effects of past emissions may still be felt in 2860. Extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and other climate-related challenges would likely necessitate sustainable technologies for adaptation and resilience.
Population Growth: If the global population continues to grow, the demand for resources and energy will increase, putting further strain on the planet’s ecosystems. Sustainable technologies would be essential to meet these needs without exceeding Earth’s carrying capacity.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation may reach critical levels by 2860, threatening human health and well-being. Sustainable technologies would be needed to remediate these problems and prevent further damage.

Considering these factors, it’s likely that sustainable technology will not just be required in 2860, but it will be an integral part of everyday life. It will be woven into the fabric of society, from the energy we use to the food we eat and the way we travel.

However, it’s important to remember that the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 2860. It’s a need that is already present today and will only become more urgent in the years to come. The decisions we make now about developing and deploying sustainable technologies will have a profound impact on the world of 2860 and beyond.

Ultimately, the “when” of sustainable technology is not a fixed point in the future, but rather an ongoing process that requires continuous effort and innovation. The sooner we prioritize sustainability, the better prepared we will be to meet the challenges of the future.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

You’re asking a really interesting question that requires us to think about the scope of “where” in the context of 2860! Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology might be required:

1. Geographically:

Everywhere on Earth: By 2860, sustainable technology would likely be necessary in every region of the planet, from bustling cities to remote rural areas. The need for clean energy, clean water, and sustainable food production would be universal.
Specific Regions: Some regions might have particularly acute needs for certain types of sustainable technology. For example, coastal areas might require advanced sea-level rise defenses, while arid regions might need highly efficient water harvesting and management systems.
Beyond Earth: It’s conceivable that by 2860, humanity might have established settlements or bases on other planets or celestial bodies. These off-world locations would have even more stringent requirements for sustainable technology, as they would likely be more isolated and resource-limited.

2. In all aspects of life:

Energy: Sustainable energy sources would be essential for powering homes, businesses, transportation systems, and all other aspects of society.
Food: Sustainable agriculture and food production methods would be needed to feed a growing population without depleting resources or harming the environment.
Water: Sustainable water management systems would be crucial for providing clean water for drinking, sanitation, agriculture, and industry.
Transportation: Sustainable transportation technologies would be necessary to move people and goods around in an efficient and environmentally friendly way.
Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes would be needed to produce goods with minimal waste and environmental impact.
Waste Management: Sustainable waste management systems would be essential for recycling, reusing, and disposing of waste in a way that doesn’t harm the environment.

3. At all scales:

Individual Level: Sustainable technologies would be needed at the individual level, such as energy-efficient homes, personal transportation devices, and sustainable consumption habits.
Community Level: Sustainable technologies would be needed at the community level, such as smart grids, public transportation systems, and local food production initiatives.
Global Level: Sustainable technologies would be needed at the global level, such as international cooperation on climate change mitigation, resource management, and technology sharing.

In essence, by 2860, sustainable technology would likely be an indispensable part of human civilization, woven into every aspect of life and necessary in every location to ensure the well-being of humanity and the health of the planet.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

That’s a crucial question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will exist in 2860, but how it will be integrated into society. Here are some possibilities:

1. Seamless Integration:

Embedded Systems: Sustainable technologies might be so deeply integrated into infrastructure and everyday objects that they become invisible. Imagine buildings that generate their own energy, roads that harvest solar power, or clothing that regulates body temperature.
Autonomous Operation: Many sustainable systems could operate autonomously, requiring minimal human intervention. AI and machine learning could optimize energy grids, manage water resources, and even direct traffic flow for maximum efficiency.

2. Personalized Solutions:

Customization: Advanced manufacturing technologies like 3D printing could allow for highly personalized sustainable solutions. Imagine homes tailored to individual needs and local climate conditions, or food grown to meet specific dietary requirements.
Adaptive Technologies: Nanotechnology and smart materials could create devices that adapt to changing conditions. Clothing could adjust to temperature, buildings could repair themselves, and even personal medical devices could monitor and respond to health needs in real-time.

3. Circular Economy:

Closed-Loop Systems: Everything is designed for reuse and recycling. Waste becomes a resource, and materials circulate endlessly within the economy. This would require advanced technologies for material identification, separation, and reprocessing.
Product-as-a-Service: Instead of owning things, people might subscribe to services that provide the functions they need. This would encourage manufacturers to design durable, upgradable products that can be easily maintained and recycled.

4. Smart and Connected:

Internet of Things (IoT): A vast network of sensors and devices could monitor everything from energy use to pollution levels, providing real-time data for optimization and decision-making.
AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence could analyze vast amounts of data to identify patterns and optimize resource use at all scales, from individual homes to entire cities.

5. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Equitable Access: Sustainable technologies would need to be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This would require careful planning and policies to prevent a “sustainability divide.”
Ethical Frameworks: As technologies become more powerful, ethical considerations around their use would become even more important. Society would need to develop frameworks for ensuring that sustainable technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

In essence, the sustainable technology of 2860 would likely be characterized by its pervasiveness, intelligence, adaptability, and focus on circularity and social equity. It wouldn’t be just about solving environmental problems, but about creating a truly sustainable way of life for all of humanity.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

It’s difficult to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2860, as it requires imagining technologies that don’t yet exist. However, we can build a hypothetical case study based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges Delta, 2860

Background:

By 2860, the Ganges Delta, once a fertile and densely populated region, faces severe challenges. Centuries of sea-level rise have inundated vast areas, displacing millions. Climate change has brought more intense monsoons and droughts, disrupting agriculture and threatening water supplies. Pollution from past industrialization has further degraded the environment.

The Solution: An Integrated Sustainable Technology Approach

In response to these challenges, a multinational consortium of governments, scientists, and engineers implements a comprehensive revitalization plan based on advanced sustainable technologies:

Coastal Defense and Land Reclamation:

Self-Healing Sea Walls: Nanomaterial-based sea walls are constructed. These structures can adapt to rising sea levels and repair themselves automatically, providing long-term protection for coastal communities.
Floating Cities: Modular, self-sustaining floating cities are built to accommodate displaced populations. These cities are powered by renewable energy and designed to be resilient to storms and floods.
Ecological Restoration: Mangrove forests and other coastal ecosystems are restored using biomanufacturing techniques. These natural barriers provide additional protection from storms and help to filter pollutants from the water.

Water Management and Agriculture:

Atmospheric Water Harvesters: Advanced devices capture moisture from the air, providing a clean and reliable source of fresh water for drinking and irrigation.
Precision Agriculture: Vertical farms and high-tech greenhouses are established, using AI and sensors to optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.
Desalination: Highly efficient, renewable energy-powered desalination plants provide additional fresh water for communities and industries.

Energy and Infrastructure:

Renewable Energy Grid: A network of interconnected renewable energy sources, including space-based solar, enhanced geothermal, and advanced biofuels, powers the entire region.
Smart Grid: AI-powered smart grids optimize energy distribution and consumption, ensuring efficiency and reliability.
Sustainable Transportation: Electric and autonomous vehicles, along with high-speed hyperloops, provide efficient and low-impact transportation options.

Waste Management and Circular Economy:

Zero-Waste Systems: Advanced recycling and composting facilities process all waste materials, turning them into valuable resources.
Bioremediation: Microorganisms are used to clean up polluted soil and water, restoring ecosystems and removing harmful toxins.
Circular Economy Hubs: Localized hubs are established to promote the reuse and remanufacturing of products, creating jobs and reducing the need for new materials.

Outcomes:

Environmental Recovery: The Ganges Delta’s ecosystems are revitalized, with cleaner water, restored forests, and thriving biodiversity.
Economic Growth: New industries based on sustainable technologies create jobs and boost the regional economy.
Social Resilience: Communities are more resilient to climate change impacts, with access to clean water, sustainable food, and safe housing.
Improved Quality of Life: The overall quality of life for residents of the Ganges Delta is significantly improved, with a healthier environment and a more sustainable way of life.

Lessons Learned:

Integrated Approach: Addressing complex challenges like those faced by the Ganges Delta requires an integrated approach that combines multiple sustainable technologies.
Technological Innovation: Continuous innovation is essential for developing the advanced sustainable technologies needed for a healthy future.
Global Cooperation: International collaboration is crucial for sharing knowledge, resources, and technologies to address global challenges.
Social Equity: Sustainable solutions must be implemented in a way that benefits all members of society, ensuring equitable access to resources and opportunities.

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies, coupled with thoughtful planning and global cooperation, could help to revitalize a region facing severe environmental and social challenges. It provides a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology to create a better future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2860: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2860, extrapolating from current trends and advancements to envision a future where humanity has achieved a harmonious balance with the planet. It examines key areas of technological development, including energy, materials, environment, agriculture, transportation, and societal integration, highlighting the potential for transformative solutions to global challenges. It also emphasizes the crucial role of ethical considerations and global cooperation in shaping a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The year 2860 represents a significant milestone in human history, a point where the cumulative impact of technological progress and societal choices will have profoundly shaped the world. This paper posits that by this time, sustainable technology will not be a niche concept but rather the foundation upon which civilization is built. The imperative for sustainability will have become paramount, driven by centuries of addressing the consequences of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.

2. Energy: Powering a Sustainable World:

Fusion Energy Dominance: Fusion power, after centuries of research and development, will likely be a primary energy source. Small, efficient, and safe fusion reactors will provide clean, abundant energy with minimal radioactive waste.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale orbital solar arrays will capture sunlight unimpeded by Earth’s atmosphere, beaming clean energy down to the surface. This will provide a continuous and reliable energy supply.
Geothermal Energy Unleashed: Advanced drilling and materials science will allow access to deep, high-temperature geothermal resources, providing baseload power to complement other renewables.
Intelligent Energy Grids: AI-powered smart grids will manage energy distribution with unprecedented efficiency, optimizing consumption and integrating diverse energy sources seamlessly.

3. Materials and Manufacturing: The Circular Economy:

Nanotechnology Revolution: Nanomaterials with exceptional properties will be ubiquitous, revolutionizing construction, manufacturing, and countless other industries. Self-healing materials, adaptive fabrics, and ultra-efficient devices will become commonplace.
Biomanufacturing and Synthetic Biology: Engineered biological systems will “grow” materials and products, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing processes. Biodegradable and recyclable goods will be the norm.
4D Printing: Objects that can change shape over time in response to stimuli will enable dynamic infrastructure, self-assembling devices, and personalized products.
Closed-Loop Systems: Circular economy principles will be deeply embedded in society. Everything will be designed for reuse and recycling, with waste becoming a valuable resource.

4. Environment and Resources: Restoring Planetary Balance:

Atmospheric and Oceanic Cleanup: Advanced technologies will actively remove pollutants from the atmosphere and oceans. Nanobots or other innovative solutions could break down plastics and capture CO2.
Water Abundance: Highly efficient desalination powered by renewable energy, combined with atmospheric water harvesting, will ensure access to clean water even in arid regions.
Ecosystem Restoration: Biomanufacturing and other advanced techniques will be used to restore damaged ecosystems, bringing back biodiversity and enhancing planetary health.

5. Agriculture and Food: Feeding a Growing Population:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environments: Food production will shift towards highly efficient vertical farms and controlled environments, optimizing resource use and maximizing yields.
Lab-Grown Food Perfection: Cultured meat and other lab-grown foods will be indistinguishable from traditional products, but with a vastly reduced environmental impact.
Personalized Nutrition: 3D food printers will create customized meals on demand, tailored to individual dietary needs and preferences.

6. Transportation and Cities: Sustainable Mobility:

Personal Air Mobility: Advanced air traffic management systems will allow for safe and efficient personal air travel, reducing traffic congestion and expanding urban areas.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloops will connect cities and regions, powered by renewable energy, enabling rapid and low-impact travel.
Smart Cities: Urban environments will be highly optimized by AI, managing everything from energy use to traffic flow, creating sustainable and livable cities.

7. Societal Integration: A Sustainable Way of Life:

Global Cooperation: Achieving this vision of sustainable technology will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation in research, development, and deployment.
Ethical Frameworks: Robust ethical frameworks will be essential to guide the development and use of powerful technologies, ensuring they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
Education and Awareness: A global culture of sustainability will be fostered through education and awareness programs, empowering individuals to make informed choices and contribute to a healthy planet.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2860 will not be just a collection of individual inventions but a holistic system that integrates seamlessly with human society and the natural world. It will be a testament to human ingenuity and our commitment to creating a thriving future for generations to come. However, realizing this vision requires sustained effort, collaboration, and a deep commitment to ethical principles. The journey towards a sustainable future begins now.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

You’re asking about the practical applications of futuristic sustainable tech in industry! Here are some potential scenarios for how the technologies we’ve discussed could revolutionize various sectors by 2860:

1. Manufacturing:

Nanofactories: Imagine small, highly efficient factories that can produce a wide range of products on demand using nanomaterials and 3D printing. These nanofactories could be located anywhere, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Biomanufacturing: Industries could “grow” materials and products using engineered organisms. This could revolutionize sectors like textiles, construction, and even electronics, creating biodegradable and recyclable goods with minimal waste.
Circular Production: Manufacturing processes would be entirely closed-loop. Every material is tracked and reused, eliminating waste and reducing the need for virgin resources. Products are designed for disassembly and remanufacturing, creating a truly circular economy.

2. Energy:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries would have access to clean, abundant fusion energy, powering their operations with minimal environmental impact. This could revolutionize energy-intensive sectors like steel production and aluminum smelting.
Decentralized Energy Systems: Industries might generate their own energy using on-site renewable sources like geothermal or advanced solar. Smart grids would connect these decentralized systems, ensuring grid stability and resilience.

3. Agriculture:

Vertical Farms: Industries involved in food production would rely heavily on vertical farms and controlled environments. These facilities would use AI and sensors to optimize growing conditions, minimizing resource use and maximizing yields.
Precision Agriculture: In traditional agriculture, sensors and data analytics would be used to optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use. Autonomous robots could perform tasks like planting, weeding, and harvesting.

4. Resource Extraction:

Sustainable Mining: Advanced technologies could be used to extract minerals and other resources with minimal environmental impact. This might involve using robots and AI to target specific deposits, reducing the need for large-scale open-pit mines.
Ocean Mining: If ocean mining is still necessary, it would be done with advanced, sustainable technologies that minimize disruption to marine ecosystems.

5. Construction:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure would be constructed from self-healing materials that can repair themselves automatically, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
Adaptive Structures: Buildings could adapt to changing conditions using 4D printing and smart materials. They could adjust their shape to optimize energy use or withstand extreme weather events.

6. Transportation:

Sustainable Logistics: Industries would rely on electric and autonomous vehicles, along with high-speed hyperloops, to transport goods in an efficient and environmentally friendly way.
Personal Air Mobility: Employees might commute to work using personal air vehicles, reducing traffic congestion and travel time.

7. Waste Management:

Zero-Waste Industries: Industries would operate on a zero-waste model, with all waste materials being recycled, reused, or composted.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: Advanced recycling facilities would be able to separate and process even complex materials, ensuring that nothing goes to waste.

8. Information Technology:

Green Data Centers: Data centers would be powered by renewable energy and use highly efficient cooling systems to minimize their environmental impact.
Sustainable Computing: Computing devices would be made from sustainable materials and designed for easy recycling and reuse.

Overall, the industrial landscape of 2860 would likely be characterized by:

Resource efficiency: Industries would minimize their use of resources and operate on circular economy principles.
Renewable energy: Industries would rely on clean, renewable energy sources to power their operations.
Automation and AI: AI and robotics would play a significant role in optimizing processes and improving efficiency.
Environmental responsibility: Industries would prioritize environmental protection and sustainability in all aspects of their operations.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries by 2860. The possibilities are vast, and the future of industry will likely be shaped by a combination of technological innovation and a deep commitment to sustainability.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2860 ?

You’re asking about the process of getting to those amazing sustainable technologies of 2860! That’s where research and development (R&D) comes in. Here’s how it might work over the centuries:

1. Foundational Research:

Materials Science: Centuries of research into nanomaterials, metamaterials, and other advanced substances will unlock their full potential. Scientists might discover new materials with incredible properties like self-healing, super-conductivity, or even the ability to manipulate gravity.
Energy Physics: Continued exploration of fusion energy, along with investigations into other exotic energy sources like zero-point energy or antimatter, could lead to breakthroughs that make clean, abundant energy a reality.
Synthetic Biology: Deepening our understanding of genetics and biological systems will allow us to engineer organisms for specific purposes, such as growing materials, cleaning up pollution, or producing food.
Artificial Intelligence: Advanced AI research will focus on creating truly intelligent systems that can learn, adapt, and solve complex problems, enabling the development of autonomous sustainable technologies.

2. Applied Research and Development:

Nanotechnology Applications: Scientists and engineers will develop practical applications for nanomaterials, such as self-healing infrastructure, adaptive clothing, and ultra-efficient devices.
Fusion Reactor Design: Continued R&D into fusion reactor design will focus on achieving stable and efficient fusion reactions, as well as developing cost-effective ways to build and maintain fusion power plants.
Biomanufacturing Processes: Researchers will develop efficient and scalable biomanufacturing processes for producing a wide range of products, from biodegradable plastics to lab-grown meat.
AI Integration: AI will be integrated into various sustainable technologies, from smart grids to autonomous vehicles, enabling them to operate more efficiently and adapt to changing conditions.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Convergence of Fields: The development of sustainable technology in 2860 will require collaboration between experts from diverse fields, including materials science, physics, biology, computer science, engineering, and even social sciences.
Global Research Networks: International collaborations will be essential for sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise, accelerating the pace of innovation.

4. Iterative Development and Testing:

Prototype Development: Scientists and engineers will develop prototypes of new sustainable technologies and test them in increasingly realistic environments.
Simulation and Modeling: Advanced computer simulations will be used to model and optimize the performance of complex sustainable systems, such as smart grids and hyperloop networks.
Real-World Testing: Large-scale testing in real-world settings will be essential for validating the effectiveness and reliability of sustainable technologies.

5. Ethical and Societal Considerations:

Ethical Frameworks: Researchers and policymakers will need to develop ethical frameworks to guide the development and use of powerful technologies, ensuring they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
Public Engagement: Public dialogue and engagement will be essential for building trust in sustainable technologies and ensuring they are accepted by society.

6. Long-Term Vision:

Centuries of Progress: The sustainable technologies of 2860 will be the result of centuries of research, development, and innovation.
Continuous Improvement: Even in 2860, research and development will continue, with scientists and engineers constantly seeking to improve existing technologies and develop new ones.

In essence, the R&D process for sustainable technology in 2860 will be a continuous journey of exploration, innovation, and collaboration, driven by a long-term vision of a sustainable future for all.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.