Sustainable Technology of 2840

Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

Sustainable technology in 2840 is a concept that is not yet defined, as it is far in the future. However, it is likely that it will be based on the principles of sustainability that are being developed today. These principles include reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, using renewable energy sources, and conserving resources.  

It is also likely that sustainable technology in 2840 will be based on new technologies that have not yet been invented. These technologies could include new ways to generate and store energy, new ways to produce food, and new ways to manufacture goods.

In addition, sustainable technology in 2840 will need to be affordable and accessible to everyone. This means that it will need to be developed in a way that is both environmentally and economically sustainable.

Overall, sustainable technology in 2840 is a concept that is full of potential. It has the potential to help us create a more sustainable and equitable world for all.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

Sustainable technology in 2840 is a fascinating concept, but it’s impossible to define it precisely. Here’s why:

• Technology evolves exponentially: Predicting technology even a few decades out is challenging, let alone over 800 years. New discoveries and innovations constantly reshape our understanding of what’s possible.
• Sustainability is a moving target: Our understanding of what constitutes “sustainable” practices will likely evolve as we learn more about the Earth’s systems and our impact on them. What seems sustainable in 2024 might be considered harmful in 2840.  
• Societal priorities change: The needs and values of society in 2840 will likely be very different from today. This will influence the direction of technological development and what is considered “sustainable.”

However, we can speculate on some potential trends and possibilities:

• Closed-loop systems: Technologies that minimize waste and pollution by creating closed-loop systems where resources are continuously reused and recycled.  
• Advanced energy generation: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, or other currently unimaginable energy sources that provide clean, abundant power.
• Biomimicry and bio-integrated technology: Technologies that mimic natural processes or integrate with biological systems for energy production, resource management, or manufacturing.  
• Hyper-efficient resource utilization: Technologies that dramatically reduce the amount of resources needed for production, transportation, and daily life.
• Global-scale environmental management: Technologies that allow us to monitor, manage, and restore ecosystems on a planetary scale.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2840 will likely be a combination of:

• Continuously improved existing technologies: Making current sustainable technologies like solar power and electric vehicles even more efficient and cost-effective.
• Breakthrough innovations: Discovering and developing entirely new technologies that we can’t even conceive of today.
• Shifts in societal values and practices: Embracing a culture of sustainability that prioritizes environmental protection and resource conservation.

While we can’t know exactly what sustainable technology in 2840 will look like, it’s safe to say that it will be essential for ensuring a healthy planet and a thriving human civilization for generations to come.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

It’s more accurate to say that everyone will be impacted by sustainable technology in 2840, and therefore, everyone has a stake in its development and implementation. However, some groups might have a particularly strong need for it:

• Future generations: They will inherit the consequences of our actions (or inaction) regarding sustainability. Sustainable technology in 2840 is crucial for ensuring a habitable planet and a thriving civilization for them.
• Communities vulnerable to climate change: Those already experiencing the effects of rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and resource scarcity will be heavily reliant on sustainable technologies for adaptation and resilience.
• Developing nations: Access to clean energy, clean water, and sustainable agriculture will be essential for these nations to achieve economic development and improve living standards without exacerbating environmental problems.
• Ecosystems and biodiversity: Sustainable technologies will be necessary to protect and restore natural habitats, preserve biodiversity, and maintain the health of the planet’s ecosystems.

In a broader sense, the need for sustainable technology in 2840 highlights the interconnectedness of all life on Earth. Every individual, community, and nation has a role to play in creating a sustainable future. This includes:

• Supporting research and development: Investing in the development of new sustainable technologies.
• Adopting sustainable practices: Making changes in our daily lives to reduce our environmental impact.
• Advocating for sustainable policies: Supporting policies that promote environmental protection and resource conservation.

Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology in 2840 will depend on our collective commitment to creating a more just and sustainable world for all.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

This is a great question that gets to the heart of why we talk about sustainable technology in the context of the future!

The simple answer is: We need sustainable technology in 2840 (and beyond) because the need for sustainability is ongoing and likely to intensify.

Here’s a breakdown of why:

• Long-term challenges: Many of the environmental challenges we face today, like climate change and resource depletion, are not going to be solved overnight. They require long-term solutions and a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices.  
• Continuing population growth: Even if population growth slows down, the global population is likely to continue increasing for some time. This means increased demand for resources, energy, and food, which will put further strain on the planet.  
• Technological dependence: As societies become more technologically advanced, we become more reliant on technology. This means that the sustainability of our technology becomes even more critical.
• Unforeseen challenges: It’s impossible to predict what new environmental or social challenges might emerge in the coming centuries. Sustainable technology will be essential for addressing these unknown challenges.

Therefore, the need for sustainable technology in 2840 is not just about solving today’s problems, but also about:

• Preventing future problems: Developing technologies that minimize our impact on the environment and prevent new problems from arising.  
• Adapting to change: Creating technologies that allow us to adapt to the inevitable changes that will occur, such as climate change and resource scarcity.
• Ensuring a thriving future: Building a world where future generations can enjoy a healthy planet and a high quality of life.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in 2840 is a recognition that sustainability is not a destination, but a journey. It requires continuous innovation, adaptation, and a commitment to creating a better future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just about when we need sustainable technology in 2840, but also where it will be needed. The answer is: Everywhere!

Here’s a breakdown of the key areas where sustainable technology will be crucial in 2840:

• Urban centers: Cities will likely be even more densely populated in the future. Sustainable technologies will be needed for:
  • Energy-efficient buildings: Smart homes and infrastructure that minimize energy consumption.
  • Sustainable transportation: Advanced public transit systems, electric vehicles, and infrastructure for alternative modes of transportation.
  • Waste management: Closed-loop systems for waste recycling and resource recovery.
  • Urban agriculture: Vertical farms and other innovative ways to produce food within cities.
• Rural areas: Sustainable technologies will be essential for:
  • Sustainable agriculture: Precision farming, drought-resistant crops, and renewable energy-powered irrigation systems.
  • Renewable energy generation: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources to power rural communities.  
  • Water management: Technologies for water conservation, purification, and distribution.
  • Ecosystem restoration: Technologies to protect and restore natural habitats and biodiversity.
• Infrastructure: Sustainable technologies will be needed to make our infrastructure more resilient and efficient:
  • Smart grids: Energy grids that can optimize energy distribution and integrate renewable energy sources.  
  • Sustainable transportation networks: High-speed rail, electric vehicle charging networks, and other sustainable transportation infrastructure.
  • Resilient infrastructure: Infrastructure that can withstand the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events.  
• Industry: Sustainable technologies will be needed to transform industries:
  • Circular economy: Manufacturing processes that minimize waste and pollution by reusing and recycling resources.  
  • Green manufacturing: Technologies that reduce the environmental impact of industrial processes.
  • Sustainable materials: Developing and using materials that are renewable, recyclable, and biodegradable.
• Homes and communities: Sustainable technologies will be integrated into our daily lives:
  • Smart homes: Homes that are energy-efficient, water-conserving, and generate their own renewable energy.
  • Sustainable appliances: Appliances that use less energy and water.  
  • Community-based solutions: Local initiatives for renewable energy generation, waste management, and food production.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2840 will need to be integrated into every aspect of human life and activity. It will be a fundamental part of how we live, work, and interact with the world around us. This requires a holistic approach that considers the interconnectedness of different systems and scales, from individual homes to global ecosystems.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

That’s a crucial question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be needed in 2840, but how we get there. Here’s a breakdown of the key requirements for developing and implementing sustainable technology in the long term:

1. Continuous Research and Development:

• Fundamental scientific research: Investing in basic research to expand our understanding of the natural world and discover new principles that can be applied to sustainable technologies.
• Applied research and engineering: Translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies and solutions.
• Interdisciplinary collaboration: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, social scientists, and other experts to develop holistic and integrated solutions.  

2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship:

• Creating an environment that fosters innovation: Supporting startups, incubators, and other initiatives that promote the development of new sustainable technologies.  
• Incentivizing sustainable practices: Implementing policies that encourage businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable technologies.  
• Promoting a circular economy: Shifting towards a circular economy where resources are continuously reused and recycled, minimizing waste and pollution.  

3. Education and Awareness:

• Educating future generations: Integrating sustainability into education at all levels to raise awareness and build the skills needed to develop and implement sustainable technologies.  
• Engaging the public: Communicating the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies to the broader public.
• Promoting behavioral change: Encouraging individuals and communities to adopt sustainable practices in their daily lives.  

4. Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing:

• International cooperation: Sharing knowledge, technologies, and best practices across borders to accelerate the development and implementation of sustainable solutions.  
• Open-source platforms: Creating open-source platforms for sharing research data, software, and designs to foster collaboration and innovation.
• Global partnerships: Building partnerships between governments, businesses, NGOs, and other stakeholders to address global sustainability challenges.  

5. Ethical Considerations and Social Responsibility:

• Ensuring equity and justice: Developing sustainable technologies that benefit all members of society, including marginalized and vulnerable communities.
• Addressing ethical implications: Considering the ethical implications of new technologies and ensuring that they are used responsibly.  
• Promoting transparency and accountability: Ensuring that the development and implementation of sustainable technologies are transparent and accountable to the public.

In essence, developing sustainable technology for 2840 and beyond requires a long-term vision, a commitment to innovation, and a collaborative approach that involves all stakeholders. It’s about creating a future where technology serves humanity and the planet, ensuring a thriving and sustainable world for generations to come.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” for sustainable technology in 2840, as it’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and potential breakthroughs to illustrate what it might look like.

Scenario: The Floating City of Aethel

Imagine a coastal city, Aethel, in the year 2840. Rising sea levels have forced many communities to relocate, and Aethel is designed as a self-sustaining, floating city. Here’s how sustainable technology is integrated:

• Energy: Aethel is powered by a combination of:
  • Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): Utilizing the temperature difference between surface and deep ocean water to generate clean electricity.  
  • Advanced Solar: Highly efficient solar panels integrated into the city’s infrastructure, even capturing energy from diffused light on cloudy days.  
  • Kinetic Energy Harvesting: Utilizing the movement of the city on the water to generate small amounts of energy, like how some watches are powered by movement.
• Food: Aethel produces much of its own food through:
  • Vertical Farms: Multi-level, hydroponic farms within the city, using minimal water and space to grow a variety of crops.
  • Aquaculture: Sustainable fish farms integrated into the city’s structure, providing a source of protein.
  • Lab-grown Meat: Advanced biotechnology facilities producing protein with a significantly lower environmental impact than traditional agriculture.
• Water: Aethel manages its water resources carefully:
  • Desalination: Advanced and energy-efficient desalination plants providing fresh water from the ocean.
  • Rainwater Harvesting: Systems to capture and store rainwater for use in irrigation and other non-potable needs.
  • Greywater Recycling: Treating and reusing wastewater from showers, sinks, and laundry for irrigation and other purposes.
• Waste Management: Aethel operates on a circular economy model:
  • Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling systems that can break down materials to their basic components for reuse.
  • Composting: Organic waste is composted and used to fertilize the vertical farms.
  • Waste-to-Energy: Non-recyclable waste is converted into energy through advanced incineration technologies.  
• Transportation: Aethel prioritizes sustainable transportation:
  • Electric Vehicles: Most personal vehicles are electric, powered by the city’s renewable energy sources.
  • Public Transit: Efficient and widespread public transportation systems, including underwater and aerial options.
  • Walkable City Design: The city is designed to be pedestrian-friendly, encouraging walking and cycling.

Challenges and Considerations:

Even in this futuristic scenario, challenges remain:

• Maintaining the Ecosystem: Ensuring that OTEC and other technologies don’t harm the surrounding ocean environment.
• Resource Availability: Even with recycling, the city still needs some raw materials. Sourcing these sustainably is crucial.
• Social Equity: Ensuring that everyone in Aethel has access to the benefits of these technologies and that the city remains a fair and equitable place to live.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced technologies and sustainable practices could create a thriving and environmentally responsible city in the future. It highlights the potential of sustainable technology to address the challenges of climate change and resource scarcity, while also improving the quality of life for future generations.Sources and related content

COURTESY : DiscoverMHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2840: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2840, acknowledging the inherent challenges in predicting technological advancements over such a vast timescale. It posits that sustainable technology in 2840 will be characterized by highly advanced, interconnected systems operating on principles of closed-loop resource utilization, abundant clean energy, and deep integration with natural processes. The paper outlines potential technological breakthroughs, societal shifts, and ethical considerations crucial for achieving a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The concept of “sustainable technology” evolves with our understanding of the planet and our impact upon it. In 2840, sustainable technology will not be merely an option, but a necessity for human civilization to thrive. This paper envisions a future where technology is harmoniously integrated with natural systems, ensuring a healthy planet and a high quality of life for all.

2. Core Principles:

Sustainable technology in 2840 will likely be underpinned by the following core principles:

• Radical Resource Efficiency: Minimizing resource consumption through closed-loop systems, advanced recycling, and the development of durable, adaptable materials.
• Abundant Clean Energy: Reliance on renewable energy sources such as advanced solar, fusion, or other currently unknown, highly efficient energy generation methods. Energy will be readily available and distributed through smart, globally interconnected grids.
• Biomimicry and Bio-integration: Technologies inspired by natural processes, seamlessly integrating with biological systems for energy production, resource management, and manufacturing.
• Global Ecosystem Management: Technologies facilitating the monitoring, management, and restoration of ecosystems on a planetary scale, addressing climate change and biodiversity loss.
• Social Equity and Justice: Ensuring equitable access to resources and the benefits of sustainable technologies for all communities, regardless of location or socioeconomic status.

3. Potential Technological Breakthroughs:

While predicting specific technologies is difficult, we can speculate on potential breakthroughs:

• Advanced Material Science: Development of self-healing materials, adaptable materials that can change their properties on demand, and materials derived from readily available renewable resources.
• Quantum Computing and AI: Powerful computing capabilities enabling complex simulations for optimizing resource utilization, predicting environmental changes, and designing sustainable solutions.
• Nanotechnology and Molecular Manufacturing: Precise manipulation of matter at the atomic and molecular level, enabling the creation of highly efficient devices and the manufacturing of products with minimal waste.
• Advanced Biotechnology: Engineering biological systems for energy production, bioremediation, and the creation of sustainable materials.
• Space-Based Technologies: Utilizing space for resource acquisition, energy generation (e.g., space-based solar power), and planetary observation for environmental monitoring.

4. Societal Shifts:

Achieving a sustainable future by 2840 will require significant societal shifts:

• Global Cooperation: Increased international collaboration on environmental issues, resource management, and technological development.
• Sustainable Consumption Patterns: A shift towards a culture of mindful consumption, prioritizing durability, repairability, and sharing over disposable goods.
• Education and Awareness: Widespread education on sustainability principles and the importance of environmental stewardship.
• Ethical Frameworks: Robust ethical frameworks for guiding technological development and ensuring equitable access to resources.

5. Ethical Considerations:

As we develop increasingly powerful technologies, ethical considerations become paramount:

• Environmental Stewardship: Ensuring that technological advancements do not inadvertently harm ecosystems or create unintended consequences.
• Resource Distribution: Addressing potential inequalities in access to resources and the benefits of sustainable technologies.
• Technological Unemployment: Mitigating the potential impact of automation and AI on employment.
• Data Privacy and Security: Protecting individual privacy in a world of interconnected devices and vast data collection.

6. Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 2840 represents a vision of hope for a thriving future. While the specific technologies remain to be discovered, the core principles of resource efficiency, clean energy, biomimicry, and global cooperation will guide our path. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a world where technology empowers humanity to live in harmony with the planet for generations to come. This white paper serves as a starting point for further discussion and exploration of this critical topic.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2840, building upon the concepts discussed earlier. It’s important to remember this is speculative, but grounded in current trends and extrapolated possibilities:

1. Advanced Materials Production:

• Bio-Integrated Factories: Imagine factories that grow materials rather than manufacture them. Using advanced bioengineering, these facilities cultivate materials like super-strong bio-plastics, self-healing composites, or even materials with embedded electronic circuits, directly from renewable resources like algae or engineered trees. These materials would be completely biodegradable or infinitely recyclable.
• Molecular Assemblers: Nanotechnology could allow for the creation of molecular assemblers – machines that can construct materials and products atom by atom. This would dramatically reduce waste, allow for on-demand manufacturing of highly customized products, and even enable the repurposing of existing materials at a molecular level.  

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

• Fusion-Powered Manufacturing: Industries like steel production or aluminum smelting, which are currently highly energy-intensive, could be powered by compact and efficient fusion reactors. This would provide clean, virtually limitless energy, drastically reducing the environmental footprint of these industries.  
• Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Utilization: Factories could incorporate advanced carbon capture technologies, not just to reduce emissions, but to actively capture CO2 from the atmosphere and use it as a feedstock for manufacturing processes, creating a closed-loop carbon cycle.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Sustainable Mining: Mining operations, if still necessary, would be drastically different. Imagine autonomous, AI-controlled robotic systems that selectively extract resources with minimal environmental impact, guided by advanced geological mapping and utilizing in-situ processing to reduce waste and transportation needs. These operations could even utilize bio-mining, where microorganisms are used to extract valuable minerals from low-grade ores or even from industrial waste.
• Ocean Resource Management: Sustainable aquaculture and deep-sea mining (if practiced at all) would be carefully managed using advanced monitoring and AI systems to ensure minimal disruption to marine ecosystems. Resources would be extracted responsibly and sustainably, with a focus on preserving biodiversity.

4. Manufacturing and Production:

• Circular Manufacturing: Factories would operate on circular economy principles. Products would be designed for disassembly and reuse, with materials being easily recovered and repurposed at the end of their life cycle. Manufacturing processes would be highly automated and optimized to minimize waste and energy consumption.
• Localized Production: Advanced manufacturing technologies like 3D printing and molecular assembly could enable localized production of goods, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and its associated environmental impact. Communities could produce many of the goods they need locally, using locally sourced materials.  

5. Waste Management:

• Zero-Waste Industries: Industries would strive for zero waste. All byproducts and waste materials would be either reused, recycled, or converted into energy. Advanced sorting and processing technologies would enable the efficient recovery of valuable resources from waste streams.  
• Industrial Symbiosis: Factories would be integrated into industrial ecosystems where the waste products of one industry become the raw materials for another, creating closed-loop systems and minimizing environmental impact.  

Example: Sustainable Electronics Manufacturing:

Imagine a factory that produces electronic devices. Instead of using rare earth minerals mined from the earth, it uses bio-engineered materials grown in bio-reactors. The factory is powered by fusion energy and uses molecular assemblers to create the devices with atomic precision. When a device reaches the end of its life, it can be returned to the factory, where it is disassembled at the molecular level and the materials are reused to create new devices. The entire process is closed-loop, with minimal waste and a significantly reduced environmental impact.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industry in 2840. The key will be the integration of multiple technologies and a shift towards a more holistic and sustainable approach to manufacturing and resource management.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2840 ?

It’s fascinating to think about the research and development needed for sustainable technology in 2840! While we can’t know the exact paths, here are some key areas of focus, building on current scientific frontiers:

1. Fundamental Science:

• New Energy Physics: Exploring beyond current fusion research, investigating concepts like zero-point energy, or manipulating fundamental forces to directly generate clean energy.
• Consciousness and Technology: If AI reaches sentience, understanding consciousness could be key to ensuring its development aligns with sustainability goals, avoiding resource-intensive “needs.”
• Unified Field Theory: If such a theory is discovered, it could unlock new ways to interact with the universe, potentially for energy generation or even manipulating gravity for transportation, with minimal environmental impact.

2. Advanced Materials:

• Programmable Matter: Materials that can change their properties on demand, adapting to different needs. This could revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for on-demand creation of tools, structures, even food, reducing waste and resource needs.  
• Bio-Integrated Materials: Growing materials with desired properties using synthetic biology. Imagine “wood” that’s stronger than steel, or fabrics that repair themselves, grown from renewable resources.
• Exotic Matter Manipulation: If scientists learn to manipulate exotic matter (like dark matter), it could lead to revolutionary energy storage or even new forms of transportation that defy current physics.

3. Biotechnology and Bioengineering:

• Synthetic Biology: Designing new organisms to perform specific tasks, like breaking down pollutants, producing biofuels, or even creating new materials. This could revolutionize manufacturing and resource management.  
• Genetic Engineering: Developing crops that are incredibly resilient to climate change, require minimal resources, and even produce their own fertilizers, ensuring food security for a growing population.
• Human Augmentation: While ethically complex, technology that reduces human reliance on resources (like needing less food or being more resistant to disease) could have a significant impact on sustainability.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Computation:

• Quantum Computing: This could unlock the ability to simulate complex systems (like Earth’s climate) with incredible accuracy, allowing us to predict and mitigate environmental changes more effectively.
• AI-Driven Optimization: AI could manage global resource distribution, optimize energy grids, and even design new sustainable technologies autonomously, leading to far more efficient systems.  
• Brain-Computer Interfaces: Direct communication between the human brain and technology could lead to more intuitive and efficient use of resources, and even allow for new forms of communication that reduce the need for physical travel.  

5. Space-Based Technologies:

• Space Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it back to Earth could provide a clean and abundant energy source.  
• Asteroid Mining: Extracting resources from asteroids could provide access to rare materials without further damaging Earth’s ecosystems.  
• Planetary Engineering: In the very long term, if humanity expands beyond Earth, understanding how to sustainably manage and even terraform other planets will be crucial.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Frameworks: As technology advances, robust ethical frameworks are essential to guide its development and use, ensuring it aligns with sustainability goals and benefits all of humanity.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Research will need to be highly interdisciplinary, with experts from different fields working together to solve complex challenges.
• Long-Term Vision: Sustainable technology in 2840 requires a long-term perspective, with research focused on fundamental science and potentially transformative breakthroughs, even if they seem far off today.

It’s impossible to predict the future, but these are some potential areas of focus for research and development that could lead to truly sustainable technologies in the distant future. The journey will require curiosity, innovation, and a deep commitment to ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Accenture

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.