Sustainable Technology of 2460

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2460 / By
86 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

The query “Sustainable Technology of 2460” may refer to two different things:

  1. National Electric Mobility Mission Plan 2460: This is a government plan from India aimed at promoting the adoption and manufacturing of electric vehicles. It is not directly related to the year 2460.
  2. Advantech WISE-2460: This is an industrial-grade smart vibration sensor used for monitoring equipment health and preventing failures. It is a current technology and not related to the year 2460.  

If you are interested in sustainable technologies that might exist in the year 2460, it is difficult to say for sure what those might be. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends:

  • Renewable energy: It is likely that renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal will be even more advanced and widely used in 2460.
  • Energy storage: Technologies for storing energy, such as batteries and pumped hydro, will likely be more efficient and affordable.
  • Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles will likely be the norm, and there may be new forms of sustainable transportation such as flying cars or hyperloops.
  • Sustainable agriculture: Technologies for producing food in a sustainable way, such as vertical farming and precision agriculture, will likely be more advanced.
  • Circular economy: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are reused and recycled, will likely be more widely adopted.

Overall, it is likely that sustainable technologies will play a major role in society in 2460. These technologies will help us to address the challenges of climate change and resource depletion, and to create a more sustainable future for all.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses about sustainable technology in 2460 based on current trends and potential advancements. Here are some possibilities:

Energy:

  • Advanced renewable energy: Solar, wind, and geothermal energy will likely be highly efficient and integrated into everyday life. Imagine solar panels seamlessly incorporated into buildings and infrastructure, and wind turbines that are more efficient and less intrusive.
  • Fusion power: If breakthroughs occur, fusion power could become a clean and abundant energy source.  
  • Wireless energy transfer: We might see widespread wireless energy transfer, powering devices and even vehicles without the need for cables.
  • Hyper-efficient energy storage: Energy storage solutions will be incredibly advanced, allowing for the efficient storage and distribution of renewable energy.

Transportation:

  • Electric and autonomous vehicles: Electric vehicles will be the norm, and self-driving technology will be highly advanced, making transportation safer and more efficient.
  • Flying vehicles: Personal air mobility might be a reality, with electric flying cars or other forms of personal aircraft for quick and efficient travel.
  • Hyperloop and other high-speed transport: High-speed transportation systems like the Hyperloop could connect cities and regions, drastically reducing travel times.  

Food and Agriculture:

  • Vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture: Food production will likely shift towards vertical farms and controlled environments, maximizing yields while minimizing land and water usage.
  • Precision agriculture: Advanced sensors and data analytics will optimize crop production, reducing waste and the need for pesticides and fertilizers.  
  • Lab-grown meat and alternative proteins: Technologies for producing meat and other protein sources in labs will likely be more efficient and widely adopted, reducing the environmental impact of traditional agriculture.

Materials and Manufacturing:

  • Bioplastics and biodegradable materials: The use of bioplastics and other biodegradable materials will be widespread, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing waste.
  • 3D printing and additive manufacturing: 3D printing will be highly advanced, enabling on-demand manufacturing of complex products and reducing waste.
  • Circular economy: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are reused and recycled, will be deeply ingrained in manufacturing processes.  

Environment and Resource Management:

  • Carbon capture and storage: Technologies for capturing and storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere will be more efficient and widely deployed.
  • Ocean cleanup and restoration: Advanced technologies will be used to clean up pollution in the oceans and restore marine ecosystems.
  • Water purification and conservation: Highly efficient water purification and conservation technologies will be essential for managing water resources in a sustainable way.

Other areas:

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage, managing infrastructure, and developing new sustainable technologies.  
  • Biotechnology and genetic engineering: Advances in biotechnology could lead to new ways of producing energy, food, and materials in a sustainable way.

It’s important to remember that these are just possibilities. The actual sustainable technologies of 2460 might be very different. However, it’s clear that sustainability will be a driving force behind technological innovation in the centuries to come.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

It’s more accurate to ask who will benefit from sustainable technology in 2460, as “requiring” it implies a demand that may not exist in the same way centuries from now. However, here’s a breakdown of who would likely be impacted:

  • Humanity as a whole: The most significant beneficiary would be humankind. Sustainable technology is crucial for mitigating climate change, ensuring resource availability, and preserving the planet for future generations.  
  • Future generations: Those living in 2460 and beyond will inherit the consequences of our actions today. Sustainable technologies will be essential for their well-being and survival.
  • The environment: Sustainable technologies aim to minimize environmental impact, preserving ecosystems, biodiversity, and natural resources.  
  • Developing nations: Sustainable solutions can help address challenges like poverty, lack of access to clean water and energy, and environmental degradation in developing countries.  
  • Industries and economies: While some industries might need to adapt, sustainable technologies can create new economic opportunities, drive innovation, and improve resource efficiency.  

It’s important to note that the need for sustainable technology is not limited to 2460. It’s a pressing concern today and will continue to be so in the coming years. The choices we make now will determine the kind of future we create.

In conclusion, sustainable technology is not something that a specific group “requires” in 2460. Instead, it’s a necessity for ensuring a livable and prosperous future for all of humanity and the planet.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

This is a fascinating question! It’s not about a specific date, but rather a continuous and increasingly urgent need. Here’s how we can think about it:

  • The need is NOW: Sustainable technology isn’t something we can postpone until 2460. The effects of climate change and resource depletion are being felt today. We need sustainable solutions now to mitigate these impacts and prevent further damage.  
  • A continuous process: Developing and implementing sustainable technology is an ongoing journey. It’s not a one-time event but a continuous process of innovation, adaptation, and improvement.
  • The urgency increases: As time passes, the need for sustainable technology becomes more critical. The longer we wait to take action, the more severe the consequences will be, and the more drastic the solutions we’ll need.

In essence, the “when” for sustainable technology is: Always, with increasing urgency as we move forward.

Here’s why the urgency is so high:

  • Climate change: We’re already experiencing the effects of global warming, such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems. Sustainable technologies are crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change.  
  • Resource depletion: Many of the resources we rely on are finite. Sustainable technology can help us use resources more efficiently, find alternatives, and move towards a circular economy where resources are reused and recycled.  
  • Population growth: The global population is increasing, which puts more pressure on resources and the environment. Sustainable technologies can help us meet the needs of a growing population without exceeding the planet’s capacity.  

Therefore, while 2460 might seem far away, the need for sustainable technology is immediate. We must act now to create a sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

It’s not about a specific location in 2460, but rather about the scope of its application. Sustainable technology will be needed everywhere:

  • Globally: Climate change and resource depletion are global issues that require global solutions. Sustainable technologies will need to be implemented worldwide to address these challenges effectively.  
  • In every sector: Sustainable solutions will be needed in all sectors of the economy, including energy, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, and construction.
  • In urban and rural areas: Sustainable technologies will be needed in both urban and rural areas to address the specific challenges faced by each.
  • In developed and developing countries: Sustainable technologies will be needed in both developed and developing countries, although the specific solutions may vary depending on the context.

Essentially, sustainable technology will need to be integrated into every aspect of human life and activity. It will be a fundamental part of how we live, work, and interact with the planet.

Here are some examples of where sustainable technology will be needed:

  • Cities: Sustainable cities will need to have efficient public transportation systems, renewable energy sources, green buildings, and waste management systems.
  • Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture will be needed to produce food in a way that minimizes environmental impact and supports local communities.  
  • Homes: Sustainable homes will need to be energy-efficient, use renewable energy sources, and have systems for conserving water and other resources.  
  • Industries: Sustainable industries will need to adopt circular economy principles, reduce waste, and use renewable energy sources.

In conclusion, sustainable technology will be needed everywhere in 2460 and beyond. It will be essential for creating a sustainable future for all of humanity and the planet.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

“How” sustainable technology is required in 2460 (and, importantly, now) has several facets:

  • Innovation and Development: Continuous research and development are crucial. We need to invest in exploring new materials, processes, and technologies that are more efficient, less polluting, and utilize renewable resources. This includes advancements in areas like energy generation and storage, materials science, biotechnology, and information technology.
  • Integration and Implementation: Sustainable technologies need to be integrated into existing infrastructure and systems. This requires careful planning, policy support, and collaboration between governments, businesses, and individuals. Retrofitting existing systems and designing new infrastructure with sustainability in mind are essential.  
  • Scalability and Affordability: Sustainable solutions must be scalable to meet the needs of a global population. They also need to be affordable to ensure widespread adoption and avoid exacerbating inequalities. This often involves driving down costs through innovation and economies of scale.  
  • Behavioral Change: Technology alone is not enough. Sustainable practices require changes in human behavior. This includes adopting more sustainable lifestyles, making conscious consumption choices, and supporting businesses that prioritize sustainability. Education and awareness campaigns play a crucial role in fostering these changes.  
  • Policy and Regulation: Governments play a crucial role in creating a framework that supports sustainable technology. This includes setting standards, providing incentives, and regulating activities that are harmful to the environment. International cooperation is also essential to address global challenges like climate change.  
  • Circular Economy Principles: Moving towards a circular economy, where resources are reused and recycled, is crucial. This requires designing products for durability, repairability, and recyclability, and developing systems for recovering and reusing materials.  
  • Resilience and Adaptability: Sustainable technologies should be resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges. They should also be adaptable to changing conditions and new information.

In essence, “how” sustainable technology is required is through a multi-faceted approach that involves innovation, integration, scalability, behavioral change, policy support, circular economy principles, and resilience. It’s a complex challenge that requires collaboration and commitment from all sectors of society.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

It’s impossible to provide a true “case study” of sustainable technology in 2460, as that would require predicting the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and project them forward. This allows us to explore potential scenarios and the interconnectedness of different sustainable technologies.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Integrated Coastal City of Aethel, 2460

Background: By 2460, rising sea levels have significantly reshaped coastlines. Aethel is a newly built city designed from the ground up to be a model of sustainable living, built on reclaimed land protected by advanced sea defenses.

Sustainable Technologies in Action:

  • Energy: Aethel is powered entirely by a combination of:
    • Advanced Fusion Power: A small, highly efficient fusion reactor provides the bulk of the city’s baseload power.
    • Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): OTEC plants utilize the temperature difference between surface and deep ocean water to generate electricity.  
    • Integrated Solar and Wind: Solar panels are seamlessly integrated into building materials and infrastructure, while advanced wind turbines located offshore capture consistent energy.
    • Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Excess energy is stored in advanced battery systems and pumped hydro facilities, ensuring a stable power supply even during periods of low renewable energy generation.
  • Transportation:
    • Electric Autonomous Vehicles: Personal vehicles are electric and fully autonomous, optimizing traffic flow and reducing congestion.
    • High-Speed Underwater Rail: A network of underwater rail systems connects Aethel to other coastal cities, providing fast and efficient long-distance transport.
    • Personal Aerial Mobility: Electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft provide a limited form of personal air mobility for specific needs, managed by a sophisticated air traffic control system.
  • Food and Agriculture:
    • Vertical Farms: Multi-story vertical farms within the city produce a significant portion of the city’s fresh produce, minimizing land use and water consumption.
    • Aquaculture and Algae Farms: Sustainable aquaculture and algae farms provide protein sources and other nutrients, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture.  
    • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI optimize crop production in surrounding areas, minimizing resource use and environmental impact.
  • Water Management:
    • Advanced Desalination: Highly efficient desalination plants provide a constant supply of fresh water.
    • Water Recycling: Greywater and wastewater are treated and recycled for irrigation and other non-potable uses.  
    • Atmospheric Water Generation: In periods of drought, atmospheric water generators extract moisture from the air to supplement water supplies.  
  • Materials and Waste Management:
    • Bioplastics and Biodegradable Materials: The city relies heavily on bioplastics and other biodegradable materials, minimizing the use of traditional plastics.
    • Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Highly efficient recycling systems recover valuable materials from waste streams, minimizing landfill use.  
    • Circular Economy: The city operates on circular economy principles, where resources are constantly reused and recycled.
  • Resilience and Adaptation:
    • Sea Walls and Coastal Defenses: Advanced sea walls and other coastal defenses protect the city from rising sea levels and storm surges.
    • Climate-Resilient Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure are designed to withstand extreme weather events.
    • Adaptive Management Systems: AI-powered systems monitor environmental conditions and adapt infrastructure and resource usage in real-time.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Initial Investment: Building a city like Aethel would require a massive initial investment in sustainable technologies and infrastructure.
  • Technological Development: Many of the technologies described are still under development or in their early stages. Significant advancements will be needed to make them viable on a large scale.
  • Social and Economic Equity: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technology are shared equitably will be a major challenge.
  • Environmental Impacts: Even sustainable technologies can have environmental impacts. Careful planning and management are needed to minimize these impacts.

Conclusion:

The hypothetical case study of Aethel illustrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies could create a thriving and resilient city in the future. While this is just one possible scenario, it highlights the potential of sustainable technology to address the challenges of the 21st century and beyond. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of various systems and the importance of a holistic approach to sustainability.Sources and related content

COURTESY : AutoApex_TV

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2460: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2460. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and emerging technologies to envision a world where sustainability is deeply integrated into every aspect of human life. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, highlighting the interconnectedness of these technologies and their role in addressing global challenges.

1. Introduction:

The 25th century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Climate change, resource depletion, and a growing global population necessitate a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices. This paper posits that by 2460, sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of human civilization, enabling a harmonious relationship with the planet.

2. Energy:

The energy landscape of 2460 will likely be dominated by:

  • Advanced Fusion Power: Fusion energy, if breakthroughs are achieved, will provide a clean, abundant, and safe source of baseload power.
  • Ubiquitous Renewable Integration: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources will be seamlessly integrated into infrastructure, powering buildings, transportation systems, and even personal devices. Smart grids will dynamically manage energy distribution and storage.
  • Wireless Energy Transfer: Wireless power transmission, both short and long-range, will become commonplace, eliminating the need for cumbersome cables and enabling the efficient powering of remote areas.
  • Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Advanced energy storage solutions, including high-capacity batteries, pumped hydro, and potentially novel technologies like gravitational energy storage, will ensure grid stability and maximize the use of intermittent renewable sources.

3. Transportation:

Transportation in 2460 will be characterized by:

  • Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles will be the norm, and autonomous driving technology will be highly advanced, improving safety, efficiency, and accessibility.
  • Personal Air Mobility: Electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft will provide a new dimension to personal transportation, enabling rapid transit within and between cities, while minimizing ground congestion.
  • Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed ground transportation systems like Hyperloop and Maglev trains will connect distant cities and regions, drastically reducing travel times and promoting efficient movement of people and goods.
  • Sustainable Aviation Fuels: For long-haul flights, where electrification may be challenging, sustainable aviation fuels derived from biomass or synthetic processes will minimize the environmental impact of air travel.

4. Food and Agriculture:

Feeding a growing population sustainably will require:

  • Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture will maximize food production in urban areas, reducing land use and transportation costs.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics will optimize crop yields, minimize water and fertilizer use, and reduce the need for pesticides.
  • Cellular Agriculture and Alternative Proteins: Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will become increasingly prevalent, reducing the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.
  • Personalized Nutrition: Advanced diagnostics and personalized nutrition plans will optimize individual health and reduce food waste.

5. Materials and Manufacturing:

Sustainable materials and manufacturing processes will be essential:

  • Bioplastics and Biodegradable Materials: Bioplastics and other biodegradable materials will replace traditional plastics, reducing pollution and dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Highly efficient recycling systems will recover valuable materials from waste streams, moving towards a circular economy.
  • 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: 3D printing will enable on-demand manufacturing of customized products, reducing waste and optimizing resource use.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Materials with self-healing properties will extend product lifespans and reduce maintenance needs.

6. Environment and Resource Management:

Protecting and restoring the environment will be a priority:

  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced carbon capture and storage technologies will remove CO2 from the atmosphere, mitigating climate change.
  • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Advanced robotics and other technologies will be used to clean up plastic pollution and restore marine ecosystems.
  • Water Purification and Desalination: Highly efficient water purification and desalination technologies will ensure access to clean water in even the most arid regions.
  • Ecosystem Restoration and Rewilding: Large-scale ecosystem restoration and rewilding projects will help to restore biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services.

7. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 2460 will represent a profound shift in how humans interact with the planet. By embracing innovation, collaboration, and a commitment to sustainability, we can create a future where both humanity and the environment thrive. This vision is not merely aspirational; it is a necessity for the long-term well-being of our species and the planet we call home. The journey towards this future begins now, with the choices we make today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2460! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and potential advancements:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

  • Circular Economy-Based Factories: Factories will be designed around closed-loop systems, where waste is minimized and resources are continuously reused. Advanced recycling and resource recovery technologies will be integrated into production processes.
  • On-Demand Manufacturing: 3D printing and additive manufacturing will be highly advanced, allowing for the on-demand production of customized goods, minimizing waste and optimizing resource use.  
  • AI-Powered Optimization: AI and machine learning will be used to optimize production processes, reduce energy consumption, and minimize environmental impact.  
  • Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Biotechnology may be integrated into manufacturing processes, using biological systems to produce materials and products in a sustainable way.

2. Energy & Resource Management:

  • Smart Grids and Energy Optimization: Smart grids will dynamically manage energy distribution, optimizing the use of renewable energy sources and minimizing energy waste.  
  • Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries will utilize advanced carbon capture technologies to capture CO2 emissions and convert them into valuable products, such as fuels or materials.  
  • Resource Recovery and Recycling: Advanced technologies will be used to recover valuable resources from waste streams, reducing the need for mining and other resource extraction activities.
  • Sustainable Materials: Industries will rely heavily on bioplastics, biodegradable materials, and other sustainable alternatives to traditional materials.

3. Agriculture & Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Large-scale vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture facilities will be located near urban centers, providing fresh produce with minimal land and water use.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics will be used to optimize crop yields, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize the need for pesticides.  
  • Cellular Agriculture: Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will be produced in large-scale facilities, reducing the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Sustainable aquaculture practices will be used to produce seafood in a way that minimizes environmental impact and protects marine ecosystems.  

4. Construction & Infrastructure:

  • Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings will be constructed using sustainable materials, such as bioplastics, recycled materials, and locally sourced timber.
  • Energy-Efficient Buildings: Buildings will be designed to maximize energy efficiency, utilizing passive solar design, advanced insulation, and smart building management systems.
  • Modular and Prefabricated Construction: Modular and prefabricated construction methods will be used to reduce waste and construction time.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Construction materials with self-healing properties will extend the lifespan of buildings and infrastructure, reducing maintenance needs.

5. Transportation & Logistics:

  • Electric and Autonomous Fleets: Commercial transportation and logistics will rely on electric and autonomous vehicles, optimizing routes and reducing emissions.
  • Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Aviation will utilize sustainable aviation fuels derived from biomass or synthetic processes, minimizing the environmental impact of air travel.
  • Hyperloop and Maglev Transportation: High-speed transportation systems like Hyperloop and Maglev trains will be used for long-distance freight transport, reducing travel times and energy consumption.

6. Biotechnology & Biomanufacturing:

  • Biorefineries: Biorefineries will convert biomass into biofuels, bioplastics, and other valuable products.  
  • Biomanufacturing: Biological systems will be used to produce materials, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals in a sustainable way.
  • Genetic Engineering: Advances in genetic engineering may lead to the development of crops that are more resilient to climate change and require fewer resources.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2460. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see even more innovative and transformative applications in the years to come.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2460 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 2460 will be a continuous and multifaceted endeavor, building upon current trends and pushing the boundaries of scientific knowledge. Here’s how it might look:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

  • Materials Science: R&D will focus on discovering and developing new materials with unique properties, such as:
    • Super-efficient energy conductors: Materials that can transmit electricity with minimal loss, crucial for wireless energy transfer and advanced electronics.  
    • Ultra-lightweight and strong composites: Materials for building advanced transportation systems, infrastructure, and even space-based structures.
    • Bio-integrated materials: Materials that can seamlessly integrate with biological systems, with applications in medicine, agriculture, and even construction.
    • Adaptive materials: Materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli, for use in smart buildings, adaptive clothing, and robotics.  
  • Energy Science: Research will explore new ways to generate, store, and transmit energy, including:
    • Fusion energy: Continued research into achieving controlled and sustained fusion reactions for a clean and abundant energy source.
    • Novel renewable energy technologies: Exploring untapped sources like deep-sea thermal energy, space-based solar power, and advanced forms of geothermal energy.
    • Quantum energy: Investigating the potential of harnessing quantum phenomena for energy generation and storage.
  • Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology: R&D will focus on:
    • Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials, chemicals, and fuels in a sustainable way.
    • Genetic engineering: Developing crops that are more resilient to climate change, require fewer resources, and have enhanced nutritional value.  
    • Synthetic biology: Designing and building new biological systems for applications in medicine, agriculture, and environmental remediation.  
  • Environmental Science: Research will be crucial for understanding and addressing environmental challenges:
    • Climate change mitigation: Developing advanced carbon capture and storage technologies, as well as geoengineering solutions.
    • Ecosystem restoration: Developing methods for restoring damaged ecosystems and enhancing biodiversity.
    • Pollution remediation: Creating technologies for removing pollutants from air, water, and soil.  

2. Applied Research and Development:

  • Advanced Manufacturing Technologies:
    • Nanotechnology: Developing and applying nanomaterials and processes for various applications, including energy storage, medicine, and manufacturing.
    • 3D printing and additive manufacturing: Advancing 3D printing technologies to enable the on-demand production of complex products with minimal waste.
    • Artificial intelligence and robotics: Integrating AI and robotics into manufacturing processes to optimize efficiency, reduce waste, and enable automation.  
  • Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems:
    • Vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture: Developing advanced systems for growing crops in urban areas with minimal resource use.
    • Precision agriculture: Using sensors, AI, and robotics to optimize crop yields and reduce environmental impact.  
    • Cellular agriculture: Improving the efficiency and scalability of producing cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources.
  • Sustainable Cities and Infrastructure:
    • Smart grids: Developing advanced smart grids to manage energy distribution and optimize the use of renewable energy sources.  
    • Sustainable building materials: Researching and developing new building materials that are environmentally friendly, durable, and energy-efficient.
    • Autonomous transportation systems: Advancing autonomous driving technology and integrating it with smart city infrastructure.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

R&D for sustainable technology in 2460 will require strong interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, social scientists, and policymakers. This will ensure that sustainable solutions are not only technologically sound but also socially acceptable and economically viable.

4. Global Cooperation:

Given the global nature of many environmental challenges, international cooperation will be essential for R&D in sustainable technology. This will involve sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise to accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable solutions.

5. Ethical Considerations:

As we develop new sustainable technologies, it will be crucial to consider their ethical implications. This includes ensuring that these technologies are used responsibly and that their benefits are shared equitably.

In conclusion, R&D for sustainable technology in 2460 will be a continuous process of scientific discovery, technological innovation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. It will require a long-term vision and a commitment to creating a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

courtesy : Top Picks Network

References

  1. ^ Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993). “The Setting”. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-691-08631-1. JSTOR j.ctt7rpm1. I find the most useful conceptual definition for this study to be that given by Harvey Brooks, who has defined technology …as ‘knowledge of how to fulfill certain human purposes in a specifiable and reproducible way.’
  2. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 117–118: “The first pole, that of the naturalisation of a new discipline within the university curriculum, was presented by Christian Wolff in 1728, in Chapter III of the “Preliminary discourse” to his Philosophia rationalisis sive Logica: ‘Technology is the science of skills and works of skill, or, if one prefers, the science of things made by man’s labour, chiefly through the use of his hands.'”
  3. ^ Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-53196-1.
  4. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1996) [1891]. Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-910205-8. OCLC 38307662.
  5. ^ Simpson, J.; Weiner, Edmund, eds. (1989). “technology”. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611868.
  6. ^ Aristotle (2009). Brown, Lesley (ed.). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Translated by Ross, David. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-921361-0. LCCN 2009005379. OCLC 246896490.
  7. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 114–115.
  8. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 117.
  9. ^ Schatzberg, Eric (2006). “”Technik” Comes to America: Changing Meanings of “Technology” before 1930″. Technology and Culture. 47 (3): 486–512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 40061169. S2CID 143784033. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 119: “With the industrial revolution and the important part England played in it, the word technology was to lose this meaning as the subject or thrust of a branch of education, as first in English and then in other languages it embodied all technical activity based on the application of science to practical ends.”
  11. ^ Schiffer, M. B. (2013). “Discovery Processes: Trial Models”. The Archaeology of Science. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Vol. 9. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–198. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_13. ISBN 978-3319000770. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  12. ^ The British Museum. “Our earliest technology?”. smarthistory.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  13. ^ Minogue, K. (28 October 2010). “Stone Age Toolmakers Surprisingly Sophisticated”. science.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  14. ^ Crump, Thomas (2001). A Brief History of Science. Constable & Robinson. p. 9. ISBN 978-1841192352.
  15. ^ Gowlett, J. A. J.; Wrangham, R. W. (1 March 2013). “Earliest fire in Africa: towards the convergence of archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis”. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 48 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2012.756754. ISSN 0067-270X. S2CID 163033909.
  16. ^ Stahl, Ann B. (1984). “Hominid dietary selection before fire”. Current Anthropology. 25 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1086/203106. JSTOR 2742818. S2CID 84337150.
  17. ^ Wrangham, R. (1 August 2017). “Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis”. Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S303 – S313. doi:10.1086/692113. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 148798286. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  18. ^ Dunbar, R. I. M.; Gamble, C.; Gowlett, J. A. J., eds. (2014). Lucy to Language: the Benchmark Papers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199652594. OCLC 1124046527. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  19. ^ Wade, Nicholas (15 July 2003). “Early Voices: The Leap to Language”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Shaar, Ron; Matmon, Ari; Horwitz, Liora K.; Ebert, Yael; Chazan, Michael; Arnold, M.; Aumaître, G.; Bourlès, D.; Keddadouche, K. (1 May 2021). “Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk Cave: New constraints for the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age”. Quaternary Science Reviews. 259: 106907. Bibcode:2021QSRv..25906907S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106907. ISSN 0277-3791. S2CID 234833092.
  21. ^ Hallett, Emily Y.; Marean, Curtis W.; Steele, Teresa E.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Jacobs, Zenobia; Cerasoni, Jacopo Niccolò; Aldeias, Vera; Scerri, Eleanor M. L.; Olszewski, Deborah I.; Hajraoui, Mohamed Abdeljalil El; Dibble, Harold L. (24 September 2021). “A worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 year old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Atlantic Coast, Morocco”. iScience. 24 (9): 102988. Bibcode:2021iSci…24j2988H. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102988. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8478944. PMID 34622180.
  22. ^ O’Neil, Dennis. “Evolution of Modern Humans: Archaic Homo sapiens Culture”. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2007.
  23. ^ Villa, Paola (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene archaeological record of southern France. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 303. ISBN 978-0520096622.
  24. ^ Cordaux, Richard; Stoneking, Mark (2003). “South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an ‘Early’ Human Dispersal out of Africa” (PDF). American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (6): 1586–1590, author reply 1590–93. doi:10.1086/375407. PMC 1180321. PMID 12817589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2007.
  25. ^ “‘Oldest remains’ outside Africa reset human migration clock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  26. ^ Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini (2019). “Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia”. Nature. 571 (7766). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 500–504. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31292546. S2CID 195873640. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  27. ^ Kuijt, i., ed. (2002). Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Fundamental Issues in Archaeology. Springer New York. ISBN 9780306471667. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  28. ^ Coghlan, H. H. (1943). “The Evolution of the Axe from Prehistoric to Roman Times”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 73 (1/2): 27–56. doi:10.2307/2844356. ISSN 0307-3114. JSTOR 2844356. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  29. ^ Driscoll, Killian (2006). The early prehistory in the west of Ireland: Investigations into the social archaeology of the Mesolithic, west of the Shannon, Ireland. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  30. ^ University of Chicago Press Journals (4 January 2006). “The First Baby Boom: Skeletal Evidence Shows Abrupt Worldwide Increase In Birth Rate During Neolithic Period”. ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  31. ^ Sussman, Robert W.; Hall, Roberta L. (April 1972). “Child Transport, Family Size, and Increase in Human Population During the Neolithic”. Current Anthropology. 13 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1086/201274. JSTOR 2740977. S2CID 143449170.
  32. ^ Ferraro, Gary P. (2006). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. The Thomson Corporation. ISBN 978-0495030393. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  33. ^ Patterson, Gordon M. (1992). The Essentials of Ancient History. Research & Education Association. ISBN 978-0878917044. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  34. ^ Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press.
  35. ^ Cramb, Alan W (1964). “A Short History of Metals”. Nature. 203 (4943): 337. Bibcode:1964Natur.203Q.337T. doi:10.1038/203337a0. S2CID 382712.
  36. ^ Hall, Harry Reginald Holland (1911). “Ceramics” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 05 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–760, see page 708. The art of making a pottery consisting of a siliceous sandy body coated with a vitreous copper glaze seems to have been known unexpectedly early, possibly even as early as the period immediately preceding the Ist Dynasty (4000 B.C.).
  37. ^ Akanuma, Hideo. “The significance of the composition of excavated iron fragments taken from Stratum III at the site of Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey”. Anatolian Archaeological Studies. 14. Tokyo: Japanese Institute of Anatolian Archaeology.
  38. ^ “Ironware piece unearthed from Turkey found to be oldest steel”. The Hindu. 26 March 2009. Archived from the original on 29 March 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  39. ^ Usai, Donatella; Salvatori, Sandro. “The oldest representation of a Nile boat”. Antiquity. 81.
  40. ^ Postel, Sandra (1999). “Egypt’s Nile Valley Basin Irrigation”. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393319378. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  41. ^ Crawford, Harriet (2013). The Sumerian World. New York & London: Routledge. pp. 34–43. ISBN 978-0203096604. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  42. ^ Potts, D.T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  43. ^ Childe, V. Gordon (1928). New Light on the Most Ancient East. p. 110.
  44. ^ Anthony, David A. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0691058870.
  45. ^ Gasser, Aleksander (March 2003). “World’s Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia”. Republic of Slovenia Government Communication Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  46. ^ Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0226452388. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999) [1994]. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. p. 146. ISBN 978-1575060422. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b Lay, M G (1992). Ways of the World. Sydney: Primavera Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1875368051.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Gregersen, Erik (2012). The Complete History of Wheeled Transportation: From Cars and Trucks to Buses and Bikes. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1615307012. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Aicher, Peter J. (1995). Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0865162822. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c Eslamian, Saeid (2014). Handbook of Engineering Hydrology: Environmental Hydrology and Water Management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-1466552500. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Lechner, Norbert (2012). Plumbing, Electricity, Acoustics: Sustainable Design Methods for Architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 106. ISBN 978-1118014752. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  53. ^ Davids, K.; De Munck, B., eds. (2019). Innovation and Creativity in Late Medieval and Early Modern European Cities. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315588605. ISBN 978-1317116530. S2CID 148764971. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  54. ^ Courtenay, W. J.; Miethke, J.; Priest, D. B., eds. (2000). Universities and Schooling in Medieval Society. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004113510. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  55. ^ Deming, D. (2014). Science and Technology in World History, Volume 3: The Black Death, the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. McFarland. ISBN 978-0786490868.
  56. ^ Stearns, P. N. (2020). The Industrial Revolution in World History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0813347295.
  57. ^ Mokyr, J. (2000). “The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870–1914” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  58. ^ Black, B. C. (2022). To Have and Have Not: Energy in World History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1538105047. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  59. ^ Albion, Robert G. (1 January 1933). “The Communication Revolution, 1760–1933”. Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 14 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1179/tns.1933.002. ISSN 0372-0187. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  60. ^ Agar, J. (2012). Science in the 20th Century and Beyond. Polity. ISBN 978-0745634692. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  61. ^ Goldin, C.; Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674037731. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  62. ^ Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926047. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  63. ^ Bresnahan, Timothy F.; Trajtenberg, M. (1 January 1995). “General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?”. Journal of Econometrics. 65 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T. ISSN 0304-4076.
  64. ^ Wrigley, E. A (13 March 2013). “Energy and the English Industrial Revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371 (1986): 20110568. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37110568W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0568. PMID 23359739. S2CID 10624423.
  65. ^ Persily, Nathaniel; Tucker, Joshua A., eds. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108890960. hdl:11245.1/cf2f5b6a-8dc8-4400-bc38-3317b0164499. ISBN 978-1108835558. S2CID 243715477. Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
  66. ^ Autor, D. H. (2015). “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022.
  67. ^ Bessen, J. E. (3 October 2016). “How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills”. Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law EJournal. 15–49. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2690435. S2CID 29968989. SSRN 2690435. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
  68. ^ “Robots and Artificial Intelligence”. igmchicago.org. Initiative on Global Markets. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  69. ^ “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” (PDF). www3.weforum.org. October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  70. ^ “Robots and AI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know | Built In”. builtin.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  71. ^ “How many jobs do robots really replace?”. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  72. ^ Acemoglu, Daron; Restrepo, Pascual (1 June 2020). “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716. hdl:1721.1/130324. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 7468879. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  73. ^ “Remarks Upon Signing Bill Creating the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. | The American Presidency Project”. www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  74. ^ “Technology and the American Economy” (PDF). files.eric.ed.gov. February 1966. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  75. ^ “If Robots Take Our Jobs, Will They Make It Up to Us?”. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  76. ^ “GovInfo”. www.govinfo.gov n. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  77. ^ “H.R.11611 – An Act to establish a National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress”. www.congress.gov. 1963. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  78. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenberg, Elizabeth; Harrell, Peter E.; Shiffman, Gary M.; Dorshimer, Sam (2019). “Financial Technology and National Security”. Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  79. ^ “U.S. takes aim at North Korean crypto laundering”. NBC News. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  80. ^ “U.S. ties North Korean hacker group to Axie Infinity crypto theft”. NBC News. 15 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  81. ^ Austin, David; Macauley, Molly K. (1 December 2001). “Cutting Through Environmental Issues: Technology as a double-edged sword”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  82. ^ Grainger, Alan; Francisco, Herminia A.; Tiraswat, Penporn (July 2003). “The impact of changes in agricultural technology on long-term trends in deforestation”. The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use. 20 (3): 209–223. Bibcode:2003LUPol..20..209G. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00009-7. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  83. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
  84. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists (6 November 2017). “What is Climate Engineering?”. www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
  85. ^ Chaudhry, Imran Sharif; Ali, Sajid; Bhatti, Shaukat Hussain; Anser, Muhammad Khalid; Khan, Ahmad Imran; Nazar, Raima (October 2021). “Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries”. Environmental Science & Policy. 124 (Environmental Science & Policy): 313–323. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..313C. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  86. ^ Smol, J. P. (2009). Pollution of Lakes and Rivers : a Paleoenvironmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 135. ISBN 978-1444307573. OCLC 476272945. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b Franssen, M.; Lokhorst, G.-J.; van de Poel, I. (2018). “Philosophy of Technology”. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b de Vries, M. J.; Verkerk, M. J.; Hoogland, J.; van der Stoep, J. (2015). Philosophy of Technology : An Introduction for Technology and Business Students. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1317445715. OCLC 907132694. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  89. ^ Brey, P. (2000). Mitcham, C. (ed.). “Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Faculties”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. 19.
  90. ^ Jump up to:a b Johnson, Deborah G.; Wetmore, Jameson M. (2021). Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262539968. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  91. ^ Dusek, Val (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley. ISBN 978-1405111621. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  92. ^ Postman, Neil (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
  93. ^ Marcuse, H. (2004). Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. Routledge. ISBN 978-1134774661. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  94. ^ Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1783486595. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  95. ^ Al-Rodhan, Nayef. “The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  96. ^ Luppicini, R. (2008). “The emerging field of Technoethics”. In Luppicini; R. Adell (eds.). Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
  97. ^ Veruggio, Gianmarco (2011). “The Roboethics Roadmap”. EURON Roboethics Atelier. Scuola di Robotica: 2. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.466.2810.
  98. ^ Anderson, Michael; Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112352.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies, Volume 1: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412823791. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  100. ^ “About us”. cser.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 30 December 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  101. ^ Gottlieb, J. (1 May 2022). “Discounting, Buck-Passing, and Existential Risk Mitigation: The Case of Space Colonization”. Space Policy. 60: 101486. Bibcode:2022SpPol..6001486G. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101486. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 247718992.
  102. ^ “Stanford Existential Risks Initiative”. cisac.fsi.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
  103. ^ Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199606504. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Bostrom, Nick (6 September 2019). “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis”. Global Policy. 10 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 203169705.
  105. ^ Kurzweil, Ray (2005). “GNR: Three Overlapping Revolutions”. The Singularity is Near. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101218884.
  106. ^ Kompridis, N. (2009). “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human” (PDF). Parrhesia. 8 (1): 20–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  107. ^ McShane, Sveta (19 April 2016). “Ray Kurzweil Predicts Three Technologies Will Define Our Future”. Singularity Hub. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  108. ^ Poole, C. P. Jr.; Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471079354.
  109. ^ Vince, G. (3 July 2003). “Nanotechnology may create new organs”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  110. ^ Lee, Sukhan; Suh, Il Hong (2008). Recent Progress in Robotics: Viable Robotic Service to Human: An Edition of the Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 978-3540767282. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  111. ^ Grace, K.; Salvatier, J.; Dafoe, A.; Zhang, B.; Evans, O. (31 July 2018). “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 62: 729–754. doi:10.1613/jair.1.11222. ISSN 1076-9757. S2CID 8746462. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  112. ^ Segal, H. P. (2005). Technological Utopianism in American Culture (20th Anniversary ed.). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0815630616. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  113. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Roots and Core Themes”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part1. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  114. ^ Istvan, Zoltan (1 February 2015). “A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging”. Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  115. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Future Trajectories: Singularity”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 361–363. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part8. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  116. ^ Blackford, R.; Bostrom, N.; Dupuy, J.-P. (2011). H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute. ISBN 978-1456815653. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  117. ^ Jones, Steven E. (2013). Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135522391. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  118. ^ Kelman, David (1 June 2020). “Politics in a Small Room: Subterranean Babel in Piglia’s El camino de Ida”. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. 63: 179–201. doi:10.3138/ycl.63.005. ISSN 0084-3695. S2CID 220494877. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  119. ^ Fleming, Sean (7 May 2021). “The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 27 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940. ISSN 1356-9317.
  120. ^ Vannini, Phillip; Jonathan Taggart (2013). “Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles”. Environment and Planning A. 45 (2): 295–311. Bibcode:2013EnPlA..45..295V. doi:10.1068/a4564. S2CID 143970611.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b Scranton, Philip (1 May 2006). “Urgency, uncertainty, and innovation: Building jet engines in postwar America”. Management & Organizational History. 1 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1177/1744935906064096. ISSN 1744-9359. S2CID 143813033.
  122. ^ Di Nucci Pearce, M. R.; Pearce, David (1989). “Technology vs. Science: The Cognitive Fallacy”. Synthese. 81 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1007/BF00869324. ISSN 0039-7857. JSTOR 20116729. S2CID 46975083. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  123. ^ Skolimowski, Henryk (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”. Technology and Culture. 7 (3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3101935.
  124. ^ Brooks, H. (1 September 1994). “The relationship between science and technology”. Research Policy. Special Issue in Honor of Nathan Rosenberg. 23 (5): 477–486. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b c Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012). Antifragile. Penguin Random House. OCLC 1252833169.
  126. ^ Hare, Ronald (1970). The Birth of Penicillin, and the Disarming of Microbes. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0049250055. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  127. ^ Wise, George (1985). “Science and Technology”. Osiris. 2nd Series. 1: 229–46. doi:10.1086/368647. S2CID 144475553.
  128. ^ Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521653183.
  129. ^ Taleb, N. N. (12 December 2012). “Understanding is a Poor Substitute for Convexity (Antifragility)” (PDF). fooledbyrandomness.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  130. ^ Narin, Francis; Olivastro, Dominic (1 June 1992). “Status report: Linkage between technology and science”. Research Policy. 21 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-Y. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  131. ^ Krieger, Joshua L.; Schnitzer, Monika; Watzinger, Martin (1 May 2019). “Standing on the Shoulders of Science” (PDF). SSRN 3401853. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  132. ^ Oakley, K. P. (1976). “Man the Tool-Maker”. Nature. 199 (4898): 1042–1043. Bibcode:1963Natur.199U1042.. doi:10.1038/1991042e0. ISBN 978-0226612706. S2CID 4298952.
  133. ^ Sagan, Carl; Druyan, Ann; Leakey, Richard. “Chimpanzee Tool Use”. Archived from the original on 21 September 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2007.
  134. ^ Rincon, Paul (7 June 2005). “Sponging dolphins learn from mum”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  135. ^ Schmid, Randolph E. (4 October 2007). “Crows use tools to find food”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  136. ^ Rutz, C.; Bluff, L.A.; Weir, A.A.S.; Kacelnik, A. (4 October 2007). “Video cameras on wild birds”. Science. 318 (5851): 765. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..765R. doi:10.1126/science.1146788. PMID 17916693. S2CID 28785984.
  137. ^ McGrew, W. C (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521423717.
  138. ^ Boesch, Christophe; Boesch, Hedwige (1984). “Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking”. Primates. 25 (2): 160–170. doi:10.1007/BF02382388. S2CID 24073884.
  139. ^ Brahic, Catherine (15 January 2009). “Nut-cracking monkeys find the right tool for the job”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  140. ^ Müller, G.; Watling, J. (24 June 2016). The engineering in beaver dams. River Flow 2016: Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. St. Louis: University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  141. ^ Thomas Michaud (2008). “Science fiction and politics: Cyberpunk science fiction as political philosophy”. New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction. By Hassler, Donald M. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 65–77 [75–76]. ISBN 978-1570037368.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »