Sustainable Technology of 2480

78 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

Sustainable technology in 2480 would likely be far more advanced and integrated into daily life than what we see today. Here are some potential aspects:

Energy:

Fusion Power: Nuclear fusion, a clean and virtually limitless energy source, could be a primary power source.
Advanced Solar: Solar technology might involve highly efficient space-based solar farms or advanced materials that can capture energy from various sources like vibrations or temperature differences.
Smart Grids: Highly sophisticated, AI-controlled smart grids would optimize energy distribution and minimize waste.

Environment:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies would efficiently capture and store or utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Technologies could actively remove pollutants from oceans and restore marine ecosystems.
Precision Agriculture: Highly efficient and sustainable farming practices using AI, robotics, and biotechnology to maximize yields while minimizing environmental impact.

Resources:

Circular Economy: A closed-loop system where resources are continuously reused and recycled, minimizing waste and the need for raw materials.
3D Printing with Recycled Materials: Advanced 3D printing could utilize a wide range of recycled materials to create new products on demand.
Desalination and Water Management: Highly efficient desalination technologies and smart water management systems would ensure access to clean water in even the most arid regions.

Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Widespread use of electric vehicles powered by clean energy sources, along with advanced autonomous driving systems to optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents.
Hyperloop or Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops or magnetic levitation trains could connect cities and regions efficiently.
Sustainable Aviation: Biofuels or electric-powered aircraft could significantly reduce the environmental impact of air travel.

Technology:

Artificial Intelligence: AI would be deeply integrated into various aspects of life, optimizing resource usage, managing infrastructure, and assisting in scientific research.
Nanotechnology: Advanced materials and devices at the nanoscale could revolutionize medicine, manufacturing, and energy storage.
Biotechnology: Genetic engineering and synthetic biology could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and environmental remediation.

Society:

Smart Cities: Urban centers designed with sustainability in mind, optimizing energy use, waste management, and transportation.
Sustainable Consumption: Emphasis on reducing consumption, reusing and repairing products, and choosing eco-friendly alternatives.
Global Cooperation: International collaboration on environmental issues and sustainable development goals.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 2480 could be very different from what we imagine today. However, the core principles of sustainability – protecting the environment, conserving resources, and promoting social equity – will likely remain central to technological development in the future.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, here’s an imaginative look at what sustainable technology in 2480 might entail, building upon current trends and potential breakthroughs:

Energy:

Fusion Power Dominance: Nuclear fusion, a clean and virtually limitless energy source, could be the primary global power source. Advanced fusion reactors might be smaller, more efficient, and widely distributed.
Space-Based Solar: Massive solar farms in space could collect sunlight without atmospheric interference and beam energy to Earth.
Ambient Energy Harvesting: Technologies that capture energy from the environment – vibrations, temperature differences, even radio waves – could power small devices and infrastructure.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Revolutionary battery technologies or entirely new energy storage methods could allow for seamless integration of renewable energy sources.

Environment:

Atmospheric Regeneration: Active technologies could remove greenhouse gases and pollutants from the atmosphere, potentially reversing the effects of climate change.
Ocean Restoration: Advanced robotics and biotechnology could be used to clean up pollution, restore coral reefs, and revitalize marine ecosystems.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems could optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use, and vertical farms could become commonplace in urban areas.
Personalized Ecosystem Management: Individuals might have tools to monitor and manage their environmental impact, making sustainable choices easier.

Resources:

Circular Economy in Full Swing: A truly closed-loop system where resources are continuously reused and recycled, with minimal waste generation.
3D Printing Revolution: Advanced 3D printing using a wide range of recycled materials could enable on-demand manufacturing and reduce the need for traditional factories.
Material Synthesis: Technologies could allow us to create new materials with desired properties from readily available resources, reducing reliance on rare elements.
Water Abundance: Highly efficient desalination and atmospheric water capture technologies could provide clean water even in arid regions.

Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous: Electric vehicles powered by clean energy sources would be the norm, with highly advanced autonomous driving systems optimizing traffic flow and eliminating accidents.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops or maglev trains could connect cities and regions, reducing travel times significantly.
Personal Aerial Mobility: Small, electric-powered aircraft could become a common mode of personal transportation, relieving congestion on the ground.
Sustainable Aviation: Biofuel or electric-powered aircraft could significantly reduce the environmental impact of air travel for long distances.

Technology:

AI Everywhere: Artificial intelligence would be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, from managing energy grids to assisting in scientific research and personal healthcare.
Nanotechnology and Biotechnology: These fields could lead to breakthroughs in medicine (targeted drug delivery, regenerative therapies), manufacturing (self-assembling materials), and environmental remediation (nanobots for cleaning up pollution).
Human-Computer Symbiosis: Brain-computer interfaces could become more advanced, allowing for seamless interaction with technology and potentially enhancing human capabilities.

Society:

Smart Cities: Urban centers designed with sustainability as a core principle, optimizing energy use, waste management, and transportation.
Sustainable Consumption: A shift towards mindful consumption, with an emphasis on durability, repairability, and sharing of resources.
Global Cooperation: International collaboration on environmental issues and sustainable development goals would be essential to address global challenges.

Ethical Considerations:

AI Governance: Careful regulation and ethical frameworks would be crucial to ensure that AI is used responsibly and for the benefit of humanity.
Resource Equity: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technologies are shared equitably across the globe, addressing issues of environmental justice.
Technological Unemployment: Strategies to mitigate the potential job displacement caused by automation and AI, focusing on education and retraining.

It’s crucial to remember that this is a speculative vision. The actual sustainable technologies of 2480 could be very different. However, the core principles of sustainability – protecting the environment, conserving resources, and promoting social equity – will likely remain central to technological development in the future.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

Sustainable technology in 2480 would be essential for everyone, but here’s a breakdown of who would be most reliant on it and why:

1. Humanity as a whole:

Survival: By 2480, the effects of climate change and resource depletion could be severe. Sustainable technology would be crucial for ensuring the survival and well-being of humanity.
Quality of life: Sustainable technology would provide access to clean energy, clean water, and other essential resources, improving the quality of life for everyone.
Future generations: Sustainable practices would ensure that future generations have access to the resources they need to thrive.

2. Governments and policymakers:

National security: Sustainable resource management and environmental protection would be critical for national security and stability.
Economic development: Investing in sustainable technology would create new industries and jobs, driving economic growth.
Global cooperation: International collaboration on environmental issues and sustainable development goals would be essential to address global challenges.

3. Businesses and industries:

Resource efficiency: Sustainable technologies would help businesses reduce their environmental footprint and save money on resources.
Innovation: Sustainable practices would drive innovation and create new market opportunities.
Corporate social responsibility: Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products and services, making it essential for businesses to adopt sustainable practices.

4. Individuals:

Personal responsibility: Individuals would have a role to play in adopting sustainable practices in their daily lives, such as reducing energy consumption, recycling, and making sustainable consumer choices.
Health and well-being: Access to clean air and water, and a healthy environment would be essential for individual health and well-being.
Empowerment: Individuals might have tools and technologies to monitor and manage their environmental impact, empowering them to make sustainable choices.

5. Vulnerable populations:

Climate change impacts: Communities most vulnerable to the effects of climate change, such as those in low-lying coastal areas or arid regions, would be particularly reliant on sustainable technologies for adaptation and resilience.
Resource scarcity: Sustainable technologies would be crucial for ensuring access to essential resources like water and food in areas facing resource scarcity.
Environmental justice: Sustainable development would need to address issues of environmental justice, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not disproportionately affected by environmental problems.

In conclusion, sustainable technology in 2480 would be essential for everyone, but its importance would be particularly pronounced for ensuring the survival and well-being of humanity, driving economic development, and addressing issues of environmental justice.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

It’s not a matter of when sustainable technology is required in 2480, but rather that it will be an absolute necessity by that point. Here’s why:

Resource Depletion: By 2480, we can anticipate that many of Earth’s finite resources will be significantly depleted, if not exhausted. Sustainable technology will be essential to provide alternatives and manage what remains responsibly.
Climate Change Impacts: The long-term effects of climate change will likely be much more pronounced by 2480. Sustainable technology will be crucial for mitigating those effects, adapting to the changed environment, and potentially even reversing some of the damage.
Population Growth: Even with potential population stabilization, the sheer number of people on the planet in 2480 will require careful resource management and efficient systems, which sustainable technology can provide.
Environmental Degradation: Without sustainable practices, pollution and habitat destruction will likely worsen over time. Sustainable technology will be necessary to clean up the environment, restore ecosystems, and prevent further damage.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2480 won’t be a choice, but a fundamental requirement for human civilization to survive and thrive. It will need to be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, from energy production and resource management to transportation and even how we live in our homes.

Think of it this way: if we don’t develop and implement sustainable technology long before 2480, the world we know may be drastically different, or even uninhabitable, by that time.

COURTESY : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” as well as the “when”! Sustainable technology in 2480 will be needed everywhere, but some areas will be particularly crucial:

Urban Centers: Cities will likely be even more densely populated by 2480. Sustainable technologies will be essential for managing resources, transportation, waste, and energy in these concentrated areas. Think smart grids, vertical farms, and advanced public transportation systems.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture and resource management will be crucial in rural areas to ensure food production and protect ecosystems. This could involve precision farming, renewable energy sources for farms, and sustainable water management.
Remote and Isolated Communities: Sustainable technologies can help provide access to essential resources like clean water and energy in remote areas where traditional infrastructure may be difficult to establish or maintain.
Extreme Environments: As climate change progresses, sustainable technologies will be needed to help communities adapt to extreme conditions like rising sea levels, droughts, or extreme temperatures. This might involve floating cities, drought-resistant crops, or advanced climate control systems.
Space: By 2480, space exploration and even colonization may be more advanced. Sustainable technologies will be essential for providing resources and maintaining habitable environments in space. Think closed-loop life support systems and in-situ resource utilization.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2480 will need to be implemented anywhere human activity takes place, from the deepest oceans to the furthest reaches of space. It will need to be integrated into every aspect of our lives and infrastructure to ensure a sustainable future for all.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

The “how” of sustainable technology in 2480 is complex and multifaceted, but here are some key aspects:

Innovation and Breakthroughs: Continuous research and development will be crucial. We’ll need breakthroughs in areas like energy production (fusion, advanced solar), materials science (creating new sustainable materials), biotechnology (for agriculture and medicine), and nanotechnology (for various applications).
Integration and System Thinking: Sustainable technology won’t be effective in isolation. It needs to be integrated into complex systems, like smart grids for energy, circular economies for resource management, and smart cities for urban living. A systems-thinking approach is essential to optimize resource use and minimize waste.
Scalability and Affordability: Even the most promising technologies are useless if they can’t be scaled up to meet global demand and made affordable for everyone. This requires innovation in manufacturing processes and business models.
Resilience and Adaptability: The world of 2480 will likely face unforeseen challenges. Sustainable technologies need to be designed to be resilient to climate change impacts, resource scarcity, and other disruptions. They must also be adaptable to changing conditions.
Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: Developing and implementing sustainable technology requires global collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and businesses. Open knowledge sharing and international cooperation are essential.
Behavioral Change and Social Acceptance: Technology alone isn’t enough. Sustainable practices require changes in human behavior and social norms. Education, awareness campaigns, and incentives can encourage sustainable consumption and lifestyle choices.
Ethical Considerations and Governance: As technology advances, ethical considerations become more important. We’ll need robust frameworks to govern the development and use of technologies like AI, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, ensuring they are used responsibly and for the benefit of humanity.
Policy and Regulation: Governments will play a crucial role in creating an environment that supports sustainable technology. Policies that incentivize sustainable practices, regulate resource use, and promote innovation will be essential.

In short, the “how” of sustainable technology in 2480 involves a combination of technological innovation, systems thinking, scalability, resilience, collaboration, behavioral change, ethical considerations, and supportive policies. It’s a complex challenge that requires a holistic and long-term perspective.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

It’s tricky to do a traditional “case study” on sustainable technology in 2480, as it’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study to illustrate what it might involve. Here’s an example focusing on urban sustainability:

Case Study: Eco-City Prime, 2480

Background:

By 2480, many coastal cities have been submerged due to rising sea levels. Eco-City Prime is a newly built urban center designed from the ground up with sustainability as its core principle. It houses 5 million people and is a model for sustainable urban living.

Sustainable Technologies in Focus:

Energy: Eco-City Prime is powered primarily by a network of small, advanced fusion reactors. These provide clean, reliable energy with minimal waste. Buildings are equipped with smart energy management systems that optimize energy use based on occupancy and real-time conditions.
Transportation: Personal vehicles are largely a thing of the past. Residents rely on a network of high-speed, electric-powered maglev trains and an extensive network of automated, electric buses. Personal mobility is facilitated by small, electric-powered aerial vehicles for short-distance travel.
Food: Food production is integrated into the city through vertical farms and hydroponic gardens. These utilize recycled water and nutrients and minimize land use. Residents also have access to personalized nutrition plans and 3D-printed meals made from sustainable protein sources.
Waste: Eco-City Prime operates on a closed-loop system. All waste is recycled or repurposed. Advanced material recovery facilities break down waste into its basic components, which are then used to create new products via 3D printing.
Water: Water is a precious resource. The city utilizes highly efficient desalination plants and atmospheric water capture technologies to ensure a constant supply of clean water. Smart water management systems minimize water loss and optimize its use in agriculture and industry.

Outcomes:

Carbon Neutrality: Eco-City Prime has a net-zero carbon footprint.
Resource Efficiency: The city operates on a circular economy model, minimizing waste and maximizing resource reuse.
High Quality of Life: Residents enjoy clean air and water, access to green spaces, and a high quality of life.
Economic Prosperity: The city is a hub for sustainable technology innovation and attracts investment in green industries.

Challenges:

Initial Investment: Building Eco-City Prime required significant upfront investment in sustainable technologies and infrastructure.
Social Acceptance: Convincing residents to adopt new lifestyles and technologies required extensive education and outreach programs.
Technological Maintenance: Maintaining the city’s complex sustainable systems requires a highly skilled workforce and ongoing technological advancements.

Lessons Learned:

Planning is Crucial: Designing for sustainability from the outset is essential for creating truly sustainable cities.
Technology is Key: Advanced technologies are necessary to address the complex challenges of urban sustainability.
Social Engagement Matters: Engaging residents in the transition to a sustainable lifestyle is crucial for long-term success.

Conclusion:

Eco-City Prime serves as a model for sustainable urban development in 2480. It demonstrates that it is possible to create thriving urban centers that are environmentally responsible and provide a high quality of life for their residents.

This is just one example, of course. Sustainable technology in 2480 will likely be applied in countless other areas, from agriculture and manufacturing to healthcare and space exploration. By imagining these future scenarios, we can better understand the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead and work towards creating a more sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Financial Times

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2480: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2480. Building upon current trends and anticipating future breakthroughs, it outlines key technological advancements across various sectors, highlighting their potential impact on society, the environment, and the global economy. It also addresses the critical challenges and ethical considerations associated with developing and implementing these technologies, emphasizing the importance of global collaboration and responsible innovation.

1. Introduction:

The year 2480 represents a significant milestone in human history. By this point, the cumulative effects of climate change, resource depletion, and population growth will likely be profound. Sustainable technology will be not just desirable, but essential for human civilization to thrive. This paper envisions a future where technological innovation, coupled with responsible practices, has enabled humanity to achieve a sustainable balance with the planet.

2. Key Technological Domains:

2.1 Energy:

Fusion Power: Widespread adoption of commercially viable fusion reactors, providing clean, abundant, and safe energy.
Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar farms in orbit capturing solar energy without atmospheric interference and beaming it to Earth.
Ambient Energy Harvesting: Ubiquitous integration of technologies that harvest energy from the environment (vibrations, temperature gradients, etc.) to power small devices and infrastructure.
Advanced Energy Storage: Revolutionary battery technologies or alternative storage solutions enabling efficient and reliable energy distribution.

2.2 Environment:

Atmospheric Regeneration: Active technologies for removing greenhouse gases and pollutants from the atmosphere, potentially reversing climate change effects.
Ocean Restoration: Advanced robotics and biotechnology for cleaning up pollution, restoring marine ecosystems, and managing fisheries sustainably.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems optimizing crop yields while minimizing resource use and environmental impact, including vertical farming and lab-grown meat alternatives.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Advanced recycling and resource recovery systems achieving near-zero waste.

2.3 Resources:

Material Synthesis: Technologies for creating new materials with desired properties from readily available resources, reducing reliance on rare elements.
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: On-demand manufacturing using recycled and sustainable materials, enabling localized production and reducing waste.
Water Management: Highly efficient desalination and atmospheric water capture technologies providing clean water even in arid regions.

2.4 Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Widespread use of electric vehicles powered by clean energy sources, coupled with sophisticated autonomous driving systems.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems connecting cities and regions, reducing travel times and carbon emissions.
Sustainable Aviation: Biofuel or electric-powered aircraft for long-distance travel, minimizing the environmental impact of air travel.

2.5 Technology & Society:

Artificial Intelligence: AI integrated into all aspects of life, optimizing resource use, managing infrastructure, and assisting in scientific research.
Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Breakthroughs in medicine, manufacturing, and environmental remediation using these advanced fields.
Smart Cities: Urban centers designed with sustainability as a core principle, optimizing energy use, waste management, and transportation.
Global Communication Networks: Seamless and accessible communication technologies fostering global collaboration and knowledge sharing.

3. Challenges and Ethical Considerations:

Technological Unemployment: Strategies to mitigate potential job displacement due to automation and AI, focusing on education and retraining.
Resource Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and resources across the globe, addressing issues of environmental justice.
AI Governance: Developing ethical frameworks and regulations for AI development and deployment, preventing misuse and ensuring responsible innovation.
Environmental Remediation: Addressing the legacy of past environmental damage and restoring degraded ecosystems.
Data Privacy and Security: Protecting individual privacy and data security in a world of ubiquitous connectivity and AI.

4. The Path Forward:

Achieving this vision of sustainable technology in 2480 requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders:

Research and Development: Continued investment in basic and applied research across all relevant scientific disciplines.
International Collaboration: Global cooperation on environmental issues, resource management, and technology development.
Policy and Regulation: Government policies that incentivize sustainable practices, regulate resource use, and promote innovation.
Education and Awareness: Educating the public about the importance of sustainability and empowering individuals to make sustainable choices.
Business and Industry: Adopting sustainable business practices and investing in green technologies.

5. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2480 represents a beacon of hope for humanity. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a future where technology serves as a powerful tool for achieving a sustainable and equitable world for all. This vision requires a long-term perspective, a commitment to responsible innovation, and a collective effort to build a thriving future for generations to come.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

You’re thinking ahead! It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might revolutionize industry in 2480. Here are some potential applications:

1. Manufacturing:

Circular Economy Manufacturing: Factories of the future could operate on closed-loop systems. Raw materials would be sourced sustainably, products would be designed for disassembly and reuse, and waste would be virtually eliminated. Advanced 3D printing with recycled materials could enable on-demand manufacturing, minimizing waste and transportation costs.
Energy-Efficient Production: Industrial processes would be powered by clean energy sources like fusion power and ambient energy harvesting. AI-powered systems would optimize energy use in real-time, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.
Automated and Sustainable Supply Chains: AI and robotics would manage supply chains, ensuring that materials are sourced sustainably and transported efficiently. Manufacturing processes would be highly automated, reducing the need for human labor in hazardous or repetitive tasks.

2. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Advanced technologies could enable the extraction of resources from the Earth with minimal environmental impact. This might involve using robots and AI to target specific minerals, reducing the need for large-scale mining operations.
Material Synthesis: Technologies could allow us to create new materials with desired properties from readily available resources, reducing our reliance on rare or environmentally damaging materials.
Waste Reprocessing: Advanced facilities would be able to break down waste into its basic components and use them to create new products, effectively closing the loop on resource use.

3. Agriculture:

Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Indoor farms and vertical farms would become commonplace, using AI and automation to optimize growing conditions and minimize resource use.
Precision Agriculture: Farmers would use sensors, drones, and AI to monitor crops and soil conditions, allowing them to apply water and fertilizer only where needed, reducing waste and environmental impact.
Sustainable Food Production: Technologies like lab-grown meat and personalized nutrition plans could reduce our reliance on traditional agriculture, which can be resource-intensive and have a significant environmental footprint.

4. Construction:

Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings would be constructed from sustainable materials, such as recycled materials, bio-based materials, and materials synthesized from readily available resources.
3D-Printed Buildings: 3D printing could be used to create buildings on demand, reducing waste and construction time. Buildings could be designed to be energy-efficient and incorporate sustainable features like solar panels and rainwater harvesting systems.

5. Transportation:

Sustainable Logistics: Transportation of goods would be optimized using AI and electric vehicles. Hyperloop networks and other high-speed transportation systems could reduce travel times and carbon emissions.
Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Industries would rely on fleets of electric and autonomous vehicles for transporting goods and materials, reducing the environmental impact of transportation.

6. Other Industries:

Healthcare: Sustainable technologies could revolutionize healthcare, with advanced diagnostics, personalized medicine, and regenerative therapies.
Space Exploration: Sustainable technologies would be essential for space exploration and colonization, enabling us to create closed-loop life support systems and utilize resources found in space.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industry in 2480. The key is that sustainability would be integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, from resource extraction and manufacturing to transportation and waste management. This would not only reduce the environmental impact of industry but also create new economic opportunities and improve the quality of life for everyone.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2480 ?

You’re asking about the really big picture here! Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 2480 would be a massive, ongoing, and globally collaborative undertaking. Here’s how it might function:

1. Global Research Network:

Interconnected Institutions: A vast network of research institutions, universities, and private companies worldwide would be dedicated to sustainable technology R&D. These entities would be interconnected, sharing knowledge and collaborating on projects.
Open Access and Data Sharing: Research findings and data would be shared openly and freely, accelerating the pace of innovation. International collaborations would be the norm, with scientists and engineers from all over the world working together.
Funding and Support: Governments and international organizations would provide substantial funding for sustainable technology R&D, recognizing its importance for the future of humanity.

2. Key Research Areas:

Energy:
- Fusion Energy: Continued research on fusion reactor design, materials, and plasma physics to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
- Advanced Solar: Development of new materials and technologies for space-based solar power, including efficient energy transmission and storage.
- Ambient Energy Harvesting: Exploring new ways to capture energy from the environment, such as vibrations, temperature differences, and even quantum fluctuations.
Environment:
- Atmospheric Regeneration: Research on advanced carbon capture and storage technologies, as well as methods for actively removing pollutants from the atmosphere.
- Ocean Restoration: Developing technologies for cleaning up pollution, restoring coral reefs, and managing marine ecosystems sustainably.
- Climate Change Mitigation: Research on geoengineering techniques and other methods for mitigating the effects of climate change.
Resources:
- Material Synthesis: Discovering new methods for creating materials with desired properties from readily available resources, reducing our reliance on rare elements.
- Circular Economy Technologies: Developing advanced recycling and resource recovery systems to achieve a truly circular economy.
- Sustainable Agriculture: Research on precision agriculture, vertical farming, and other technologies to increase food production while minimizing resource use and environmental impact.
Technology & Society:
- Artificial Intelligence: Continued research on AI, focusing on ethical considerations, safety, and its application to various fields, including energy management, environmental monitoring, and resource optimization.
- Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Exploring the potential of these fields for medicine, manufacturing, and environmental remediation, while addressing ethical and safety concerns.
- Human-Computer Interaction: Research on advanced brain-computer interfaces and other technologies to enhance human capabilities and facilitate seamless interaction with technology.

3. Experimental Platforms and Testbeds:

Living Laboratories: Cities and communities would serve as living laboratories for testing and demonstrating sustainable technologies in real-world settings.
Simulation and Modeling: Advanced computer simulations and models would be used to predict the impacts of new technologies and optimize their design and implementation.
Space-Based Research: Space stations and lunar or Martian bases could be used as testbeds for developing sustainable technologies for space exploration and colonization.

4. Interdisciplinary Approach:

Collaboration across Disciplines: Sustainable technology R&D would require a highly interdisciplinary approach, bringing together experts from fields like physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, computer science, and social sciences.
Systems Thinking: Researchers would need to adopt a systems-thinking approach, considering the interconnectedness of various technologies and their potential impacts on society and the environment.

5. Continuous Improvement:

Iterative Development: Sustainable technologies would be continuously improved and refined through ongoing research and development.
Adaptability: R&D efforts would focus on creating technologies that are resilient to change and adaptable to new challenges and conditions.

The research and development of sustainable technology in 2480 would be a global endeavor, driven by a shared commitment to creating a sustainable future for humanity. It would be a continuous process of innovation, adaptation, and collaboration, ensuring that technology serves as a tool for achieving a harmonious balance with the planet.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.