Sustainable technology of 4740

81 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

Several sources suggest that the concept of “sustainable technology” in the year 4740 would likely be centered around achieving a harmonious balance between human needs and the Earth’s ecosystems. This would involve technologies that:

Minimize environmental impact: Reducing pollution, conserving resources, and protecting biodiversity.
Promote social equity: Ensuring access to resources and opportunities for all people.
Support economic viability: Creating sustainable livelihoods and fostering long-term prosperity.

Specific examples of sustainable technologies in 4740 might include:

Advanced renewable energy systems: Harnessing solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable sources with high efficiency and minimal environmental disruption.
Closed-loop resource systems: Re-imagining manufacturing and consumption to eliminate waste and pollution by reusing and recycling materials endlessly.
Ecological restoration and conservation technologies: Restoring damaged ecosystems and protecting biodiversity through innovative approaches like bioengineering and habitat restoration.
Sustainable agriculture and food systems: Producing food in ways that are environmentally responsible, socially just, and economically viable, potentially through vertical farming, precision agriculture, and plant-based protein alternatives.
Green building and infrastructure: Designing and constructing buildings and infrastructure that are energy-efficient, resource-conserving, and integrate seamlessly with the natural environment.

It’s important to note that the specific technologies that would be considered “sustainable” in 4740 would depend on the challenges and opportunities of that time. However, the underlying principles of minimizing environmental impact, promoting social equity, and supporting economic viability would likely remain central to the concept of sustainable technology.

What is Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

It’s fascinating to speculate about sustainable technology in 4740! While we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the long-term needs of a sustainable society. Here’s a breakdown of what it might entail:

Core Principles:

Harmony with Nature: Technology would likely be deeply integrated with natural systems, minimizing human impact and even actively restoring ecosystems.
Closed-Loop Systems: Resource use would be circular, with materials constantly recycled and reused, eliminating waste.
Renewable Energy Dominance: Energy would be sourced entirely from renewable sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially even more advanced methods we can’t imagine yet.
Localized Production: Manufacturing might be highly localized, reducing transportation needs and fostering community self-sufficiency.
Advanced Materials: Materials science could produce incredibly durable, biodegradable, or even self-healing materials.

Possible Technologies:

Bio-Integrated Technology: Imagine technology that merges seamlessly with living organisms, like trees that generate electricity or crops that produce biodegradable plastics.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Utilization: Advanced systems might capture CO2 from the air and transform it into fuels, materials, or even food.
Precision Agriculture and Vertical Farming: Food production could be highly efficient and localized, with vertical farms in urban centers and advanced techniques to optimize crop yields while minimizing land use.
Advanced Water Management: Technologies for purifying, conserving, and even generating water could be crucial, especially if climate change continues to impact water resources.
Personalized and Preventative Healthcare: Nanotechnology and biotechnology could enable highly personalized medicine, with early disease detection and treatments tailored to individual needs.

Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Advancement: The technologies described above would require significant advancements in various fields, pushing the boundaries of what’s currently possible.
Social and Ethical Implications: Such advanced technologies would raise complex ethical questions about their use, access, and potential impact on society.
Adaptability and Resilience: Sustainable technologies would need to be adaptable to changing environmental conditions and resilient to potential disruptions.

In Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 4740 would likely be a testament to human ingenuity and our ability to learn from the past. It would represent a shift towards a more harmonious relationship with the planet, ensuring a thriving future for generations to come.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 4740 would be essential for everyone. However, different groups might have specific needs and roles to play:

General Population: Would benefit from access to clean energy, healthy food, safe water, and sustainable living environments. They would also play a role in adopting and utilizing these technologies responsibly.
Scientists and Engineers: Would be crucial in developing and refining these technologies, pushing the boundaries of innovation while ensuring ethical and sustainable practices.
Governments and Policymakers: Would need to create frameworks and regulations that promote sustainable technology development and adoption, while also addressing potential risks and inequalities.
Businesses and Industries: Would need to embrace sustainable practices and invest in technologies that minimize their environmental impact and contribute to a circular economy.
Educators and Communities: Would play a vital role in fostering awareness and understanding of sustainable technologies, empowering individuals to make informed choices and contribute to a sustainable future.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 4740 would require a collective effort from all members of society, working together to create a world where human needs are met in a way that protects and preserves the planet for future generations.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

While it’s fun to imagine sustainable tech in 4740, the real answer is: We need it NOW.

The need for sustainable technology isn’t something far off in the future. It’s a critical issue we face today. Here’s why:

Climate Change: We’re already experiencing the effects of climate change, with rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and sea-level rise. Sustainable technologies are crucial to mitigate these impacts and transition to a low-carbon future.
Resource Depletion: Our current consumption patterns are depleting natural resources at an alarming rate. Sustainable technologies can help us use resources more efficiently and transition to a circular economy.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and biodiversity loss are threatening the health of our planet. Sustainable technologies can help us minimize our environmental footprint and protect ecosystems.

Sustainable technology is not just about future generations; it’s about our present. The choices we make today will determine the kind of world we live in tomorrow. By investing in and adopting sustainable technologies now, we can create a healthier, more equitable, and prosperous future for all.

Think of it this way: The sustainable technologies of 4740 will be built upon the foundations we lay today. The sooner we prioritize sustainability, the better equipped future generations will be to face their own challenges.

So, while it’s interesting to speculate about the future, let’s focus on the urgent need for sustainable technology in our own time.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

Sustainable technology in 4740 (and, importantly, today) is required everywhere. It’s not confined to a specific location but rather a pervasive need across all aspects of human life and interaction with the planet. Here’s a breakdown:

Urban Centers: Cities, being hubs of population and consumption, require sustainable solutions for energy, transportation, waste management, and resource utilization. Think green buildings, efficient public transit, and localized food production.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and access to clean water are crucial for rural communities. These technologies can support local economies and preserve traditional ways of life while minimizing environmental impact.
Industrial Sectors: Manufacturing, energy production, and other industries need to adopt sustainable practices to reduce pollution, conserve resources, and minimize their carbon footprint. This includes transitioning to circular economy models and investing in cleaner technologies.
Transportation Systems: Sustainable transportation is essential for moving people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact. This includes electric vehicles, public transportation powered by renewable energy, and potentially even more advanced modes of transport.
Homes and Communities: Sustainable living starts at home. Energy-efficient appliances, water conservation measures, and waste reduction practices are all important steps. Communities can also play a role by promoting sustainable lifestyles and supporting local initiatives.
Global Ecosystems: Protecting and restoring natural ecosystems is crucial for maintaining biodiversity and the health of the planet. Sustainable technologies can play a role in conservation efforts, habitat restoration, and monitoring environmental changes.

In short, sustainable technology isn’t about one place; it’s about a way of life and a set of practices that need to be integrated into every aspect of our world, from the smallest home to the largest industrial complex, and across the entire planet. It’s a global imperative.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

Sustainable technology in 4740 (and, crucially, now) is required through a multi-faceted approach involving innovation, collaboration, and systemic change. It’s not a single solution but a complex web of interconnected efforts. Here’s how it’s required:

Research and Development: Continuous investment in scientific research and technological innovation is essential. This includes exploring new materials, developing more efficient energy systems, and finding innovative ways to minimize our environmental footprint.
Policy and Regulation: Governments play a crucial role in creating policies and regulations that incentivize sustainable practices and discourage harmful ones. This includes carbon pricing, renewable energy targets, and environmental protection laws.
Education and Awareness: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainability and educating people about sustainable technologies is vital. This empowers individuals to make informed choices and participate in the transition to a sustainable future.
Investment and Funding: Significant financial investment is needed to support the development and deployment of sustainable technologies. This includes public funding for research and infrastructure, as well as private investment in sustainable businesses.
Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaboration between governments, businesses, researchers, and communities is essential. Sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise can accelerate the development and adoption of sustainable solutions.
Systems Thinking: A holistic approach is needed, recognizing the interconnectedness of different systems and addressing the root causes of environmental problems. This includes transitioning to a circular economy, where resources are used and reused continuously.
Behavioral Change: Individual actions and choices play a significant role. Adopting sustainable lifestyles, reducing consumption, and supporting sustainable businesses are all important steps.
Ethical Considerations: As we develop new technologies, it’s crucial to consider their ethical implications and ensure that they are used responsibly and equitably.

In essence, requiring sustainable technology is a process of ongoing learning, adaptation, and collective action. It’s about creating a system where sustainability is not just an afterthought but a core principle guiding our decisions and actions. It’s a journey, not a destination, and it requires the participation of everyone.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

It’s tricky to provide a specific case study for sustainable technology in 4740, as that’s far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and what we might need in such a distant future.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project – 4740

Background: By 4740, even with centuries of effort, some ecosystems might still be recovering from past damage. The Great Lakes, a vital freshwater resource in North America, could be one such area. Imagine a future where, despite significant progress, residual pollution and the effects of past climate change still pose challenges.

The Technology: A multi-pronged approach is needed, combining advanced tech with ecological principles:

Bio-Integrated Remediation: Genetically engineered microbes, integrated with native plant life, are deployed to break down persistent pollutants in the lakebed and surrounding areas. These microbes are designed to work in symbiosis with the ecosystem, not disrupt it.
Atmospheric Water Capture: Advanced systems pull moisture from the air, supplementing the lake’s water levels and counteracting any remaining effects of drought. This water is purified and integrated into the lake’s ecosystem.
Smart Infrastructure: A network of sensors and AI monitors the lake’s health in real-time. This system can predict potential problems (like algal blooms) and automatically deploy solutions, like targeted nutrient adjustments, to maintain balance.
Circular Economy Integration: Industries in the region operate on closed-loop systems. Waste is eliminated, and resources are constantly recycled, preventing further pollution from entering the lakes.

Outcomes:

Ecosystem Restoration: The Great Lakes become a thriving, self-sustaining ecosystem, supporting diverse aquatic life and providing clean water for communities.
Resource Security: The atmospheric water capture system ensures a stable water supply, even in times of drought.
Economic Revitalization: The restored lakes support sustainable industries, like eco-tourism and localized agriculture, creating jobs and economic opportunities.

Lessons Learned:

Long-Term Vision: Sustainable technology requires a long-term perspective, recognizing that some ecosystems may take centuries to fully recover.
Integration is Key: Combining different technologies and integrating them with natural systems is crucial for success.
Proactive Management: Real-time monitoring and AI-driven solutions allow for proactive management, preventing problems before they escalate.

This is just one hypothetical example. Sustainable technology in 4740 could involve many different approaches, depending on the specific challenges and needs of that time. But the core principles of minimizing environmental impact, promoting ecological balance, and ensuring resource security would likely remain central.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4740 – A Vision for a Harmonious Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4740. While predicting specific technologies is speculative, we can extrapolate from current trends and fundamental principles to envision a future where technology and nature are deeply intertwined, fostering a harmonious and thriving planet. This paper examines potential core principles, technological advancements, and societal implications of sustainable technology in this distant future.

1. Introduction:

The concept of “sustainable technology” in 4740 implies a long-term commitment to ecological balance, resource efficiency, and social equity. It suggests that humanity has learned from past mistakes and embraced a paradigm shift towards living in harmony with the natural world. This paper posits that sustainable technologies in 4740 will be characterized by deep integration with natural systems, closed-loop resource utilization, and a focus on resilience and adaptability.

2. Core Principles:

Biocentric Design: Technology will be designed with nature as the primary model, mimicking natural processes and integrating seamlessly with ecosystems.
Circular Economy: Resource utilization will be entirely circular, with materials constantly recycled and reused, eliminating waste and pollution.
Renewable Energy Dominance: Energy will be derived entirely from renewable sources, potentially including advanced methods beyond our current understanding.
Localized Production and Consumption: Manufacturing and consumption will be highly localized, reducing transportation needs and fostering community self-sufficiency.
Adaptive and Resilient Systems: Technologies will be designed to adapt to changing environmental conditions and withstand potential disruptions.

3. Potential Technological Advancements:

Bio-Integrated Technology: Living organisms will be integrated with technology, creating systems like trees that generate electricity or crops that produce biodegradable materials.
Advanced Material Science: Materials will be incredibly durable, self-healing, and fully biodegradable, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
Atmospheric Resource Harvesting: Technologies will capture essential resources like water and minerals directly from the atmosphere, reducing reliance on finite reserves.
Precision Ecosystem Management: Advanced monitoring systems and AI will enable precise management of ecosystems, preventing ecological imbalances and promoting biodiversity.
Personalized and Preventative Healthcare: Nanotechnology and biotechnology will revolutionize healthcare, enabling early disease detection and personalized treatments.
Consciousness and AI Integration: Ethical considerations surrounding advanced AI and its potential integration with human consciousness will be paramount, ensuring responsible development and deployment.

4. Societal Implications:

Decentralized Governance: Localized production and resource management may lead to more decentralized and community-based governance structures.
Emphasis on Well-being: A focus on sustainability may shift societal values towards well-being, community, and connection with nature, rather than material possessions.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will necessitate unprecedented levels of international cooperation.
Ethical Frameworks: Advanced technologies will require robust ethical frameworks to guide their development and use, ensuring fairness, equity, and respect for all life.

5. Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Feasibility: Achieving the technological advancements described above will require significant breakthroughs in various scientific fields.
Ethical Dilemmas: Integrating advanced technologies with living systems and potentially with human consciousness raises complex ethical questions that must be carefully considered.
Social and Economic Transition: Shifting to a fully sustainable society will require significant social and economic transformations.

6. Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 4740 represents a vision of a future where humanity has achieved a harmonious balance with the natural world. While the specific technologies may be beyond our current comprehension, the core principles of ecological balance, resource efficiency, and social equity will likely remain central. Achieving this vision requires continuous innovation, ethical considerations, and a collective commitment to creating a sustainable future for all. The journey towards this future begins now, with the choices we make today.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

It’s speculative, but we can imagine some fascinating industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4740, based on extrapolated trends:

1. Closed-Loop Manufacturing:

Scenario: Imagine a factory that takes in raw materials and outputs finished products, but with zero waste.
Technology: Advanced material science allows for the creation of products designed for disassembly and reuse. AI-powered systems manage the entire lifecycle of materials, ensuring they are constantly recycled and repurposed within the manufacturing process. Energy for the factory comes from on-site renewable sources, perhaps bio-integrated systems or advanced fusion.
Impact: Eliminates waste, reduces resource depletion, and minimizes environmental impact.

2. Atmospheric Resource Processing:

Scenario: A factory that “mines” the atmosphere for resources.
Technology: Advanced capture technologies extract water, minerals, and even rare earth elements from the air. These resources are then used in manufacturing processes.
Impact: Reduces reliance on traditional mining, minimizes environmental damage, and provides access to resources in a sustainable way.

3. Bio-Integrated Production:

Scenario: A factory that grows its products.
Technology: Bio-engineered organisms, integrated with advanced manufacturing processes, produce materials and products directly. Imagine “growing” furniture, building materials, or even complex electronic components.
Impact: Reduces energy consumption, minimizes waste, and creates products that are biodegradable or easily recycled.

4. Localized Micro-Manufacturing:

Scenario: Factories become small, highly specialized, and localized.
Technology: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques allow for the on-demand production of goods, tailored to specific needs. Factories are integrated into communities, reducing transportation needs and fostering local economies.
Impact: Reduces transportation costs and emissions, increases customization, and strengthens local communities.

5. Energy-Independent Industries:

Scenario: Factories generate their own power sustainably.
Technology: Bio-integrated energy systems, advanced solar or geothermal power plants, or even potentially more advanced energy generation methods are integrated directly into industrial facilities.
Impact: Reduces reliance on fossil fuels, minimizes carbon emissions, and creates more resilient and self-sufficient industries.

6. Regenerative Industry:

Scenario: Industries that actively restore ecosystems.
Technology: Companies might specialize in restoring damaged ecosystems, using bio-integrated technologies and other advanced methods. They could even “grow” new forests or rebuild coral reefs.
Impact: Reverses environmental damage, enhances biodiversity, and creates a circular economy where industry contributes to ecological health.

These are just a few possibilities. The actual applications of sustainable technology in 4740 will depend on the specific challenges and opportunities of that time. However, the underlying principles of resource efficiency, environmental protection, and social responsibility will likely remain central to industrial practices.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4740 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 4740 would be a highly advanced and interdisciplinary endeavor, building upon centuries of accumulated knowledge and innovation. Here’s how it might function:

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Teams: R&D would involve close collaboration between experts from diverse fields:
- Material Scientists: Developing advanced, biodegradable, self-healing materials.
- Biologists and Genetic Engineers: Creating bio-integrated technologies and optimizing natural processes.
- AI Specialists: Designing intelligent systems for resource management and ecosystem monitoring.
- Energy Physicists: Exploring new energy sources and improving energy efficiency.
- Social Scientists and Ethicists: Considering the social and ethical implications of new technologies.
Institutes: Specialized research institutes might focus on specific areas of sustainable technology, fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing.

2. Advanced Research Methods:

Simulation and Modeling: Highly sophisticated computer models would simulate complex systems, allowing researchers to predict the long-term impacts of new technologies.
Nanotechnology and Biotechnology: These fields would likely play a central role, enabling the development of bio-integrated systems and advanced materials at the molecular level.
Quantum Computing: Quantum computers could be used to solve complex problems related to energy generation, material design, and ecosystem management.
Citizen Science: Large-scale citizen science initiatives might involve communities in data collection and monitoring, contributing to research efforts.

3. Focus Areas:

Bio-Integrated Systems: Developing technologies that seamlessly integrate with living organisms and ecosystems.
Advanced Energy Generation: Exploring new energy sources, potentially including fusion power, space-based solar energy, or other methods we can’t yet imagine.
Resource Regeneration: Creating technologies that can regenerate resources, such as water and minerals, from the atmosphere or other sources.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing methods for restoring damaged ecosystems and promoting biodiversity.
Human-Technology Symbiosis: Investigating the ethical implications of advanced AI and its potential integration with human consciousness.

4. Ethical Considerations:

Sustainability Assessment: All new technologies would undergo rigorous sustainability assessments to evaluate their environmental, social, and economic impacts.
Ethical Guidelines: Strict ethical guidelines would govern research and development, ensuring that new technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
Transparency and Openness: Research findings would be shared openly to foster collaboration and accelerate the development of sustainable solutions.

5. Continuous Improvement:

Monitoring and Evaluation: Sustainable technologies would be continuously monitored and evaluated to identify areas for improvement.
Adaptive Management: Research and development would be an ongoing process of adaptation and refinement, responding to changing environmental conditions and societal needs.

R&D for sustainable technology in 4740 would be a testament to human ingenuity and our commitment to creating a thriving and harmonious future. It would involve pushing the boundaries of scientific knowledge and technological innovation while always prioritizing ethical considerations and the long-term well-being of the planet.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.