Sustainable Technology of 2450

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2450 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

It’s impossible to predict the exact state of sustainable technology in 2450. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the long-term nature of technological development:

Possible Trends:

  • Highly Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources will likely be the dominant forms of energy production. Energy storage solutions will be incredibly efficient, and energy distribution will be managed by sophisticated smart grids.
  • Closed-Loop Resource Systems: The concept of a circular economy will be fully realized. Resource extraction will be minimized, and materials will be continuously recycled and reused. Manufacturing processes will be highly efficient and generate minimal waste.
  • Advanced Biotechnology: Biotechnology will play a significant role in various sectors, including agriculture, medicine, and materials science. Genetically engineered crops may be more resilient and require fewer resources. Biomanufacturing could produce sustainable materials and even fuels.
  • Precision Agriculture: Agriculture will be highly optimized with the use of sensors, AI, and robotics. This will minimize water and fertilizer usage while maximizing crop yields. Vertical farms and other innovative farming methods may be widely adopted.
  • Carbon Capture and Utilization: Technologies for capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converting it into useful products will be highly advanced. This could help mitigate the effects of past emissions and create a circular carbon economy.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Transportation will be dominated by electric vehicles powered by renewable energy. Advanced battery technology and charging infrastructure will make electric vehicles highly efficient and convenient. Hyperloops or other high-speed transportation systems may be common for long-distance travel.
  • Smart Cities: Cities will be designed with sustainability in mind. Buildings will be energy-efficient and utilize renewable resources. Public transportation will be highly developed and integrated. Waste management systems will be optimized to minimize waste and maximize resource recovery.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation will play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage and minimizing waste across various sectors. Smart systems will manage energy grids, transportation networks, and other infrastructure to ensure efficiency and sustainability.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Resource Availability: Even with advanced recycling technologies, certain resources may become scarce. Careful planning and resource management will be crucial.
  • Environmental Impacts: New technologies may have unintended environmental consequences. Thorough assessment and mitigation strategies will be necessary.
  • Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and their benefits will be essential.
  • Ethical Considerations: Advanced technologies like biotechnology and AI raise ethical questions that will need careful consideration.

**Overall

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

While it’s exciting to imagine the possibilities of sustainable technology in 2450, it’s important to remember that predicting the future with certainty is impossible. However, we can make some informed speculations based on current trends and the long-term direction of technological development. Here’s a glimpse into what sustainable technology might look like in 2450:

1. Energy:

  • Renewable Energy Dominance: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources will likely be the primary sources of power. Advanced energy storage solutions will ensure a stable and reliable energy supply, even when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing.  
  • Smart Grids: Intelligent, self-regulating energy grids will optimize energy distribution and minimize waste. These grids will be able to predict and respond to energy demand fluctuations in real-time.  
  • Fusion Power: It’s possible that by 2450, nuclear fusion will have become a viable and safe energy source, providing a clean and virtually limitless supply of power.

2. Resource Management:

  • Circular Economy: The concept of a circular economy will be fully realized. Resource extraction will be minimized, and materials will be continuously recycled and reused. Manufacturing processes will be highly efficient and generate minimal waste.
  • Biomanufacturing: Biotechnology will play a significant role in producing sustainable materials and even fuels. Biomanufacturing will utilize biological processes to create products from renewable resources, reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Resource Optimization: Advanced AI and automation will optimize resource usage across various sectors, from agriculture to manufacturing. Smart systems will monitor and manage resource flows to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.  

3. Food and Agriculture:

  • Precision Agriculture: Agriculture will be highly optimized with the use of sensors, AI, and robotics. This will minimize water and fertilizer usage while maximizing crop yields. Vertical farms and other innovative farming methods may be widely adopted.  
  • Sustainable Food Production: Biotechnology may be used to develop crops that are more resilient to climate change and require fewer resources. Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources could become more common, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.  

4. Transportation:

  • Electric Vehicles: Transportation will be dominated by electric vehicles powered by renewable energy. Advanced battery technology and charging infrastructure will make electric vehicles highly efficient and convenient.
  • Hyperloops and High-Speed Transport: Hyperloops or other high-speed transportation systems may be common for long-distance travel, reducing travel times and energy consumption.
  • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles will be integrated into smart city systems, optimizing traffic flow and reducing accidents.

5. Cities and Infrastructure:

  • Smart Cities: Cities will be designed with sustainability in mind. Buildings will be energy-efficient and utilize renewable resources. Public transportation will be highly developed and integrated. Waste management systems will be optimized to minimize waste and maximize resource recovery.
  • Green Infrastructure: Cities will incorporate more green spaces, such as parks and vertical gardens, to improve air quality, reduce the urban heat island effect, and enhance biodiversity.

6. Environmental Remediation:

  • Carbon Capture and Utilization: Technologies for capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converting it into useful products will be highly advanced. This could help mitigate the effects of past emissions and create a circular carbon economy.
  • Ocean Cleanup: Advanced technologies will be used to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans, restoring marine ecosystems.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Resource Availability: Even with advanced recycling technologies, certain resources may become scarce. Careful planning and resource management will be crucial.
  • Environmental Impacts: New technologies may have unintended environmental consequences. Thorough assessment and mitigation strategies will be necessary.
  • Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and their benefits will be essential.
  • Ethical Considerations: Advanced technologies like biotechnology and AI raise ethical questions that will need careful consideration.

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 2450 will likely be characterized by a high degree of efficiency, resourcefulness, and integration. Technologies will be designed to minimize environmental impact and promote a circular economy. However, careful planning, ethical considerations, and global cooperation will be necessary to ensure a truly sustainable future.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual path of technological development is uncertain, and unforeseen breakthroughs could lead to entirely different outcomes. However, by focusing on sustainability and responsible innovation, we can increase the likelihood of a positive future.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

While the benefits of sustainable technology in 2450 would ideally be available to everyone, here’s a breakdown of who would be most reliant on and involved in its development and implementation:

1. Global Population:

  • Consumers: Everyone would benefit from access to clean energy, sustainable food production, efficient transportation, and resource-efficient products. This would improve quality of life, reduce environmental risks, and potentially lower costs associated with resource scarcity.  
  • Citizens: Individuals would play a role in adopting sustainable practices, making informed choices about consumption, and potentially participating in community-based sustainability initiatives.  

2. Governments and Policymakers:

  • Regulators: Governments would need to establish regulations and policies that promote the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. This includes setting standards for emissions, resource usage, and waste management.  
  • Investors: Public funding would be crucial for research and development of sustainable technologies, as well as for creating incentives for businesses to adopt sustainable practices.  
  • Urban Planners: City planners would be responsible for designing sustainable cities with efficient infrastructure, green spaces, and integrated transportation systems.  

3. Businesses and Industries:

  • Technology Developers: Companies and researchers would be at the forefront of developing and innovating sustainable technologies, from renewable energy solutions to advanced materials and manufacturing processes.
  • Manufacturers: Industries would need to adopt sustainable practices in their production processes, minimizing waste, using renewable energy, and prioritizing resource efficiency.  
  • Service Providers: Businesses across various sectors, from transportation to agriculture, would need to integrate sustainable technologies and practices into their operations.

4. Scientists and Engineers:

  • Researchers: Scientists and engineers would play a crucial role in advancing our understanding of environmental challenges and developing innovative solutions.
  • Innovators: Individuals with creative ideas and technical expertise would be needed to develop new sustainable technologies and improve existing ones.

5. Communities and Organizations:

  • Local Initiatives: Community-based organizations and initiatives would play a role in promoting sustainable practices at the local level, raising awareness, and implementing grassroots projects.  
  • Educational Institutions: Schools and universities would need to educate future generations about sustainability and equip them with the knowledge and skills to contribute to a sustainable future.  

Key Considerations:

  • Equity: It’s crucial to ensure that the benefits of sustainable technology are accessible to everyone, regardless of their location, socioeconomic status, or background.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international collaboration in developing and sharing sustainable technologies.  
  • Ethical Considerations: As we develop and implement new technologies, it’s important to consider the ethical implications and potential unintended consequences.

Ultimately, the successful implementation of sustainable technology in 2450 would require a collective effort from individuals, governments, businesses, scientists, and communities around the world.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 2450 is not a question of “when,” but rather a continuous and urgent imperative. It’s not about a specific point in time when we suddenly require these technologies, but rather an ongoing process that begins now and extends far into the future.

Here’s why:

  • Resource Depletion: Our current consumption patterns are depleting finite resources at an alarming rate. Even with recycling and efficiency improvements, we need to transition to a circular economy and resource-efficient technologies to ensure long-term availability. This need is urgent and ongoing.  
  • Climate Change: The effects of climate change are already being felt around the world. Extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and ecological disruptions demand immediate action to mitigate further damage and adapt to the changing environment. Sustainable technologies are crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and building resilience. This need is immediate and critical.  
  • Population Growth: The global population is projected to continue growing, increasing the demand for resources like food, water, and energy. Sustainable technologies are essential for meeting these needs without further straining the planet’s resources. This need is continuous and evolving.  
  • Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and habitat loss are already impacting ecosystems and human health. Sustainable technologies can help reverse this trend by minimizing waste, reducing pollution, and protecting biodiversity. This need is ongoing and requires continuous effort.  

Therefore, the need for sustainable technology is not something that suddenly arises in 2450. It’s a need that exists now and will continue to exist as long as we strive for a healthy planet and a thriving society.

The development and implementation of sustainable technologies is an ongoing process that requires continuous effort from individuals, governments, businesses, and researchers. The sooner we embrace sustainable practices and invest in sustainable technologies, the better equipped we will be to face the challenges of the future.  

In essence, the “when” for sustainable technology is now and always.Sources and related content

COURTESY : AutoApex_TV

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 2450 isn’t confined to a single location, but rather a global imperative. However, here are some key areas where it would be particularly crucial:

1. Urban Centers:

  • Megacities: Densely populated urban areas will be highly reliant on sustainable technologies for energy efficiency, waste management, transportation, and resource optimization.
  • Developing Cities: Rapidly growing cities in developing countries will need to adopt sustainable infrastructure and technologies from the outset to avoid the environmental problems faced by older cities.

2. Resource-Stressed Regions:

  • Arid and Semi-Arid Areas: Regions facing water scarcity will heavily depend on sustainable water management technologies, such as desalination, water recycling, and efficient irrigation.
  • Coastal Regions: Coastal communities will need sustainable solutions to protect against rising sea levels, erosion, and storm surges.

3. Industrial Zones:

  • Manufacturing Hubs: Industrial areas will need to adopt sustainable manufacturing processes, including resource efficiency, waste reduction, and the use of renewable energy.
  • Mining Regions: Mining operations will need to minimize their environmental impact through sustainable extraction techniques and ecosystem restoration.  

4. Agricultural Lands:

  • Farming Regions: Sustainable agriculture will be crucial for ensuring food security while minimizing water and fertilizer usage, and protecting biodiversity.
  • Deforested Areas: Reforestation efforts will require sustainable practices to restore ecosystems and prevent further deforestation.

5. Remote and Isolated Communities:

  • Island Nations: Small island nations will be particularly vulnerable to climate change and will need sustainable solutions for energy, water, and coastal protection.  
  • Rural Areas: Remote communities will need access to sustainable energy sources and technologies for basic needs like water purification and sanitation.

6. Global Commons:

  • Oceans: Sustainable technologies will be needed to protect marine ecosystems, prevent pollution, and manage fisheries responsibly.  
  • Atmosphere: Global efforts will be required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and develop carbon capture technologies.

Key Considerations:

  • Equity: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to all regions and communities, regardless of their economic status.
  • Local Context: The specific sustainable technologies needed will vary depending on the local environmental conditions, resource availability, and social context.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international collaboration in developing and sharing sustainable technologies.  

Ultimately, the successful implementation of sustainable technology in 2450 will require a global effort to address environmental challenges and ensure a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

The “how” of achieving sustainable technology by 2450 is a complex question, but it boils down to a multi-faceted approach involving continuous effort across various sectors and levels of society. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Continuous Research and Development:

  • Fundamental Science: Investing in basic research to understand Earth’s systems, develop new materials, and explore innovative energy sources is crucial. This lays the foundation for future technological breakthroughs.  
  • Applied Research: Focusing on translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies, such as more efficient solar cells, advanced energy storage systems, and sustainable manufacturing processes.
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between scientists, engineers, and social scientists to ensure that technological solutions are not only effective but also socially acceptable and equitable.

2. Policy and Regulation:

  • Incentives: Governments need to create incentives for businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable practices, such as tax breaks for renewable energy, subsidies for electric vehicles, and carbon pricing mechanisms.  
  • Regulations: Setting standards for emissions, resource usage, and waste management is essential to ensure that industries operate sustainably.  
  • International Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international agreements and collaboration on technology development and deployment.  

3. Business and Industry:

  • Sustainable Practices: Businesses need to integrate sustainability into their operations, from sourcing materials responsibly to reducing waste and using renewable energy.  
  • Investment: Companies need to invest in research and development of sustainable technologies and adopt sustainable practices across their supply chains.
  • Circular Economy: Embracing the principles of a circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, is crucial for minimizing waste and resource depletion.  

4. Education and Awareness:

  • Public Education: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies is essential for driving adoption.  
  • Skills Development: Educating and training future generations in science, engineering, and other fields related to sustainability is crucial for developing the workforce needed for a sustainable future.  

5. Societal Shifts:

  • Sustainable Consumption: Encouraging individuals to adopt sustainable consumption patterns, such as reducing their environmental footprint, choosing eco-friendly products, and conserving resources.  
  • Community Engagement: Empowering communities to participate in sustainability initiatives and make decisions about their local environment.

6. Technological Innovation:

  • Open Source and Collaboration: Sharing knowledge and technologies through open-source platforms and collaborative projects can accelerate innovation.  
  • Focus on Efficiency: Prioritizing the development of technologies that are highly efficient in their use of resources and energy.  
  • Resilience: Designing systems that are resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.

7. Ethical Considerations:

  • Responsible Innovation: Ensuring that new technologies are developed and used responsibly, considering their potential social and environmental impacts.  
  • Equity: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

It’s important to remember that this is an ongoing process. The “how” of achieving sustainable technology by 2450 is not a one-time fix, but a continuous journey of innovation, adaptation, and collaboration. It requires a long-term vision and a commitment to sustainability from all sectors of society.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

It’s tough to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 2450, as that’s far in the future and we can only speculate. However, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and extrapolate what might be possible:

Scenario: The Island Nation of ‘Aethel’ in 2450

Aethel is a small island nation, heavily impacted by rising sea levels in the 22nd century. They were forced to become pioneers in sustainable living to survive. Here’s how they utilize sustainable technology:

  • Energy: Aethel is powered entirely by a combination of:
    • Advanced Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): They utilize the temperature difference between surface and deep ocean water to generate electricity. This is a consistent and reliable source.  
    • Wave and Tidal Power: They have highly efficient systems that harness the constant motion of the ocean for energy.
    • Floating Solar Farms: These farms, designed to minimize impact on marine life, provide supplemental energy.
    • Smart Grid: A highly sophisticated AI-managed grid optimizes energy distribution and storage, minimizing any waste.
  • Resource Management:
    • Closed-loop Recycling: Aethel has perfected resource recovery. Almost all materials are recycled and reused in closed-loop systems, minimizing the need for resource extraction.
    • Biomanufacturing: They utilize advanced biotechnology to create biodegradable plastics and other materials from seaweed and other renewable resources.
    • Vertical Farming: High-tech vertical farms provide the majority of their food, requiring minimal land and water, and producing minimal waste.
  • Transportation:
    • Electric Vehicles: All vehicles on the island are electric, powered by the renewable energy grid.
    • Autonomous Systems: AI manages traffic flow and optimizes routes, minimizing congestion and energy use.  
    • Ocean Transportation: Aethel utilizes highly efficient electric ships for trade and travel, and potentially underwater transportation systems for some routes.
  • City Design:
    • Green Infrastructure: The city is designed with green buildings, vertical gardens, and interconnected parks, creating a livable and sustainable environment.
    • Resilient Infrastructure: Buildings are designed to withstand extreme weather events and rising sea levels.
    • Waste Management: Advanced systems sort and process waste, turning it into resources or energy.

Challenges Faced:

  • Initial Investment: Transitioning to these technologies required massive upfront investment and societal changes.
  • Maintenance: Keeping these advanced systems running requires a highly skilled workforce and continuous maintenance.
  • Unexpected Issues: Even with careful planning, unforeseen environmental changes or technological glitches can occur, requiring adaptation.

Lessons Learned:

  • Long-term Vision: Aethel’s success came from a commitment to sustainability over generations, with consistent investment and policy.
  • Community Involvement: Engaging the entire community in the transition was crucial for its success.
  • Adaptability: Being ready to adapt to new challenges and technologies is crucial for long-term sustainability.

This hypothetical case study highlights how a nation might achieve sustainability by 2450 through a combination of advanced technology, careful planning, and societal shifts. While this is just one possible scenario, it illustrates the potential for a sustainable future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Top Picks Network

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2450: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2450. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and scientific advancements to envision a world where technology plays a crucial role in environmental stewardship, resource management, and societal well-being. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, discusses the challenges involved, and proposes a framework for achieving a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The 25th century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Climate change, resource depletion, and a growing global population demand innovative solutions. This paper posits that sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of a thriving future in 2450, enabling humanity to live in harmony with the planet.

2. Key Areas of Advancement:

2.1 Energy:

  • Renewable Energy Dominance: Solar, wind, geothermal, and biomass energy will be the primary sources, supplemented by advanced energy storage solutions like high-capacity batteries and potentially even more exotic methods like gravitational energy storage.
  • Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, if realized, could provide a clean and virtually limitless energy source, further reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids will optimize energy distribution and consumption, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

2.2 Resource Management:

  • Circular Economy: Closed-loop recycling systems will be ubiquitous, minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery. “Urban mining” of previously discarded materials will be a common practice.
  • Biomanufacturing: Advanced biotechnology will enable the production of sustainable materials, fuels, and chemicals from renewable biological resources.
  • Precision Resource Management: AI and sensor networks will monitor and manage resource flows in real-time, optimizing consumption and minimizing waste across all sectors.

2.3 Food and Agriculture:

  • Precision Agriculture: AI-driven precision agriculture will optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer usage. Vertical farms and other innovative farming methods will be commonplace, particularly in urban areas.
  • Sustainable Food Production: Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will reduce the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.
  • Personalized Nutrition: Advanced diagnostics and personalized nutrition plans will optimize human health and reduce food waste.

2.4 Transportation:

  • Electric Vehicles: Electric vehicles powered by renewable energy will dominate personal and commercial transportation.
  • Advanced Battery Technology: Battery technology will be significantly advanced, offering higher energy density, faster charging times, and longer lifespans.
  • Hyperloops and High-Speed Transport: Hyperloops or similar high-speed transport systems will facilitate efficient and sustainable long-distance travel.

2.5 Cities and Infrastructure:

  • Smart Cities: Urban centers will be designed as interconnected smart cities, optimizing resource usage, minimizing waste, and promoting sustainable living.
  • Green Infrastructure: Green spaces, vertical gardens, and other forms of green infrastructure will be integrated into urban environments to improve air quality, reduce the urban heat island effect, and enhance biodiversity.
  • Resilient Infrastructure: Infrastructure will be designed to withstand the impacts of climate change, including extreme weather events and rising sea levels.

2.6 Environmental Remediation:

  • Carbon Capture and Utilization: Advanced technologies will capture CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it into useful products, effectively creating a circular carbon economy.
  • Ocean Cleanup: Advanced robotics and other technologies will be used to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans, restoring marine ecosystems.
  • Geoengineering: While potentially controversial, geoengineering techniques may be employed as a last resort to mitigate the effects of climate change.

3. Challenges and Considerations:

  • Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced recycling, certain resources may become scarce. Careful resource management and exploration of alternative materials will be crucial.
  • Technological Risks: New technologies may have unintended consequences. Thorough risk assessment and mitigation strategies will be necessary.
  • Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and their benefits will be essential to prevent further social disparities.
  • Ethical Considerations: Advanced technologies like biotechnology and AI raise ethical questions that will require careful consideration and public discourse.

4. Framework for Achieving Sustainability:

  • Investment in Research and Development: Continued investment in basic and applied research is essential for developing breakthrough sustainable technologies.
  • Policy and Regulation: Governments must implement policies and regulations that incentivize sustainable practices and promote the adoption of sustainable technologies.
  • International Cooperation: Global challenges require international collaboration on technology development, deployment, and regulation.
  • Education and Awareness: Public education and awareness campaigns are crucial for fostering a culture of sustainability and driving individual behavior change.
  • Ethical Frameworks: Establishing robust ethical frameworks for the development and deployment of new technologies is essential to ensure responsible innovation.

5. Conclusion:

Sustainable technology holds the key to a thriving future in 2450. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, humanity can create a world where technology empowers us to live in harmony with the planet and ensure a prosperous future for generations to come. This vision requires a long-term commitment and a global effort, but the potential rewards are immeasurable.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2450, building on the trends we’ve discussed:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Advanced Biomanufacturing: Factories will utilize engineered biological systems to produce everything from biodegradable plastics and textiles to complex materials like carbon nanotubes and graphene. These bio-factories will run on renewable energy and generate minimal waste, often using locally sourced biomass as feedstock.
  • Additive Manufacturing (4D Printing): 4D printing, where materials can change shape over time in response to stimuli, will be highly advanced. Products will be designed for easy disassembly and recycling, and even “grown” to precise specifications, minimizing material waste. Imagine a bridge component that can repair itself after damage.
  • Closed-Loop Production Systems: Manufacturing facilities will operate on closed-loop systems, where all byproducts and waste materials are captured and reused within the production process. Factories will be highly localized, minimizing transportation needs and maximizing resource efficiency.
  • AI-Optimized Production: AI will manage every aspect of the manufacturing process, from design and material selection to production and quality control. This will optimize energy use, reduce waste, and ensure product quality.

2. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: Advanced robotics and AI will enable highly precise and minimally invasive mining operations, reducing environmental impact and maximizing resource recovery. “Urban mining” from recycled materials will be a primary source.
  • Advanced Material Recovery: Highly efficient recycling facilities will be able to separate and recover valuable materials from complex products and waste streams, ensuring that resources are continuously reused.
  • In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): For off-world activities (if humanity has expanded beyond Earth), ISRU will be crucial. Automated systems will extract and process resources from asteroids, planets, or moons, minimizing the need to transport materials from Earth.

3. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Decentralized Energy Systems: Industries will increasingly rely on decentralized energy systems, generating their own power through a combination of renewable sources like solar, wind, and geothermal.
  • Smart Grids: AI-managed smart grids will optimize energy distribution and storage at both the industrial and community levels, ensuring a reliable and efficient energy supply.
  • Energy Storage Integration: Industries will have access to highly advanced energy storage solutions, enabling them to store excess renewable energy for later use or to power their operations during periods of low renewable energy generation.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Large-scale vertical farms and other forms of controlled environment agriculture will be integrated into industrial areas, providing a local and sustainable source of fresh produce.
  • Automated Food Processing: AI-powered robots and automation systems will handle food processing and packaging, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.  
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Advanced aquaculture systems will provide a sustainable source of seafood, minimizing the impact on wild fish populations.

5. Infrastructure Development:

  • Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure components, such as bridges and roads, will be made from self-healing materials that can repair themselves after damage, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
  • Modular Construction: Buildings and other structures will be constructed using modular components that can be easily assembled, disassembled, and reused, minimizing waste and maximizing flexibility.  
  • Smart Infrastructure: Sensor networks and AI will monitor the condition of infrastructure in real-time, enabling proactive maintenance and preventing failures.  

6. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Autonomous Logistics Networks: Autonomous vehicles and drones will be integrated into highly efficient logistics networks, optimizing delivery routes and minimizing transportation costs and emissions.
  • Sustainable Transportation Hubs: Industrial areas will be connected to each other and to urban centers by sustainable transportation systems, such as high-speed electric trains and hyperloops.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology might be applied in industry in 2450. The key themes are resource efficiency, renewable energy, automation, and the integration of biological systems. The goal will be to create a circular economy where industry operates in harmony with the environment, minimizing its impact and contributing to a sustainable future.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2450 ?

It’s fascinating to think about the research and development that would be necessary to achieve the sustainable technologies of 2450! Here’s a glimpse into potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • New Materials:
    • Beyond Graphene: Exploring materials with even more extraordinary properties than graphene, such as room-temperature superconductors, ultra-light but super-strong composites, and materials with programmable properties.
    • Bio-integrated Materials: Developing materials that can seamlessly integrate with biological systems, for applications in medicine, agriculture, and even construction.
    • Self-healing Materials: Researching materials that can automatically repair themselves after damage, extending the lifespan of infrastructure and reducing maintenance needs.  
  • Energy:
    • Fusion Breakthroughs: Continued research into achieving controlled nuclear fusion, potentially unlocking a clean and limitless energy source. This involves plasma physics, advanced materials, and complex engineering.  
    • Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring more unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy or harnessing the energy of cosmic rays.
    • Advanced Energy Storage: Developing energy storage solutions far beyond current battery technology, such as high-density supercapacitors, or even storing energy in entirely new ways.
  • Biology:
    • Synthetic Biology: Engineering new biological systems and organisms for applications in biomanufacturing, medicine, and environmental remediation.  
    • Understanding Ecosystems: Gaining a deeper understanding of complex ecological interactions to better manage and restore ecosystems.
    • Genetic Engineering: Developing precise gene editing techniques for applications in agriculture, medicine, and potentially even human health.  

2. Applied Research and Engineering:

  • Advanced Manufacturing:
    • 4D Printing: Developing 4D printing technologies that allow materials to change shape over time in response to stimuli, enabling self-assembling structures and dynamic materials.  
    • Biomanufacturing at Scale: Scaling up biomanufacturing processes to produce a wide range of materials and products sustainably and efficiently.
    • Closed-loop Manufacturing Systems: Designing and implementing manufacturing systems that operate on closed-loop principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery.
  • Energy Technologies:
    • Highly Efficient Renewable Energy: Improving the efficiency of solar cells, wind turbines, and other renewable energy technologies to maximize energy capture.  
    • Decentralized Energy Systems: Developing and integrating decentralized energy systems, such as microgrids and smart grids, to optimize energy distribution and resilience.
    • Energy Harvesting: Researching and developing technologies to harvest energy from the environment, such as ambient vibrations, temperature gradients, or even radio waves.  
  • Environmental Remediation:
    • Carbon Capture and Utilization: Developing more efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and converting it into useful products.
    • Ocean Cleanup Technologies: Designing and deploying advanced technologies for removing plastic and other pollutants from the oceans.
    • Ecosystem Restoration: Developing innovative approaches to restoring damaged ecosystems, such as coral reefs, forests, and wetlands.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:
    • AI for Sustainability: Developing AI algorithms and systems to optimize resource usage, manage energy grids, and monitor environmental conditions.  
    • Autonomous Systems: Creating advanced robots and autonomous systems for applications in manufacturing, agriculture, transportation, and environmental cleanup.  

3. Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Research:

  • Sustainable Consumption: Studying human behavior and developing strategies to promote sustainable consumption patterns.
  • Environmental Economics: Developing economic models that account for the value of ecosystem services and the costs of environmental degradation.
  • Policy and Governance: Researching and developing effective policies and governance frameworks for promoting sustainable development.
  • Ethics of Technology: Examining the ethical implications of new technologies, particularly in areas like biotechnology and artificial intelligence.

4. Research Infrastructure and Collaboration:

  • Advanced Research Facilities: Investing in state-of-the-art research facilities, such as supercomputers, advanced materials characterization labs, and large-scale testing facilities.  
  • International Collaboration: Fostering international collaboration on research and development of sustainable technologies to accelerate progress and share knowledge.
  • Open Access and Data Sharing: Promoting open access to research data and publications to accelerate innovation and collaboration.

The research and development of sustainable technology for 2450 will require a long-term vision, sustained investment, and a collaborative approach. By focusing on fundamental science, applied engineering, and social science research, we can pave the way for a sustainable future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993). “The Setting”. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-691-08631-1. JSTOR j.ctt7rpm1. I find the most useful conceptual definition for this study to be that given by Harvey Brooks, who has defined technology …as ‘knowledge of how to fulfill certain human purposes in a specifiable and reproducible way.’
  2. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 117–118: “The first pole, that of the naturalisation of a new discipline within the university curriculum, was presented by Christian Wolff in 1728, in Chapter III of the “Preliminary discourse” to his Philosophia rationalisis sive Logica: ‘Technology is the science of skills and works of skill, or, if one prefers, the science of things made by man’s labour, chiefly through the use of his hands.'”
  3. ^ Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-53196-1.
  4. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1996) [1891]. Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-910205-8. OCLC 38307662.
  5. ^ Simpson, J.; Weiner, Edmund, eds. (1989). “technology”. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611868.
  6. ^ Aristotle (2009). Brown, Lesley (ed.). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Translated by Ross, David. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-921361-0. LCCN 2009005379. OCLC 246896490.
  7. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 114–115.
  8. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 117.
  9. ^ Schatzberg, Eric (2006). “”Technik” Comes to America: Changing Meanings of “Technology” before 1930″. Technology and Culture. 47 (3): 486–512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 40061169. S2CID 143784033. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 119: “With the industrial revolution and the important part England played in it, the word technology was to lose this meaning as the subject or thrust of a branch of education, as first in English and then in other languages it embodied all technical activity based on the application of science to practical ends.”
  11. ^ Schiffer, M. B. (2013). “Discovery Processes: Trial Models”. The Archaeology of Science. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Vol. 9. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–198. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_13. ISBN 978-3319000770. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  12. ^ The British Museum. “Our earliest technology?”. smarthistory.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  13. ^ Minogue, K. (28 October 2010). “Stone Age Toolmakers Surprisingly Sophisticated”. science.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  14. ^ Crump, Thomas (2001). A Brief History of Science. Constable & Robinson. p. 9. ISBN 978-1841192352.
  15. ^ Gowlett, J. A. J.; Wrangham, R. W. (1 March 2013). “Earliest fire in Africa: towards the convergence of archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis”. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 48 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2012.756754. ISSN 0067-270X. S2CID 163033909.
  16. ^ Stahl, Ann B. (1984). “Hominid dietary selection before fire”. Current Anthropology. 25 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1086/203106. JSTOR 2742818. S2CID 84337150.
  17. ^ Wrangham, R. (1 August 2017). “Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis”. Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S303 – S313. doi:10.1086/692113. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 148798286. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  18. ^ Dunbar, R. I. M.; Gamble, C.; Gowlett, J. A. J., eds. (2014). Lucy to Language: the Benchmark Papers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199652594. OCLC 1124046527. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  19. ^ Wade, Nicholas (15 July 2003). “Early Voices: The Leap to Language”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Shaar, Ron; Matmon, Ari; Horwitz, Liora K.; Ebert, Yael; Chazan, Michael; Arnold, M.; Aumaître, G.; Bourlès, D.; Keddadouche, K. (1 May 2021). “Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk Cave: New constraints for the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age”. Quaternary Science Reviews. 259: 106907. Bibcode:2021QSRv..25906907S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106907. ISSN 0277-3791. S2CID 234833092.
  21. ^ Hallett, Emily Y.; Marean, Curtis W.; Steele, Teresa E.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Jacobs, Zenobia; Cerasoni, Jacopo Niccolò; Aldeias, Vera; Scerri, Eleanor M. L.; Olszewski, Deborah I.; Hajraoui, Mohamed Abdeljalil El; Dibble, Harold L. (24 September 2021). “A worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 year old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Atlantic Coast, Morocco”. iScience. 24 (9): 102988. Bibcode:2021iSci…24j2988H. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102988. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8478944. PMID 34622180.
  22. ^ O’Neil, Dennis. “Evolution of Modern Humans: Archaic Homo sapiens Culture”. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2007.
  23. ^ Villa, Paola (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene archaeological record of southern France. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 303. ISBN 978-0520096622.
  24. ^ Cordaux, Richard; Stoneking, Mark (2003). “South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an ‘Early’ Human Dispersal out of Africa” (PDF). American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (6): 1586–1590, author reply 1590–93. doi:10.1086/375407. PMC 1180321. PMID 12817589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2007.
  25. ^ “‘Oldest remains’ outside Africa reset human migration clock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  26. ^ Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini (2019). “Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia”. Nature. 571 (7766). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 500–504. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31292546. S2CID 195873640. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  27. ^ Kuijt, i., ed. (2002). Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Fundamental Issues in Archaeology. Springer New York. ISBN 9780306471667. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  28. ^ Coghlan, H. H. (1943). “The Evolution of the Axe from Prehistoric to Roman Times”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 73 (1/2): 27–56. doi:10.2307/2844356. ISSN 0307-3114. JSTOR 2844356. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  29. ^ Driscoll, Killian (2006). The early prehistory in the west of Ireland: Investigations into the social archaeology of the Mesolithic, west of the Shannon, Ireland. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  30. ^ University of Chicago Press Journals (4 January 2006). “The First Baby Boom: Skeletal Evidence Shows Abrupt Worldwide Increase In Birth Rate During Neolithic Period”. ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  31. ^ Sussman, Robert W.; Hall, Roberta L. (April 1972). “Child Transport, Family Size, and Increase in Human Population During the Neolithic”. Current Anthropology. 13 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1086/201274. JSTOR 2740977. S2CID 143449170.
  32. ^ Ferraro, Gary P. (2006). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. The Thomson Corporation. ISBN 978-0495030393. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  33. ^ Patterson, Gordon M. (1992). The Essentials of Ancient History. Research & Education Association. ISBN 978-0878917044. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  34. ^ Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press.
  35. ^ Cramb, Alan W (1964). “A Short History of Metals”. Nature. 203 (4943): 337. Bibcode:1964Natur.203Q.337T. doi:10.1038/203337a0. S2CID 382712.
  36. ^ Hall, Harry Reginald Holland (1911). “Ceramics” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 05 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–760, see page 708. The art of making a pottery consisting of a siliceous sandy body coated with a vitreous copper glaze seems to have been known unexpectedly early, possibly even as early as the period immediately preceding the Ist Dynasty (4000 B.C.).
  37. ^ Akanuma, Hideo. “The significance of the composition of excavated iron fragments taken from Stratum III at the site of Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey”. Anatolian Archaeological Studies. 14. Tokyo: Japanese Institute of Anatolian Archaeology.
  38. ^ “Ironware piece unearthed from Turkey found to be oldest steel”. The Hindu. 26 March 2009. Archived from the original on 29 March 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  39. ^ Usai, Donatella; Salvatori, Sandro. “The oldest representation of a Nile boat”. Antiquity. 81.
  40. ^ Postel, Sandra (1999). “Egypt’s Nile Valley Basin Irrigation”. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393319378. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  41. ^ Crawford, Harriet (2013). The Sumerian World. New York & London: Routledge. pp. 34–43. ISBN 978-0203096604. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  42. ^ Potts, D.T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  43. ^ Childe, V. Gordon (1928). New Light on the Most Ancient East. p. 110.
  44. ^ Anthony, David A. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0691058870.
  45. ^ Gasser, Aleksander (March 2003). “World’s Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia”. Republic of Slovenia Government Communication Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  46. ^ Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0226452388. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999) [1994]. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. p. 146. ISBN 978-1575060422. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b Lay, M G (1992). Ways of the World. Sydney: Primavera Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1875368051.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Gregersen, Erik (2012). The Complete History of Wheeled Transportation: From Cars and Trucks to Buses and Bikes. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1615307012. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Aicher, Peter J. (1995). Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0865162822. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c Eslamian, Saeid (2014). Handbook of Engineering Hydrology: Environmental Hydrology and Water Management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-1466552500. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Lechner, Norbert (2012). Plumbing, Electricity, Acoustics: Sustainable Design Methods for Architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 106. ISBN 978-1118014752. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  53. ^ Davids, K.; De Munck, B., eds. (2019). Innovation and Creativity in Late Medieval and Early Modern European Cities. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315588605. ISBN 978-1317116530. S2CID 148764971. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  54. ^ Courtenay, W. J.; Miethke, J.; Priest, D. B., eds. (2000). Universities and Schooling in Medieval Society. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004113510. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  55. ^ Deming, D. (2014). Science and Technology in World History, Volume 3: The Black Death, the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. McFarland. ISBN 978-0786490868.
  56. ^ Stearns, P. N. (2020). The Industrial Revolution in World History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0813347295.
  57. ^ Mokyr, J. (2000). “The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870–1914” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  58. ^ Black, B. C. (2022). To Have and Have Not: Energy in World History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1538105047. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  59. ^ Albion, Robert G. (1 January 1933). “The Communication Revolution, 1760–1933”. Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 14 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1179/tns.1933.002. ISSN 0372-0187. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  60. ^ Agar, J. (2012). Science in the 20th Century and Beyond. Polity. ISBN 978-0745634692. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  61. ^ Goldin, C.; Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674037731. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  62. ^ Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926047. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  63. ^ Bresnahan, Timothy F.; Trajtenberg, M. (1 January 1995). “General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?”. Journal of Econometrics. 65 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T. ISSN 0304-4076.
  64. ^ Wrigley, E. A (13 March 2013). “Energy and the English Industrial Revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371 (1986): 20110568. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37110568W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0568. PMID 23359739. S2CID 10624423.
  65. ^ Persily, Nathaniel; Tucker, Joshua A., eds. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108890960. hdl:11245.1/cf2f5b6a-8dc8-4400-bc38-3317b0164499. ISBN 978-1108835558. S2CID 243715477. Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
  66. ^ Autor, D. H. (2015). “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022.
  67. ^ Bessen, J. E. (3 October 2016). “How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills”. Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law EJournal. 15–49. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2690435. S2CID 29968989. SSRN 2690435. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
  68. ^ “Robots and Artificial Intelligence”. igmchicago.org. Initiative on Global Markets. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  69. ^ “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” (PDF). www3.weforum.org. October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  70. ^ “Robots and AI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know | Built In”. builtin.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  71. ^ “How many jobs do robots really replace?”. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  72. ^ Acemoglu, Daron; Restrepo, Pascual (1 June 2020). “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716. hdl:1721.1/130324. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 7468879. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  73. ^ “Remarks Upon Signing Bill Creating the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. | The American Presidency Project”. www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  74. ^ “Technology and the American Economy” (PDF). files.eric.ed.gov. February 1966. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  75. ^ “If Robots Take Our Jobs, Will They Make It Up to Us?”. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  76. ^ “GovInfo”. www.govinfo.gov n. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  77. ^ “H.R.11611 – An Act to establish a National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress”. www.congress.gov. 1963. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  78. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenberg, Elizabeth; Harrell, Peter E.; Shiffman, Gary M.; Dorshimer, Sam (2019). “Financial Technology and National Security”. Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  79. ^ “U.S. takes aim at North Korean crypto laundering”. NBC News. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  80. ^ “U.S. ties North Korean hacker group to Axie Infinity crypto theft”. NBC News. 15 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  81. ^ Austin, David; Macauley, Molly K. (1 December 2001). “Cutting Through Environmental Issues: Technology as a double-edged sword”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  82. ^ Grainger, Alan; Francisco, Herminia A.; Tiraswat, Penporn (July 2003). “The impact of changes in agricultural technology on long-term trends in deforestation”. The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use. 20 (3): 209–223. Bibcode:2003LUPol..20..209G. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00009-7. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  83. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
  84. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists (6 November 2017). “What is Climate Engineering?”. www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
  85. ^ Chaudhry, Imran Sharif; Ali, Sajid; Bhatti, Shaukat Hussain; Anser, Muhammad Khalid; Khan, Ahmad Imran; Nazar, Raima (October 2021). “Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries”. Environmental Science & Policy. 124 (Environmental Science & Policy): 313–323. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..313C. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  86. ^ Smol, J. P. (2009). Pollution of Lakes and Rivers : a Paleoenvironmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 135. ISBN 978-1444307573. OCLC 476272945. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b Franssen, M.; Lokhorst, G.-J.; van de Poel, I. (2018). “Philosophy of Technology”. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b de Vries, M. J.; Verkerk, M. J.; Hoogland, J.; van der Stoep, J. (2015). Philosophy of Technology : An Introduction for Technology and Business Students. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1317445715. OCLC 907132694. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  89. ^ Brey, P. (2000). Mitcham, C. (ed.). “Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Faculties”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. 19.
  90. ^ Jump up to:a b Johnson, Deborah G.; Wetmore, Jameson M. (2021). Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262539968. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  91. ^ Dusek, Val (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley. ISBN 978-1405111621. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  92. ^ Postman, Neil (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
  93. ^ Marcuse, H. (2004). Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. Routledge. ISBN 978-1134774661. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  94. ^ Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1783486595. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  95. ^ Al-Rodhan, Nayef. “The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  96. ^ Luppicini, R. (2008). “The emerging field of Technoethics”. In Luppicini; R. Adell (eds.). Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
  97. ^ Veruggio, Gianmarco (2011). “The Roboethics Roadmap”. EURON Roboethics Atelier. Scuola di Robotica: 2. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.466.2810.
  98. ^ Anderson, Michael; Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112352.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies, Volume 1: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412823791. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  100. ^ “About us”. cser.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 30 December 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  101. ^ Gottlieb, J. (1 May 2022). “Discounting, Buck-Passing, and Existential Risk Mitigation: The Case of Space Colonization”. Space Policy. 60: 101486. Bibcode:2022SpPol..6001486G. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101486. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 247718992.
  102. ^ “Stanford Existential Risks Initiative”. cisac.fsi.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
  103. ^ Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199606504. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Bostrom, Nick (6 September 2019). “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis”. Global Policy. 10 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 203169705.
  105. ^ Kurzweil, Ray (2005). “GNR: Three Overlapping Revolutions”. The Singularity is Near. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101218884.
  106. ^ Kompridis, N. (2009). “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human” (PDF). Parrhesia. 8 (1): 20–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  107. ^ McShane, Sveta (19 April 2016). “Ray Kurzweil Predicts Three Technologies Will Define Our Future”. Singularity Hub. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  108. ^ Poole, C. P. Jr.; Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471079354.
  109. ^ Vince, G. (3 July 2003). “Nanotechnology may create new organs”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  110. ^ Lee, Sukhan; Suh, Il Hong (2008). Recent Progress in Robotics: Viable Robotic Service to Human: An Edition of the Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 978-3540767282. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  111. ^ Grace, K.; Salvatier, J.; Dafoe, A.; Zhang, B.; Evans, O. (31 July 2018). “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 62: 729–754. doi:10.1613/jair.1.11222. ISSN 1076-9757. S2CID 8746462. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  112. ^ Segal, H. P. (2005). Technological Utopianism in American Culture (20th Anniversary ed.). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0815630616. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  113. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Roots and Core Themes”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part1. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  114. ^ Istvan, Zoltan (1 February 2015). “A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging”. Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  115. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Future Trajectories: Singularity”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 361–363. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part8. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  116. ^ Blackford, R.; Bostrom, N.; Dupuy, J.-P. (2011). H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute. ISBN 978-1456815653. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  117. ^ Jones, Steven E. (2013). Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135522391. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  118. ^ Kelman, David (1 June 2020). “Politics in a Small Room: Subterranean Babel in Piglia’s El camino de Ida”. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. 63: 179–201. doi:10.3138/ycl.63.005. ISSN 0084-3695. S2CID 220494877. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  119. ^ Fleming, Sean (7 May 2021). “The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 27 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940. ISSN 1356-9317.
  120. ^ Vannini, Phillip; Jonathan Taggart (2013). “Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles”. Environment and Planning A. 45 (2): 295–311. Bibcode:2013EnPlA..45..295V. doi:10.1068/a4564. S2CID 143970611.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b Scranton, Philip (1 May 2006). “Urgency, uncertainty, and innovation: Building jet engines in postwar America”. Management & Organizational History. 1 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1177/1744935906064096. ISSN 1744-9359. S2CID 143813033.
  122. ^ Di Nucci Pearce, M. R.; Pearce, David (1989). “Technology vs. Science: The Cognitive Fallacy”. Synthese. 81 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1007/BF00869324. ISSN 0039-7857. JSTOR 20116729. S2CID 46975083. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  123. ^ Skolimowski, Henryk (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”. Technology and Culture. 7 (3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3101935.
  124. ^ Brooks, H. (1 September 1994). “The relationship between science and technology”. Research Policy. Special Issue in Honor of Nathan Rosenberg. 23 (5): 477–486. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b c Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012). Antifragile. Penguin Random House. OCLC 1252833169.
  126. ^ Hare, Ronald (1970). The Birth of Penicillin, and the Disarming of Microbes. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0049250055. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  127. ^ Wise, George (1985). “Science and Technology”. Osiris. 2nd Series. 1: 229–46. doi:10.1086/368647. S2CID 144475553.
  128. ^ Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521653183.
  129. ^ Taleb, N. N. (12 December 2012). “Understanding is a Poor Substitute for Convexity (Antifragility)” (PDF). fooledbyrandomness.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  130. ^ Narin, Francis; Olivastro, Dominic (1 June 1992). “Status report: Linkage between technology and science”. Research Policy. 21 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-Y. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  131. ^ Krieger, Joshua L.; Schnitzer, Monika; Watzinger, Martin (1 May 2019). “Standing on the Shoulders of Science” (PDF). SSRN 3401853. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  132. ^ Oakley, K. P. (1976). “Man the Tool-Maker”. Nature. 199 (4898): 1042–1043. Bibcode:1963Natur.199U1042.. doi:10.1038/1991042e0. ISBN 978-0226612706. S2CID 4298952.
  133. ^ Sagan, Carl; Druyan, Ann; Leakey, Richard. “Chimpanzee Tool Use”. Archived from the original on 21 September 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2007.
  134. ^ Rincon, Paul (7 June 2005). “Sponging dolphins learn from mum”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  135. ^ Schmid, Randolph E. (4 October 2007). “Crows use tools to find food”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  136. ^ Rutz, C.; Bluff, L.A.; Weir, A.A.S.; Kacelnik, A. (4 October 2007). “Video cameras on wild birds”. Science. 318 (5851): 765. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..765R. doi:10.1126/science.1146788. PMID 17916693. S2CID 28785984.
  137. ^ McGrew, W. C (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521423717.
  138. ^ Boesch, Christophe; Boesch, Hedwige (1984). “Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking”. Primates. 25 (2): 160–170. doi:10.1007/BF02382388. S2CID 24073884.
  139. ^ Brahic, Catherine (15 January 2009). “Nut-cracking monkeys find the right tool for the job”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  140. ^ Müller, G.; Watling, J. (24 June 2016). The engineering in beaver dams. River Flow 2016: Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. St. Louis: University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  141. ^ Thomas Michaud (2008). “Science fiction and politics: Cyberpunk science fiction as political philosophy”. New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction. By Hassler, Donald M. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 65–77 [75–76]. ISBN 978-1570037368.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »