Sustainable Technology of 2440

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2020, Sustainable Technology of 2440 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

It’s difficult to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2440, as that’s over 400 years in the future. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and challenges:

Potential Focus Areas:

  • Advanced Energy Solutions: Fusion power, highly efficient solar energy capture and storage, and potentially even new forms of energy generation we can’t yet imagine.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that minimize waste and pollution by creating circular economies where resources are continuously reused and recycled.  
  • Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Utilizing biological processes and designs to create sustainable materials, energy sources, and manufacturing processes.  
  • Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Technologies that optimize food production with minimal environmental impact, potentially including vertical farms, lab-grown meat, and advanced genetic engineering.
  • Climate Engineering: Technologies to actively mitigate climate change, such as carbon capture and storage, solar radiation management, and weather modification.

Underlying Principles:

  • Renewable Resources: Reliance on renewable energy sources and sustainable materials.
  • Resource Efficiency: Minimizing the use of resources and maximizing their lifespan.  
  • Environmental Protection: Reducing pollution and protecting ecosystems.
  • Social Equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies benefit all of humanity.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Technological Development: Many of these technologies are still in early stages of development and require significant breakthroughs.  
  • Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies must be economically competitive to be widely adopted.
  • Social Acceptance: Public acceptance and ethical considerations will play a crucial role in the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The future of sustainable technology will depend on many factors, including scientific discoveries, economic conditions, and social priorities. However, it’s clear that the need for sustainable solutions will only become more urgent in the coming centuries.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2440 is a fascinating but ultimately speculative exercise. However, we can make some informed guesses based on current trends and the pressing challenges facing humanity.

Here are some potential focus areas for sustainable technology in 2440:

  • Advanced Energy Solutions:
    • Fusion power: If achieved, fusion could provide a clean, abundant, and virtually inexhaustible energy source.  
    • Highly efficient solar energy: Advanced materials and technologies could dramatically increase the efficiency of solar energy capture and storage, making it a primary energy source.
    • Exotic energy sources: It’s possible that entirely new forms of energy generation, beyond our current understanding, could be discovered and harnessed.
  • Closed-Loop Systems:
    • Circular economies: Technologies that enable the complete reuse and recycling of resources, minimizing waste and pollution.
    • Advanced materials: Biodegradable and highly recyclable materials could replace many of the materials we use today.
    • Pollution remediation: Technologies to actively remove pollutants from the environment and restore damaged ecosystems.  
  • Biotechnology and Biomimicry:
    • Sustainable materials: Biologically derived materials with unique properties, such as self-healing or biodegradability.
    • Bio-based manufacturing: Using biological processes to produce sustainable fuels, chemicals, and other products.
    • Biomimetic design: Designing technologies inspired by nature’s solutions, such as highly efficient energy systems or adaptive materials.  
  • Precision Agriculture and Food Production:
    • Vertical farms: Indoor, multi-level farms that use minimal land and resources to produce crops.  
    • Lab-grown meat: Cultured meat produced from animal cells, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.  
    • Advanced genetic engineering: Developing crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and have higher nutritional value.  
  • Climate Engineering:
    • Carbon capture and storage: Technologies to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it securely.
    • Solar radiation management: Techniques to reflect sunlight back into space, reducing the amount of heat trapped in the atmosphere.  
    • Weather modification: Technologies to influence weather patterns, potentially to mitigate droughts or extreme weather events.

Underlying Principles:

  • Renewable Resources: A complete shift to renewable energy sources and sustainable materials.
  • Resource Efficiency: Minimizing the use of resources and maximizing their lifespan through reuse, recycling, and closed-loop systems.
  • Environmental Protection: Technologies that actively protect and restore ecosystems, reduce pollution, and mitigate climate change.  
  • Social Equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible and benefit all of humanity, not just a privileged few.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Technological Development: Many of these technologies are still in early stages of development and require significant breakthroughs in science and engineering.
  • Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies must be economically competitive with existing solutions to be widely adopted.
  • Social Acceptance: Public acceptance and ethical considerations will play a crucial role in the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The future of sustainable technology will depend on many factors, including scientific discoveries, economic conditions, and social priorities. However, it’s clear that the need for sustainable solutions will only become more urgent in the coming centuries, and the technologies developed in 2440 will likely play a critical role in addressing these challenges.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 2440 will be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

  • Addressing Global Challenges: By 2440, the consequences of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution will likely be even more severe. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for mitigating these challenges and ensuring the survival and well-being of humanity.
  • Resource Scarcity: As resources become scarcer, sustainable technologies will be necessary to efficiently utilize what remains and create closed-loop systems that minimize waste.
  • Economic Stability: Sustainable technologies will be essential for creating a stable and resilient economy that can withstand environmental shocks and resource limitations.
  • Social Equity: Sustainable technologies can help to address social inequalities by ensuring access to essential resources and opportunities for all.

While everyone will benefit from sustainable technology in 2440, some groups may have a greater need or responsibility:

  • Governments and policymakers: Will need to invest in and promote the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
  • Businesses: Will need to integrate sustainability into their operations and develop innovative sustainable solutions.  
  • Individuals: Will need to adopt sustainable lifestyles and make informed choices about the products and services they consume.
  • Scientists and engineers: Will play a critical role in developing and improving sustainable technologies.

Ultimately, the successful transition to a sustainable future will require a collective effort from all members of society.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2440 won’t be a luxury or an option, but a necessity for human survival and prosperity.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

While the specific technologies of 2440 are speculative, the need for sustainable technology is urgent and ongoing. It’s not something we can postpone until the distant future. Here’s why:  

  • Addressing Current Crises: We are already facing the consequences of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Sustainable technologies are needed now to mitigate these issues and prevent further damage.  
  • Building a Foundation: The technologies of 2440 will likely be built upon the advancements we make today. Investing in research and development of sustainable technologies now is crucial for future breakthroughs.
  • Long-Term Planning: Transitioning to a sustainable future requires long-term planning and action. The sooner we start, the smoother and more successful the transition will be.  

Therefore, the “when” for sustainable technology is NOW. We need to:

  • Invest in research and development: To accelerate the development of new sustainable technologies.
  • Implement existing solutions: To deploy and scale up the sustainable technologies we already have.
  • Educate and raise awareness: To promote the importance of sustainability and encourage the adoption of sustainable practices.
  • Foster collaboration: To bring together scientists, engineers, policymakers, and individuals to work towards a sustainable future.

While the specific technologies of 2440 may be different from what we have today, the underlying principles of sustainability will remain the same. By acting now, we can lay the groundwork for a future where sustainable technology is not just an option, but a way of life.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

This is a fascinating question! While it’s impossible to pinpoint exact locations for the sustainable technologies of 2440, we can consider the areas where they will likely be most crucial and where they might originate:

Where Sustainable Technology of 2440 Will Be Needed:

  • Everywhere: Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2440 will need to be integrated into every aspect of human life, from energy production and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.
  • Urban Centers: Cities, with their high population densities and resource consumption, will be key areas for implementing sustainable solutions.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for ensuring food security, managing natural resources, and supporting sustainable livelihoods in rural communities.
  • Extreme Environments: As climate change continues, sustainable technologies will be needed to help people adapt to extreme weather conditions and live in previously uninhabitable areas.

Where Sustainable Technology of 2440 Might Originate:

  • Research Institutions: Universities and research centers will continue to be hubs for scientific discovery and technological innovation.
  • Technology Companies: Businesses will play a crucial role in developing and commercializing sustainable technologies.
  • Startups and Innovation Hubs: New companies and initiatives will drive innovation in sustainable technology.
  • International Collaborations: Global cooperation will be essential for sharing knowledge and developing solutions to global challenges.  

It’s important to remember that the development and deployment of sustainable technology will be a global effort. Scientists, engineers, policymakers, and individuals from all over the world will need to work together to create a sustainable future.

In addition to physical locations, we can also consider the “spaces” where sustainable technology will be important:

  • Cyberspace: Digital technologies and the internet will play a crucial role in enabling sustainable solutions, such as smart grids, precision agriculture, and circular economies.  
  • Outer Space: As humanity expands its presence in space, sustainable technologies will be essential for resource utilization, waste management, and creating self-sustaining habitats.  

Ultimately, the “where” of sustainable technology in 2440 is everywhere and in every domain. It will be an integral part of how humanity interacts with the planet and beyond.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

It’s impossible to know the exact “how” of sustainable technology in 2440, as that depends on countless discoveries and innovations yet to happen. However, we can discuss the general approaches and principles that will likely be involved:

1. Building on Current Trends:

  • Advancements in renewable energy: We’ll likely see significant progress in areas like solar, wind, and potentially fusion power. This might involve new materials, more efficient energy conversion, and better energy storage solutions.
  • Circular economy principles: Technologies that enable closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, will be crucial. This could involve advanced recycling techniques, biodegradable materials, and product design that prioritizes durability and reparability.
  • Biotechnology and biomimicry: Utilizing biological processes and designs to create sustainable materials, energy sources, and manufacturing processes. This could involve engineering microorganisms to produce biofuels or developing materials inspired by the structure of plants or animals.  
  • Digital technologies: Smart grids, precision agriculture, and other digital tools will play a key role in optimizing resource use and minimizing waste.  

2. Overcoming Current Challenges:

  • Addressing climate change: Technologies for carbon capture and storage, solar radiation management, and other climate engineering approaches will likely be necessary to mitigate the impacts of climate change.
  • Resource scarcity: Developing technologies that reduce our reliance on finite resources and enable the efficient use of renewable resources.
  • Environmental pollution: Creating technologies to actively remove pollutants from the environment and restore damaged ecosystems.

3. Embracing Innovation and Exploration:

  • Investing in research and development: Continued investment in scientific research and technological innovation will be essential for developing new sustainable solutions.
  • Exploring new frontiers: Pushing the boundaries of our understanding of the natural world and exploring new approaches to technology development.
  • Fostering collaboration: Bringing together scientists, engineers, policymakers, and individuals from all disciplines to work towards a sustainable future.

4. Integrating Sustainability into All Aspects of Life:

  • Sustainable infrastructure: Designing and building cities and infrastructure that are energy-efficient, resilient to climate change, and minimize environmental impact.
  • Sustainable agriculture and food production: Developing technologies to produce food with minimal environmental impact, such as vertical farms, lab-grown meat, and advanced genetic engineering.  
  • Sustainable transportation: Transitioning to electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel cells, and other forms of sustainable transportation.

Ultimately, the “how” of sustainable technology in 2440 will be a combination of building on current trends, overcoming current challenges, embracing innovation, and integrating sustainability into all aspects of life. It will require a global effort and a long-term commitment to creating a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2440, as that’s far beyond our current technological understanding. However, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and the challenges we might face:

Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project – 2440

Background: By the mid-25th century, climate change has significantly altered the Great Lakes region. Warmer temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and increased pollution have severely impacted water quality, biodiversity, and the overall ecosystem. Traditional restoration methods have proven insufficient.

Sustainable Technology Solution: A multi-faceted approach combining several advanced technologies:

  • Advanced Bioremediation: Genetically engineered microorganisms are deployed to break down pollutants and excess nutrients in the water, restoring its natural balance.
  • Atmospheric Water Generation: Large-scale systems capture moisture from the air and purify it to supplement the dwindling freshwater supply. These systems are powered by highly efficient solar energy farms.
  • Smart Water Management: A network of sensors and AI algorithms monitors water levels, quality, and usage across the entire region. This data-driven approach optimizes water distribution and prevents overuse.  
  • Ecological Restoration: Drones and robots are used to plant native vegetation, restore wetlands, and create artificial reefs, helping to revitalize the ecosystem and provide habitat for wildlife.
  • Closed-Loop Aquaculture: Sustainable fish farms utilize advanced filtration and recycling systems to minimize water usage and pollution, while providing a source of protein for the growing population.  

Outcomes:

  • Improved Water Quality: The Great Lakes are restored to a healthy state, with clean water and thriving aquatic life.
  • Increased Biodiversity: Native species return to the region, and the ecosystem becomes more resilient to future environmental changes.
  • Sustainable Water Supply: The combination of atmospheric water generation and smart water management ensures a reliable source of freshwater for communities and industries.
  • Economic Revitalization: The restoration of the Great Lakes supports tourism, recreation, and other economic activities in the region.  

Lessons Learned:

  • Integrated Approach: Solving complex environmental challenges requires a combination of advanced technologies and interdisciplinary collaboration.
  • Proactive Measures: It’s crucial to anticipate future challenges and develop sustainable solutions before they become crises.
  • Long-Term Vision: Sustainable technology requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to investing in research and development.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 2440 might be used to address complex environmental challenges and create a more sustainable future. It highlights the importance of innovation, collaboration, and a long-term vision in developing solutions to the pressing issues facing humanity.

COURTESY : AutoApex_TV

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2440: A Glimpse into the Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2440, acknowledging the inherent speculative nature of such predictions. Building upon current technological trends and anticipating future global challenges, we examine potential advancements in key areas like energy, resource management, biotechnology, food production, and climate engineering. This exploration aims to stimulate thought and guide present-day research and development towards a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The 25th century will likely face unprecedented environmental and societal challenges. Climate change, resource depletion, and population growth will necessitate radical shifts in how humanity interacts with the planet. Sustainable technology, in its most advanced forms, will be crucial for navigating these challenges and ensuring a thriving future. This paper offers a speculative yet informed look at what these technologies might entail.

2. Advanced Energy Solutions:

  • Fusion Power Dominance: By 2440, fusion energy may have become a primary global energy source, offering clean, abundant power. Advanced containment and reaction technologies, perhaps utilizing currently theoretical physics, will be the norm.
  • Ubiquitous Solar Energy: Nanotechnology-enhanced solar panels, integrated into virtually all surfaces, will harvest energy with near-perfect efficiency. Advanced energy storage solutions, potentially based on novel quantum phenomena, will ensure a stable and readily available power supply.
  • Geothermal Advancements: Deep geothermal energy, accessed through advanced drilling techniques and utilizing enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), will provide a stable baseload power source.  

3. Closed-Loop Resource Management:

  • The Circular Economy in Practice: Advanced materials science will enable the creation of fully recyclable and biodegradable products. Automated recycling facilities, powered by AI and robotics, will disassemble and repurpose materials with minimal waste.
  • Resource Extraction from Waste: Nanotechnology-based systems will efficiently extract valuable resources from waste streams, turning what was once discarded into valuable raw materials.
  • Atmospheric Resource Mining: Technologies capable of extracting essential elements from the atmosphere, such as carbon for material production or rare earth elements, will become feasible.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

  • Engineered Photosynthesis: Highly efficient artificial photosynthesis systems, inspired by plants, will capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into fuels and other valuable products.  
  • Bio-Integrated Technologies: Biotechnology will seamlessly integrate with other technologies, creating self-healing materials, bio-based sensors, and even bio-computers.
  • Personalized Medicine and Biomanufacturing: Advanced bioprinting and genetic engineering will allow for the personalized production of medicines, organs, and other biological materials.

5. Sustainable Food Production:

  • Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Automated vertical farms, utilizing hydroponics and aeroponics, will produce food in urban centers, minimizing transportation costs and land use.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will monitor crops and soil conditions in real time, optimizing resource use and maximizing yields.  
  • Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Lab-grown meat and other alternative protein sources will become widely available, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.

