Sustainable Technology of 2490

Leave a Comment / Blog, Sustainable Technology of 2490 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

Sustainable technology in 2490 is likely to be vastly different from what we see today. Here are some potential advancements:

  • Energy: Fusion power may be a reality, providing clean and abundant energy. Solar energy could be harvested from space and beamed down to Earth.  
  • Transportation: Flying cars and hyperloops could be commonplace, powered by sustainable energy sources.
  • Manufacturing: 3D printing and nanotechnology could allow for on-demand production of goods with minimal waste.  
  • Agriculture: Vertical farms and lab-grown meat could feed a growing population while minimizing environmental impact.
  • Waste Management: Advanced recycling and waste-to-energy technologies could create a circular economy.  

Overall, sustainable technology in 2490 would likely focus on efficiency, resource conservation, and minimizing environmental impact.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

It’s impossible to say for sure what sustainable technology will look like in 2490. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities:

Energy:

  • Fusion power: This could be a primary source of clean, abundant energy.
  • Space-based solar power: Solar energy could be collected in space and beamed down to Earth.  
  • Advanced energy storage: Highly efficient batteries or other storage solutions could make renewable energy sources more reliable.  

Transportation:

  • Flying cars and personal aircraft: These could be powered by sustainable energy sources and integrated into smart traffic management systems.
  • Hyperloops and high-speed rail: These could provide fast, efficient, and sustainable long-distance travel.
  • Electric and autonomous vehicles: These could be commonplace for ground transportation.

Manufacturing:

  • 3D printing and nanotechnology: These could enable on-demand production of goods with minimal waste and the use of sustainable materials.  
  • Circular economy: Manufacturing processes could be designed to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse.  

Agriculture:

  • Vertical farms and hydroponics: These could increase food production while reducing land use and water consumption.  
  • Lab-grown meat and alternative proteins: These could provide sustainable sources of protein.  
  • Precision agriculture: Advanced technologies could optimize crop yields while minimizing environmental impact.  

Waste Management:

  • Advanced recycling and waste-to-energy technologies: These could create a circular economy and reduce landfill waste.  
  • Bioremediation and other innovative waste treatment methods: These could break down pollutants and restore ecosystems.  

Other areas:

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning: These could be used to optimize resource use and improve the efficiency of sustainable technologies.
  • Biotechnology and genetic engineering: These could be used to develop sustainable materials, crops, and other products.
  • Smart cities and infrastructure: These could be designed to minimize environmental impact and promote sustainable living.

Overall, sustainable technology in 2490 would likely focus on:

  • Efficiency: Minimizing energy and resource use.  
  • Renewable resources: Shifting away from fossil fuels and other finite resources.
  • Circular economy: Reducing waste and maximizing resource reuse.  
  • Environmental protection: Minimizing pollution and preserving ecosystems.

It’s important to remember that these are just possibilities. The actual sustainable technologies of 2490 could be very different. However, by continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can create a future where technology helps us live in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

It’s not about who requires sustainable technology in 2490, but rather who will benefit from it, and that’s essentially everyone! Here’s why:

  • The planet: By 2490, the effects of climate change and resource depletion will likely be even more pronounced. Sustainable technology will be crucial for mitigating these effects and preserving the planet for future generations.
  • Humanity: Sustainable technology will be essential for ensuring a high quality of life for all people. This includes access to clean energy, food, water, and other essential resources.
  • Future generations: Sustainable technology will help to create a world where future generations can thrive. This means leaving behind a healthy planet and a sustainable society.

In a sense, sustainable technology in 2490 will be a necessity for survival and well-being. It won’t be a matter of choice, but a fundamental requirement for a thriving civilization.

Think of it like this: we need clean air and water to survive today. In 2490, sustainable technology will be just as essential, providing the foundation for a healthy and prosperous future.

Ultimately, the “requirement” for sustainable technology in 2490 comes from the need to ensure the long-term survival and well-being of both humanity and the planet.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just about having sustainable technology in 2490, but about when it becomes absolutely essential. Here’s a breakdown:

  • The need is NOW: We already need sustainable technology. Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are pressing issues. The sooner we develop and implement sustainable solutions, the better our chances of a positive future.  
  • Increasing urgency: The need will only become more urgent as time passes. The longer we delay, the more severe the consequences will be, and the more drastic the measures we’ll need to take in the future.  
  • 2490 and beyond: By 2490, sustainable technology will likely be non-negotiable for survival and a decent quality of life. The cumulative effects of environmental damage will likely make it impossible to sustain a thriving civilization without it.

Think of it like this:

  • Now: We need to start building the foundation for a sustainable future.
  • In the coming decades: We need to accelerate the development and adoption of sustainable technologies to mitigate the worst effects of climate change and resource depletion.
  • By 2490: Sustainable technology needs to be fully integrated into every aspect of society to ensure long-term survival and well-being.

So, while 2490 might seem far off, the need for sustainable technology is not a future problem. It’s a present necessity that will only grow more critical with each passing year.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Intel Technology

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology is so important! Here’s where it will be absolutely essential in 2490:

  • Everywhere! Sustainable technology won’t be confined to specific places. It will need to be integrated into every facet of life. Think about it:
    • Homes: Sustainable energy, efficient appliances, smart home systems to minimize resource use.
    • Cities: Sustainable infrastructure, public transportation, waste management, green spaces.
    • Industries: Sustainable manufacturing, resource management, circular economy practices.
    • Agriculture: Sustainable farming techniques, vertical farms, alternative protein production.
    • Transportation: Sustainable vehicles, charging infrastructure, smart traffic management.  
    • Even in space! As humanity potentially expands beyond Earth, sustainable practices will be crucial for off-world settlements.
  • Specific Needs: While it will be everywhere, sustainable technology will be particularly critical in certain areas:
    • Regions vulnerable to climate change: Coastal areas threatened by rising sea levels, arid regions facing drought, etc.  
    • Areas with limited resources: Sustainable solutions for water management, energy production, and food security.  
    • Developing nations: Sustainable technology can help these regions grow without replicating the environmental mistakes of the past.  

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2490 will need to be a global, interconnected system that supports human civilization while protecting the planet. It will be woven into the fabric of daily life, ensuring that everyone has access to the resources they need without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

This is where it gets interesting! It’s not just about having sustainable technology, but how it’s integrated and used that truly matters. Here’s how sustainable technology will likely be required in 2490:

  • Seamless Integration: It won’t be add-ons or separate systems. Sustainable technology will be woven into the very fabric of society. Think of it like this: electricity today is essential and integrated into everything. In 2490, sustainability will be the same.  
  • Smart Systems: AI and machine learning will likely play a huge role. These technologies can optimize resource use, predict needs, and manage complex systems to ensure efficiency and minimize waste. Imagine a city where energy grids automatically adjust to demand, or farms where robots precisely deliver water and nutrients to crops.  
  • Circular Economy: This will be key. Products will be designed for durability, reuse, and recycling. Waste will be minimized, and resources will be kept in circulation. Think of materials that can be broken down and reformed into new products, or closed-loop systems where waste from one process becomes a resource for another.  
  • Localized Solutions: While global systems will be important, sustainable technology will also need to be adaptable to local conditions. This means solutions tailored to specific climates, ecosystems, and resource availability.  
  • Behavioral Integration: Sustainable technology won’t just be about the tech itself. It will also require changes in human behavior and a shift towards a more sustainable way of life. This could involve things like:
    • Conscious consumption: Making informed choices about the products we buy and use.  
    • Sharing economy: Sharing resources and goods to reduce overall consumption.  
    • Community-based solutions: Working together to create sustainable communities.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2490 will be a complex, interconnected system that combines advanced technology with smart planning and responsible behavior. It will be a way of life that prioritizes the well-being of both humanity and the planet.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

It’s tricky to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2490, as that would involve detailed speculation. However, we can build a hypothetical case study based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed.

Case Study: The Integrated Sustainable City of Aurora, 2490

Background:

By 2490, many coastal cities have been impacted by rising sea levels. Aurora is a newly built city designed from the ground up with sustainability at its core. It houses 2 million people and is a hub for advanced technology and sustainable industries.

Sustainable Technology in Action:

  • Energy: Aurora is powered by a combination of fusion energy and space-based solar power. Smart grids distribute energy efficiently, and homes are equipped with AI systems that optimize energy use based on occupant needs and real-time weather data.
  • Transportation: The city features a network of flying cars for personal transport, powered by advanced batteries and integrated with a smart air traffic management system. Hyperloops connect Aurora to other cities, and ground transport within the city is entirely electric and autonomous.
  • Manufacturing: Aurora has several “micro-factories” that use 3D printing and nanotechnology to produce goods on demand, minimizing waste and using sustainable materials. A sophisticated recycling system ensures that materials are constantly reused and repurposed.
  • Agriculture: The city has large vertical farms that provide fresh produce for its inhabitants. Lab-grown meat and other alternative proteins are also produced within the city, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture.
  • Waste Management: Aurora has a zero-waste policy. Advanced recycling facilities break down waste into its basic components, which are then used to create new products. Waste-to-energy plants convert any remaining waste into clean energy.  
  • Water Management: The city has a closed-loop water system. Water is collected, treated, and reused multiple times. Advanced sensors and AI monitor water usage and identify leaks to ensure efficient water management.  

Outcome:

Aurora is a thriving city with a high quality of life. Its inhabitants enjoy clean air and water, abundant energy, and access to all the resources they need. The city has a minimal environmental footprint and is a model for sustainable urban living.

Lessons Learned:

  • Systems thinking: Sustainable technology is most effective when it is integrated into a holistic system.
  • Technological advancement: Continued investment in research and development is crucial for developing new sustainable technologies.
  • Behavioral change: Technological solutions must be coupled with changes in human behavior and a commitment to sustainable living.

This case study, while fictional, highlights the potential of sustainable technology to create a thriving and environmentally responsible society in the future.

Important Note: This is just one possible scenario. The actual sustainable technologies of 2490 could be very different. However, by focusing on innovation, integration, and a commitment to sustainability, we can create a future where technology helps us live in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2490: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2490. Building upon current trends and extrapolating future advancements, it envisions a world where technology is seamlessly integrated with sustainable practices, ensuring a high quality of life for all while preserving the planet for future generations. The paper examines key areas of technological development, including energy, transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, waste management, and information technology, highlighting the interconnectedness and systemic nature of sustainable solutions.

1. Introduction:

The 25th century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Climate change, resource depletion, and population growth demand a fundamental shift in how we live and interact with our planet. This white paper argues that sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of a thriving civilization in 2490, enabling us to overcome these challenges and build a more equitable and resilient future.

2. Key Areas of Technological Advancement:

2.1 Energy:

  • Fusion Power: Widespread adoption of commercially viable fusion reactors will provide clean, abundant, and safe energy.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit will capture sunlight and beam it to Earth, supplementing terrestrial solar energy and providing a consistent energy source.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions will be crucial for balancing supply and demand, particularly for intermittent renewable sources.

2.2 Transportation:

  • Advanced Air Mobility: Personal and commercial flying vehicles, powered by sustainable energy sources, will revolutionize urban transportation, reducing congestion and emissions.
  • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems will connect cities and regions, enabling rapid and efficient long-distance travel.
  • Autonomous Electric Vehicles: Electric vehicles, coupled with advanced AI-powered autonomous driving systems, will dominate ground transportation, improving safety and efficiency.

2.3 Manufacturing:

  • Nanotechnology and 3D Printing: These technologies will enable on-demand manufacturing of complex products with minimal waste and the use of sustainable materials.
  • Circular Economy: Manufacturing processes will be designed for closed-loop systems, where materials are continuously reused and recycled, minimizing resource depletion and pollution.
  • Biomanufacturing: The use of biological systems to produce materials and products will offer sustainable alternatives to traditional manufacturing processes.

2.4 Agriculture:

  • Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: These methods will maximize food production while minimizing land use, water consumption, and the need for pesticides.
  • Cellular Agriculture: Lab-grown meat and other animal products will provide sustainable sources of protein, reducing the environmental impact of traditional agriculture.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics will optimize crop yields and resource use, minimizing waste and environmental impact.

2.5 Waste Management:

  • Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Highly efficient recycling technologies will recover valuable materials from waste streams, minimizing landfill waste and promoting a circular economy.
  • Waste-to-Energy: Advanced waste-to-energy plants will convert non-recyclable waste into clean energy, further reducing landfill burden.
  • Bioremediation: The use of biological processes to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems will be a crucial tool for environmental remediation.

2.6 Information Technology:

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI and machine learning will be integral to optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and driving innovation in all areas of sustainable technology.
  • The Internet of Things (IoT): A vast network of interconnected devices will provide real-time data on resource consumption, environmental conditions, and infrastructure performance, enabling efficient management and optimization.

3. The Interconnectedness of Sustainable Technologies:

It is crucial to recognize that these technological advancements are not isolated solutions. They are interconnected and interdependent, forming a complex and integrated system. For example, fusion power will provide the clean energy needed to power electric vehicles and vertical farms, while AI will optimize the efficiency of these systems and manage the complex interactions between them.

4. Societal and Behavioral Changes:

Technological advancements alone are not sufficient. Achieving a sustainable future also requires significant societal and behavioral changes. This includes:

  • Conscious Consumption: Individuals and societies must adopt more sustainable consumption patterns, prioritizing durability, reuse, and sharing.
  • Sustainable Lifestyles: Embracing lifestyles that minimize environmental impact, such as reducing energy consumption, choosing sustainable transportation options, and supporting sustainable businesses.
  • Global Cooperation: International collaboration is essential for developing and implementing sustainable technologies on a global scale.

5. Conclusion:

The year 2490 presents a vision of a world where sustainable technology is not just a desirable option, but a fundamental necessity for a thriving civilization. By investing in research and development, fostering innovation, and embracing a holistic approach that integrates technology with societal and behavioral changes, we can create a future where humanity and the planet prosper together. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging us to accelerate our efforts towards a sustainable future, ensuring a healthy and vibrant world for generations to come.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2490, building on the trends we’ve discussed:

1. Sustainable Manufacturing and Resource Management:

  • Nanofactories: Imagine factories at the nanoscale, able to manipulate individual atoms and molecules to create materials and products on demand. These nanofactories would drastically reduce waste and energy consumption, as materials could be built precisely and repurposed endlessly.
  • Closed-Loop Production: Industries would operate on circular economy principles. Factories wouldn’t just produce goods; they’d also be responsible for reclaiming and recycling them at the end of their life cycle. Materials would be designed for disassembly and reuse, creating a closed loop where resources are constantly cycled.  
  • Biomanufacturing: Industries could leverage biological processes to create sustainable materials, fuels, and chemicals. Imagine growing plastics or fabrics instead of manufacturing them from fossil fuels. This could revolutionize industries like textiles, construction, and packaging.

2. Energy and Resource Production:

  • Advanced Fusion Reactors: Fusion power plants would provide clean and abundant energy for industrial processes. These plants would be highly efficient and safe, providing a stable energy source for even the most energy-intensive industries.  
  • Space-Based Resource Extraction: Mining asteroids and other celestial bodies for rare earth minerals and other resources could become feasible and sustainable. This would reduce the environmental impact of terrestrial mining and provide access to resources needed for advanced technologies.  
  • Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries would actively capture CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it into valuable products, such as fuels, chemicals, and building materials. This would help to mitigate climate change while creating new industrial opportunities.

3. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Automated Vertical Farms: Large-scale, automated vertical farms would be integrated into industrial complexes, providing fresh produce for workers and local communities. These farms would use minimal land and water, and would be powered by renewable energy sources.
  • Cellular Agriculture Facilities: Industries would produce lab-grown meat, poultry, and seafood at scale, providing sustainable and ethical sources of protein. These facilities would require far less land, water, and energy than traditional agriculture.
  • Precision Agriculture for Industrial Crops: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics would be used to optimize the production of industrial crops, such as biofuels, bioplastics, and pharmaceuticals. This would increase yields while minimizing environmental impact.

4. Infrastructure Development and Maintenance:

  • Self-Healing Materials: Construction materials would be designed to self-heal, extending the lifespan of infrastructure and reducing maintenance costs. This would be particularly important for large-scale industrial facilities and transportation networks.
  • Robotic Construction and Repair: Robots would be used to build and maintain infrastructure, improving safety and efficiency. This would be especially useful in remote or hazardous environments.
  • Smart Infrastructure Systems: Industrial facilities and transportation networks would be equipped with advanced sensors and AI systems that monitor performance, predict failures, and optimize resource use.

5. Information and Communication Technologies:

  • AI-Powered Optimization: AI would be used to optimize all aspects of industrial operations, from energy consumption to supply chain management. This would improve efficiency, reduce costs, and minimize environmental impact.
  • Digital Twins: Industries would use digital twins of their facilities and processes to simulate different scenarios and optimize performance. This would allow them to identify potential problems and improve efficiency before they are implemented in the real world.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industry in 2490. The key takeaway is that sustainability would not be an afterthought; it would be deeply integrated into every aspect of industrial operations, driving innovation and ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2490 ?

It’s fascinating to think about the kind of research and development that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 2490! Here are some potential areas of focus, keeping in mind that this is speculative but based on current trends:

1. Fundamental Materials Science:

  • Designer Materials: Research into creating materials with specific properties at the atomic level. This could lead to super-strong, ultra-light materials for construction, or materials that can adapt to changing conditions.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Developing materials that can repair themselves when damaged, extending the lifespan of infrastructure and reducing waste.  
  • Biodegradable and Compostable Super-Materials: Creating materials that are not only strong and durable but also completely break down naturally at the end of their use.

2. Energy Breakthroughs:

  • Advanced Fusion Energy: Continued research into achieving stable and efficient fusion power, potentially unlocking a limitless source of clean energy.
  • Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring less conventional energy sources, like harnessing zero-point energy or developing more efficient methods of converting other forms of energy (like thermal or kinetic) into usable electricity.
  • Wireless Energy Transmission: Developing ways to transmit energy wirelessly over long distances, potentially making space-based solar power a more practical solution.  

3. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

  • Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to produce useful materials, fuels, and chemicals. This could revolutionize manufacturing by creating sustainable alternatives to traditional processes.
  • Advanced Genetic Engineering: Developing techniques to enhance crops for increased yields and resilience, potentially creating varieties that require minimal resources and can thrive in harsh conditions.  
  • Bioremediation and Ecosystem Restoration: Researching ways to use biological systems to clean up pollution, restore damaged ecosystems, and even reverse the effects of climate change.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Complex Systems:

  • AI for Resource Optimization: Developing AI systems that can manage complex networks of energy grids, transportation systems, and resource allocation, ensuring maximum efficiency and minimizing waste.  
  • Predictive Modeling for Sustainability: Using AI to model and predict the long-term effects of human activity on the environment, helping us to make more informed decisions about resource use and development.  
  • AI-Driven Material Discovery: Employing AI to accelerate the discovery of new sustainable materials by analyzing vast datasets and identifying promising candidates.  

5. Space Technologies for Sustainability:

  • Space-Based Resource Extraction: Researching methods for mining asteroids and other celestial bodies for valuable resources, reducing our dependence on Earth’s finite supply.  
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Developing more efficient and cost-effective ways to collect solar energy in space and beam it back to Earth.
  • Terraforming and Off-World Habitats: Exploring the possibility of creating sustainable human settlements on other planets, potentially requiring radical advances in closed-loop life support systems and resource management.  

6. Social and Behavioral Research:

  • Understanding Sustainable Behaviors: Studying how to encourage individuals and societies to adopt more sustainable practices.
  • Designing Sustainable Systems: Researching how to design technological systems that are not only efficient but also easy for people to use and integrate into their lives.
  • Global Cooperation and Governance: Exploring models for international cooperation on environmental issues, ensuring that sustainable technologies are developed and deployed equitably across the globe.

Important Considerations:

  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Research in these areas will require collaboration across multiple disciplines, including materials science, biology, computer science, engineering, and social sciences.
  • Ethical Considerations: As we develop more powerful technologies, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications and potential risks.
  • Long-Term Vision: Research and development for sustainable technology in 2490 requires a long-term vision and a commitment to investing in fundamental science.

By focusing on these key areas of research and development, we can pave the way for a future where sustainable technology is not just a dream, but a reality that benefits all of humanity and the planet.Sources and related content

COURTESY : PG Diploma in Sustainability Science

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »