Sustainable Technology of 2470

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2470 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

In 2470, sustainable technology will likely be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, driven by necessity and innovation. Here are some potential advancements:

  1. Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and geothermal energy will be highly efficient and widely utilized. Fusion power may be a reality, providing clean and abundant energy. Energy storage solutions will be highly advanced, ensuring a stable and reliable power supply.
  2. Circular Economy: Waste will be minimized through closed-loop systems. Products will be designed for durability, reuse, and easy recycling. Advanced material science will enable the creation of biodegradable and compostable materials for various applications.
  3. Precision Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponics will optimize food production in urban areas, reducing transportation needs and land usage. AI-powered systems will monitor crops, optimize irrigation, and minimize resource waste.
  4. Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles will dominate, with advanced battery technology and charging infrastructure. Hyperloop systems or

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2470

The term “Sustainable Technology of 2470” refers to the technological advancements and practices that will likely be in place in the year 2470, with a strong emphasis on environmental sustainability and resource conservation.

Here’s a breakdown of what that might entail:

  • Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and geothermal energy will be highly efficient and widely utilized. Fusion power may be a reality, providing clean and abundant energy. Energy storage solutions will be highly advanced, ensuring a stable and reliable power supply.
  • Circular Economy: Waste will be minimized through closed-loop systems. Products will be designed for durability, reuse, and easy recycling. Advanced material science will enable the creation of biodegradable and compostable materials for various applications.  
  • Precision Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponics will optimize food production in urban areas, reducing transportation needs and land usage. AI-powered systems will monitor crops, optimize irrigation, and minimize resource waste.  
  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles will dominate, with advanced battery technology and charging infrastructure. Hyperloop systems or similar high-speed transport may connect cities efficiently. Personal air mobility might be a reality with electric VTOL aircraft.
  • Smart Cities: Urban centers will be designed for sustainability, with green spaces, efficient public transport, and smart energy grids. Buildings will be self-sufficient with integrated solar panels, rainwater harvesting, and smart energy management systems.
  • Environmental Remediation: Advanced technologies will address past environmental damage. Carbon capture and storage, ocean cleanup systems, and ecosystem restoration projects will be in place to heal the planet.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2470 will be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, driven by necessity and innovation. It will represent a shift towards a harmonious relationship with the planet, ensuring a healthy and thriving environment for future generations.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

In the year 2470, the need for sustainable technology will be universal, impacting every aspect of human life and the environment. Here’s a breakdown of who will require and benefit from it:

1. Individuals:

  • Daily Life: Individuals will rely on sustainable technology for their homes, transportation, food, and personal devices. Smart homes with energy-efficient appliances, electric vehicles, and personalized healthcare solutions will be commonplace.
  • Health and Well-being: Access to clean air and water, sustainable food production, and advanced medical technologies will be crucial for individual health and well-being.
  • Future Generations: Individuals have a vested interest in ensuring a sustainable future for their children and grandchildren, with access to resources and a healthy planet.  

2. Communities:

  • Urban and Rural Areas: Cities will need sustainable infrastructure, public transport, and waste management systems. Rural areas will require sustainable agriculture, water management, and renewable energy solutions.
  • Resource Management: Communities will depend on sustainable technology to manage resources like water, energy, and land effectively.
  • Resilience: Sustainable technology will help communities adapt to climate change impacts, such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise.

3. Industries:

  • Manufacturing and Production: Industries will need to adopt circular economy models, minimize waste, and use renewable energy sources.
  • Agriculture and Food: Sustainable farming practices, precision agriculture, and alternative protein sources will be essential to feed a growing population.
  • Transportation and Logistics: Electric vehicles, sustainable fuels, and efficient transportation networks will be necessary to move people and goods.

4. Governments and Organizations:

  • Policy and Regulation: Governments will need to create policies that incentivize sustainable practices and regulate resource use.  
  • Environmental Protection: Organizations will play a role in monitoring the environment, restoring ecosystems, and promoting sustainable development.
  • Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be crucial to address global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.  

5. The Planet:

  • Ecosystems: Sustainable technology will be essential to protect and restore ecosystems, preserve biodiversity, and mitigate climate change.
  • Natural Resources: Sustainable practices will ensure the responsible use of natural resources like water, forests, and minerals.
  • Planetary Health: Ultimately, sustainable technology will be necessary to maintain the health and balance of the planet for all living things.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2470 will be a fundamental requirement for individuals, communities, industries, governments, and the planet as a whole. It will be the foundation for a thriving and equitable future, ensuring the well-being of both humanity and the environment.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

While we’re talking about the future of sustainable technology in 2470, it’s important to remember that the need for it is urgent and immediate. We don’t have to wait until 2470 to start implementing sustainable practices and technologies. In fact, the groundwork needs to be laid now to even have a chance of reaching that future.

Here’s a breakdown of when sustainable technology is required, with a focus on the present and near future:

  • Now: The need for sustainable technology is critical today. We are already facing the consequences of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation. Implementing sustainable solutions now is crucial to mitigate these impacts and prevent further damage.  
  • In the coming decades: The next few decades are crucial for transitioning to a sustainable future. We need to rapidly deploy renewable energy technologies, adopt circular economy models, and develop sustainable solutions for all sectors of the economy.
  • By 2470: While the specific technologies of 2470 might be speculative, the underlying need for sustainability will remain constant. By that time, sustainable technology should be fully integrated into all aspects of life, ensuring a harmonious relationship with the planet.

Why the urgency?

  • Climate change: The effects of climate change are already being felt around the world, with rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and sea-level rise. We need to act now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change.  
  • Resource depletion: We are depleting natural resources at an unsustainable rate. Sustainable technology can help us use resources more efficiently, reduce waste, and transition to a circular economy.  
  • Environmental degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and habitat loss are threatening ecosystems and biodiversity. Sustainable technology can help us protect and restore the environment.  

What can we do now?

  • Individual actions: We can all make a difference by adopting sustainable practices in our daily lives, such as reducing energy consumption, using public transport, and recycling.  
  • Technological innovation: We need to invest in research and development of sustainable technologies, such as renewable energy, energy storage, and sustainable agriculture.
  • Policy and regulation: Governments need to create policies that incentivize sustainable practices and regulate resource use.  
  • Global cooperation: International collaboration is crucial to address global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.  

In conclusion, while the “Sustainable Technology of 2470” is an interesting concept to explore, the real need for sustainable technology is now. We need to act urgently to create a sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

This is a fascinating question! When we talk about “Sustainable Technology of 2470”, we’re not just talking about specific gadgets or inventions, but a whole way of life that’s in harmony with the planet. So, where would this kind of technology be needed? The answer is: everywhere! Here’s a breakdown:

1. Homes and Cities:

  • Energy: Homes and buildings would likely be self-sufficient, generating their own power through solar, wind, or other renewable sources. Smart grids would manage energy distribution efficiently.  
  • Waste Management: Advanced recycling and composting systems would minimize waste, with most materials being reused or repurposed.
  • Water: Water conservation and purification technologies would be essential, with rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling systems in place.
  • Transportation: Cities would be designed for walkability and cycling, with electric vehicles and advanced public transport systems dominating.

2. Food Production:

  • Urban Farming: Vertical farms and hydroponic systems in urban areas would produce fresh, local food, reducing transportation needs and land use.  
  • Sustainable Agriculture: In rural areas, precision agriculture and regenerative farming practices would optimize food production while minimizing environmental impact.  
  • Alternative Proteins: Technologies for producing plant-based and lab-grown meat alternatives would be well-developed, reducing reliance on traditional livestock farming.

3. Industry and Manufacturing:

  • Circular Economy: Industries would operate on circular economy principles, with products designed for durability, reuse, and easy recycling.
  • Clean Energy: Manufacturing would be powered by renewable energy sources, and processes would be designed to minimize waste and pollution.
  • Sustainable Materials: Advanced materials science would lead to the development of biodegradable and compostable materials for various applications.

4. Transportation and Travel:

  • Electric Vehicles: Electric vehicles would be the norm, with advanced battery technology and charging infrastructure.
  • High-Speed Transport: Hyperloop systems or similar technologies might connect cities efficiently, reducing travel time and emissions.  
  • Sustainable Aviation: Sustainable aviation fuels and electric aircraft could make air travel more environmentally friendly.

5. Environment and Ecosystems:

  • Environmental Remediation: Technologies for carbon capture and storage, ocean cleanup, and ecosystem restoration would be essential to address past environmental damage.
  • Biodiversity Conservation: Advanced monitoring and conservation technologies would help protect endangered species and preserve biodiversity.  
  • Climate Change Adaptation: Sustainable technologies would help communities adapt to the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise.

6. Healthcare and Well-being:

  • Personalized Medicine: Advanced diagnostics and personalized medicine would improve healthcare outcomes and reduce costs.
  • Sustainable Healthcare: Healthcare facilities would operate sustainably, with energy-efficient systems, waste reduction programs, and eco-friendly medical supplies.  
  • Mental Health: Technology could play a role in promoting mental well-being, with virtual therapy and stress management tools.

In essence, the “Sustainable Technology of 2470” would be needed in every sphere of life, from the personal to the global. It would represent a fundamental shift towards a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with the planet, ensuring a healthy and thriving environment for all

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

That’s a great question! It helps us understand the scope and importance of sustainable technology in the future. Here’s how it will be required in 2470:

1. As a Foundation for Society:

  • Essential Infrastructure: Sustainable technology will be the bedrock of all infrastructure, from energy grids and transportation networks to waste management systems and communication technologies. It will ensure the efficient and responsible use of resources.
  • Economic Stability: Sustainable practices will drive economic activity, creating new industries and jobs while minimizing environmental costs. A circular economy will be the norm, with resources being reused and repurposed, reducing waste and pollution.  
  • Social Equity: Sustainable technology will help address social inequalities by ensuring access to clean energy, clean water, and sustainable food production for all. It will promote a more just and equitable society.

2. To Address Environmental Challenges:

  • Climate Change Mitigation: Even in 2470, ongoing efforts will be needed to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Sustainable technology will be crucial for carbon capture and storage, renewable energy development, and climate change adaptation.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Past environmental damage will require continuous efforts to restore ecosystems and preserve biodiversity. Sustainable technology will play a key role in these efforts, with advanced monitoring systems and remediation technologies.
  • Resource Management: Sustainable technology will be essential for managing resources like water, forests, and minerals responsibly. It will ensure that these resources are used efficiently and that ecosystems are protected.  

3. To Support Human Well-being:

  • Health and Longevity: Sustainable technology will contribute to human health and well-being by providing access to clean air and water, sustainable food production, and advanced medical technologies. It will help people live longer, healthier lives.  
  • Quality of Life: Sustainable cities with green spaces, efficient public transport, and access to cultural amenities will enhance the quality of life for urban dwellers. Sustainable technology will create a more pleasant and livable environment.
  • Future Generations: Ultimately, sustainable technology will be required to ensure a healthy and thriving planet for future generations. It will be a legacy of responsible stewardship, leaving behind a world where both humanity and nature can flourish.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2470 will be more than just a set of tools and techniques. It will be a fundamental way of life, deeply ingrained in society and essential for addressing environmental challenges, supporting human well-being, and ensuring a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

It’s difficult to create a true case study for the “Sustainable Technology of 2470” because it’s so far in the future and relies on speculation. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on plausible extrapolations of current trends and needs. This allows us to explore how such technologies might function and interact.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges River Delta, 2470

Background: By the mid-21st century, the Ganges River Delta faced severe challenges: rising sea levels, saltwater intrusion, extreme weather events, and overpopulation. Traditional agricultural practices were becoming unsustainable, and millions were displaced.

The 2470 Solution: A multi-pronged approach, leveraging advanced sustainable technologies, was implemented:

  • Delta Barrier System: A network of advanced, semi-permeable barriers, powered by tidal and wave energy, was constructed to protect the delta from rising sea levels and saltwater intrusion. These barriers also incorporated advanced filtration systems to purify water.
  • Vertical Farming and Aquaponics: Massive, integrated vertical farms and aquaponic systems were established in designated zones. These structures, powered by renewable energy, produced food for the local population, minimizing land use and water consumption. AI-controlled systems optimized growing conditions and resource usage.  
  • Renewable Energy Microgrids: Decentralized microgrids, powered by a combination of solar, wind, and advanced biofuel sources, provided clean and reliable energy to communities throughout the delta. Smart grid technologies optimized energy distribution and minimized waste.
  • Advanced Material Science: Buildings and infrastructure were constructed using advanced, locally sourced, and biodegradable materials. Self-healing concrete and adaptable structures were used to withstand extreme weather events.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Robotic systems and bioengineered organisms were deployed to restore mangrove forests and other critical ecosystems. These systems removed pollutants and helped stabilize the coastline.
  • Population Management and Education: Sustainable development initiatives, coupled with access to education and family planning resources, helped stabilize the population and improve living standards.

Results:

  • Food Security: The vertical farms and aquaponic systems ensured a stable and sustainable food supply for the delta’s population.
  • Water Security: The barrier system and advanced filtration technologies provided access to clean and fresh water.
  • Energy Independence: The renewable energy microgrids provided reliable and affordable energy to communities.
  • Environmental Restoration: The mangrove forests and other ecosystems were restored, improving biodiversity and protecting the coastline.
  • Economic Growth: The sustainable technologies created new industries and jobs, revitalizing the local economy.
  • Improved Quality of Life: The combination of these factors led to a significant improvement in the quality of life for the people living in the Ganges River Delta.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies could be used to address complex environmental and social challenges in the future. It highlights the importance of integrated solutions, technological innovation, and a commitment to sustainability in creating a thriving and resilient society. While the specific technologies may differ, the underlying principles of sustainability will be crucial for ensuring a healthy planet and a prosperous future for all.

COURTESY : AutoApex_TV

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology of 2470 – A Vision for a Harmonious Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2470. It acknowledges the speculative nature of predicting so far into the future but aims to extrapolate current trends and emerging technologies to envision a world where sustainability is deeply integrated into all aspects of life. The paper examines key areas like energy, resource management, food production, transportation, and environmental remediation, highlighting potential advancements and their implications for society and the planet.

1. Introduction:

The 25th century will likely be defined by the successful integration of sustainable practices and technologies. Driven by centuries of increasing environmental awareness and necessity, humanity will have transitioned to a circular economy and embraced a harmonious relationship with the planet. This paper envisions the technological landscape that will underpin this sustainable future.

2. Energy:

  • Fusion Power: Commercial fusion power will likely be a reality, providing clean, abundant, and safe energy. Advanced materials and containment technologies will have overcome the challenges that currently hinder its widespread adoption.
  • Advanced Renewables: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources will be highly efficient and integrated into smart grids. Nanotechnology and material science will have significantly improved energy harvesting and storage capabilities.
  • Decentralized Energy Systems: Microgrids and localized energy generation will be commonplace, increasing resilience and reducing transmission losses.

3. Resource Management:

  • Circular Economy: Closed-loop systems will be the norm, with products designed for durability, reuse, and easy recycling. Advanced material science will enable the creation of biodegradable and compostable materials for various applications.
  • Resource Recovery: Sophisticated recycling and resource recovery technologies will extract valuable materials from waste streams, minimizing the need for virgin resources.
  • Water Management: Advanced filtration and purification systems, coupled with efficient irrigation and water conservation practices, will ensure access to clean water for all.

4. Food Production:

  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will monitor crops, optimize irrigation, and minimize resource waste in both traditional and vertical farms.
  • Vertical Farming and Aquaponics: Urban centers will rely on vertical farms and aquaponic systems to produce fresh, local food, reducing transportation needs and land usage.
  • Alternative Proteins: Plant-based and lab-grown meat alternatives will be widely available, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.

5. Transportation:

  • Electric Vehicles: Electric vehicles will dominate, with advanced battery technology and ubiquitous charging infrastructure.
  • High-Speed Transport: Hyperloop systems or similar technologies will connect cities efficiently, reducing travel time and emissions.
  • Sustainable Aviation: Sustainable aviation fuels and electric aircraft will make air travel more environmentally friendly.

6. Environmental Remediation:

  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies will capture and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, mitigating the effects of past emissions.
  • Ocean Cleanup: Autonomous robotic systems will clean up plastic and other pollutants from the oceans, restoring marine ecosystems.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Bioengineered organisms and other technologies will be used to restore damaged ecosystems and preserve biodiversity.

7. Smart Cities:

  • Integrated Systems: Urban centers will be designed for sustainability, with green spaces, efficient public transport, and smart energy grids.
  • Self-Sufficient Buildings: Buildings will be self-sufficient with integrated solar panels, rainwater harvesting, and smart energy management systems.
  • Data-Driven Optimization: AI and data analytics will be used to optimize resource usage and improve the quality of life in cities.

8. Conclusion:

The Sustainable Technology of 2470 will be characterized by a deep integration of technology and environmental consciousness. It will represent a shift towards a harmonious relationship with the planet, ensuring a healthy and thriving environment for future generations. While the specific technologies may evolve, the underlying principles of sustainability will remain crucial for creating a just and equitable future for all.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a speculative vision of the future. The technologies and trends discussed are based on current knowledge and projections, but unforeseen developments may significantly alter the landscape of sustainable technology in 2470.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

You’re asking about how the “Sustainable Technology of 2470” would be put to work in industries! Here are some fascinating possibilities:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

  • Circular Economy in Action: Imagine factories where every material is tracked and reused. Products are designed to be disassembled and their components repurposed. Waste becomes a resource, fueling new production cycles.  
  • Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Industries might use biological processes to create materials and products, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and harmful chemicals. Imagine growing furniture or clothing!
  • Personalized Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could allow for highly customized products, made on demand with minimal waste.  

2. Energy & Resource Extraction:

  • Sustainable Mining: Advanced robotics and AI could be used to extract resources with minimal environmental impact, restoring ecosystems as mining progresses.  
  • Renewable Energy Production: Industries would be at the forefront of developing and deploying renewable energy technologies, from advanced solar panels to fusion power plants.
  • Atmospheric Resource Gathering: Technologies might exist to extract valuable resources directly from the atmosphere, reducing our dependence on finite resources.

3. Agriculture & Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms & Automated Greenhouses: Industries would operate massive, highly efficient vertical farms and greenhouses, producing food in urban areas and minimizing transportation needs.
  • Precision Agriculture at Scale: AI and robotics would be used to optimize crop yields, manage irrigation, and minimize the use of pesticides and fertilizers on large-scale farms.  
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Fish farming would be done in a way that protects ocean ecosystems, with closed-loop systems and alternative feed sources.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

  • Sustainable Supply Chains: Industries would use AI and blockchain technology to create transparent and sustainable supply chains, minimizing waste and ensuring ethical sourcing.  
  • Autonomous Transportation: Self-driving vehicles and drones would be used to transport goods efficiently and safely, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
  • Advanced Logistics Networks: Smart logistics systems would optimize delivery routes and minimize transportation distances, reducing fuel consumption and environmental impact.  

5. Construction & Infrastructure:

  • Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure would be made from materials that can repair themselves, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.  
  • Modular Construction: Buildings could be constructed from modular components that can be easily assembled and disassembled, allowing for flexibility and reuse.  
  • Eco-Friendly Materials: Industries would use sustainable and locally sourced materials for construction, minimizing the environmental impact of building projects.

6. Healthcare & Biotechnology:

  • Biomanufacturing: Industries might use biological processes to produce pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and other healthcare products sustainably.  
  • Personalized Medicine: Advanced diagnostics and personalized medicine would allow for targeted treatments and reduce waste in the healthcare system.
  • Sustainable Healthcare Facilities: Hospitals and clinics would be designed to be energy-efficient, minimize waste, and use eco-friendly medical supplies.  

7. Information Technology & Communication:

  • Green Data Centers: Data centers would be powered by renewable energy and designed to minimize energy consumption.
  • Sustainable Computing: Computing devices would be made from sustainable materials and designed for energy efficiency.
  • Virtual Collaboration: Increased reliance on virtual collaboration technologies would reduce the need for travel and its associated environmental impact.  

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industries in 2470. The key is that sustainability would be integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, from resource extraction and manufacturing to transportation and waste management. This would create a more efficient, resilient, and environmentally responsible industrial ecosystem.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2470 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development (R&D) that would lead to the “Sustainable Technology of 2470”! Here’s a glimpse into what that might entail:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • Advanced Materials: Scientists would be pushing the boundaries of material science, creating new substances with incredible properties: super-strength, self-healing, biodegradable, and even adaptable materials that can change their properties on demand.
  • Energy Physics: Deepening our understanding of physics would be crucial for harnessing energy sources like fusion. Research would focus on plasma containment, advanced reactor designs, and efficient energy conversion.
  • Biological Systems: Understanding how biological systems work at a fundamental level would be key to developing bio-integrated manufacturing, bioremediation technologies, and sustainable agriculture practices.
  • Artificial Intelligence: AI would be a driving force in R&D, helping scientists analyze vast datasets, simulate complex systems, and design new technologies.  

2. Engineering & Technology:

  • Nanotechnology: Manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level would open up possibilities for creating advanced sensors, energy storage devices, and materials with unique properties.  
  • Biotechnology: Genetic engineering and synthetic biology would be used to develop microorganisms for bioremediation, create new biofuels, and enhance agricultural productivity.
  • Robotics & Automation: Advanced robotics and AI would be combined to create autonomous systems for environmental monitoring, resource extraction, manufacturing, and even healthcare.
  • Energy Storage: Developing highly efficient and safe energy storage solutions would be crucial for integrating renewable energy sources into the grid and powering electric vehicles.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Convergence of Disciplines: The Sustainable Technology of 2470 would require collaboration between scientists and engineers from various disciplines, including physics, biology, materials science, computer science, and environmental science.
  • Global Research Networks: International collaboration would be essential to address global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity. Researchers from around the world would share knowledge and work together to develop sustainable solutions.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Governments, research institutions, and private companies would need to work together to fund and accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.

4. Ethical Considerations:

  • Responsible Innovation: As new technologies emerge, it would be crucial to consider their ethical implications and potential risks. Research would need to be guided by principles of sustainability, social responsibility, and environmental stewardship.
  • Technology Assessment: Comprehensive technology assessments would be conducted to evaluate the potential impacts of new technologies on society and the environment.
  • Public Engagement: Open dialogue and public engagement would be essential to ensure that the development and deployment of sustainable technologies are aligned with societal values and needs.

5. Future-Oriented Focus:

  • Long-Term Vision: R&D efforts would need to focus on long-term sustainability goals, anticipating future challenges and developing solutions that can meet the needs of future generations.
  • Adaptive Research: Research programs would need to be flexible and adaptable, responding to new discoveries and emerging challenges.
  • Continuous Improvement: The pursuit of sustainable technology would be an ongoing process, with continuous innovation and improvement as the guiding principles.

In essence, the R&D leading to the Sustainable Technology of 2470 would be a massive, collaborative, and ethically driven endeavor, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and ingenuity to create a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993). “The Setting”. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-691-08631-1. JSTOR j.ctt7rpm1. I find the most useful conceptual definition for this study to be that given by Harvey Brooks, who has defined technology …as ‘knowledge of how to fulfill certain human purposes in a specifiable and reproducible way.’
  2. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 117–118: “The first pole, that of the naturalisation of a new discipline within the university curriculum, was presented by Christian Wolff in 1728, in Chapter III of the “Preliminary discourse” to his Philosophia rationalisis sive Logica: ‘Technology is the science of skills and works of skill, or, if one prefers, the science of things made by man’s labour, chiefly through the use of his hands.'”
  3. ^ Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-53196-1.
  4. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1996) [1891]. Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-910205-8. OCLC 38307662.
  5. ^ Simpson, J.; Weiner, Edmund, eds. (1989). “technology”. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611868.
  6. ^ Aristotle (2009). Brown, Lesley (ed.). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Translated by Ross, David. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-921361-0. LCCN 2009005379. OCLC 246896490.
  7. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 114–115.
  8. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 117.
  9. ^ Schatzberg, Eric (2006). “”Technik” Comes to America: Changing Meanings of “Technology” before 1930″. Technology and Culture. 47 (3): 486–512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 40061169. S2CID 143784033. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 119: “With the industrial revolution and the important part England played in it, the word technology was to lose this meaning as the subject or thrust of a branch of education, as first in English and then in other languages it embodied all technical activity based on the application of science to practical ends.”
  11. ^ Schiffer, M. B. (2013). “Discovery Processes: Trial Models”. The Archaeology of Science. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Vol. 9. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–198. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_13. ISBN 978-3319000770. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  12. ^ The British Museum. “Our earliest technology?”. smarthistory.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  13. ^ Minogue, K. (28 October 2010). “Stone Age Toolmakers Surprisingly Sophisticated”. science.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  14. ^ Crump, Thomas (2001). A Brief History of Science. Constable & Robinson. p. 9. ISBN 978-1841192352.
  15. ^ Gowlett, J. A. J.; Wrangham, R. W. (1 March 2013). “Earliest fire in Africa: towards the convergence of archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis”. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 48 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2012.756754. ISSN 0067-270X. S2CID 163033909.
  16. ^ Stahl, Ann B. (1984). “Hominid dietary selection before fire”. Current Anthropology. 25 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1086/203106. JSTOR 2742818. S2CID 84337150.
  17. ^ Wrangham, R. (1 August 2017). “Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis”. Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S303 – S313. doi:10.1086/692113. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 148798286. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  18. ^ Dunbar, R. I. M.; Gamble, C.; Gowlett, J. A. J., eds. (2014). Lucy to Language: the Benchmark Papers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199652594. OCLC 1124046527. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  19. ^ Wade, Nicholas (15 July 2003). “Early Voices: The Leap to Language”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Shaar, Ron; Matmon, Ari; Horwitz, Liora K.; Ebert, Yael; Chazan, Michael; Arnold, M.; Aumaître, G.; Bourlès, D.; Keddadouche, K. (1 May 2021). “Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk Cave: New constraints for the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age”. Quaternary Science Reviews. 259: 106907. Bibcode:2021QSRv..25906907S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106907. ISSN 0277-3791. S2CID 234833092.
  21. ^ Hallett, Emily Y.; Marean, Curtis W.; Steele, Teresa E.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Jacobs, Zenobia; Cerasoni, Jacopo Niccolò; Aldeias, Vera; Scerri, Eleanor M. L.; Olszewski, Deborah I.; Hajraoui, Mohamed Abdeljalil El; Dibble, Harold L. (24 September 2021). “A worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 year old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Atlantic Coast, Morocco”. iScience. 24 (9): 102988. Bibcode:2021iSci…24j2988H. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102988. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8478944. PMID 34622180.
  22. ^ O’Neil, Dennis. “Evolution of Modern Humans: Archaic Homo sapiens Culture”. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2007.
  23. ^ Villa, Paola (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene archaeological record of southern France. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 303. ISBN 978-0520096622.
  24. ^ Cordaux, Richard; Stoneking, Mark (2003). “South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an ‘Early’ Human Dispersal out of Africa” (PDF). American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (6): 1586–1590, author reply 1590–93. doi:10.1086/375407. PMC 1180321. PMID 12817589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2007.
  25. ^ “‘Oldest remains’ outside Africa reset human migration clock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  26. ^ Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini (2019). “Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia”. Nature. 571 (7766). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 500–504. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31292546. S2CID 195873640. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  27. ^ Kuijt, i., ed. (2002). Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Fundamental Issues in Archaeology. Springer New York. ISBN 9780306471667. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  28. ^ Coghlan, H. H. (1943). “The Evolution of the Axe from Prehistoric to Roman Times”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 73 (1/2): 27–56. doi:10.2307/2844356. ISSN 0307-3114. JSTOR 2844356. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  29. ^ Driscoll, Killian (2006). The early prehistory in the west of Ireland: Investigations into the social archaeology of the Mesolithic, west of the Shannon, Ireland. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  30. ^ University of Chicago Press Journals (4 January 2006). “The First Baby Boom: Skeletal Evidence Shows Abrupt Worldwide Increase In Birth Rate During Neolithic Period”. ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  31. ^ Sussman, Robert W.; Hall, Roberta L. (April 1972). “Child Transport, Family Size, and Increase in Human Population During the Neolithic”. Current Anthropology. 13 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1086/201274. JSTOR 2740977. S2CID 143449170.
  32. ^ Ferraro, Gary P. (2006). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. The Thomson Corporation. ISBN 978-0495030393. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  33. ^ Patterson, Gordon M. (1992). The Essentials of Ancient History. Research & Education Association. ISBN 978-0878917044. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  34. ^ Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press.
  35. ^ Cramb, Alan W (1964). “A Short History of Metals”. Nature. 203 (4943): 337. Bibcode:1964Natur.203Q.337T. doi:10.1038/203337a0. S2CID 382712.
  36. ^ Hall, Harry Reginald Holland (1911). “Ceramics” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 05 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–760, see page 708. The art of making a pottery consisting of a siliceous sandy body coated with a vitreous copper glaze seems to have been known unexpectedly early, possibly even as early as the period immediately preceding the Ist Dynasty (4000 B.C.).
  37. ^ Akanuma, Hideo. “The significance of the composition of excavated iron fragments taken from Stratum III at the site of Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey”. Anatolian Archaeological Studies. 14. Tokyo: Japanese Institute of Anatolian Archaeology.
  38. ^ “Ironware piece unearthed from Turkey found to be oldest steel”. The Hindu. 26 March 2009. Archived from the original on 29 March 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  39. ^ Usai, Donatella; Salvatori, Sandro. “The oldest representation of a Nile boat”. Antiquity. 81.
  40. ^ Postel, Sandra (1999). “Egypt’s Nile Valley Basin Irrigation”. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393319378. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  41. ^ Crawford, Harriet (2013). The Sumerian World. New York & London: Routledge. pp. 34–43. ISBN 978-0203096604. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  42. ^ Potts, D.T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  43. ^ Childe, V. Gordon (1928). New Light on the Most Ancient East. p. 110.
  44. ^ Anthony, David A. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0691058870.
  45. ^ Gasser, Aleksander (March 2003). “World’s Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia”. Republic of Slovenia Government Communication Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  46. ^ Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0226452388. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999) [1994]. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. p. 146. ISBN 978-1575060422. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b Lay, M G (1992). Ways of the World. Sydney: Primavera Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1875368051.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Gregersen, Erik (2012). The Complete History of Wheeled Transportation: From Cars and Trucks to Buses and Bikes. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1615307012. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Aicher, Peter J. (1995). Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0865162822. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c Eslamian, Saeid (2014). Handbook of Engineering Hydrology: Environmental Hydrology and Water Management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-1466552500. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Lechner, Norbert (2012). Plumbing, Electricity, Acoustics: Sustainable Design Methods for Architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 106. ISBN 978-1118014752. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  53. ^ Davids, K.; De Munck, B., eds. (2019). Innovation and Creativity in Late Medieval and Early Modern European Cities. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315588605. ISBN 978-1317116530. S2CID 148764971. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  54. ^ Courtenay, W. J.; Miethke, J.; Priest, D. B., eds. (2000). Universities and Schooling in Medieval Society. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004113510. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  55. ^ Deming, D. (2014). Science and Technology in World History, Volume 3: The Black Death, the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. McFarland. ISBN 978-0786490868.
  56. ^ Stearns, P. N. (2020). The Industrial Revolution in World History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0813347295.
  57. ^ Mokyr, J. (2000). “The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870–1914” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  58. ^ Black, B. C. (2022). To Have and Have Not: Energy in World History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1538105047. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  59. ^ Albion, Robert G. (1 January 1933). “The Communication Revolution, 1760–1933”. Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 14 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1179/tns.1933.002. ISSN 0372-0187. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  60. ^ Agar, J. (2012). Science in the 20th Century and Beyond. Polity. ISBN 978-0745634692. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  61. ^ Goldin, C.; Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674037731. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  62. ^ Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926047. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  63. ^ Bresnahan, Timothy F.; Trajtenberg, M. (1 January 1995). “General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?”. Journal of Econometrics. 65 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T. ISSN 0304-4076.
  64. ^ Wrigley, E. A (13 March 2013). “Energy and the English Industrial Revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371 (1986): 20110568. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37110568W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0568. PMID 23359739. S2CID 10624423.
  65. ^ Persily, Nathaniel; Tucker, Joshua A., eds. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108890960. hdl:11245.1/cf2f5b6a-8dc8-4400-bc38-3317b0164499. ISBN 978-1108835558. S2CID 243715477. Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
  66. ^ Autor, D. H. (2015). “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022.
  67. ^ Bessen, J. E. (3 October 2016). “How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills”. Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law EJournal. 15–49. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2690435. S2CID 29968989. SSRN 2690435. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
  68. ^ “Robots and Artificial Intelligence”. igmchicago.org. Initiative on Global Markets. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  69. ^ “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” (PDF). www3.weforum.org. October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  70. ^ “Robots and AI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know | Built In”. builtin.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  71. ^ “How many jobs do robots really replace?”. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  72. ^ Acemoglu, Daron; Restrepo, Pascual (1 June 2020). “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716. hdl:1721.1/130324. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 7468879. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  73. ^ “Remarks Upon Signing Bill Creating the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. | The American Presidency Project”. www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  74. ^ “Technology and the American Economy” (PDF). files.eric.ed.gov. February 1966. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  75. ^ “If Robots Take Our Jobs, Will They Make It Up to Us?”. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  76. ^ “GovInfo”. www.govinfo.gov n. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  77. ^ “H.R.11611 – An Act to establish a National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress”. www.congress.gov. 1963. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  78. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenberg, Elizabeth; Harrell, Peter E.; Shiffman, Gary M.; Dorshimer, Sam (2019). “Financial Technology and National Security”. Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  79. ^ “U.S. takes aim at North Korean crypto laundering”. NBC News. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  80. ^ “U.S. ties North Korean hacker group to Axie Infinity crypto theft”. NBC News. 15 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  81. ^ Austin, David; Macauley, Molly K. (1 December 2001). “Cutting Through Environmental Issues: Technology as a double-edged sword”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  82. ^ Grainger, Alan; Francisco, Herminia A.; Tiraswat, Penporn (July 2003). “The impact of changes in agricultural technology on long-term trends in deforestation”. The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use. 20 (3): 209–223. Bibcode:2003LUPol..20..209G. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00009-7. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  83. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
  84. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists (6 November 2017). “What is Climate Engineering?”. www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
  85. ^ Chaudhry, Imran Sharif; Ali, Sajid; Bhatti, Shaukat Hussain; Anser, Muhammad Khalid; Khan, Ahmad Imran; Nazar, Raima (October 2021). “Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries”. Environmental Science & Policy. 124 (Environmental Science & Policy): 313–323. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..313C. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  86. ^ Smol, J. P. (2009). Pollution of Lakes and Rivers : a Paleoenvironmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 135. ISBN 978-1444307573. OCLC 476272945. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b Franssen, M.; Lokhorst, G.-J.; van de Poel, I. (2018). “Philosophy of Technology”. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b de Vries, M. J.; Verkerk, M. J.; Hoogland, J.; van der Stoep, J. (2015). Philosophy of Technology : An Introduction for Technology and Business Students. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1317445715. OCLC 907132694. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  89. ^ Brey, P. (2000). Mitcham, C. (ed.). “Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Faculties”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. 19.
  90. ^ Jump up to:a b Johnson, Deborah G.; Wetmore, Jameson M. (2021). Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262539968. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  91. ^ Dusek, Val (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley. ISBN 978-1405111621. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  92. ^ Postman, Neil (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
  93. ^ Marcuse, H. (2004). Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. Routledge. ISBN 978-1134774661. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  94. ^ Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1783486595. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  95. ^ Al-Rodhan, Nayef. “The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  96. ^ Luppicini, R. (2008). “The emerging field of Technoethics”. In Luppicini; R. Adell (eds.). Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
  97. ^ Veruggio, Gianmarco (2011). “The Roboethics Roadmap”. EURON Roboethics Atelier. Scuola di Robotica: 2. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.466.2810.
  98. ^ Anderson, Michael; Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112352.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies, Volume 1: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412823791. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  100. ^ “About us”. cser.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 30 December 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  101. ^ Gottlieb, J. (1 May 2022). “Discounting, Buck-Passing, and Existential Risk Mitigation: The Case of Space Colonization”. Space Policy. 60: 101486. Bibcode:2022SpPol..6001486G. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101486. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 247718992.
  102. ^ “Stanford Existential Risks Initiative”. cisac.fsi.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
  103. ^ Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199606504. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Bostrom, Nick (6 September 2019). “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis”. Global Policy. 10 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 203169705.
  105. ^ Kurzweil, Ray (2005). “GNR: Three Overlapping Revolutions”. The Singularity is Near. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101218884.
  106. ^ Kompridis, N. (2009). “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human” (PDF). Parrhesia. 8 (1): 20–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  107. ^ McShane, Sveta (19 April 2016). “Ray Kurzweil Predicts Three Technologies Will Define Our Future”. Singularity Hub. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  108. ^ Poole, C. P. Jr.; Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471079354.
  109. ^ Vince, G. (3 July 2003). “Nanotechnology may create new organs”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  110. ^ Lee, Sukhan; Suh, Il Hong (2008). Recent Progress in Robotics: Viable Robotic Service to Human: An Edition of the Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 978-3540767282. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  111. ^ Grace, K.; Salvatier, J.; Dafoe, A.; Zhang, B.; Evans, O. (31 July 2018). “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 62: 729–754. doi:10.1613/jair.1.11222. ISSN 1076-9757. S2CID 8746462. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  112. ^ Segal, H. P. (2005). Technological Utopianism in American Culture (20th Anniversary ed.). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0815630616. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  113. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Roots and Core Themes”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part1. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  114. ^ Istvan, Zoltan (1 February 2015). “A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging”. Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  115. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Future Trajectories: Singularity”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 361–363. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part8. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  116. ^ Blackford, R.; Bostrom, N.; Dupuy, J.-P. (2011). H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute. ISBN 978-1456815653. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  117. ^ Jones, Steven E. (2013). Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135522391. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  118. ^ Kelman, David (1 June 2020). “Politics in a Small Room: Subterranean Babel in Piglia’s El camino de Ida”. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. 63: 179–201. doi:10.3138/ycl.63.005. ISSN 0084-3695. S2CID 220494877. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  119. ^ Fleming, Sean (7 May 2021). “The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 27 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940. ISSN 1356-9317.
  120. ^ Vannini, Phillip; Jonathan Taggart (2013). “Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles”. Environment and Planning A. 45 (2): 295–311. Bibcode:2013EnPlA..45..295V. doi:10.1068/a4564. S2CID 143970611.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b Scranton, Philip (1 May 2006). “Urgency, uncertainty, and innovation: Building jet engines in postwar America”. Management & Organizational History. 1 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1177/1744935906064096. ISSN 1744-9359. S2CID 143813033.
  122. ^ Di Nucci Pearce, M. R.; Pearce, David (1989). “Technology vs. Science: The Cognitive Fallacy”. Synthese. 81 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1007/BF00869324. ISSN 0039-7857. JSTOR 20116729. S2CID 46975083. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  123. ^ Skolimowski, Henryk (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”. Technology and Culture. 7 (3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3101935.
  124. ^ Brooks, H. (1 September 1994). “The relationship between science and technology”. Research Policy. Special Issue in Honor of Nathan Rosenberg. 23 (5): 477–486. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b c Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012). Antifragile. Penguin Random House. OCLC 1252833169.
  126. ^ Hare, Ronald (1970). The Birth of Penicillin, and the Disarming of Microbes. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0049250055. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  127. ^ Wise, George (1985). “Science and Technology”. Osiris. 2nd Series. 1: 229–46. doi:10.1086/368647. S2CID 144475553.
  128. ^ Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521653183.
  129. ^ Taleb, N. N. (12 December 2012). “Understanding is a Poor Substitute for Convexity (Antifragility)” (PDF). fooledbyrandomness.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  130. ^ Narin, Francis; Olivastro, Dominic (1 June 1992). “Status report: Linkage between technology and science”. Research Policy. 21 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-Y. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  131. ^ Krieger, Joshua L.; Schnitzer, Monika; Watzinger, Martin (1 May 2019). “Standing on the Shoulders of Science” (PDF). SSRN 3401853. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  132. ^ Oakley, K. P. (1976). “Man the Tool-Maker”. Nature. 199 (4898): 1042–1043. Bibcode:1963Natur.199U1042.. doi:10.1038/1991042e0. ISBN 978-0226612706. S2CID 4298952.
  133. ^ Sagan, Carl; Druyan, Ann; Leakey, Richard. “Chimpanzee Tool Use”. Archived from the original on 21 September 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2007.
  134. ^ Rincon, Paul (7 June 2005). “Sponging dolphins learn from mum”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  135. ^ Schmid, Randolph E. (4 October 2007). “Crows use tools to find food”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  136. ^ Rutz, C.; Bluff, L.A.; Weir, A.A.S.; Kacelnik, A. (4 October 2007). “Video cameras on wild birds”. Science. 318 (5851): 765. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..765R. doi:10.1126/science.1146788. PMID 17916693. S2CID 28785984.
  137. ^ McGrew, W. C (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521423717.
  138. ^ Boesch, Christophe; Boesch, Hedwige (1984). “Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking”. Primates. 25 (2): 160–170. doi:10.1007/BF02382388. S2CID 24073884.
  139. ^ Brahic, Catherine (15 January 2009). “Nut-cracking monkeys find the right tool for the job”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  140. ^ Müller, G.; Watling, J. (24 June 2016). The engineering in beaver dams. River Flow 2016: Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. St. Louis: University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  141. ^ Thomas Michaud (2008). “Science fiction and politics: Cyberpunk science fiction as political philosophy”. New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction. By Hassler, Donald M. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 65–77 [75–76]. ISBN 978-1570037368.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »