Sustainable Technology of 2780

Sustainable Technology of 2780 ?

Unfortunately, I cannot provide specific details about “Sustainable Technology of 2770”. Here’s why:

• Future Predictions: Predicting the state of technology nearly 750 years into the future is highly speculative. Technological advancements are rapid and often unpredictable.
• Limited Information: There’s no established body of knowledge or research specifically focused on “Sustainable Technology of 2770”.

However, I can offer some insights based on current trends and potential future developments:

• Sustainability as a Core Principle: It’s highly likely that by 2770, sustainability will be a fundamental consideration in all technological development. Resource scarcity, climate change, and environmental concerns will likely necessitate this.
• Advanced Renewable Energy: Technologies for harnessing renewable energy (solar, wind, geothermal, etc.) will likely be highly advanced and efficient, potentially providing the primary source of energy.
• Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that minimize waste and maximize resource utilization will be prevalent. This could involve advanced recycling, material science, and manufacturing processes.
• Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Technologies for sustainable food production will be crucial, potentially involving vertical farming, hydroponics, and other innovative approaches.
• Environmental Remediation: Technologies for cleaning up existing pollution and restoring ecosystems might be highly advanced.
• Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation could play a significant role in optimizing resource use, managing energy systems, and developing sustainable solutions.  

Additional Points:

• Ethical Considerations: It’s important to consider the ethical implications of future technologies. Ensuring that technological advancements benefit humanity and the planet will be crucial.
• Interdisciplinary Approach: Sustainable technology in the future will likely require an interdisciplinary approach, integrating knowledge from various fields like engineering, environmental science, biology, and social sciences.

While I cannot provide specific details about “Sustainable Technology of 2770”, it’s fascinating to imagine the possibilities. The future of sustainable technology will depend on our collective efforts to address current challenges and prioritize a sustainable future.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

While we can’t know exactly what sustainable technology in 2770 will look like, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities:

1. Advanced Renewable Energy Systems:

• Fusion Power: Perhaps by 2770, fusion power will be a viable and widespread energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
• Space-Based Solar Power: Satellites could collect solar energy in space and beam it down to Earth, providing a continuous and reliable source of power.  
• Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions will be essential for balancing energy supply and demand.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems:

• Circular Economy: Technologies that enable a true circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, will be highly advanced.
• Material Science: New materials with unique properties, such as self-healing or biodegradable materials, could revolutionize manufacturing and reduce waste.
• Waste Transformation: Technologies that can efficiently transform waste into valuable resources or energy could be commonplace.

3. Sustainable Food Production:

• Vertical Farming: Multi-story vertical farms located in urban areas could provide fresh and locally grown food with minimal environmental impact.  
• Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and data analytics could optimize resource use in agriculture, reducing water consumption and minimizing environmental impact.  
• Alternative Proteins: Technologies for producing sustainable alternative proteins, such as cultured meat or plant-based proteins, could be highly advanced.  

4. Environmental Remediation:

• Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies for capturing and storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could be highly efficient and widely deployed.
• Ocean Cleanup: Advanced technologies could be used to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans.
• Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies for restoring damaged ecosystems, such as forests or coral reefs, could be highly advanced.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

• AI-Powered Optimization: AI could be used to optimize resource use in various sectors, from energy and transportation to manufacturing and agriculture.  
• Autonomous Systems: Autonomous systems could play a significant role in environmental monitoring, resource management, and disaster response.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Development: It’s crucial to ensure that future technologies are developed and used ethically, with consideration for their social and environmental impacts.
• Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and collaboration.

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, these are some potential directions for sustainable technology in 2770. By continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can create a better future for ourselves and generations to come.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

It’s more accurate to say that everyone will be impacted by the need for sustainable technology in 2770. However, some groups might have a greater stake or responsibility in its development and implementation:

• Future Generations: They are the primary beneficiaries of sustainable practices. The choices made today will directly impact the quality of their lives and the health of the planet they inherit.
• Scientists and Engineers: They have a crucial role in developing the innovative technologies needed for a sustainable future. Their research, creativity, and problem-solving skills will be essential.  
• Policymakers and Leaders: Governments and organizations will need to create policies and incentives that encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies and practices.
• Businesses and Industries: They will need to embrace sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials to manufacturing and distribution.
• Educators: They have the responsibility to educate future generations about sustainability and equip them with the knowledge and skills needed to create a sustainable world.  
• Individuals: Every person has a role to play in adopting sustainable lifestyles and making informed choices that support a healthy planet.  

Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology in 2770 will depend on the collective efforts of everyone. It will require a global commitment to prioritize sustainability and work together to create a future where both humanity and the planet can thrive.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

This is a fascinating question! While we can’t pinpoint an exact date for when sustainable technology will be required in 2770, it’s safe to say that the need for it will be constant and ever-increasing from now until then. Here’s why:

• Resource Depletion: As the Earth’s resources dwindle, sustainable technologies will become essential for ensuring access to energy, food, and other necessities. This is a process already happening, and it will likely intensify over time.
• Climate Change: The effects of climate change are becoming more severe, making sustainable solutions crucial for mitigating its impacts and adapting to a changing environment. This urgency will only grow as time passes.  
• Population Growth: The global population is projected to continue growing, increasing the demand for resources and the need for sustainable practices to support everyone.  
• Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation will necessitate technologies that can help restore ecosystems and prevent further damage.

Therefore, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 2770. It’s an ongoing imperative that is already critical today and will only become more so in the future.

Here’s how we can think about it:

• Now: We need to invest in research and development, implement sustainable practices, and educate people about the importance of sustainability.
• Near Future: Sustainable technologies will become increasingly important for addressing immediate challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.  
• Distant Future (like 2770): Sustainable technology will likely be the foundation of society, integrated into every aspect of life to ensure the well-being of both humanity and the planet.

It’s not about a specific date but about a continuous journey towards a sustainable future. The sooner we prioritize sustainable technology, the better equipped we will be to face the challenges of the future, including those in 2770.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology is so important! Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology will be required in 2770 (and, really, long before then):

• Everywhere! By 2770, sustainability will likely be a non-negotiable aspect of virtually every facet of human life. This means sustainable technology will be needed in:
  • Energy Production and Distribution: To power homes, industries, and transportation systems with clean and renewable sources.
  • Food Production: To feed a growing population sustainably, using methods that minimize environmental impact and maximize resource efficiency.  
  • Manufacturing and Industry: To produce goods with minimal waste, using sustainable materials and processes.  
  • Transportation: To move people and goods in a way that reduces emissions and minimizes environmental impact.  
  • Urban Planning and Development: To create cities that are resource-efficient, resilient, and environmentally friendly.
  • Waste Management: To minimize waste generation and maximize resource recovery through advanced recycling and waste-to-energy technologies.
  • Water Management: To ensure access to clean water and use water resources efficiently.  
  • Communication and Technology: To develop and use technologies that are energy-efficient and have a minimal environmental footprint.
• Specific Examples:
  • Homes: Smart homes with integrated energy management systems, using renewable energy sources and minimizing water consumption.
  • Cities: Green cities with efficient public transportation, renewable energy infrastructure, and sustainable waste management systems.  
  • Farming: Vertical farms and precision agriculture techniques to maximize food production while minimizing environmental impact.
  • Transportation: Electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, and advanced transportation networks powered by renewable energy.  

Key Takeaway:

Sustainable technology in 2770 won’t be confined to specific sectors. It will be a fundamental requirement across all aspects of society, integrated into the very fabric of how we live and interact with the world. This is because by that time, the consequences of unsustainable practices will likely be far too severe to ignore.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

How sustainable technology will be required in 2770 is less about a specific mechanism of enforcement and more about the fundamental realities of the world at that time. It won’t be a matter of someone making people use it, but rather it will be a necessity for survival and a functioning society. Here’s how that might come to pass:

• Resource Scarcity: By 2770, if we continue on current trends, many resources will be significantly depleted. Sustainable technologies will be the only viable options for accessing energy, food, water, and other essential resources. Unsustainable practices will simply be impossible due to lack of availability.
• Environmental Degradation: The cumulative effects of climate change, pollution, and ecosystem damage will likely make unsustainable practices extremely costly and difficult. Extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and other environmental challenges will necessitate sustainable solutions for adaptation and resilience.
• Economic Imperative: In a world of limited resources and environmental challenges, sustainable technologies will likely be the most economically viable options. Businesses and industries that fail to adopt sustainable practices will be at a competitive disadvantage.
• Social Pressure and Cultural Shift: By 2770, a strong cultural shift towards sustainability is likely. People will likely demand sustainable products and services, and there may be social consequences for those who continue to engage in unsustainable practices.
• Technological Advancement: It’s possible that by 2770, sustainable technologies will be so advanced and integrated into daily life that they are simply the default options. Unsustainable alternatives may be obsolete or impractical.
• Interconnectedness: In a globally connected world, the impacts of unsustainable practices in one region will be felt globally. This interconnectedness may necessitate international agreements and regulations that promote sustainable technologies and practices.

In short: The “requirement” for sustainable technology in 2770 won’t be a matter of law or decree, but rather a fundamental necessity driven by resource limitations, environmental realities, economic pressures, and cultural shifts. It will be the only way to maintain a functioning society and ensure the well-being of future generations.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

It’s tricky to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2770, as that would involve detailed predictions about the future. However, we can build a hypothetical case study based on current trends and extrapolate to imagine what might be necessary:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 2770

Background:

By the mid-28th century, the Amazon rainforest, once a vast and biodiverse ecosystem, had been severely degraded. Centuries of deforestation, unsustainable agriculture, and the effects of climate change had taken their toll. The region faced:

• Loss of Biodiversity: Many species had gone extinct, and the delicate ecological balance was disrupted.
• Soil Erosion and Degradation: Deforestation had led to widespread soil erosion, making it difficult to grow crops.
• Water Scarcity: Changes in rainfall patterns and deforestation had reduced water availability in the region.
• Climate Instability: The loss of the Amazon rainforest, a crucial carbon sink, had exacerbated climate change.  

The Challenge:

The international community recognized the urgent need to revitalize the Amazon rainforest. This required a multi-faceted approach that addressed the environmental, social, and economic challenges facing the region.

The Solution:

A comprehensive plan was implemented, leveraging advanced sustainable technologies:

• Reforestation: Drones and AI-powered systems were used to plant native trees on a massive scale. Advanced bioengineering techniques were employed to develop tree species that were more resistant to drought and disease.
• Soil Regeneration: Nanotechnology was used to develop soil conditioners that could restore degraded soils and improve their fertility.
• Water Management: Advanced irrigation systems, powered by renewable energy, were implemented to ensure efficient water use. Atmospheric water generators were used to supplement water supplies in areas facing scarcity.  
• Sustainable Agriculture: Vertical farms and precision agriculture techniques were introduced to provide food for the local population while minimizing environmental impact.
• Bioremediation: Genetically engineered microorganisms were used to clean up pollution and restore degraded ecosystems.
• Community Involvement: Local communities were actively involved in the revitalization efforts, and they were provided with training and resources to participate in sustainable economic activities.

Results:

By 2770, the Amazon rainforest had made a remarkable recovery.

• Biodiversity Restored: Many species that were on the brink of extinction had recovered, and the ecosystem had regained its ecological balance.
• Food Security: Sustainable agriculture practices provided ample food for the local population.
• Water Availability: Improved water management and atmospheric water generation ensured access to clean water.
• Climate Mitigation: The restored rainforest acted as a significant carbon sink, contributing to global efforts to combat climate change.
• Economic Development: Sustainable economic activities, such as ecotourism and the production of sustainable products, provided livelihoods for local communities.

Lessons Learned:

This hypothetical case study highlights the potential of sustainable technology to address complex environmental challenges. It demonstrates that by combining innovative technologies with community involvement and a long-term vision, it is possible to restore and revitalize even the most degraded ecosystems.

Important Note: This is just one possible scenario. The specific technologies and solutions used in 2770 will depend on the challenges that we face and the advancements that we make in the coming centuries. However, the underlying principles of sustainability will remain crucial for ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology of 2770 – A Speculative Exploration

Abstract:

Predicting the specifics of technology 750 years into the future is inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating current trends and considering the fundamental challenges humanity will likely face, we can construct a plausible vision of sustainable technology in 2770. This white paper explores potential advancements in energy, resource management, food production, environmental remediation, and the crucial role of artificial intelligence in achieving a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The 28th century will inherit the consequences of 21st-century choices. Resource depletion, climate change, and a growing global population will necessitate a radical shift towards sustainable practices. This paper argues that by 2770, sustainable technology will not be a niche area but rather the foundation upon which all aspects of civilization are built.

2. Energy:

• Fusion Power Dominance: Controlled nuclear fusion, after centuries of research, is likely to be a primary energy source, providing clean, abundant power.
• Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit may capture sunlight unimpeded by weather or atmospheric interference, beaming energy back to Earth.
• Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems, tapping into deep Earth heat, could provide baseload power.
• Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids will optimize energy distribution and minimize waste.

3. Resource Management:

• Circular Economy: Closed-loop systems will be the norm, with near-total recycling of materials. “Waste” as we understand it today may be a relic of the past.
• Advanced Materials: Self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, and other advanced materials will minimize resource depletion and environmental impact.
• Resource Extraction from Waste: Nanotechnology may enable the efficient extraction of valuable elements from what is currently considered waste.

4. Food Production:

• Vertical Farming: High-rise vertical farms in urban centers will provide fresh, locally grown produce year-round, minimizing transportation costs and land use.
• Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact.
• Cultured and Plant-Based Proteins: Advanced biotechnology will provide sustainable alternatives to traditional animal agriculture, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and land use.

5. Environmental Remediation:

• Carbon Capture and Utilization: Large-scale carbon capture and utilization technologies will remove CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it into useful products.
• Ocean Cleanup: Autonomous robotic systems will continuously patrol the oceans, removing plastic and other pollutants.
• Ecosystem Restoration: Bioengineered solutions may be used to restore damaged ecosystems, such as coral reefs and rainforests.

6. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

• AI-Driven Optimization: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use across all sectors, from energy and transportation to manufacturing and agriculture.
• Autonomous Systems: Robots and other autonomous systems will perform tasks that are dangerous, repetitive, or require high precision, freeing up human resources for other pursuits.
• Predictive Modeling: Advanced AI models will predict and mitigate potential environmental disasters, such as droughts, floods, and wildfires.

7. Societal Implications:

• Global Cooperation: Achieving a sustainable future will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation and collaboration.
• Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of advanced technologies will raise complex ethical questions that must be carefully considered.
• Education and Awareness: Educating future generations about sustainability will be crucial for ensuring the long-term success of these efforts.

8. Conclusion:

While the specifics of sustainable technology in 2770 remain uncertain, the need for it is undeniable. By investing in research and development, fostering international cooperation, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a future where both humanity and the planet thrive. The technologies described in this paper represent potential pathways towards that future, a future where sustainability is not just a goal, but a way of life.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2770! Here are some possibilities, extrapolated from current trends and potential future developments:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

• Circular Production Systems: Factories will operate on closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously reused and recycled. Waste will be minimized, and products will be designed for disassembly and material recovery.
• Additive Manufacturing with Sustainable Materials: 3D printing will be widely used to create customized products on demand, using sustainable and recycled materials.
• Nanofactories: Nanotechnology may enable the creation of “nanofactories” that can manipulate matter at the atomic level, allowing for the production of goods with unprecedented precision and efficiency, using minimal resources.  

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

• Green Hydrogen Production: Industries that require high temperatures, such as steel manufacturing or cement production, will likely rely on green hydrogen produced from renewable energy sources.  
• Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries that inevitably produce CO2 emissions will utilize advanced carbon capture technologies to prevent those emissions from entering the atmosphere. The captured CO2 will then be used to create valuable products, such as fuels or building materials.  
• Advanced Energy Storage: Industries will have access to highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions, allowing them to store and utilize renewable energy effectively.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Sustainable Mining: Mining operations will employ advanced technologies to minimize environmental impact, such as autonomous vehicles, precision drilling, and in-situ resource extraction techniques.  
• Resource Recovery from Waste: Advanced recycling and waste-to-energy technologies will be used to recover valuable resources from waste streams, reducing the need for virgin resource extraction.
• Desalination and Water Purification: Industries that require large amounts of water will rely on sustainable desalination and water purification technologies to ensure access to clean water without depleting freshwater resources.

4. Transportation and Logistics:

• Electric and Autonomous Fleets: Industrial transportation will be dominated by electric and autonomous vehicles, powered by renewable energy sources. This will reduce emissions and improve efficiency.
• Hyperloop Systems: High-speed transportation systems, such as hyperloops, may be used to transport goods and materials quickly and efficiently between industrial facilities, reducing transportation costs and emissions.
• Drone Delivery: Drones may be used for last-mile delivery of goods, particularly in remote or difficult-to-reach areas.  

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Industries that rely on agricultural products will increasingly use vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture to produce crops sustainably, with minimal land use and environmental impact.
• Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and data analytics will be used to optimize resource use in agriculture, reducing water consumption, fertilizer use, and pesticide use.  
• Biotechnology and Bio-based Industries: Biotechnology will be used to develop sustainable alternatives to traditional industrial processes, such as bio-based plastics or biofuels.

Key Considerations:

• Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications will rely heavily on automation and artificial intelligence to optimize processes, improve efficiency, and minimize environmental impact.
• Global Collaboration: Achieving a sustainable industrial sector in 2770 will require global collaboration to develop and implement sustainable technologies and practices.
• Ethical Implications: It will be crucial to consider the ethical implications of these technologies and ensure that they are used in a way that benefits both humanity and the planet.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2770. As technology continues to advance, we can expect even more innovative and sustainable solutions to emerge in the coming centuries.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2770 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that will shape sustainable technology in 2770! While we can’t know the exact paths research will take, here are some potential areas of focus, building on current trends:

1. Fundamental Science:

• Advanced Materials:
  • Self-healing materials: Materials that can repair themselves when damaged, extending their lifespan and reducing waste.  
  • Adaptive materials: Materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli, allowing for dynamic control of their function.  
  • Bio-integrated materials: Materials that can seamlessly integrate with living systems, opening up possibilities for sustainable agriculture and medicine.
• Energy Physics:
  • Harnessing zero-point energy: Exploring the potential of extracting energy from the quantum vacuum.
  • Exotic energy sources: Investigating other potential energy sources beyond those currently known.
  • Advanced energy conversion: Developing more efficient ways to convert energy from one form to another.
• Environmental Science:
  • Understanding complex ecosystems: Developing a deeper understanding of how ecosystems function and how they respond to environmental changes.
  • Geoengineering: Researching methods for safely and effectively mitigating climate change through large-scale interventions.
  • Planetary science: Studying other planets to gain insights into Earth’s climate and environment.  

2. Applied Research and Development:

• Energy Technologies:
  • Fusion energy: Continued research and development to make fusion power a viable and widespread energy source.  
  • Space-based solar power: Developing the technologies needed to collect solar energy in space and beam it down to Earth.
  • Advanced energy storage: Creating highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions.
• Resource Management:
  • Circular economy technologies: Developing new ways to recycle and reuse materials, minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency.
  • Resource extraction from waste: Creating technologies to efficiently extract valuable elements from waste streams.
  • Sustainable agriculture: Developing new methods for producing food sustainably, with minimal environmental impact.  
• Environmental Remediation:
  • Carbon capture and utilization: Improving the efficiency and scalability of carbon capture technologies and developing new ways to utilize captured CO2.
  • Ocean cleanup: Developing advanced technologies for removing plastic and other pollutants from the oceans.
  • Ecosystem restoration: Creating new methods for restoring damaged ecosystems, such as forests and coral reefs.
• Artificial Intelligence and Automation:
  • AI for sustainability: Developing AI algorithms and models to optimize resource use, predict environmental changes, and design sustainable solutions.  
  • Autonomous systems for environmental monitoring: Creating robots and other autonomous systems to monitor environmental conditions and collect data.
  • AI-powered materials discovery: Using AI to accelerate the discovery of new sustainable materials.  

3. Interdisciplinary Research:

• Socio-technical systems: Studying the complex interactions between technology and society to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed and implemented in a way that benefits everyone.
• Environmental ethics: Exploring the ethical implications of new technologies and developing frameworks for making responsible decisions about their use.
• Sustainable development: Integrating knowledge from various disciplines to develop holistic solutions to sustainability challenges.

Key Considerations:

• Long-term vision: Research and development for sustainable technology in 2770 requires a long-term vision and a commitment to investing in fundamental science.
• Global collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and collaboration in research and development.
• Ethical considerations: It is crucial to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure that they are used in a way that is sustainable and equitable.

By focusing on these areas of research and development, we can lay the foundation for a sustainable future, not just in 2770, but for generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.