6. Climate Engineering and Geoengineering:

  • Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Advanced carbon capture technologies will remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it securely underground or in other long-term storage solutions.  
  • Solar Radiation Management: Techniques to reflect sunlight back into space, such as stratospheric aerosol injection or space-based mirrors, may be used to mitigate global warming.  
  • Localized Weather Modification: While controversial, technologies to influence weather patterns on a localized scale, such as cloud seeding or hurricane mitigation, might be refined.

7. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 2440 will be the culmination of centuries of scientific advancement and a deep understanding of our planet’s interconnected systems. While the specifics remain speculative, the underlying principles of resource efficiency, environmental protection, and social equity will remain paramount. By focusing on these principles today, we can pave the way for a future where technology and sustainability work in harmony to create a thriving world for generations to come.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a speculative vision of sustainable technology in 2440. The technologies described are based on current trends and scientific understanding, but their actual development and implementation will depend on numerous factors, including scientific breakthroughs, economic conditions, and societal priorities.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

You’re asking about the practical applications of sustainable technology in a future far beyond our current experience. It’s exciting to speculate! Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2440, keeping in mind these are informed guesses based on current trends:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

  • Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories will likely operate on closed-loop systems. Raw materials will be sourced sustainably (perhaps even from recycled or bio-derived sources), and every stage of production will aim to eliminate waste. Advanced robotics and AI will optimize processes for maximum efficiency and minimal environmental impact.  
  • On-Demand Manufacturing: 3D printing and advanced biomanufacturing could enable on-demand production of goods, reducing the need for mass manufacturing and long-distance transportation. This could be particularly useful for specialized products or in remote locations.  
  • Sustainable Materials: Industries will rely heavily on advanced, sustainable materials. These could include:
    • Biodegradable polymers: Replacing traditional plastics with materials that break down naturally.
    • Self-healing materials: Extending the lifespan of products and reducing the need for replacements.  
    • Lightweight, high-strength composites: Improving energy efficiency in transportation and construction.  

2. Energy & Resource Management:

  • Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries will likely have access to decentralized energy grids powered by a mix of renewable sources like fusion, advanced solar, and geothermal. Smart grids will optimize energy distribution and usage.  
  • Resource Recovery & Recycling: Advanced technologies will enable the efficient recovery and recycling of resources from waste streams. This could involve nanotechnology-based systems for extracting valuable materials from complex waste.
  • Atmospheric Resource Utilization: Industries might utilize technologies to extract resources from the atmosphere, such as carbon capture for manufacturing or extracting rare earth elements.

3. Construction & Infrastructure:

  • Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings will be constructed from sustainable materials with low embodied carbon. Advanced materials could include self-healing concrete, bio-based composites, and 3D-printed structures using recycled materials.
  • Smart Infrastructure: Infrastructure will be equipped with sensors and AI to monitor its condition and optimize its performance. This could include smart grids, self-healing roads, and water management systems.  
  • Vertical Cities: Urban centers might feature vertical cities with integrated farms, energy generation, and waste management systems, minimizing their environmental footprint.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

  • Sustainable Transportation: Industries will rely on sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, hydrogen fuel cells, and potentially even advanced air or space-based transportation.
  • Optimized Logistics: AI and automation will optimize logistics and supply chains, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact. This could involve autonomous vehicles, smart routing systems, and advanced warehouse management.

5. Agriculture & Food Production:

  • Vertical Farming & Controlled Environment Agriculture: Industries will utilize vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture to produce food in urban centers, reducing transportation costs and land use.  
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will monitor crops and soil conditions in real time, optimizing resource use and maximizing yields.  
  • Alternative Proteins: Lab-grown meat and other alternative protein sources will become widely available, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.

Important Considerations:

  • Automation & AI: Many of these industrial applications will rely heavily on automation and artificial intelligence. This raises important questions about the future of work and the need for retraining and reskilling the workforce.
  • Global Collaboration: Developing and implementing these sustainable technologies will require global collaboration and knowledge sharing.
  • Ethical Considerations: As with any technology, it’s important to consider the ethical implications of sustainable technology and ensure that it is used responsibly.

By focusing on these areas, industries in 2440 can contribute to a more sustainable future while also driving economic growth and innovation.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2440 ?

You’re right to focus on research and development (R&D) – that’s where the sustainable technologies of 2440 will begin! Here’s a breakdown of the R&D needed, keeping in mind this is a speculative look into the future:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

  • Advanced Physics: Exploring new frontiers in physics, such as novel energy sources (e.g., harnessing zero-point energy), manipulating gravity, or faster-than-light communication. These breakthroughs could revolutionize energy production, transportation, and communication.
  • Materials Science: Developing new materials with unprecedented properties, such as room-temperature superconductors, self-healing materials, or materials that can adapt to their environment. This could lead to revolutionary advancements in construction, manufacturing, and electronics.
  • Biology and Biotechnology: Gaining a deeper understanding of biological processes and developing new tools for genetic engineering, synthetic biology, and biomimicry. This could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and materials science.
  • Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence: Developing advanced AI systems that can learn, reason, and problem-solve like humans, and exploring the nature of consciousness itself. This could lead to transformative advancements in robotics, automation, and decision-making.

2. Applied Research and Engineering:

  • Energy Technologies: Researching and developing new energy sources, such as advanced fusion reactors, highly efficient solar energy conversion, and novel energy storage solutions.
  • Resource Management: Developing technologies for resource extraction from unconventional sources (e.g., the atmosphere or deep sea), advanced recycling and waste management systems, and closed-loop manufacturing processes.
  • Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Engineering microorganisms for bioremediation, developing bio-based materials with unique properties, and designing technologies inspired by nature’s solutions.
  • Climate Engineering: Researching and developing technologies for carbon capture and sequestration, solar radiation management, and other approaches to mitigate climate change.  
  • Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production: Developing technologies for vertical farming, precision agriculture, lab-grown meat, and other methods to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Bringing together experts: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and social scientists to address complex challenges and develop holistic solutions.  
  • Global partnerships: Encouraging international collaboration to share knowledge, resources, and expertise in sustainable technology development.  
  • Open innovation: Promoting open-source research and development to accelerate the pace of innovation and ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible to all.

4. Long-Term Vision and Funding:

  • Investing in fundamental research: Supporting long-term research projects that may not have immediate applications but could lead to transformative breakthroughs in the future.  
  • Creating incentives: Providing incentives for businesses and individuals to invest in sustainable technology development and adoption.  
  • Developing education and training programs: Preparing the next generation of scientists, engineers, and innovators with the skills and knowledge needed to develop and implement sustainable technologies.

5. Ethical Considerations:

  • Addressing potential risks: Carefully considering the potential risks and unintended consequences of new technologies and developing safeguards to mitigate them.
  • Ensuring equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible and benefit all of humanity, not just a privileged few.
  • Promoting transparency: Fostering transparency and public dialogue about the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

By focusing on these areas of R&D, we can lay the groundwork for a future where sustainable technology is not just a dream, but a reality. It will require a long-term commitment to scientific exploration, technological innovation, and interdisciplinary collaboration.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

  1. ^ Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993). “The Setting”. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-691-08631-1. JSTOR j.ctt7rpm1. I find the most useful conceptual definition for this study to be that given by Harvey Brooks, who has defined technology …as ‘knowledge of how to fulfill certain human purposes in a specifiable and reproducible way.’
  2. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 117–118: “The first pole, that of the naturalisation of a new discipline within the university curriculum, was presented by Christian Wolff in 1728, in Chapter III of the “Preliminary discourse” to his Philosophia rationalisis sive Logica: ‘Technology is the science of skills and works of skill, or, if one prefers, the science of things made by man’s labour, chiefly through the use of his hands.'”
  3. ^ Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-53196-1.
  4. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1996) [1891]. Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-910205-8. OCLC 38307662.
  5. ^ Simpson, J.; Weiner, Edmund, eds. (1989). “technology”. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611868.
  6. ^ Aristotle (2009). Brown, Lesley (ed.). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Translated by Ross, David. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-921361-0. LCCN 2009005379. OCLC 246896490.
  7. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 114–115.
  8. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 117.
  9. ^ Schatzberg, Eric (2006). “”Technik” Comes to America: Changing Meanings of “Technology” before 1930″. Technology and Culture. 47 (3): 486–512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 40061169. S2CID 143784033. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 119: “With the industrial revolution and the important part England played in it, the word technology was to lose this meaning as the subject or thrust of a branch of education, as first in English and then in other languages it embodied all technical activity based on the application of science to practical ends.”
  11. ^ Schiffer, M. B. (2013). “Discovery Processes: Trial Models”. The Archaeology of Science. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Vol. 9. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–198. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_13. ISBN 978-3319000770. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  12. ^ The British Museum. “Our earliest technology?”. smarthistory.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  13. ^ Minogue, K. (28 October 2010). “Stone Age Toolmakers Surprisingly Sophisticated”. science.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  14. ^ Crump, Thomas (2001). A Brief History of Science. Constable & Robinson. p. 9. ISBN 978-1841192352.
  15. ^ Gowlett, J. A. J.; Wrangham, R. W. (1 March 2013). “Earliest fire in Africa: towards the convergence of archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis”. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 48 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2012.756754. ISSN 0067-270X. S2CID 163033909.
  16. ^ Stahl, Ann B. (1984). “Hominid dietary selection before fire”. Current Anthropology. 25 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1086/203106. JSTOR 2742818. S2CID 84337150.
  17. ^ Wrangham, R. (1 August 2017). “Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis”. Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S303 – S313. doi:10.1086/692113. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 148798286. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  18. ^ Dunbar, R. I. M.; Gamble, C.; Gowlett, J. A. J., eds. (2014). Lucy to Language: the Benchmark Papers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199652594. OCLC 1124046527. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  19. ^ Wade, Nicholas (15 July 2003). “Early Voices: The Leap to Language”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Shaar, Ron; Matmon, Ari; Horwitz, Liora K.; Ebert, Yael; Chazan, Michael; Arnold, M.; Aumaître, G.; Bourlès, D.; Keddadouche, K. (1 May 2021). “Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk Cave: New constraints for the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age”. Quaternary Science Reviews. 259: 106907. Bibcode:2021QSRv..25906907S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106907. ISSN 0277-3791. S2CID 234833092.
  21. ^ Hallett, Emily Y.; Marean, Curtis W.; Steele, Teresa E.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Jacobs, Zenobia; Cerasoni, Jacopo Niccolò; Aldeias, Vera; Scerri, Eleanor M. L.; Olszewski, Deborah I.; Hajraoui, Mohamed Abdeljalil El; Dibble, Harold L. (24 September 2021). “A worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 year old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Atlantic Coast, Morocco”. iScience. 24 (9): 102988. Bibcode:2021iSci…24j2988H. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102988. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8478944. PMID 34622180.
  22. ^ O’Neil, Dennis. “Evolution of Modern Humans: Archaic Homo sapiens Culture”. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2007.
  23. ^ Villa, Paola (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene archaeological record of southern France. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 303. ISBN 978-0520096622.
  24. ^ Cordaux, Richard; Stoneking, Mark (2003). “South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an ‘Early’ Human Dispersal out of Africa” (PDF). American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (6): 1586–1590, author reply 1590–93. doi:10.1086/375407. PMC 1180321. PMID 12817589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2007.
  25. ^ “‘Oldest remains’ outside Africa reset human migration clock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  26. ^ Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini (2019). “Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia”. Nature. 571 (7766). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 500–504. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31292546. S2CID 195873640. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  27. ^ Kuijt, i., ed. (2002). Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Fundamental Issues in Archaeology. Springer New York. ISBN 9780306471667. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  28. ^ Coghlan, H. H. (1943). “The Evolution of the Axe from Prehistoric to Roman Times”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 73 (1/2): 27–56. doi:10.2307/2844356. ISSN 0307-3114. JSTOR 2844356. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  29. ^ Driscoll, Killian (2006). The early prehistory in the west of Ireland: Investigations into the social archaeology of the Mesolithic, west of the Shannon, Ireland. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  30. ^ University of Chicago Press Journals (4 January 2006). “The First Baby Boom: Skeletal Evidence Shows Abrupt Worldwide Increase In Birth Rate During Neolithic Period”. ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  31. ^ Sussman, Robert W.; Hall, Roberta L. (April 1972). “Child Transport, Family Size, and Increase in Human Population During the Neolithic”. Current Anthropology. 13 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1086/201274. JSTOR 2740977. S2CID 143449170.
  32. ^ Ferraro, Gary P. (2006). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. The Thomson Corporation. ISBN 978-0495030393. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  33. ^ Patterson, Gordon M. (1992). The Essentials of Ancient History. Research & Education Association. ISBN 978-0878917044. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  34. ^ Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press.
  35. ^ Cramb, Alan W (1964). “A Short History of Metals”. Nature. 203 (4943): 337. Bibcode:1964Natur.203Q.337T. doi:10.1038/203337a0. S2CID 382712.
  36. ^ Hall, Harry Reginald Holland (1911). “Ceramics” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 05 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–760, see page 708. The art of making a pottery consisting of a siliceous sandy body coated with a vitreous copper glaze seems to have been known unexpectedly early, possibly even as early as the period immediately preceding the Ist Dynasty (4000 B.C.).
  37. ^ Akanuma, Hideo. “The significance of the composition of excavated iron fragments taken from Stratum III at the site of Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey”. Anatolian Archaeological Studies. 14. Tokyo: Japanese Institute of Anatolian Archaeology.
  38. ^ “Ironware piece unearthed from Turkey found to be oldest steel”. The Hindu. 26 March 2009. Archived from the original on 29 March 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  39. ^ Usai, Donatella; Salvatori, Sandro. “The oldest representation of a Nile boat”. Antiquity. 81.
  40. ^ Postel, Sandra (1999). “Egypt’s Nile Valley Basin Irrigation”. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393319378. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  41. ^ Crawford, Harriet (2013). The Sumerian World. New York & London: Routledge. pp. 34–43. ISBN 978-0203096604. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  42. ^ Potts, D.T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  43. ^ Childe, V. Gordon (1928). New Light on the Most Ancient East. p. 110.
  44. ^ Anthony, David A. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0691058870.
  45. ^ Gasser, Aleksander (March 2003). “World’s Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia”. Republic of Slovenia Government Communication Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  46. ^ Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0226452388. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999) [1994]. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. p. 146. ISBN 978-1575060422. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b Lay, M G (1992). Ways of the World. Sydney: Primavera Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1875368051.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Gregersen, Erik (2012). The Complete History of Wheeled Transportation: From Cars and Trucks to Buses and Bikes. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1615307012. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Aicher, Peter J. (1995). Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0865162822. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c Eslamian, Saeid (2014). Handbook of Engineering Hydrology: Environmental Hydrology and Water Management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-1466552500. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Lechner, Norbert (2012). Plumbing, Electricity, Acoustics: Sustainable Design Methods for Architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 106. ISBN 978-1118014752. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  53. ^ Davids, K.; De Munck, B., eds. (2019). Innovation and Creativity in Late Medieval and Early Modern European Cities. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315588605. ISBN 978-1317116530. S2CID 148764971. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  54. ^ Courtenay, W. J.; Miethke, J.; Priest, D. B., eds. (2000). Universities and Schooling in Medieval Society. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004113510. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  55. ^ Deming, D. (2014). Science and Technology in World History, Volume 3: The Black Death, the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. McFarland. ISBN 978-0786490868.
  56. ^ Stearns, P. N. (2020). The Industrial Revolution in World History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0813347295.
  57. ^ Mokyr, J. (2000). “The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870–1914” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  58. ^ Black, B. C. (2022). To Have and Have Not: Energy in World History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1538105047. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  59. ^ Albion, Robert G. (1 January 1933). “The Communication Revolution, 1760–1933”. Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 14 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1179/tns.1933.002. ISSN 0372-0187. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  60. ^ Agar, J. (2012). Science in the 20th Century and Beyond. Polity. ISBN 978-0745634692. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  61. ^ Goldin, C.; Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674037731. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  62. ^ Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926047. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  63. ^ Bresnahan, Timothy F.; Trajtenberg, M. (1 January 1995). “General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?”. Journal of Econometrics. 65 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T. ISSN 0304-4076.
  64. ^ Wrigley, E. A (13 March 2013). “Energy and the English Industrial Revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371 (1986): 20110568. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37110568W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0568. PMID 23359739. S2CID 10624423.
  65. ^ Persily, Nathaniel; Tucker, Joshua A., eds. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108890960. hdl:11245.1/cf2f5b6a-8dc8-4400-bc38-3317b0164499. ISBN 978-1108835558. S2CID 243715477. Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
  66. ^ Autor, D. H. (2015). “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022.
  67. ^ Bessen, J. E. (3 October 2016). “How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills”. Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law EJournal. 15–49. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2690435. S2CID 29968989. SSRN 2690435. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
  68. ^ “Robots and Artificial Intelligence”. igmchicago.org. Initiative on Global Markets. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  69. ^ “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” (PDF). www3.weforum.org. October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  70. ^ “Robots and AI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know | Built In”. builtin.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  71. ^ “How many jobs do robots really replace?”. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  72. ^ Acemoglu, Daron; Restrepo, Pascual (1 June 2020). “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716. hdl:1721.1/130324. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 7468879. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  73. ^ “Remarks Upon Signing Bill Creating the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. | The American Presidency Project”. www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  74. ^ “Technology and the American Economy” (PDF). files.eric.ed.gov. February 1966. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  75. ^ “If Robots Take Our Jobs, Will They Make It Up to Us?”. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  76. ^ “GovInfo”. www.govinfo.gov n. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  77. ^ “H.R.11611 – An Act to establish a National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress”. www.congress.gov. 1963. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  78. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenberg, Elizabeth; Harrell, Peter E.; Shiffman, Gary M.; Dorshimer, Sam (2019). “Financial Technology and National Security”. Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  79. ^ “U.S. takes aim at North Korean crypto laundering”. NBC News. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  80. ^ “U.S. ties North Korean hacker group to Axie Infinity crypto theft”. NBC News. 15 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  81. ^ Austin, David; Macauley, Molly K. (1 December 2001). “Cutting Through Environmental Issues: Technology as a double-edged sword”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  82. ^ Grainger, Alan; Francisco, Herminia A.; Tiraswat, Penporn (July 2003). “The impact of changes in agricultural technology on long-term trends in deforestation”. The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use. 20 (3): 209–223. Bibcode:2003LUPol..20..209G. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00009-7. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  83. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
  84. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists (6 November 2017). “What is Climate Engineering?”. www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
  85. ^ Chaudhry, Imran Sharif; Ali, Sajid; Bhatti, Shaukat Hussain; Anser, Muhammad Khalid; Khan, Ahmad Imran; Nazar, Raima (October 2021). “Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries”. Environmental Science & Policy. 124 (Environmental Science & Policy): 313–323. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..313C. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  86. ^ Smol, J. P. (2009). Pollution of Lakes and Rivers : a Paleoenvironmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 135. ISBN 978-1444307573. OCLC 476272945. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b Franssen, M.; Lokhorst, G.-J.; van de Poel, I. (2018). “Philosophy of Technology”. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b de Vries, M. J.; Verkerk, M. J.; Hoogland, J.; van der Stoep, J. (2015). Philosophy of Technology : An Introduction for Technology and Business Students. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1317445715. OCLC 907132694. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  89. ^ Brey, P. (2000). Mitcham, C. (ed.). “Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Faculties”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. 19.
  90. ^ Jump up to:a b Johnson, Deborah G.; Wetmore, Jameson M. (2021). Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262539968. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  91. ^ Dusek, Val (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley. ISBN 978-1405111621. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  92. ^ Postman, Neil (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
  93. ^ Marcuse, H. (2004). Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. Routledge. ISBN 978-1134774661. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  94. ^ Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1783486595. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  95. ^ Al-Rodhan, Nayef. “The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  96. ^ Luppicini, R. (2008). “The emerging field of Technoethics”. In Luppicini; R. Adell (eds.). Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
  97. ^ Veruggio, Gianmarco (2011). “The Roboethics Roadmap”. EURON Roboethics Atelier. Scuola di Robotica: 2. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.466.2810.
  98. ^ Anderson, Michael; Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112352.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies, Volume 1: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412823791. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  100. ^ “About us”. cser.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 30 December 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  101. ^ Gottlieb, J. (1 May 2022). “Discounting, Buck-Passing, and Existential Risk Mitigation: The Case of Space Colonization”. Space Policy. 60: 101486. Bibcode:2022SpPol..6001486G. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101486. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 247718992.
  102. ^ “Stanford Existential Risks Initiative”. cisac.fsi.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
  103. ^ Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199606504. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Bostrom, Nick (6 September 2019). “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis”. Global Policy. 10 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 203169705.
  105. ^ Kurzweil, Ray (2005). “GNR: Three Overlapping Revolutions”. The Singularity is Near. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101218884.
  106. ^ Kompridis, N. (2009). “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human” (PDF). Parrhesia. 8 (1): 20–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  107. ^ McShane, Sveta (19 April 2016). “Ray Kurzweil Predicts Three Technologies Will Define Our Future”. Singularity Hub. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  108. ^ Poole, C. P. Jr.; Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471079354.
  109. ^ Vince, G. (3 July 2003). “Nanotechnology may create new organs”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  110. ^ Lee, Sukhan; Suh, Il Hong (2008). Recent Progress in Robotics: Viable Robotic Service to Human: An Edition of the Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 978-3540767282. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  111. ^ Grace, K.; Salvatier, J.; Dafoe, A.; Zhang, B.; Evans, O. (31 July 2018). “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 62: 729–754. doi:10.1613/jair.1.11222. ISSN 1076-9757. S2CID 8746462. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  112. ^ Segal, H. P. (2005). Technological Utopianism in American Culture (20th Anniversary ed.). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0815630616. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  113. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Roots and Core Themes”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part1. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  114. ^ Istvan, Zoltan (1 February 2015). “A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging”. Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  115. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Future Trajectories: Singularity”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 361–363. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part8. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  116. ^ Blackford, R.; Bostrom, N.; Dupuy, J.-P. (2011). H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute. ISBN 978-1456815653. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  117. ^ Jones, Steven E. (2013). Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135522391. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  118. ^ Kelman, David (1 June 2020). “Politics in a Small Room: Subterranean Babel in Piglia’s El camino de Ida”. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. 63: 179–201. doi:10.3138/ycl.63.005. ISSN 0084-3695. S2CID 220494877. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  119. ^ Fleming, Sean (7 May 2021). “The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 27 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940. ISSN 1356-9317.
  120. ^ Vannini, Phillip; Jonathan Taggart (2013). “Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles”. Environment and Planning A. 45 (2): 295–311. Bibcode:2013EnPlA..45..295V. doi:10.1068/a4564. S2CID 143970611.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b Scranton, Philip (1 May 2006). “Urgency, uncertainty, and innovation: Building jet engines in postwar America”. Management & Organizational History. 1 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1177/1744935906064096. ISSN 1744-9359. S2CID 143813033.
  122. ^ Di Nucci Pearce, M. R.; Pearce, David (1989). “Technology vs. Science: The Cognitive Fallacy”. Synthese. 81 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1007/BF00869324. ISSN 0039-7857. JSTOR 20116729. S2CID 46975083. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  123. ^ Skolimowski, Henryk (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”. Technology and Culture. 7 (3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3101935.
  124. ^ Brooks, H. (1 September 1994). “The relationship between science and technology”. Research Policy. Special Issue in Honor of Nathan Rosenberg. 23 (5): 477–486. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b c Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012). Antifragile. Penguin Random House. OCLC 1252833169.
  126. ^ Hare, Ronald (1970). The Birth of Penicillin, and the Disarming of Microbes. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0049250055. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  127. ^ Wise, George (1985). “Science and Technology”. Osiris. 2nd Series. 1: 229–46. doi:10.1086/368647. S2CID 144475553.
  128. ^ Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521653183.
  129. ^ Taleb, N. N. (12 December 2012). “Understanding is a Poor Substitute for Convexity (Antifragility)” (PDF). fooledbyrandomness.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  130. ^ Narin, Francis; Olivastro, Dominic (1 June 1992). “Status report: Linkage between technology and science”. Research Policy. 21 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-Y. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  131. ^ Krieger, Joshua L.; Schnitzer, Monika; Watzinger, Martin (1 May 2019). “Standing on the Shoulders of Science” (PDF). SSRN 3401853. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  132. ^ Oakley, K. P. (1976). “Man the Tool-Maker”. Nature. 199 (4898): 1042–1043. Bibcode:1963Natur.199U1042.. doi:10.1038/1991042e0. ISBN 978-0226612706. S2CID 4298952.
  133. ^ Sagan, Carl; Druyan, Ann; Leakey, Richard. “Chimpanzee Tool Use”. Archived from the original on 21 September 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2007.
  134. ^ Rincon, Paul (7 June 2005). “Sponging dolphins learn from mum”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  135. ^ Schmid, Randolph E. (4 October 2007). “Crows use tools to find food”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  136. ^ Rutz, C.; Bluff, L.A.; Weir, A.A.S.; Kacelnik, A. (4 October 2007). “Video cameras on wild birds”. Science. 318 (5851): 765. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..765R. doi:10.1126/science.1146788. PMID 17916693. S2CID 28785984.
  137. ^ McGrew, W. C (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521423717.
  138. ^ Boesch, Christophe; Boesch, Hedwige (1984). “Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking”. Primates. 25 (2): 160–170. doi:10.1007/BF02382388. S2CID 24073884.
  139. ^ Brahic, Catherine (15 January 2009). “Nut-cracking monkeys find the right tool for the job”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  140. ^ Müller, G.; Watling, J. (24 June 2016). The engineering in beaver dams. River Flow 2016: Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. St. Louis: University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  141. ^ Thomas Michaud (2008). “Science fiction and politics: Cyberpunk science fiction as political philosophy”. New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction. By Hassler, Donald M. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 65–77 [75–76]. ISBN 978-1570037368.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »