Sustainable Technology of 2790

84 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

It appears you’re asking about sustainable technology in the context of a specific report, likely the “IBM State of Sustainability Readiness Report 2024”. This report surveyed 2,790 business leaders across various industries and countries, including India, about their views on sustainability and technology.

Key takeaways from the report regarding sustainable technology:

AI is a game-changer: The report emphasizes the growing recognition of AI’s potential to drive sustainability initiatives. Many business leaders see AI as crucial for achieving their sustainability goals.
Increased IT investment: A significant majority of respondents plan to increase their investments in IT for sustainability in the coming years. This indicates a strong commitment to using technology to address environmental challenges.
Challenges remain: Despite the positive outlook, the report also highlights challenges such as the need for better data maturity and the gap in perception between C-suite executives and other decision-makers.

Specific examples of sustainable technologies mentioned in relation to the report:

Generative AI: This type of AI can analyze data to identify opportunities for reducing carbon emissions and create more sustainable business practices.
AI-powered automation: Combining AI with automation can optimize resource management and reduce energy consumption, particularly in areas like data centers.
AI and geospatial data: AI models trained on geospatial datasets can be used to predict and mitigate the impact of extreme weather events and climate crises.

Overall, the report suggests that sustainable technology is becoming increasingly important for businesses. AI, in particular, is seen as a powerful tool for driving sustainability initiatives and achieving environmental goals. However, there are still challenges to overcome, such as improving data quality and ensuring that sustainability efforts are aligned across different levels of an organization. Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

It seems you might be thinking about a specific report or data set related to “2790” and sustainable technology. However, without more context, it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly what this refers to.

To help me understand what you’re looking for, could you please provide more information? For example:

Is “2790” a specific number related to a report or study? If so, could you share the name of the report or where you encountered this number?
What kind of sustainable technology are you interested in? Are you curious about renewable energy, green building materials, sustainable agriculture, or something else?
What is the context of your question? Are you researching for a school project, trying to understand industry trends, or something else?

With more information, I can provide a more relevant and helpful response.

In the meantime, here are some general points about sustainable technology:

Sustainable technology aims to reduce environmental impact and promote resource efficiency. It encompasses a wide range of innovations and practices across various sectors.
Key areas of sustainable technology include:
- Renewable energy (solar, wind, hydro, etc.)
- Energy efficiency
- Green building materials and design
- Sustainable agriculture
- Waste management and recycling
- Water conservation
- Sustainable transportation
Sustainable technology is crucial for addressing global challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. It plays a vital role in creating a more sustainable future.

I’m ready to assist you further once you provide more details about what you’re looking for.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

It appears you’re interested in who needs sustainable technology, particularly in light of the “IBM State of Sustainability Readiness Report 2024” which surveyed 2,790 business leaders.

Essentially, the answer is everyone. Sustainable technology is not just a niche interest, but a necessity for the well-being of our planet and future generations. However, different stakeholders have different roles and responsibilities:

Businesses: As highlighted in the report, businesses are increasingly recognizing the importance of sustainable technology. They need it to:
- Reduce their environmental footprint
- Enhance their brand reputation
- Improve operational efficiency
- Drive innovation and growth
- Meet regulatory requirements
Governments: Governments play a crucial role in promoting and regulating sustainable technology. They need it to:
- Achieve national and international environmental targets
- Foster a green economy
- Protect natural resources
- Ensure public health and safety
Individuals: Individuals also have a significant role to play. We need sustainable technology to:
- Reduce our personal environmental impact
- Make informed consumer choices
- Support sustainable businesses and initiatives
- Advocate for a sustainable future
Communities: Communities need sustainable technology to:
- Build resilience to climate change
- Access clean energy and water
- Promote local economic development
- Preserve their cultural heritage

The IBM report emphasizes that businesses, particularly in India, are recognizing the potential of AI and other technologies to achieve their sustainability goals. This suggests a growing awareness of the need for sustainable technology across different sectors and regions.

Ultimately, the transition to a sustainable future requires a collective effort from all stakeholders. Sustainable technology is not just a tool for businesses or governments, but a shared responsibility that we all must embrace.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

It seems you’re asking about the urgency of adopting sustainable technology, particularly in the context of the “IBM State of Sustainability Readiness Report 2024”.

The answer is now. While the report highlights growing awareness and investment in sustainable technology, it also emphasizes the need for immediate action. Here’s why:

Climate change is accelerating: The impacts of climate change are becoming increasingly severe and frequent. We need to act now to mitigate these effects and prevent further damage to the environment.
Resources are depleting: Our planet’s natural resources are finite. Sustainable technology can help us use these resources more efficiently and reduce our consumption.
Sustainability is a business imperative: As the report shows, businesses are recognizing that sustainability is not just a cost, but an opportunity. It can drive innovation, improve brand reputation, and enhance long-term resilience.
Technology is available: Many sustainable technologies already exist, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency solutions, and AI-powered tools for resource management. We need to deploy these technologies more widely and accelerate their development.

The IBM report suggests that businesses are planning to increase their investments in IT for sustainability in the coming years. This is a positive sign, but it’s crucial to translate these plans into concrete actions as soon as possible.

Key takeaways from the report regarding the urgency of sustainable technology:

AI is a game-changer: The report emphasizes the potential of AI to accelerate sustainability initiatives. Businesses need to invest in AI tools and integrate them into their sustainability strategies now.
Data maturity is crucial: The report highlights the need for better data maturity to measure and track sustainability progress. Organizations need to prioritize data collection and analysis to make informed decisions.
Leadership alignment is essential: The report notes a perception gap between C-suite executives and other decision-makers. Organizations need to ensure that sustainability efforts are aligned across all levels of the company.

In conclusion, the time for sustainable technology is now. We need to act urgently to address the environmental challenges we face and create a more sustainable future for all. The IBM report provides valuable insights into the current state of sustainability readiness and highlights the need for immediate action.Sources and related content

courtesy : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

You’re right to focus on the “where” of sustainable technology! It’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology is most needed, keeping in mind the insights from the IBM report:

1. Across Industries:

High-impact sectors: Industries with significant environmental footprints like manufacturing, energy, transportation, and agriculture are prime candidates. The IBM report highlights how these sectors are increasingly adopting AI-powered solutions for optimization.
Supply chains: Sustainable technology is crucial for making supply chains more transparent and responsible. This involves tracking materials, reducing waste, and ensuring ethical sourcing.
Urban environments: Cities are hubs of consumption and waste generation. Sustainable technology is essential for smart grids, efficient waste management, and green building practices.

2. Geographically:

Developing economies: Countries like India, where the IBM report focused, are experiencing rapid growth. Sustainable technology can help them develop in an environmentally responsible way, avoiding the pitfalls of traditional industrialization.
Vulnerable regions: Areas prone to climate change impacts like droughts, floods, or extreme weather events need sustainable technology for resilience and adaptation.
Global collaboration: Sustainable technology requires international cooperation to share knowledge, resources, and best practices.

3. Within Organizations:

Data centers: These energy-intensive facilities can benefit greatly from AI-powered optimization and energy-efficient hardware.
Operations: Sustainable technology can be applied to various operational aspects, from resource management and waste reduction to energy efficiency and supply chain optimization.
Product development: Designing products with sustainability in mind, using eco-friendly materials and minimizing waste, is crucial.

Key takeaways from the IBM report regarding “where” sustainable technology is needed:

India as a focus: The report specifically highlights the growing adoption of sustainable technology in India, indicating its importance in rapidly developing economies.
AI for diverse applications: The report emphasizes the potential of AI to address sustainability challenges across various sectors and use cases.

In essence, sustainable technology is needed wherever there is an environmental impact. This means its application is vast and requires a tailored approach depending on the specific context, whether it’s a particular industry, geographical location, or organizational function.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

You’re asking about the how of implementing sustainable technology, which is a crucial question. It’s not just about having the technology, but about effectively integrating it. Here’s a breakdown of how sustainable technology is required, drawing on insights from reports like the IBM study:

1. Strategic Integration:

Clear sustainability goals: Organizations need well-defined, measurable sustainability targets aligned with their overall business strategy. Sustainable technology should be a tool to achieve these goals.
Long-term vision: Sustainable technology implementation requires a long-term perspective, not just short-term fixes. This includes planning for upgrades, maintenance, and evolving technologies.
Cross-functional collaboration: Sustainability initiatives shouldn’t be siloed. Effective implementation requires collaboration across departments, from IT and operations to finance and marketing.

2. Technology Adoption & Implementation:

Data-driven approach: As the IBM report emphasizes, data maturity is crucial. Organizations need robust data collection and analysis systems to understand their environmental impact and track progress. This is where AI and analytics play a key role.
Phased rollout: Implementing sustainable technology is often best done in phases, starting with pilot projects and scaling up successful initiatives.
Technology selection: Choosing the right technology is essential. This involves evaluating different options based on factors like cost, effectiveness, scalability, and compatibility with existing systems.

3. People & Culture:

Employee engagement: Sustainability initiatives are more successful when employees are engaged and empowered. Training and communication are essential to build awareness and support.
Leadership buy-in: Strong leadership commitment is crucial for driving sustainability efforts. Leaders need to champion the cause and allocate resources.
Cultural shift: Sustainable technology implementation often requires a shift in organizational culture, embracing sustainability as a core value.

4. Continuous Improvement:

Monitoring and evaluation: Regularly tracking progress and measuring the impact of sustainable technology is essential for continuous improvement.
Adaptation and innovation: The field of sustainable technology is constantly evolving. Organizations need to stay informed about new developments and be willing to adapt their strategies.
Collaboration and partnerships: Working with other organizations, researchers, and technology providers can accelerate innovation and improve implementation outcomes.

Key takeaways from the IBM report regarding how sustainable technology is required:

AI as a key enabler: The report highlights AI’s potential to drive sustainability initiatives, emphasizing the need for businesses to invest in and integrate AI tools.
Data maturity as a foundation: The report underscores the importance of data maturity, suggesting that organizations need to prioritize data collection, analysis, and management to effectively implement sustainable technology.
Leadership alignment: The report points out the need for alignment between C-suite executives and other decision-makers to ensure that sustainability efforts are effectively implemented across the organization.

In short, successfully implementing sustainable technology requires a holistic approach that considers strategy, technology, people, and continuous improvement. It’s not just about buying new equipment, but about transforming the way organizations operate and fostering a culture of sustainability.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

While I don’t have access to a specific case study with the exact title “Sustainable Technology of 2790”, I can offer you some relevant examples that illustrate the key themes from the IBM report and the broader landscape of sustainable technology:

Case Study 1: Ikano Group and ESG Data Automation

Challenge: Ikano Group, a financial services company, faced challenges in capturing and analyzing vast amounts of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data for reporting and compliance.
Solution: They implemented a technology solution to automate ESG data capture and analysis.
Results: This automation significantly reduced the time and resources required for reporting, saving thousands of man-hours. It also improved the accuracy and reliability of their ESG data.
Relevance: This case study demonstrates the importance of data maturity, as highlighted in the IBM report. It shows how technology can streamline sustainability reporting and improve data-driven decision-making.

Case Study 2: Companies Using AI for Carbon Emission Reduction

Challenge: Many companies across various sectors are seeking to reduce their carbon footprint and improve energy efficiency.
Solution: They are leveraging AI and machine learning to analyze energy consumption patterns, optimize operations, and identify opportunities for reducing emissions.
Examples:
- Manufacturing: AI can optimize production processes to minimize energy use and waste.
- Transportation: AI can be used to develop more fuel-efficient vehicles and optimize logistics for reduced emissions.
- Buildings: AI can control building management systems to optimize energy consumption for heating, cooling, and lighting.
Relevance: This aligns with the IBM report’s emphasis on AI as a game-changer for sustainability. It showcases how AI can be applied across different sectors to address climate change challenges.

Case Study 3: Sustainable Agriculture with Precision Farming

Challenge: Agriculture needs to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact and resource use.
Solution: Precision farming techniques utilize technology like sensors, GPS, and data analytics to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control.
Results: This leads to reduced water and fertilizer use, minimized environmental pollution, and increased crop yields.
Relevance: This example illustrates how sustainable technology can be applied in specific sectors like agriculture to improve resource efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

Key Takeaways from these Case Studies:

Data is crucial: Effective implementation of sustainable technology relies on robust data collection, analysis, and management.
AI is a powerful tool: AI can be applied across various sectors to address sustainability challenges, from optimizing energy use to improving resource management.
Technology needs to be integrated: Sustainable technology implementation requires strategic planning, cross-functional collaboration, and a long-term vision.

These case studies, while not specifically labeled “Sustainable Technology of 2790”, highlight the key themes and trends discussed in reports like the IBM study. They demonstrate how organizations are using technology to achieve their sustainability goals and contribute to a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

courtesy : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

I understand you’re looking for a white paper specifically titled “Sustainable Technology of 2790.” It’s highly likely this exact title doesn’t exist. The “2790” likely refers to the number of business leaders surveyed in the IBM State of Sustainability Readiness Report 2024. That report itself acts as a kind of white paper, providing insights into the state of sustainability and technology adoption.

Therefore, instead of searching for a white paper with that exact title, I recommend focusing your search on resources related to the key themes emerging from the IBM report and the broader discussion of sustainable technology. Here’s what to look for:

The IBM Report Itself: Start with the source. Search for “IBM State of Sustainability Readiness Report 2024.” This will give you the core data and insights.
Keywords Related to the Report’s Findings: The report likely emphasizes these areas:
- AI for Sustainability: Look for white papers, articles, and case studies on how AI is being used to address environmental challenges. Search terms like “AI for ESG,” “AI for carbon reduction,” “AI for resource optimization” will be helpful.
- ESG Reporting and Data Management: Since the report highlights data maturity, search for resources on best practices in ESG reporting, data collection, and analysis. Keywords like “ESG data management,” “sustainability reporting software,” and “ESG metrics” are good starting points.
- Sustainable Technology Implementation: Look for white papers that discuss strategies for implementing sustainable technology within organizations. Search terms like “sustainable technology roadmap,” “integrating sustainability into IT,” and “measuring the impact of sustainable technology” will be useful.
- Specific Sustainable Technologies: Depending on your area of interest, research white papers on specific technologies like renewable energy integration, smart grids, green building materials, sustainable agriculture practices, etc.
Industry-Specific Resources: If you’re interested in a particular industry (e.g., manufacturing, finance, retail), look for white papers and reports that focus on sustainable technology within that sector.
Consultancy and Research Firm Websites: Many consulting firms (like McKinsey, BCG, Accenture) and research organizations (like Gartner, Forrester) publish white papers on sustainability and technology. Check their websites for relevant content.
Academic Databases: If you’re looking for more in-depth research, explore academic databases like JSTOR, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect.

By using these strategies, you’ll find a wealth of information on sustainable technology, even if the exact title “Sustainable Technology of 2790” doesn’t exist. Focus on the content related to the themes of the IBM report, and you’ll find the resources you need.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

You’re asking about how the insights from the IBM State of Sustainability Readiness Report 2024, particularly the focus on sustainable technology, can be applied in industrial settings. Here are some key areas where industries can leverage sustainable technology:

1. Manufacturing:

AI-powered optimization: AI can analyze production data to identify inefficiencies, optimize energy consumption, reduce waste, and improve resource allocation. This can lead to significant cost savings and environmental benefits.
Predictive maintenance: AI can predict equipment failures, allowing for proactive maintenance and preventing costly downtime. This also reduces waste by extending the lifespan of equipment.
Sustainable supply chains: Technology can be used to track materials, ensure ethical sourcing, and reduce the environmental impact of transportation and logistics.

2. Energy:

Smart grids: Smart grid technologies can optimize energy distribution, reduce transmission losses, and integrate renewable energy sources more effectively.
Renewable energy integration: AI and data analytics can help predict and manage fluctuations in renewable energy supply, ensuring grid stability and reliability.
Energy efficiency: Technology can be used to monitor and control energy consumption in industrial facilities, identifying areas for improvement and automating energy-saving measures.

3. Transportation:

Electric vehicles (EVs): Industries can adopt EVs for their fleets, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
Logistics optimization: AI and data analytics can optimize transportation routes, reduce fuel consumption, and improve delivery efficiency.
Sustainable aviation: The aviation industry is exploring sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and other technologies to reduce its environmental impact.

4. Agriculture:

Precision farming: Technology like sensors, GPS, and data analytics can be used to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, reducing water and chemical use while increasing crop yields.
Sustainable livestock management: Technology can help monitor animal health, optimize feeding practices, and reduce the environmental impact of livestock farming.

5. Construction:

Green building materials: Industries can adopt sustainable building materials with lower environmental impact, such as recycled materials or bio-based alternatives.
Energy-efficient buildings: Technology can be used to design and operate buildings that are more energy-efficient, reducing their carbon footprint.

Key Takeaways for Industrial Applications:

Data is crucial: Industries need to collect and analyze data to understand their environmental impact and identify areas for improvement.
AI is a powerful tool: AI can be used to optimize processes, improve resource efficiency, and drive sustainability initiatives across various industrial sectors.
Collaboration is essential: Industries need to collaborate with technology providers, researchers, and other stakeholders to develop and implement sustainable solutions.

By embracing sustainable technology, industries can reduce their environmental footprint, improve operational efficiency, and contribute to a more sustainable future. The insights from the IBM report highlight the growing recognition of this need and the increasing adoption of technology to achieve sustainability goals.

Research and developement of Sustainable Technology of 2790 ?

You’re interested in the cutting edge of sustainable technology! Research and development (R&D) is crucial for creating the innovative solutions we need for a sustainable future. Here are some key areas of R&D in sustainable technology, keeping in mind the trends highlighted by the IBM report:

1. Advanced Materials:

Bioplastics: Developing biodegradable and compostable plastics from renewable resources to replace traditional petroleum-based plastics.
Sustainable composites: Creating strong and lightweight materials from recycled or bio-based sources for use in construction, transportation, and other industries.
Nanomaterials: Researching and developing nanomaterials with unique properties for applications in energy storage, water purification, and other sustainable technologies.

2. Renewable Energy:

Next-generation solar: Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of solar cells, including perovskite solar cells and other emerging technologies.
Advanced energy storage: Developing more efficient and affordable energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries and pumped hydro storage, to enable greater integration of renewable energy sources.
Hydrogen production: Researching and developing cost-effective methods for producing green hydrogen from renewable energy sources for use as a clean fuel.

3. AI and Data Analytics:

AI for climate modeling: Using AI to develop more accurate climate models and improve our understanding of climate change.
AI for resource optimization: Applying AI to optimize resource use in various sectors, such as agriculture, manufacturing, and transportation.
AI for environmental monitoring: Developing AI-powered systems for monitoring environmental conditions, detecting pollution, and tracking biodiversity.

4. Biotechnology:

Sustainable agriculture: Researching and developing new agricultural techniques that reduce environmental impact, such as precision agriculture, vertical farming, and biopesticides.
Bioremediation: Using microorganisms to clean up pollution and restore contaminated environments.
Bio-based products: Developing new products from renewable biological resources, such as biofuels, bioplastics, and bio-based chemicals.

5. Circular Economy:

Waste-to-resource technologies: Developing innovative technologies for converting waste into valuable resources, such as energy, materials, and chemicals.
Product lifecycle management: Researching and developing systems for tracking products throughout their lifecycle to facilitate reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing.
Sustainable packaging: Creating innovative and sustainable packaging solutions that minimize waste and environmental impact.

Key Considerations for R&D:

Interdisciplinary collaboration: Sustainable technology R&D requires collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and other stakeholders.
Life cycle assessment: Evaluating the environmental impact of technologies throughout their entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal.
Scalability and affordability: Developing technologies that can be scaled up and made affordable for widespread adoption.

The IBM report emphasizes the importance of AI and data maturity for achieving sustainability goals. These areas are also crucial for driving innovation in sustainable technology. By investing in R&D and fostering collaboration, we can accelerate the development and deployment of the sustainable technologies we need for a healthy planet and a thriving future. Sources and related content

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.